Sign in

Carrie A Lee

@carriealee.bsky.social
4.8K followers 536 following 320 posts

Former public servant: Democracy, Civ-Mil, NatSec & Strategy. Senior Fellow ‪@gmfus.bsky.social‬‬, Visiting Scholar @perryworldhouse.bsky.social‬, Member ‪@cfr.org‬, Truman Project. Running enthusiast.

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Carrie A Lee
Steve Saidemonster 🧌🧛🦇⚰️👻👹 @smsaideman.bsky.social · 11/08/2026
yo civmilsky, this APSA’s Civ-Mil Hangout© will be September 4th at 4pm at A.T. O’Keefe’s www.atokeeffes.com. Ask for Steve’s table/room/trench. @carriealee.bsky.social @lindsaypcohn.bsky.social @naunihal.bsky.social @kschake.bsky.social Spread the word.
static.klipy.com
1104
Reposted by Carrie A Lee
Elizabeth N. Saunders @profsaunders.bsky.social · 31/07/2026
Apropos of nothin, remember how Trump in 2016 attacked Obama for publicly discussing an impending offensive against ISIS and called for a "sneak attack"? Lots of reasons to publicize, as @carriealee.bsky.social wrote @warontherocks.bsky.social. Still, memory-holed. warontherocks.com/warning-orde...
warontherocks.com
Warning Orders: Strategic Reasons for Publicizing Military Offensives
Does publicly announcing an impending military offensive expose assaulting troops to dangers that could be avoided if plans to invade were kept quiet?
0347
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 03/04/2026
Key summary:
02411
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 03/04/2026
Re-upping this piece I published last year on Trump’s efforts to not just politicize but personalize military leadership. nationalsecurity.law.georgetown.edu/journal/2025...
nationalsecurity.law.georgetown.edu
Trump’s Second Term: The Personalization of the Military and Implications for National Security - Georgetown Law - Center on National Security
By Carrie A. Lee
073
Reposted by Carrie A Lee
Caitlin Talmadge @proftalmadge.bsky.social · 03/04/2026
Firing senior officers for cause is one thing. Firing them repeatedly on this scale and with no explanation is unprecedented in our nation's history. www.nytimes.com/2026/04/02/u...
nytimes.com
Hegseth Fires Army Chief Amid Battle With Its Leaders
1329985
Reposted by Carrie A Lee
Kori Schake 🎃 @kschake.bsky.social · 02/04/2026
AEI is making a fired flags tracker so you can assess the replacements are more political. Coles out Monday.
215633
Reposted by Carrie A Lee
Amy Earhart @aearhart.bsky.social · 26/02/2026
Years ago our admin did a red and black report. It took salaries & how much $ each instructor made in tuition $ for classes we taught-you were in the red or black. They released numbers once & shut it down bc humanities were producing huge $ for uni & engineers, business and scientists were losing $
32129609
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 24/02/2026
If you were surprised by the men’s Olympic hockey team locker room, you obviously weren’t watching any of the interviews during the competition. Patel’s presence with those guys is the least surprising thing about these Olympics.
062
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 29/01/2026
My friend @gowder.io and his colleagues are brilliant and unflinching here. I’m sorry to be late to it but this is an outstanding piece of critical analysis that has lessons well beyond the current debate over birthright citizenship. publications.lawschool.cornell.edu/lawreview/20...
publications.lawschool.cornell.edu
Birthright Citizenship and the Dunning School of Unoriginal Meanings – Cornell Law Review
14517
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 24/01/2026
Was it worth it, Bridge? Was this dumpster-fire of a "strategy" document worth prostrating yourself for white supremacists and those committed to destroying almost every source of American strength? What a tragedy. media.defense.gov/2026/Jan/23/...
media.defense.gov
070
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 14/01/2026
Thus far, I've felt that ROK has been a model for how to both repulse would-be authoritarianism and enforce accountability, but this feels like a pretty extreme move that reveals more weaknesses in South Korean democracy than strengths.
