Sign in

David H. Montgomery

@dhmontgomery.com
7.4K followers 790 following 2.8K posts

Words, data, code. Senior data journalist with @today.yougov.com. Host of the French history podcast The Siècle (@thesiecle.com).

PostsRepliesMedia
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 1h
Historical rankings of presidents should exclude recent presidents. Passions are raw & context missing. But the sitting president disagrees. Donald Trump recently posted a presidential tier-ranking (himself #1). So we at YouGov knew what we had to poll: yougovamerica.substack.com/p/do-america...
A stacked bar chart of YouGov polling data with the headline: "How Americans rate the best-known presidents."

The chart has the sub-headline: "How would you rate the following U.S. president, compared to other presidents? (%)."

The chart has the note: "Note: Respondents were asked about a random sample of 23 of the 45 presidents. This chart shows the 16 presidents with the smallest shares who say "not sure" about them."A stacked bar chart of YouGov polling data with the headline: "How Americans rate lesser-known presidents."

The chart has the sub-headline: "How would you rate the following U.S. president, compared to other presidents? (%)."

The chart has the note: "Note: Respondents were asked about a random sample of 23 of the 45 presidents. This chart shows the 29 presidents with the largest shares who say "not sure" about them."
1111
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 29/09/2026
Padres superstar reliever Mason Miller is very good, but the Cubs were one of the rare teams to hit him this year. In 2.2 innings over 3 games, the Cubs got 5 hits, a walk, and scored 2 runs, while only striking out twice. Small sample, past results are no guarantee, etc., but interesting.
Table of Mason Miller's 2026 results by team.
000
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 29/09/2026
In this week's Economist / YouGov Poll, Democratic candidates have a 16-point lead among likely voters. That's bigger than they ever got in 2018. My @today.yougov.com writeup, with lots of charts: yougov.com/en-us/articl...
A line chart of YouGov polling data with the headline: "Democrats have a bigger lead among likely voters in 2026 than they had with a similar group at any point in the 2018 midterms."

The chart has the sub-headline: "In the elections for U.S. Congress in November, who will you vote for in the district where you live? (% who say the Democratic candidate minus the % who say the Republican candidate)."

The chart has the note: "Note: 2026 likely voters are U.S. adult citizens who meet two criteria: (1) They either are registered to vote or say they will be registered to vote by the November elections; and (2) They either say they will definitely vote in November or say they have already voted.
The 2018 group is defined as similar to 2026 likely voters: registered voters who said they will definitely vote in that year's congressional elections. Responses of "other," "not sure," "I would not vote," and "I will not vote" are not shown."
092
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 22/09/2026
New in this week's Economist / YouGov Poll: a 14-point lead for Democrats among likely voters. The full analysis of our latest congressional polling: yougovamerica.substack.com/p/democrats-...
A line chart of YouGov polling data with the headline: "How many Americans plan to vote for Democrats and Republicans for Congress in 2026."

The chart has the sub-headline: "In the elections for U.S. Congress in November, who will you vote for in the district where you live? (%)."

The chart has the note: "Note: Likely voters are U.S. adult citizens who meet two criteria: (1) They either are registered to vote or say they will be registered to vote by the November elections; and (2) They either say they will definitely vote in November or say they have already voted. The displayed question has been used since the August 14 - 17, 2026 survey. Prior surveys asked the question, "If the elections for U.S. Congress were being held today, who would you vote for in the district where you live?" Responses of "other," "not sure," "I would not vote," and "I will not vote" are not shown."
061
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 20/09/2026
How’s the Cubs’ season going? Well, when their bullpen doesn’t give up any runs in a game, that’s headline news:
Screenshot of an article headline: “Cubs' bullpen bands together to deliver clutch scoreless showing”
030
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 19/09/2026
June 3, 1944 (three days before the D-Day landings) a mistake by a 22-year-old British teletype operator accidentally announced that the Allies had landed in France. A retraction went out 2 minutes later, but the news had already been announced on live radio & in ballparks.
A screenshot of a June 4, 1944 New York Times article titled: "False Invasion Report Stirs U.S.; Associated Press Explains Error"
1122
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 15/09/2026
New from @today.yougov.com: Over the past few years, liberals have become much more concerned about the possibility of an AI-caused apocalypse, while moderates are a little more worried and conservatives' views are mostly the same. More: yougov.com/en-us/articl...
A arrow plot of YouGov polling data with the headline: "Liberals have become much more concerned about AI ending humanity since 2023."

