Sign in

Finnur Dellsén

@dellsen.bsky.social
185 followers 146 following 29 posts

Philosophy professor at the Universities of Iceland, Inland Norway, and Oslo. Mostly here for philosophy of science, epistemology (formal and social), and metaphilosophy. philpeople.org/profiles/finnur-dell… www.finnurdellsen.com

PostsRepliesMedia
Finnur Dellsén @dellsen.bsky.social · 26/03/2026
I'm looking to hire two postdoctoral researchers on The Consensus Project. Full-time research positions for three years. Preferably people in social/formal epistemology and/or philosophy of science. Please share widely! More here: philjobs.org/job/show/31193 #philsci #philsky
philjobs.org
Postdoctoral fellowships, University of Iceland - PhilJobs:JFP Postdoctoral fellowships, University of Iceland
An international database of jobs for philosophers
01616
Finnur Dellsén @dellsen.bsky.social · 12/02/2026
Some professional news: I'm delighted to share that I've been awarded a "grant of excellence" from the Icelandic Research Fund (Rannís). This is the largest type of research grant that's available in Iceland; only a couple of these are awarded each year across all disciplines.
island.is
Allocation from the Icelandic Research Fund for the financial year 2026 | The Icelandic Centre for Research
The Board of The Icelandic Research Fund has completed the allocation of grants for new research projects for 2026. A total of 414 valid applications were received, 70 of which were funded, or 17%.
161
Finnur Dellsén @dellsen.bsky.social · 27/12/2025
@boruttrpin.bsky.social and I have a new paper out in Philosophical Quarterly. We had both written on how inference to the best explanation could work with uncertain evidence. So we teamed up to test some suggestions for how to do that using computer simulations: academic.oup.com/pq/article/d...
academic.oup.com
Testing abductions from uncertain evidence
Abstract. Inference to the Best Explanation (IBE) is traditionally conceived of as a rule of inference, in which one infers to the hypothesis that provides
2237
Reposted by Finnur Dellsén
lastpositivist.bsky.social @lastpositivist.bsky.social · 07/11/2025
Finnur Dellsén got a nice pic of me on my standard Q&A slide, so now I have a stock reply to any time anyone disagrees with me.
Me in a red jumper talking into a mic and holding my hand up. Behind me is a slide with the words "You tell me I am wrong. // Who are you, who is anybody, to tell me I am wrong? // I am not wrong."
2061747
Reposted by Finnur Dellsén
Oscar @oscarw.bsky.social · 08/10/2025
Helen Longino giving the first Annual Institute of Philosophy and Duke University Research Talk at the University of Iceland! The talk was titled “Why Center Interaction? (In science and elsewhere)”
A speaker (Helen Longino) giving a talk to an audience, standing behind a lectern and in front a lecture slides with pictures of lichens and dodders
1211
Finnur Dellsén @dellsen.bsky.social · 12/09/2025
A weirdly underappreciated problem about Inference to the Best Explanation is how it can handle uncertain evidence. This new paper, now forthcoming in Philosophy of Science, proposes a strategy for doing that (and argues that Einstein may have used it). #philsky #philsci doi.org/10.1017/psa....
doi.org
Inferring to the Best Explanation from Uncertain Evidence | Philosophy of Science | Cambridge Core
Inferring to the Best Explanation from Uncertain Evidence
32410
Reposted by Finnur Dellsén
Nicholas Emmerson @nicemm.bsky.social · 08/09/2025
Curious why my latest paper left one notable astrobiologist "unpleasantly surprised"? Follow the link and you might just find out! #philsci #philsky #astrobiology www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
cambridge.org
Scientific Progress, Astrobiology and the Pursuit of Knowledge | Philosophy of Science | Cambridge Core
Scientific Progress, Astrobiology and the Pursuit of Knowledge
062
Finnur Dellsén @dellsen.bsky.social · 20/08/2025
I just found out that this paper, co-authored with James R. Beebe, is now out and freely available at Philosophy of Science. #philsky #philsci #xphi doi.org/10.1017/psa....
doi.org
The Centrality of Progressive Realism to the Scientific Realism Debate | Philosophy of Science | Cambridge Core
The Centrality of Progressive Realism to the Scientific Realism Debate
2151
Finnur Dellsén @dellsen.bsky.social · 20/08/2025
Tomorrow at U. of Iceland: James Beebe talks about how and ehy to make epistemic autonomy reflective. #philsky english.hi.is/research-tal...
english.hi.is
Research Talk in Philosophy: James R. Beebe
020
Reposted by Finnur Dellsén
Chris Crandall @chriscrandall.bsky.social · 15/08/2025
This is hilarious, and makes a good point.
172
Finnur Dellsén @dellsen.bsky.social · 14/08/2025
This paper of mine is now officially published, a mere four years after it was accepted at Philosphers' Imprint. #philsky #philsci #philpapers journals.publishing.umich.edu/phimp/articl...
journals.publishing.umich.edu
An Epistemic Advantage of Accommodation over Prediction
Many philosophers have argued that a hypothesis is better confirmed by some data if the hypothesis was not specifically designed to fit the data. ‘Prediction’, they argue, is superior to ‘accommodatio...
3242
Finnur Dellsén @dellsen.bsky.social · 08/08/2025
