Sign in

Diane Chen, PhD

@drdianechen.bsky.social
1.3K followers 567 following 37 posts

Pediatric Psychologist | Professor of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Pediatrics, and Medical Social Sciences | Associate Editor, Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology | she/her | Views my own

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Diane Chen, PhD
ProPublica @propublica.org · 08/04/2026
UnitedHealth is the nation’s largest health insurance conglomerate. ProPublica obtained what is effectively the company’s internal playbook for limiting and cutting therapy costs. Here’s what we found. (Published Nov. 2024)
propublica.org
How UnitedHealth’s Playbook for Limiting Mental Health Coverage Puts Countless Americans’ Treatment at Risk
United used an algorithm system to identify patients who it determined were getting too much therapy and then limited coverage. It was deemed illegal in three states, but similar practices persist due...
21569226
Diane Chen, PhD @drdianechen.bsky.social · 23/11/2025
Thanks @abctnow.bsky.social for the opportunity to discuss the state of the science and emerging research on gender-affirming medical care for trans youth!
071
Reposted by Diane Chen, PhD
Mark A. Hanson @hansonmark.bsky.social · 11/11/2025
We wrote the Strain on scientific publishing to highlight the problems of time & trust. With a fantastic group of co-authors, we present The Drain of Scientific Publishing: a 🧵 1/n Drain: arxiv.org/abs/2511.04820 Strain: direct.mit.edu/qss/article/... Oligopoly: direct.mit.edu/qss/article/...
A table showing profit margins of major publishers. A snippet of text related to this table is below.

1. The four-fold drain
1.1 Money
Currently, academic publishing is dominated by profit-oriented, multinational companies for
whom scientific knowledge is a commodity to be sold back to the academic community who
created it. The dominant four are Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley and Taylor & Francis,
which collectively generated over US$7.1 billion in revenue from journal publishing in 2024
alone, and over US$12 billion in profits between 2019 and 2024 (Table 1A). Their profit
margins have always been over 30% in the last five years, and for the largest publisher
(Elsevier) always over 37%.
Against many comparators, across many sectors, scientific publishing is one of the most
consistently profitable industries (Table S1). These financial arrangements make a substantial
difference to science budgets. In 2024, 46% of Elsevier revenues and 53% of Taylor &
Francis revenues were generated in North America, meaning that North American
researchers were charged over US$2.27 billion by just two for-profit publishers. The
Canadian research councils and the US National Science Foundation were allocated US$9.3
billion in that year.A figure detailing the drain on researcher time.

1. The four-fold drain

1.2 Time
The number of papers published each year is growing faster than the scientific workforce,
with the number of papers per researcher almost doubling between 1996 and 2022 (Figure
1A). This reflects the fact that publishers’ commercial desire to publish (sell) more material
has aligned well with the competitive prestige culture in which publications help secure jobs,
grants, promotions, and awards. To the extent that this growth is driven by a pressure for
profit, rather than scholarly imperatives, it distorts the way researchers spend their time.
The publishing system depends on unpaid reviewer labour, estimated to be over 130 million
unpaid hours annually in 2020 alone (9). Researchers have complained about the demands of
peer-review for decades, but the scale of the problem is now worse, with editors reporting
widespread difficulties recruiting reviewers. The growth in publications involves not only the
authors’ time, but that of academic editors and reviewers who are dealing with so many
review demands.
Even more seriously, the imperative to produce ever more articles reshapes the nature of
scientific inquiry. Evidence across multiple fields shows that more papers result in
‘ossification’, not new ideas (10). It may seem paradoxical that more papers can slow
progress until one considers how it affects researchers’ time. While rewards remain tied to
volume, prestige, and impact of publications, researchers will be nudged away from riskier,
local, interdisciplinary, and long-term work. The result is a treadmill of constant activity with
limited progress whereas core scholarly practices – such as reading, reflecting and engaging
with others’ contributions – is de-prioritized. What looks like productivity often masks
intellectual exhaustion built on a demoralizing, narrowing scientific vision.A table of profit margins across industries. The section of text related to this table is below:

1. The four-fold drain
1.1 Money
Currently, academic publishing is dominated by profit-oriented, multinational companies for
whom scientific knowledge is a commodity to be sold back to the academic community who
created it. The dominant four are Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley and Taylor & Francis,
which collectively generated over US$7.1 billion in revenue from journal publishing in 2024
alone, and over US$12 billion in profits between 2019 and 2024 (Table 1A). Their profit
margins have always been over 30% in the last five years, and for the largest publisher
(Elsevier) always over 37%.