The chart has the sub-headline: "How concerned, if at all, are you about the possibility that AI will cause the end of the human race on Earth? (% who are very or somewhat concerned)."

The chart has the note: "Note: Responses of "not very concerned," "not at all concerned," and "not sure" are not shown."
092
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 08/09/2026
Billy has his place, which is in my office on top of pedestals that raise him above the baseboards.
Picture of a curved wall of white bookshelves
130
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 04/09/2026
Just found this September 2024 paragraph from @baumann.bsky.social about Pete Crow-Armstrong. Lucas Giolito has 15.5 career fWAR. PCA now has 17.3 fWAR, and appears to have passed Giolito a few weeks ago (2.3 fWAR in the past 30 days). blogs.fangraphs.com/its-all-abou...
The one way to change that is to perform, and Crow-Armstrong is still the second-most-successful child of actors who matriculated from Harvard-Westlake School, was drafted in the middle of the first round by an NL East team, got traded, and then established himself as a big leaguer in Chicago. And there’s a ways to go before he catches Lucas Giolito.
150
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 01/09/2026
On this week's Economist / YouGov Poll, we asked Americans how often they get mad about the news: yougovamerica.substack.com/p/democrats-...
A stacked bar chart of YouGov polling data with the headline: "Half of Americans get angry about the news daily."

The chart has the sub-headline: "About how often do you hear or read something in the news that makes you angry? (%)."
1114
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 01/09/2026
TIL that the use of the "π" symbol for pi only dates back to the 17th Century: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pi#Adop...
The first recorded use of the symbol π in circle geometry is in Oughtred's Clavis Mathematicae (1648),[88][89] where the Greek letters π and δ were combined into the fraction ⁠
π
δ
{\displaystyle {\tfrac {\pi }{\delta }}}⁠ for denoting the ratios semiperimeter to semidiameter and perimeter to diameter, that is, what is presently denoted as π.[1][90][91][92] (Before then, mathematicians sometimes used letters such as c or p instead.[89]) Barrow likewise used the same notation,[93] while Gregory instead used 
π
ρ
{\textstyle {\frac {\pi }{\rho }}} to represent 6.28... .[94][91]

The earliest known use of the Greek letter π alone to represent the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter was by Welsh mathematician William Jones in his 1706 work Synopsis Palmariorum Matheseos; or, a New Introduction to the Mathematics.[68][95] The Greek letter appears on p. 243 in the phrase "
1
2
{\textstyle {\tfrac {1}{2}}} Periphery (π)", calculated for a circle with radius one. However, Jones writes that his equations for π are from the "ready pen of the truly ingenious Mr. John Machin", leading to speculation that Machin may have employed the Greek letter before Jones.[89] Jones' notation was not immediately adopted by other mathematicians, with the fraction notation still being used as late as 1767.[90][96]
050
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 28/08/2026
This dog just ran up the sidewalk and into my back yard. No collar, acts very friendly. Is anyone in or around the Wedge missing a dog?
Photo of a black and white dog.
44210
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 28/08/2026
Liberals and conservatives have very different views on whether several stereotypically female toys are suitable only for girls, or for boys and girls. (There are ideological splits on stereotypical boy toys, too, but much smaller.)
A split bar chart of YouGov polling data with the headline: "Conservatives are much more likely than liberals to say these toys are only suitable for girls."