Happy to have a chapter (coauthored with Insa Lawler, @insar.bsky.social, and James Norton) in this excellent and totally open access volume on philosophical methodology. #philsky philpapers.org/rec/HORAPA-2
philpapers.org
Joachim Horvath, Steffen Koch & Michael G. Titelbaum (eds.), Methods in Analytic Philosophy: A Primer and Guide - PhilPapers
Forthcoming guide with brief introductions on methods in analytic philosophy by experts on the relevant topics. With sections on: formal methods, argumentation, inferential methods, thought experiment...
0103
Finnur Dellsén @dellsen.bsky.social · 07/08/2025
Very exciting workshop in Reykjavik in October, organized by @oscarw.bsky.social. Please spread the word and/or consider submitting an abstract. #philsci #philsky #hps philevents.org/event/show/1...
philevents.org
Science, values, and society: themes from Helen Longino
On the occasion of Helen Longino’s talk at the University of Iceland on the 8th of October 2025, we are organising a mini-workshop on themes from Longino’s philosophical work on the 10th o...
03416
Finnur Dellsén @dellsen.bsky.social · 06/08/2025
New paper now forthcoming in PPR, co-authored with Bob Beddor. Argues that inquiry, especially in science, needs to be construed as a more social/egalitarian endeavor: the point of inquiring is often to confer epistemic benefits on others. #philsky #philsci onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Inclusive inquiry
What is the point of inquiry? Some say that the aim of inquiring into some question is to come to know its answer; others, that the aim is to attain justified belief, epistemic improvement, or some o...
1235
Finnur Dellsén @dellsen.bsky.social · 30/07/2025
New paper forthcoming in Analysis on methodological pluralism! Co-authored with the rest of the "Philosophical Meth. Lab" (Sam Baron, Tina Firing, and James Norton)! #philsky #philsci #metascience academic.oup.com/analysis/adv...
academic.oup.com
Philosophical methodology: a plea for tolerance
Abstract. Many prominent critiques of philosophical methods proceed by suggesting that some method is unreliable, especially in comparison to some alternat
5262
Finnur Dellsén @dellsen.bsky.social · 23/07/2025
#Gaza is often described as an open-air prison. That analogy is no longer accurate: prisoners are not systematically shot, bombed, and starved to death. Gaza is now an open-air death camp.
msf.org
Mass starvation spreads across Gaza | MSF
More than 100 organisations are sounding the alarm to allow lifesaving aid into Gaza.
074
Reposted by Finnur Dellsén
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science @thebjps.bsky.social · 18/06/2025
New issue, new Editors' Choice article (free to read): Finnur Dellsén, ‘Consensus versus Unanimity: Which Carries More Weight?’ Read it here: www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/... #philsci #philsky #hps
ABSTRACT. Around 97% of climate scientists endorse anthropogenic global warming (AGW), the theory that human activities are partly responsible for recent increases in global average temperatures. Clearly, this widespread endorsement of AGW is a reason for non-experts to believe in AGW. But what is the epistemic significance of the fact that some climate scientists do not endorse AGW? This article contrasts expert unanimity, in which virtually no expert disagrees with some theory, with expert consensus, in which some non-negligible proportion either rejects or is uncertain about the theory. It is argued that from a layperson’s point of view, an expert consensus is often stronger evidence for a theory’s truth than unanimity. Several lessons are drawn from this conclusion, for example, concerning what laypeople should infer from expert pronouncements, how journalists should report on scientific theories, and how working scientists should communicate with the public.
093
Finnur Dellsén @dellsen.bsky.social · 21/07/2025
Many good and interesting points made here, including the final point about research papers soon being written by AIs, reviewed by AIs, and then subsequently summarized for us by AIs. At some point we'll need to rethink the current model of the ~10k word research article. #philsci #philsky
theguardian.com
Quality of scientific papers questioned as academics ‘overwhelmed’ by the millions published
Widespread mockery of AI-generated rat with giant penis in one paper brings problem to public attention
284
Reposted by Finnur Dellsén
Andrew Zeppa @andrewzeppa.bsky.social · 18/07/2025
Have you ever wanted to visualize how belief polarization might occur in scientific communities? Then check out this simulator, based on the model developed by @cailinmeister.bsky.social and @jamesowenweatherall.com in their (2018) paper on polarization #philsci #philsky #metasci
zeppaphisci.github.io
Epistemic Community Simulation
1247
Finnur Dellsén @dellsen.bsky.social · 20/07/2025
I'm probably a bit late to this party, but I found this excellent podcast recently. Great if you need an intro to some of the ethical issues with AI; should work well for intro courses, for instance. #ai #philosophy
vox.com
The AI revolution is here. Can we build a Good Robot?
The battle over artificial intelligence is just beginning.
031
Finnur Dellsén @dellsen.bsky.social · 19/07/2025
I'm hereby making an honest attempt at using this platform. It's all quite confusing to me, making me feel very old. But so be it; here goes!
281