Sign in

Christopher David LaRoche

@claroche.bsky.social
69 followers 61 following 11 posts

Stanton fellow at Carnegie Endowment. Assistant professor at Central European University and visiting at Bard College NYC. Plato to NATO.

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Christopher David LaRoche
Joseph MacKay @lefteleven.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
very glad to see this, with @claroche.bsky.social, out at @gsqjournal.bsky.social. academic.oup.com/isagsq/artic...
academic.oup.com
Varieties of International Reaction: Mapping the Right in Current World Order
Abstract. How can today’s illiberal and far right movements be located in the larger historical variety of right and far-right politics? How should we expe
031
Reposted by Christopher David LaRoche
Foreign Affairs @foreignaffairs.com · 24/09/2026
There are real parallels between the development of nuclear technology and the buildout of AI systems, but the atomic age “cannot provide a ready-made blueprint for the problem that AI poses,” write @claroche.bsky.social and @nktpnd.bsky.social.
foreignaffairs.com
The Trouble With the Nuclear-AI Analogy
In humanity’s quest to constrain the dangers from fast-advancing artificial intelligence, many have looked to the most revolutionary technology that preceded it: nuclear weapons.
1115
Reposted by Christopher David LaRoche
Carnegie Nuclear Policy @carnegienpp.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
Interested in controlling existential risks from AI? Check out Chris LaRoche and @nktpnd.bsky.social 's new piece in @foreignaffairs.com www.foreignaffairs.com/united-state...
foreignaffairs.com
The Trouble With the Nuclear-AI Analogy
In humanity’s quest to constrain the dangers from fast-advancing artificial intelligence, many have looked to the most revolutionary technology that preceded it: nuclear weapons.
011
Reposted by Christopher David LaRoche
Lawfare @lawfaremedia.org · 16/09/2026
Recent state-level laws establishing reporting regimes have expanded the reach of government regulators over the AI industry, but the lack of a clear investigatory regime remains a glaring omission and limits the effectiveness of these laws, writes @claroche.bsky.social.
lawfaremedia.org
The Forensic Gap in AI Safety Laws
State AI laws require developers to report safety incidents—but not what investigation follows or what evidence they must keep.
0185
Reposted by Christopher David LaRoche
Ankit Panda @nktpnd.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
New in @foreignaffairs.com with @claroche.bsky.social: even if efforts to control the bomb may be a source of inspiration, they are not a ready-made template for AI governance. On the limits of the AI-nuclear weapons analogy. Gift link: www.foreignaffairs.com/guest-pass/r...
foreignaffairs.com
The Trouble With the Nuclear-AI Analogy
In humanity’s quest to constrain the dangers from fast-advancing artificial intelligence, many have looked to the most revolutionary technology that preceded it: nuclear weapons.
1127
Christopher David LaRoche @claroche.bsky.social · 06/04/2026
My latest @foreignpolicy.com
081
Reposted by Christopher David LaRoche
Joseph MacKay @lefteleven.bsky.social · 17/12/2025
This, with @claroche.bsky.social in @ejir.bsky.social, was the most fun I’ve had writing a paper in years. A quick thread on what we do here. This paper argues IR theories tell stories, and stories get their meaning from their particular endings. /1
1168
Christopher David LaRoche @claroche.bsky.social · 14/11/2025
My newest in Foreign Policy.
041
Reposted by Christopher David LaRoche
Ankit Panda @nktpnd.bsky.social · 13/11/2025
“...real-world presidents are probably unprepared for the burden imposed by their sole authority to order a nuclear strike.” foreignpolicy.com/2025/11/13/n...
foreignpolicy.com
The U.S. President Should Practice for a Nuclear Crisis
The commander in chief gets almost no preparation for the ultimate decision. That needs to change.
3152
Reposted by Christopher David LaRoche
Matthew Bunn @matthew-bunn.bsky.social · 27/06/2025
Thoughtful piece from Nicole Grajewski. Damage is substantial -- but so is the incentive to move forward. "Military action can destroy equipment and facilities, but it cannot eliminate knowledge, dispersed materials, or the underlying strategic drivers of nuclear weapons development."
184