The chart has the sub-headline: "Do you think the following toy is suitable for…? (% of U.S. adult citizens)."

The chart has the note: "Note: Responses of "only boys," "neither boys nor girls," and "not sure" are not shown."
040
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 28/08/2026
Overall, 52% of Americans say boys and girls should be brought up alike with similar toys, and 35% say boys and girls should be raised differently. Some demographic differences by gender, politics, and age:
A split bar chart of YouGov polling data with the headline: "Men, conservatives, and older Americans are each more likely than others to say boys and girls should be raised differently."

The chart has the sub-headline: "Which of these two views comes closer to your own? (%)."

The chart has the note: "Note: Responses of "not sure" are not shown."
150
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 28/08/2026
My latest for @today.yougov.com is a poll where we asked Americans whether certain toys are suitable only for boys, only for girls, or for both girls and boys. Large majorities say most are suitable for both girls and boys, but there were exceptions. Read: yougovamerica.substack.com/p/are-some-t...
A stacked bar chart of YouGov polling data with the headline: "Which children's toys Americans think are suitable for only boys, only girls, or both boys and girls."

The chart has the sub-headline: "Do you think the following toy is suitable for…? (% of U.S. adult citizens)."
1133
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 25/08/2026
@dszymborski.fangraphs.com Can you offer any insight into why the Projected Standings model thinks the Dodgers, Rays, and Braves will more or less match their season-to-date scoring trends the rest of the way, but expects big regressions from the Brewers and Cubs?
000
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 25/08/2026
Among registered voters, 91% of Democrats, 79% of Republicans, and 63% of Independents say they'll definitely vote in the November elections:
A stacked bar chart of YouGov polling data with the headline: "More Democrats than Republicans say they will definitely vote in the November elections."

The chart has the sub-headline: "How likely are you to vote in the election in November? (%)."

The chart has the note: "Note: Identification as a MAGA Republican is based on Republicans' responses to the question, "Are you a MAGA supporter?" Non-MAGA Republicans are Republicans who say "no"; Republicans who say "not sure" are not shown."
1276
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 25/08/2026
New in this week's Economist / @today.yougov.com Poll: Democrats have a 6-point lead over Republicans in the battle for Congress — but lead by 11 among registered voters who say they'll definitely vote in November. Full story: yougovamerica.substack.com/p/likely-vot...
A stacked bar chart of YouGov polling data with the headline: "Democrats lead Republicans by double digits among registered voters who say they will definitely vote."

The chart has the sub-headline: "In the elections for U.S. Congress in November, who will you vote for in the district where you live? (%)."

The chart has the note: "Note: Likelihood of voting comes from the question, "How likely are you to vote in the election in November?" "Are unlikely to vote" includes responses of "maybe will vote," "probably will not vote," and "definitely will not vote.""
58122
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 25/08/2026
This is from a defunct D&D campaign: the Duchy of Nordmark, a frontier territory conquered just a generation prior, where key powers include a young reformist duke, his conservative settler aristocracy, the oppressed native peasantry, and incursions from across the border.
A fantasy map of a land labeled "Nordmark"
161
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 20/08/2026
While Americans are more likely to prefer chronological feeds over algorithmic feeds, that's not the case among the heaviest social media users: yougovamerica.substack.com/p/algorithmi...
A split bar chart of YouGov polling data with the headline: "Many Americans want chronological social media feeds, but younger adults and heavier users of social media are more likely to prefer algorithmic feeds."

The chart has the sub-headline: "Thinking about your ideal social media platform, in which of the following ways would you most prefer content to be displayed? (%)."