Against many comparators, across many sectors, scientific publishing is one of the most
consistently profitable industries (Table S1). These financial arrangements make a substantial
difference to science budgets. In 2024, 46% of Elsevier revenues and 53% of Taylor &
Francis revenues were generated in North America, meaning that North American
researchers were charged over US$2.27 billion by just two for-profit publishers. The
Canadian research councils and the US National Science Foundation were allocated US$9.3
billion in that year.The costs of inaction are plain: wasted public funds, lost researcher time, compromised
scientific integrity and eroded public trust. Today, the system rewards commercial publishers
first, and science second. Without bold action from the funders we risk continuing to pour
resources into a system that prioritizes profit over the advancement of scientific knowledge.
8644453
Reposted by Diane Chen, PhD
Jeremy Berg @jeremymberg.bsky.social · 14/08/2025
Sign the petition to call for the removal of RFK, Jr. www.standupforscience.net/rfk-impeachm...
standupforscience.net
Sign the IMPEACH RFK Citizens' Petition to Congress — STAND UP FOR SCIENCE
Join with us to sign our Citizens' Petition to the US Congress to choose the people over Trump and Impeach RFK Jr Now!
313368
Reposted by Diane Chen, PhD
Jeremy Berg @jeremymberg.bsky.social · 12/08/2025
Article in Nature from a former NIH employee and Bethesda Declaration signer... www.nature.com/articles/d41...
nature.com
‘A whole body of health-equity research is being disappeared’ — why I resigned from the NIH
As federal support vanishes for research addressing the root causes of health disparities in the United States, we are left with a dangerous void and an urgent need to rethink science funding.
211262
Diane Chen, PhD @drdianechen.bsky.social · 12/08/2025
Proud to have contributed to this commentary in response to the HHS report on pediatric gender dysphoria urldefense.com/v3/__https:/...
urldefense.com
061
Reposted by Diane Chen, PhD
Jeremy Berg @jeremymberg.bsky.social · 03/08/2025
Here is the Democracy Now/ACLU brief for the Supreme Court. Thanks to all of the plaintiffs for standing up, and the attorneys and their staffs for all of their hard work. Let's win this thing (again) protectdemocracy.org/wp-content/u...
protectdemocracy.org
0718
Diane Chen, PhD @drdianechen.bsky.social · 01/08/2025
www.cnn.com/2025/08/01/p...
cnn.com
State attorneys general sue Trump over targeting of medical professionals who provide gender identity care to trans youth | CNN Politics
A coalition of Democratic state attorneys general sued the Trump administration on Friday over President Donald Trump’s effort to use the Department of Justice to go after medical professionals who pr...
031
Reposted by Diane Chen, PhD
Ian L Morgan @ianlmorgan.bsky.social · 31/07/2025
Here are some of the highlights of the appropriations bill that the Senate appropriations committee just approved: $48.7 billion for NIH, an increase of $400 million Rejects the proposal to cap indirect cost rates at 15% Includes a provision to prevent MYF that would reduce the number of grants
appropriations.senate.gov
39732
Reposted by Diane Chen, PhD
Jenna Norton @jenna-m-norton.bsky.social · 29/07/2025
A good explainer for #NIH funded researchers on why the multiyear funding scheme is going to squeeze NIH scientists and NIH science. open.substack.com/pub/sciencea...
open.substack.com
A Quiet Policy Shift That Could Devastate American Science
Why NIH’s sudden move to multi-year grant funding should alarm every principal investigator and university
28045
Reposted by Diane Chen, PhD
Jenna Norton @jenna-m-norton.bsky.social · 28/07/2025
Call these 14 senators. Thank them for supporting #NIH. Remind them that supporting NIH is meaningless if NIH cannot function. This stay would: 1) Enable censorship of science. 2) Disrupt NIH’s ability to fund any research.