050
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 14/01/2026
There are an unknown number of monkeys of unknown origin on the loose in St. Louis. I'm sure this ends well. www.nytimes.com/2026/01/10/u...
nytimes.com
Monkeys Are on the Loose in St. Louis, City Officials Say
050
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 07/01/2026
Outstanding summary of the civil-military tensions and issues at play in Venezuela right now by Rebecca Hanson and Veronica Zubillaga. Summary: things are fragile right now.
theconversation.com
Venezuela’s civil-military alliance is being stretched — if it breaks, numerous armed groups may be drawn into messy split
How various factions respond to the Trump administration’s threat to be the de facto ruler of the country could quickly inflame domestic tensions and lead to conflict.
193
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 06/01/2026
Indeed, the greatest tell of whether someone has actually read/internalized Thucydides is if during times like this, they quote the Melian dialogue unironically. Hint: it’s a warning not a celebration.
0156
Reposted by Carrie A Lee
Lawfare @lawfaremedia.org · 23/12/2025
On Lawfare Daily, Loren Voss spoke to @kschake.bsky.social and @carriealee.bsky.social about how they assess a healthy civil-military relationship, the current state of civil-military affairs, potential unlawful orders, and what we should watch going forward. www.lawfaremedia.org/article/lawf...
02510
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 09/12/2025
Join us on Thursday morning for a discussion of the new National Security Strategy, the National Defense Authorization Act, and their implications for the Transatlantic relationship. Am excited to join my colleagues to discuss the future of transatlantic security! www.gmfus.org/event/us-nat...
gmfus.org
The US National Security Strategy: Implications for Europe and for Washington's Global Priorities
This virtual briefing on the newly released US National Security Strategy will explore the document’s key priorities; their meaning for US engagement in the world; international reaction; and implicat...
1134
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 08/12/2025
Terrific new roundtable review for the H-Diplo Jervis Forum on Mara Karlin's outstanding book, The Inheritance. An all-star lineup of reviewers in Peter Feaver, @klkuzminski.bsky.social, @profjessblankshain.bsky.social, and Paula Thornhill! Read closely and in full! issforum.org/roundtables/...
issforum.org
Jervis Forum Roundtable 17-19 on Karlin, The Inheritance
H-Diplo | Robert Jervis International Security Studies Forum Roundtable Review 17-19 Mara E. Karlin, The Inheritance: America’s Military After Two Decades of War. Brookings Institution Press, 2022.
171
Reposted by Carrie A Lee
Kori Schake 🎃 @kschake.bsky.social · 05/12/2025
The Trump National Security Strategy is an act of vandalism against the things that actually make our country strong, safe, and prosperous.
23769152
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 08/12/2025
Movie you’ve watched more than six times with a gif. Hard mode: no Stars (Wars nor Trek), LOTR, or Marvel, Disney Animated or Pixar.
media.tenor.com
a man is sitting at a desk with the words you 've lost another submarine
ALT: a man is sitting at a desk with the words you 've lost another submarine
1170
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 07/12/2025
6. NDS. I expected a lot of daylight between the NSS and NDS, particularly on China, because I assumed the NDS would be a much more serious document. But after Hegseth's RDF speech, I'm not so sure. If I were partners and allies in Asia, I'd be watching the NDS very closely. 13/13
0372
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 07/12/2025
The sovereignty sections of the NSS might as well have been CCP talking points. Hegseth's declaration that we must "respect" China's military modernization is a gift to Beijing. Together, it is the closest the US has come to outright capitulation to the PRC on every issue it cares about. 12/
1356
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 07/12/2025
5. China. The NSS barely mentions China's territorial ambitions in the IndoPacific, fails to name it as the single greatest threat to US security, and contains absolutely no mention of China's growing nuclear modernization. Hegseth's speech at RDF is similarly shocking. 11/
1325
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 07/12/2025
Given that Africa is set to have 3bn people by 2070, this is shockingly short-sighted. As for LA, the US has spent a century trying to recover from its 19thC exploitation and rebuild trust in the region. This NSS destroys all of that, and will have generational consequences for US-LA relations. 10/
1365
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 07/12/2025
4. Neo-colonialism. The sections on the Western Hemisphere and Africa are explicitly exploitative in orientation. The only value those regions have to the U.S., according to this doc, is there natural resources, while the people themselves are a security threat to the U.S. 9/
1337
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 07/12/2025
What's more, if I were reading this NSS from Taipei I'd be exploring all kinds of options for alternative security guarantees and arrangements. This is a document that, by describing Taiwanese value in terms of economic stability, opens the door to sell out the Taiwanese people. 8/
1368
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 07/12/2025