The chart has the note: "Note: Respondents were given definitions of each term. Chronological: "Posts are displayed in the order they were published, with the newest posts appearing first." Algorithm-based: "Posts are displayed based on an algorithm that considers factors such as the user's interests and behavior, the popularity of the content, and the engagement it receives." A third option, not shown, was "Curated: Posts are selected by an editorial team or an appointed user." Responses of "not sure" are also not shown."
110
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 20/08/2026
At @today.yougov.com, we polled Americans about whether they want chronological or algorithmic social media feeds. Users of one social media network are unusually pro-chronological feed, and I'll give you one guess as to which one... My full writeup: yougovamerica.substack.com/p/algorithmi...
A split bar chart of YouGov polling data with the headline: "Users of TikTok and X are more likely than users of other social media apps to prefer algorithmic feeds."

The chart has the sub-headline: "Thinking about your ideal social media platform, in which of the following ways would you most prefer content to be displayed? (%)."

The chart has the note: "Note: Respondents were given definitions of each term. Chronological: "Posts are displayed in the order they were published, with the newest posts appearing first." Algorithm-based: "Posts are displayed based on an algorithm that considers factors such as the user's interests and behavior, the popularity of the content, and the engagement it receives." A third option, not shown, was "Curated: Posts are selected by an editorial team or an appointed user." Responses of "not sure" are also not shown. Social network use comes from the question, "Which of the following social media platforms have you used recently? Please select all that apply." Respondents can be users of multiple social media platforms. Heavy social media users are those who say they average 5 or more hours per day on social media."
2177
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 16/08/2026
The Duke of Wellington, Nov. 9, 1814, when the British government asked him to go to America and take charge in the War of 1812:
That which appears to me to be wanting in America is not a General, or General officers and troops, but a naval superiority on the Lakes. Till that superiority is acquired, it is impossible, according to my notion, to maintain an army in such a situation as to keep the enemy out of the whole frontier, much less to make any conquest from the enemy… The question is whether we can acquire this naval superiority on the Lakes. If we can’t, I shall do you but little good in America; and I shall go there only to prove the truth of [the] defence, and to sign a peace which might as well be signed now. There will always, however, remain this advantage [to my going], that the confidence which I have acquired will reconcile both the army and the people in England to terms they would not now approve.
130
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 14/08/2026
This evening I randomly stumbled on a bunch of short fiction I had written for a decade-old Pathfinder campaign — one that lasted the better part of a year before falling apart. I still regret that campaign's demise to this day — I was really vibing with my PC: smart, well-meaning, manipulative...
Screenshot of a folder of text files with a preview open to one, an excerpt of a short story written from the point of view of an RPG character.
120
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 14/08/2026
We also did a survey last year about writing & AI that didn't get in to laptops vs. desktops, but did get into people who use computers to write: ygo-assets-websites-editorial-emea.yougov.net/documents/Wr...
Screenshot of a PDF of YouGov polling resultsScreenshot of a PDF of YouGov polling results
010
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 14/08/2026
My team at @today.yougov.com just did a survey on old technology! 38% of Americans say they currently use a desktop computer. No major generational gaps. There is a gender gap, though, which may be explained by gaming PCs. yougov.com/en-us/articl...
Screenshot of a chart of a YouGov poll with the title, "The technologies Americans use now — and the ones they used to." From: https://yougov.com/en-us/articles/55320-which-technologies-do-americans-miss-and-which-are-they-glad-to-be-rid-ofTable of YouGov polling data for the question, "Which, if any, of the following do you use now or have you ever used? [A desktop computer]"
171
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 12/08/2026
Pippin out there tutoyering everyone like a boss:
A quote from Appendix F of The Lord of the Rings, reading: "One point in the divergence may here be noted, since, though important, it has proved impossible to represent. The Westron tongue made in the pronouns of the second person (and often also in those of the third) a distinction, independent of number, between ‘familiar’ and ‘deferential’ forms. It was, however, one of the peculiarities of Shire-usage that the deferential forms had gone out of colloquial use. They lingered only among the villagers, especially of the Westfarthing, who used them as endearments. This was one of the things referred to when people of Gondor spoke of the strangeness of Hobbit-speech. Peregrin Took, for instance, in his first few days in Minas Tirith used the familiar for people of all ranks, including the Lord Denethor himself. This may have amused the aged Steward, but it must have astonished his servants. No doubt this free use of the familiar forms helped to spread the popular rumour that Peregrin was a person of very high rank in his own country."
061
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 05/08/2026
Follow the Dodgers' gameday thread for such insights as that the 69-44 first-place Los Angeles Dodgers "fucking suck," that the third-best offense in MLB has "no heart" and that those who say otherwise are a "good ship lollipop fanbase."
Reddit comment reading: "This good ship lollipop fanbase don't want to admit that this team fucking sucks. Outside of Ohtani absolutely no heart on offense."
240
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 04/08/2026
Okay but this is just so funny. Being fan of *the Dodgers* has been especially stressful *the last two years*??
A Reddit comment saying, "I just got into baseball two years ago and I swear my blood pressure has been high ever since. Being a
Dodgers fan is stressful"
130
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 01/08/2026
I came across this 1879 "Panoramic View of the city of Minneapolis," and while it's not strictly to scale, it's what I've been looking for to conceptualize the sheer size of Lowry Hill (the hill). In this detail, the pond is what today is Loring Park. Full map: commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pa...
Detail from Panoramic view of the city of Minneapolis, Minnesota, 1879, via Wikimedia Commons
4445
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 01/08/2026
Apparently this *wasn't* what my wife meant??
A text message exchange in which one person texts "Draw the bath" and the other person replies with a crude drawing of a bathtub.
1151
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 01/08/2026
From our Economist / YouGov tracking polls:
A line chart of YouGov polling data with the headline: "Net approval of Donald Trump's job handling among all Americans, white, Black,  and Hispanic Americans, and white Americans with and without college degrees."