02317
Reposted by Diane Chen, PhD
Jenna Norton @jenna-m-norton.bsky.social · 25/07/2025
If the Supreme Court allows #NIH to terminate ongoing grants because it changed its mind on priorities, it will be the end of NIH and the end of the US as a leader in biomedical science. Period. thehill.com/policy/healt...
thehill.com
310945
Diane Chen, PhD @drdianechen.bsky.social · 24/07/2025
American Psychological Foundation released a call for applications for crisis funding to support early career researchers who had grants terminated. Looks like a great opportunity! ampsychfdn.org/funding/dacf/
ampsychfdn.org
Direct Action Crisis Funding - American Psychological Foundation
The APF Direct Action Crisis Funding grants are for activities to address immediate needs following grant cancellations, including completing a wave of data collection, analyzing already collected dat...
0115
Reposted by Diane Chen, PhD
Max Kozlov @maxkozlov.bsky.social · 15/07/2025
NEW: In an unprecedented move, the NIH will soon disinvite dozens of scientists about to take positions on advisory councils that make final decisions on grant funding. NIH staff were told to select others aligned with the Trump administration and told to expect placements by political appointees.
nature.com
Exclusive: NIH to dismiss dozens of grant reviewers to align with Trump priorities
The move would undo years of work, leaving advisory councils understaffed, and without the full expertise needed for reviews.
441033780
Reposted by Diane Chen, PhD
Jenna Norton @jenna-m-norton.bsky.social · 09/07/2025
So grateful to Katie Edwards for coming forward, for refusing to back down, and for helping lead the charge so many might have their grants reinstated. www.sciencefriday.com/segments/res...
sciencefriday.com
After Her Grants Got Cut, This Researcher Is Suing The NIH
Katie Edwards has lost millions of dollars in grant money, bringing her research to a standstill. She’s taking the fight to court.
0206
Reposted by Diane Chen, PhD
Max Kozlov @maxkozlov.bsky.social · 25/06/2025
Just in: NIH staff have been instructed to REINSTATE these ~900 grants to comply with the court order, per sources. This comes after staff were also directed to cease any further terminations. You can see the lists grants to be reinstated in my post below.
3339127
Reposted by Diane Chen, PhD
Governor JB Pritzker @govpritzker.illinois.gov · 18/06/2025
Illinois has enshrined protections to meet this very moment. In a time of increasing overreach and hateful rhetoric, it's more important than ever to reaffirm our commitment to the rights and dignity of the LGBTQ+ community. You have a home here always.
242166123543
Reposted by Diane Chen, PhD
Max Kozlov @maxkozlov.bsky.social · 16/06/2025
🚨 BREAKING: Nearly 4 months the NIH cut its first grants, a judge has ruled that the directives and process that led to cuts are arbitrary and capricious. "The explanations are bereft of reasoning — virtually in their entirety... unsupported by [facts]." Each of them are VOID and ILLEGAL, he says.
111227308
Diane Chen, PhD @drdianechen.bsky.social · 16/06/2025
“It is palpably clear that these directives and the set of terminated grants here also are designed to frustrate, to stop, research that may bear on the health—we’re talking about health here, the health of Americans, of our LGBTQ community. That’s appalling.” newrepublic.com/post/196887/...
newrepublic.com
Reagan Appointee: Trump NIH Cuts Represent “Racial Discrimination”
“Have we fallen so low? Have we no shame?” asked Judge William Young, in a ruling that reinstated funding to the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, among other programs.
030
Reposted by Diane Chen, PhD
Scott Delaney @scott-delaney.bsky.social · 16/06/2025
⚖️ HUGE day today in the NIH terminations cases There's a trial (of sorts) at 10a ET in Boston today for arguments that NIH unlawfully terminated 100s of grants. It's a 3 hour hearing and I'll post periodic updates. Of note: this is the 1st lawsuit filed against the Trump Admin to go to trial.