I have been skeptical of those who argue that we are in 1938, just waiting for the 3rd world war to start in the Pacific. But the NSS makes the likelihood that we are in fact in 1932 a far better analogy--but this time aided and abetted by the United States itself. 7/
1358
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 07/12/2025
They are being compelled to rearm and increase defense spending in response to the Russian threat while then also facing the extreme likelihood that they may then have to hand that powerful military over to Neo-Nazi groups intent on forcibly implementing white supremacy. 6/
23911
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 07/12/2025
3. Alliances. The NSS explicitly echoes the talking points of far-right Neo-Nazi parties that have begun to take hold in Europe, while simultaneously demanding that Europe re-arm. This points European leaders in an impossible and extraordinarily dangerous situation: 5/
1397
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 07/12/2025
2. The NSS offers a theory of security that is set on destroying the sources of American power. It spits on existing alliance structures, promotes Neo-colonialism through the exploitation of LA and Africa, and downplays the single greatest threat to US prosperity: the People's Republic of China. 4/
14612
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 07/12/2025
Watching so-called experts absolutely debase themselves by ignoring this central organizing principle in their analysis is one of the saddest and most offensive things I have seen in my career. The lack of moral courage and clarity is nothing short of astonishing. 3/
25416
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 07/12/2025
A National Security Strategy is meant to develop and identify a state's theory of security. This document clearly communicates that the Trump administration's theory of security is that the US is safer when it is run and dominated by white Christians. 2/
34612
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 07/12/2025
A few thoughts on the new NSS, expert responses, and upcoming NDS. 1. The first talking point for every expert should have been that this is an overtly white nationalist document that spits on every American ideal of meritocracy, the innate value of human life, and self-determination. 1/
110042
Reposted by Carrie A Lee
Joe Stieb @joestieb.bsky.social · 04/12/2025
This piece by @carriealee.bsky.social is one of the most essential things I've read all year. 100% assigning it to my grad students next term. Read it. warontherocks.com/2025/12/the-...
warontherocks.com
The Soldier in the Illiberal State is a Professional Dead End
The American political system today is indeed in crisis. Government function is in doubt, the administration has politicized and weaponized a previously
23612
Reposted by Carrie A Lee
The Debate - France 24 @f24debate.france24.com · 03/12/2025
🇺🇸 On #F24Debate, @carriealee.bsky.social of @gmfus.bsky.social contrasts the motives of terrorists and drug traffickers and warns against conflating them. More in #F24Debate ➡️ f24.my/Bb73
112
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 01/12/2025
Ultimately, we are living in essentially unprecedented civ-mil times. This requires deep engagement and a re-evaluation of existing norms--especially because I fear that there are far more challenging situations up ahead, and senior leadership will find themselves tested like never before. 7/7
0545
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 01/12/2025
There are no easy answers, but the choices are not as stark as obey/disobey. We should instead start by re-evaluating civil-military norms--particularly those that discourage public resignation and resignation in protest. Other norms may also need to be re-evaluated as time goes on. 6/
2423
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 01/12/2025
I also argue that liberal democracy is central to our modern understanding of the profession of arms because it preserves professional ethics in a way that other systems cannot. Serving in an illiberal state means abandoning the profession itself. 5/
27012
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 01/12/2025
Given that each scenario outlined by Mitchell is an authoritarian one, "senior leaders should instead be asking, 'To what degree does continuing to serve as an officer in the U.S. military do more harm than good to the democratic values I swore an oath to bear true faith and allegiance to?' 4/
1516
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 01/12/2025
Yet, I argue, "[M]ilitary and political leaders in the United States will not simply wake up one day, a la Rip van Winkle, to find themselves in a world where there is suddenly a new political order." So we should instead be asking a different question! 3/
1453
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 01/12/2025
The piece is a response to Peter Mitchell's Oct 31 essay demanding that officers must contemplate what service looks like in a post-liberal America. It's a dangerous and damaging piece that explicitly undermines norms while presenting as a simple thought experiment. 2/
1522
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 01/12/2025
My latest this AM with @warontherocks.bsky.social. Of note: "[Military officers] will be active participants with choices to make about the degree to which they continue to serve civilians intent on undermining the liberal values enshrined in the Constitution." 1/ warontherocks.com/2025/12/the-...