The chart has the sub-headline: "Do you approve or disapprove of the way Donald Trump is handling his job as President? (% who strongly or somewhat approve minus the % who strongly or somewhat disapprove)."

The chart has the note: "Note: The lines represent an average of the net approval for that week's poll and the two prior weekly polls. Responses of "not sure" are not shown."
001
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 31/07/2026
For our latest @today.yougov.com newsletter, we polled Americans about whether they think AI is currently better or worse at thinking than a range of public figures, including Trump, Biden, Elon Musk, and @kenjennings.bsky.social. The full writeup: yougovamerica.substack.com/p/do-america...
A stacked bar chart of YouGov polling data with the headline: "Many Americans say AI is smarter than Trump or Biden."

The chart has the sub-headline: "Do you think AI is currently able to think better or worse than the following person? (% of U.S. adult citizens)."
051
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 30/07/2026
Deleted this RT of incorrect or at least highly misleading information. For more context see @copyrightlibn.bsky.social: bsky.app/profile/copy...
Screenshot of a post by @dhmontgomery.com with the text: "The reason Al companies are shredding books after they scan them is because U.S. copyright law — as established in publishers' recent lawsuit against the Internet Archive — requires a book to be destroyed after being scanned (so you're transforming the work rather than copying it)."

Which is quoting a post by @aparker.io saying: "presumably! the suit against the internet archive held that keeping the physical copy of a digitized thing was infringing; bartz held that if you transform a physical work by scanning it and then removing the original then it is transformative fair use.
so be mad at publishers"
240
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 21/07/2026
Imagine how this Cubs season would be going if our entire pitching staff hadn't died of bubonic plague.
A table of baseball stats with the title "WAR by Team"
110
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 20/07/2026
Venmo’d my friend for our movie tickets.
A payment of $20.05 marked with emojis representing Odysseus’s journey in The Odyssey.
2231
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 18/07/2026
Do you like soccer better than American football? In my latest newsletter for @today.yougov.com, we asked Americans a bunch of head-to-head matchups about which sports they like best. Check out my results, plus crosstabs by age and race: yougov.com/en-us/articl...
A split bar chart of YouGov polling data with the headline: "Do Americans like football better than basketball? Soccer better than hockey? Which sports win most."