3398140
Reposted by Diane Chen, PhD
ACLU @aclu.org · 14/06/2025
When the National Institutes of Health cut billions of dollars of research funding earlier this year, it jeopardized our wellbeing and scientific progress. We'll be in court Monday arguing that scientific research should be guided by evidence, not politics.
science.org
Trump’s cuts to more than 1700 NIH grants get court hearing
District judge could declare terminations unlawful—or toss suit based on technicalities
9745187
Reposted by Diane Chen, PhD
Max Kozlov @maxkozlov.bsky.social · 10/06/2025
🚨 NIH director Jayanta Bhattacharya is testifying before the US Senate Appropriations Committee today. The hearing is bound to be spicy, after more than 300 agency staff wrote him a letter decrying his leadership and actions as director. 🔥 I'll be live-posting the hearing, so follow along here.
7335105
Diane Chen, PhD @drdianechen.bsky.social · 10/06/2025
A broad group of National Institutes of Health (NIH) public servants have taken action with the "Bethesda Declaration" that targets the NIH and HHS Leadership. Join these courageous and committed professionals by adding your name now. actionnetwork.org/forms/add-na...
actionnetwork.org
ADD YOUR NAME: Sign the Open Letter in Support of NIH Staff
Join the courageous and committed National Institutes of Health (NIH) public servants by adding your name now.
020
Reposted by Diane Chen, PhD
Stand Up for Science! @standupforscience.net · 09/06/2025
“In an unusual act of public protest, more than 340 scientists and staff at the National Institutes of Health today released a statement charging NIH officials and their superiors with politicizing science.” www.science.org/content/arti... #StandUpForScience #BethesdaDeclaration
science.org
NIH staff and biomedical community sound alarm about agency politicization, funding slowdown
In test of NIH director’s support of dissent, NIH staff sign Bethesda Declaration urging reversal of grant cuts and freezes
424590
Reposted by Diane Chen, PhD
Stand Up for Science! @standupforscience.net · 09/06/2025
🚨BREAKING: 300+ NIH employees call out the harm of censorship & politicized science in scathing email to Bhattacharya, demanding an end to political interference, a lift on funding freezes, & rehiring of fired staff whose work saves lives. This is historic - insiders are blowing the whistle. 🧵(1/5)
Front-page-style graphic titled “BREAKING NEWS” with photos of RFK Jr. and Dr. Bhattacharya in front of a government hearing chamber. Text reads: “NIH Scientists Sound the Alarm as Health Research Faces Historic Threat” and “NIH Employees Send Trump Cronies Scathing Wake-Up Call.”
4043101388
Reposted by Diane Chen, PhD
Jeremy Berg @jeremymberg.bsky.social · 07/06/2025
Funding freeze at Northwestern from Emma Mairson at grant-watch.us. Data from USAspending. Normally, ~$70 M per month. Now, bupkis. Northwestern is keeping research moving and must be spending ~$40 M per month. Clearly not sustainable for too long.
2224105
Diane Chen, PhD @drdianechen.bsky.social · 07/06/2025
Important piece by Drs. @jaepuckett.bsky.social and Paz Galupo theconversation.com/our-trans-he...
theconversation.com
Our trans health study was terminated by the government – the effects of abrupt NIH grant cuts ripple across science and society
The losses include millions of dollars the NIH has already spent on research that will no longer generate results, and the next generation of scientists whose work has been cut short.
052
Reposted by Diane Chen, PhD
Carl T. Bergstrom @carlbergstrom.com · 04/06/2025
This is your health on MAGA.
nytimes.com
Here Are the Nearly 2,500 Medical Research Grants Canceled or Delayed by Trump (Gift Article)
Some cuts have been starkly visible, but the country’s medical grant-making machinery has also radically transformed outside the public eye.
