Daniel Convissor
@danielconvissor.bsky.social
215 followers 36 following 797 posts
Family man. Advocate for safe, efficient transportation, land use, and, well, everything. Director of @biketarrytown.bsky.social. (Repost. Liking does nothing.)
Family man. Advocate for safe, efficient transportation, land use, and, well, everything. Director of @biketarrytown.bsky.social. (Repost. Liking does nothing.)
![Conclusion
To answer the Court's inquisition directly: "the basis for Ms. Halligan's identification
of herself as the United States Attorney, notwithstanding Judge Currie's contrary ruling" is that, in the Government's view, Ms. Halligan is the United States Attorney, and Judge Currie's ruling did not and could not require the United States to acquiesce to her contrary (and erroneous) legal reasoning outside of those cases. "[T]he reasons why this Court should not
strike Ms. Halligan's identification of herself as United States Attorney from the indictment in this matter are that no authority exists for a court to strike an attorney title out of a signature block, and certainly not on its own motion.
Finally, Ms. Halligan's "identification does not constitute a false or misleading
statement."' It is correct and consistent with the Department of Justice's internal guidance, and at minimum reflects a contested legal position that the United States is entitled to maintain
notwithstanding a single district judge's contrary view. For these reasons, the Court should deem this response sufficient, withdraw its January 6, 2026 order, and permit this prosecution to proceed without further collateral inquiry into matters beyond the Court's authority.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:v66bn4hy27pzmeti652jfmqz/bafkreiao767wtlz2twm2ino3pdychem2ssp4moo2bahpbw37l3adgotv5y)