The chart has the sub-headline: "Which sport do you like more? (% of U.S. adult citizens choosing each sport in head-to-head matches against each other sport)."

The chart has the note: "Note: Respondents who skipped each matchup are omitted."
094
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 17/07/2026
Yeah, those are my office bookshelves, mostly history and politics. The rest are in our living room. (The above and below photos were taken at different times so lots of overlapping books.)
Bookshelves in a living roomBookshelves in a living room
010
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 17/07/2026
Probably because I keep buying all the books before people you know can get them. Sorry.
A wrap-around bookcase
110
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 17/07/2026
Arthur meme with D.W. declaring, "That sign can't stop me because I can't read!"
110
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 13/07/2026
Where do you think the name came from?
Liv Tyler as Arwen
140
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 13/07/2026
As others have said, Disney's problem is they're trying to remake their *hits*. What they should be trying to do is remake their *interesting failures*: good ideas but bad execution. Which is to say: make another Prydain movie already, fools. (via @walthickey.bsky.social)
Moana

There’s a line where expense meets proceeds; it’s called green, and no one knows how far it goes. Anyway, the live-action Moana musical ain’t gonna hit it. With a bleak opening weekend of $43 million domestically and $52 million abroad (on already tempered expectations of $130 million to $140 million globally), this attempt to do a live-action nostalgia reboot for an animated franchise that was in cinemas as recently as 20 months ago flopped. An attempted brand withdrawal, to use the Disney parlance, the movie cost $250 million to make and looks to join the live-action Snow White as a movie that bombed because Disney miscalibrated the nostalgia machine. It seems the company has mined all the properties released during the nostalgia sweet spot and has been relegated to remakes of movies that are either too recent or too old.
6343
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 10/07/2026
The World Cup is about to end, but male self-confidence never will. My latest @today.yougov.com newsletter: yougovamerica.substack.com/p/could-you-...
A split bar chart of YouGov polling data with the headline: "41% of adult men under 30 think they would definitely or probably score a World Cup penalty kick."

The chart has the sub-headline: "If you took a penalty kick in a FIFA World Cup match, how likely do you think it is that you would score? (%)."

The chart has the note: "Note: Responses of "not sure" are not shown."
32510
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 09/07/2026
The only "aesthetic" that "has anything like the cultural footprint to unseat" Marvelization, wrote @eruditorumpress.com, is something she calls "Epic Cold" — think Nolan & Villeneuve. Clinical, cold, big ideas and big shots, "hella male": www.eruditorumpress.com/blog/four-ti...
Epic Cold

In terms of aesthetics that can plausibly stand up to the Marvelization of all things, we are left with one thing that has anything like the cultural footprint to unseat it. Not the only alternative possible—just the only alternative that can crack the domestic box office top ten for the year. Let’s call it Epic Cold. In film, the core trio doing it are Denis Villeneuve, Christopher Nolan, and Zack Snyder. 

Characteristics: Coldness, obviously. Very clinical, a focus on technique as the important element. Neo-modernist in this regard. Emotional investment is not important to these films. Big ideas and visual spectacle are very important. No Banter. To make an obvious point these films are hella male. 

Protagonists are often ambiguous, uncertain, distant ciphers. If they have important emotions, they are singular emotions that serve as obsessions. These emotions might be extreme, but they are looked at rather than empathized with. Obvious debts here are Lovecraft, noir, and the “difficult men” school of Prestige Television. (Indeed, its first example is probably Battlestar Galactica.)

There are obvious, massive problems with this aesthetic, of which the fact that its most vocal fans are the worst sort of Internet dudebros is only the most obvious. But look, the enemy of my enemy. We can kill it once everyone is doing austere cerebral epics and the top ten for a year has Rendezvous with Rama and The Moon is a Harsh Mistress in it, but for now this is all that’s available to stand up to Marvel as a hegemonizing force. So we’d best find something to like in it.