7231121
Reposted by Diane Chen, PhD
Max Kozlov @maxkozlov.bsky.social · 03/06/2025
Judge overseeing the NIH grant cuts lawsuit: "I've just come across this database called Grant Watch which is rather intriguing. Everybody seems to look at [it] for the data concerning NIH grants... This is like a physician's desk reference." 👏 well done @scott-delaney.bsky.social @noamross.net
220641
Reposted by Diane Chen, PhD
Tom Rodebaugh @drrodebaugh.bsky.social · 03/06/2025
Heads up! APA is urging anyone who cares about health and science to let their reps/senators know now that they should oppose the admin's murder budget. Easy to do here: www.votervoice.net/Shares/BAAAA... APA is plugged in. If they say NOW, listen! #StandUpForScience
votervoice.net
ACT NOW! Tell Congress to Reject Unprecedented Funding Cuts
Please take 2 minutes today to urge Congress to reject the administration’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 budget proposal that seeks to cut $163 billion across the federal government. This would have signific...
114189
Reposted by Diane Chen, PhD
Brittany Charlton @britshmit.bsky.social · 22/05/2025
Sworn testimony & leaked emails: more proof DOGE is hand-picking which NIH grants live or die—screening awards, handing out kill lists, & canceling science in hours 🙌 Shout out to @maxkozlov.bsky.social at @nature.com for breaking the story (again), in part due to brave NIH insiders
nature.com
NIH killed grants on orders from Elon Musk’s DOGE
Court documents and internal correspondence show the cost-cutting force has broad control over the world’s largest public biomedical funder.
06635
Reposted by Diane Chen, PhD
Jeremy Berg @jeremymberg.bsky.social · 20/05/2025
REMINDER.....REMINDER......REMINDER 3 DAYS LEFT TO COMMENT ON SCHEDULE F 1/n
media.tenor.com
gumball and anais from the amazing world of gumball are sitting at a table
ALT: gumball and anais from the amazing world of gumball are sitting at a table
38886
Diane Chen, PhD @drdianechen.bsky.social · 20/05/2025
lambdalegal.org/newsroom/glm...
lambdalegal.org
Lambda Legal Sues National Institutes of Health over Terminating Critical Research Grants Relating to LGBTQI+ Health
Today, Lambda Legal, alongside law firms Crowell & Moring LLP and Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, filed a federal lawsuit against the National Institutes of Health (NIH) over the termination of hundr...
010
Reposted by Diane Chen, PhD
Jack Leonard @jack-leonard.bsky.social · 07/05/2025
Exclusive: Trump’s NIH Axed Research Grants Even After a Judge Blocked the Cuts, Internal Records Show. By @propublica.org's @anniewaldman.bsky.social www.propublica.org/article/trum...
propublica.org
Trump’s NIH Axed Research Grants Even After a Judge Blocked the Cuts, Internal Records Show
A lawsuit led by the Washington state attorney general offers an unprecedented view of the termination of more than 600 NIH grants, including transgender research grants threatened by Trump’s executiv...
8323116
Reposted by Diane Chen, PhD
Jeremy Berg @jeremymberg.bsky.social · 01/05/2025
Science article with perspectives from NIH insiders www.science.org/content/arti... 1/n
science.org
NIH insiders: Trump is ‘dismantling and destroying everything’
After just 100 days, agency scientists say U.S. health institutes are demoralized and have lost essential staff and funding
47461
Reposted by Diane Chen, PhD
Acyn @acyn.bsky.social · 24/04/2025
Walz: If you say you love freedom but you don't believe freedom is for everybody, then the thing you love is not freedom, it is privilege.
8317870420121
Reposted by Diane Chen, PhD
Jeremy Berg @jeremymberg.bsky.social · 21/04/2025
New STAT story about the possible new NIH grants terms and conditions www.statnews.com/2025/04/21/t...
statnews.com
NIH moving to ban all future grants to universities with DEI programs or Israel boycotts, document suggests
NIH appears to be preparing to prohibit the awarding of new grants to institutions that have DEI programs or boycott Israeli companies
107265
Diane Chen, PhD @drdianechen.bsky.social · 18/04/2025
“I urge you to ask: What is my professional society actively doing to protect science right now? And if the answer is “nothing,” perhaps it’s time to rethink your membership. Because silence isn't neutrality. It’s complicity. And science deserves better.” www.scientificamerican.com/article/trum...
scientificamerican.com
Science Organizations Should Protest Loudly against Trump Cuts
Similar to other professions, science has organizations that represent scientists and the research they do. Too many are staying silent as Trump dismantles research
1126
Reposted by Diane Chen, PhD
Stand Up for Science! @standupforscience.net · 15/04/2025
Tax Day - round 3 - NIH 🩻🧠🧬 🧬 The average U.S. taxpayer contributes $105/year to NIH, helping fund: • Cancer & rare disease breakthroughs • Pandemic preparedness • Children’s health • Medical tech innovation • Mental health science & more NIH powers the science behind the healthcare we rely on.