One obvious choice: it’s an aesthetic that lets you grapple with big ideas. This is arguably the only thing it’s good for, but in a world horribly packed with Save the Cat style structures there’s a lot to be said for big idea fiction making a comeback. It’s also just a needed correction. “Look at what everyone’s doing and do the opposite” is never a bad starting point.
220
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 07/07/2026
For @today.yougov.com, we asked Americans whether candidates facing sex scandals should drop out or stay in the race. In general Democrats are more likely than Republicans to say they should drop out — but interesting things happened when I crosstabbed by Platner favorability:
A split bar chart of YouGov polling data with the headline: "Most Democrats say candidates should drop out after being accused of sexual misconduct — but support for dropping out is lower among Democrats who like Graham Platner."

The chart has the sub-headline: "If a candidate you like were accused of sexual misconduct, would you prefer that they stay in the race or that they drop out so they can be replaced on the ballot by another member of their party? (%)."

The chart has the note: "Note: Responses of "not sure" are not shown. Respondents were asked their opinion of Platner immediately before being asked about hypothetical candidates accused of sexual misconduct."
261
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 03/07/2026
Tag yourself in this board of the names of all the animals at the petting zoo we’re at this afternoon. I’m Sawyer.
A bulletin board full of pictures of animals with names
340
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 03/07/2026
Literally laughed out loud at the comparative Cubs and Cardinals injury reports.
A table listing the injured players for the Chicago Cubs (15 players) and St. Louis Cardinals (1 player).
000
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 01/07/2026
I've now asked Americans identically phrased questions about how much they know about a range of different historical periods now. Here's how they compare:
A stacked bar chart of YouGov polling data with the headline: "How many Americans know a fair amount or more about the American Revolution? Fewer than for World War II or the Civil War, but more than for the Roman Empire, French Revolution, or Middle Ages."

The chart has the sub-headline: "How much do you know about...? (% of U.S. adult citizens)."
031
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 01/07/2026
I've written for @today.yougov.com about what Americans think about the Roman Empire, about the Middle Ages, and now about the American Revolution: yougovamerica.substack.com/p/how-americ...
A range plot of YouGov polling data with the headline: "Conservatives are more likely than liberals to have favorable opinions of many founders."

The chart has the sub-headline: "Do you have a favorable or an unfavorable opinion of the following people? (% who say "very or somewhat favorable" minus the % who say "very or somewhat unfavorable")."A stacked bar chart of YouGov polling data with the headline: "Most Americans say it was very acceptable for colonists boycott British goods, but fewer say that about stoning the Redcoats."

The chart has the sub-headline: "Do you consider the following form of protest undertaken by American colonists to have been...? (% of U.S. adult citizens)."
4152
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 30/06/2026
An 1837 account of an American saying they "speak American" rather than "English":
'On our very arrival in the Chesapeake river, I came across a characteristic trait. "Can you speak French?" I asked the pilot who hailed us. Instantly he answered me, in English, "No, I only
speak American!" The claim to separate nationality
extended even to the language.'
160
David H. Montgomery @dhmontgomery.com · 23/06/2026
TIL the word "cleavage" was invented in the 1940s by movie censors as a euphemism: markforsythauthor.substack.com/p/ages-and-a... (Technically it existed before, but only as a geological term)
The term cleavage was actually invented as a euphemism. In the 1930s it was decided that Hollywood movies could be a little too saucy. And so, from 1934 until 1968 all the studios had to abide by the Motion Picture Production Code (also known as the Hays Code and the Johnston Office). This involved a lot of clean-minded chaps staring intently at women’s chests, and deciding whether too much was visible. Thus they protected the dirty-minded from obscene object of their desires.

The Johnston Office, were, as I say, clean-minded chaps. So clean-minded that they didn’t use words like chest, or breast, or door-openers. Instead they referred to ‘cleavage’, defined in Time magazine in 1946 as:

Johnston Office trade term for the shadowed depression dividing an actress' bosom into two distinct sections
160