A serious medical scene shows a healthcare worker in surgical scrubs standing in a hospital corridor. Bold white text overlays the image, reading: “Curing cancer. Preventing pandemics. What’s it worth?”A dark blue graphic with white text centered over a soft-focus medical background. The message reads: “Just $105 per year from the average taxpayer funds the national institute of health. That’s all it takes to help save lives improve care, and fight disease”A clean, square infographic with a dark blue background and light blue accents. The header reads, “What does that money actually do? Your $105 helps fund:” followed by six icons and descriptions:
	1.	Mental Health Research – Depression, PTSD, addiction
	2.	Cancer & Rare Disease Studies – From early detection to lifesaving treatments
	3.	Pandemic Preparedness – Vaccines, virus tracking, prediction and prevention
	4.	Children’s Health – Brain development, neonatal and pediatric care
	5.	Medical Innovation – Imaging, prosthetics, diagnostics
	6.	Basic Biomedical Science – Foundational research for future cures
4328131
Reposted by Diane Chen, PhD
Madhusudan 🦉 Katti @leafwarbler.myatproto.social · 15/04/2025
This should be the template for every university’s website: let the public know what they gain from research and what they stand to lose. www.harvard.edu
harvard.edu
Harvard University
Harvard University is devoted to excellence in teaching, learning, and research, and to developing leaders who make a difference globally.
523680
Reposted by Diane Chen, PhD
Colleen Stiles-Shields, Ph.D. @colleenss.bsky.social · 05/04/2025
Riding the high of #SPPAC2025, making a starter pack—but am also at the airport and am missing so many! Please chime in for an add! #ThisIsPedsPsych
1104
Reposted by Diane Chen, PhD
MoveOn @moveon.org · 05/04/2025
The people are awake. The people are angry. And the people are organized. 📍 Chicago, Illinois #HANDSOFF
306234504219
Reposted by Diane Chen, PhD
Max Kozlov @maxkozlov.bsky.social · 03/04/2025
🚨 NIH quietly reinstated a grant on gender-affirming care, hoping it'd save top officials from sitting for depositions. It didn't work. On 4/22, Memoli will sit for sworn testimony. Today: Michelle Bulls, who's signed many termination letters. Tomorrow: fmr extramural research chief Liza Bundesen.
325189
Diane Chen, PhD @drdianechen.bsky.social · 03/04/2025
Wheels down in Phoenix for #SPPAC2025! Excited to be in community with my peds psych folks and moderate a session on #transyouth health, present a mentor award to dear friend/mentor @tstancin.bsky.social, and participate in a Hot Topics panel re: what is happening at NIH! #ThisIsPedsPsych
View out an airplane window of blue skies and clouds.
0141
Diane Chen, PhD @drdianechen.bsky.social · 02/04/2025
Yep…I’ve had a grant focused on #transyouth that was supposed to be reviewed in February, then rescheduled to April, and most recently removed from the assigned study section and status says “awaiting study section assignment”. Not optimistic this grant will actually be reviewed…
140
Diane Chen, PhD @drdianechen.bsky.social · 02/04/2025
Thank you @britshmit.bsky.social 👏🏽 👏🏽 👏🏽
130
Reposted by Diane Chen, PhD
Arghavan Salles, MD, PhD @arghavansallesmd.medsky.social · 01/04/2025
Division of Violence Prevention Division of Injury Prevention Office of Health Equity Division of Reproductive Health Scientific Integrity Branch Division of Population Health Office of Human Resources Division of TB Elimination Division of HIV and TB All gutted
21614