warontherocks.com
The Soldier in the Illiberal State is a Professional Dead End
The American political system today is indeed in crisis. Government function is in doubt, the administration has politicized and weaponized a previously
517667
Reposted by Carrie A Lee
War on the Rocks @warontherocks.bsky.social · 01/12/2025
The profession of arms derives legitimacy from the system it serves. What happens when that system changes?
warontherocks.com
The Soldier in the Illiberal State is a Professional Dead End
The American political system today is indeed in crisis. Government function is in doubt, the administration has politicized and weaponized a previously
0142
Reposted by Carrie A Lee
Ryan Goodman @rgoodlaw.bsky.social · 28/11/2025
Textbook war crime/extrajudicial killing "Two survivors were clinging to the smoldering wreck. The Special Operations commander overseeing the Sept. 2 attack ... ordered a second strike to comply with Hegseth’s instructions." Report by @alexhorton.bsky.social @ellenwapo.bsky.social o.bsky.social
washingtonpost.com
Hegseth order on first Caribbean boat strike, officials say: Kill them all
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a verbal order to kill all crew members in the Sept. 2 strike on a suspected drug boat. Navy SEALs fired a second missile.
37467952766
Reposted by Carrie A Lee
Jack Goldsmith @jacklgoldsmith.bsky.social · 29/11/2025
A Dishonorable Strike Indulging all assumptions in favor of the administration’s boat strikes, killing helpless men is murder www.execfunctions.org/p/a-dishonor...
execfunctions.org
A Dishonorable Strike
Indulging all assumptions in favor of the administration’s boat strikes, killing helpless men is murder
561530450
Reposted by Carrie A Lee
Ryan Goodman @rgoodlaw.bsky.social · 29/11/2025
Former US military lawyers speak out: "The Former JAGs Working Group unanimously considers both the giving and the execution of these orders, if true, to constitute war crimes, murder, or both." Statement on Media Reports of Pentagon “No Quarter” Orders in Caribbean Boat Strikes 1/2

• If the U.S. military operation to interdict and destroy suspected narcotraFicking vessels is a “non-international armed conflict,” as the Trump Administration suggests, orders to “kill everybody,” which can reasonably be regarded as an order to give “no quarter,” and
to “double-tap” a target in order to kill survivors, are clearly illegal under international law. In short, they are war crimes.
• If the U.S. military operation is not an armed conflict of any kind, these orders to kill helpless civilians clinging to the wreckage of a vessel our military destroyed would subject everyone from SECDEF down to the individual who pulled the trigger to prosecution under U.S. law for murder.Highlighted sentence at the end of the document reads:

Again, the bottom line is that, since orders to kill survivors of an attack at sea are “patently illegal,” anyone who issues or follows such orders can and should be prosecuted for war crimes, murder, or both.
11566442775
Reposted by Carrie A Lee
Lindsay P Cohn @lindsaypcohn.bsky.social · 25/11/2025
Super excited that a new edited volume, Bend But Do Not Break, is coming out, edited by Jaron Wharton, @klkuzminski.bsky.social @jkdemp.bsky.social @mzmargulies.bsky.social Keith Carter, and @carriealee.bsky.social And it’s apparently doing well on the amazons
43617
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 22/11/2025
Outstanding reminder by @markhertling.bsky.social on the recent controversy around the oath. This is a subject that needs a lot more discussion, and a lot more nuance. www.thebulwark.com/p/what-ameri...
thebulwark.com
What Americans Should Understand About the Military Disobeying Illegal Orders
And why it matters there are two military oaths.
1167
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 31/10/2025
The PoA is a newer concept, but relies on the same ideas. The military has specialized expertise that could do significant harm to society if abused. It requires ethics, judgement, and legitimacy in addition to training/education/soldiering.
040
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 31/10/2025
Yes, very different. The classic professions are law, medicine, and clergy. They are much more than just some people doctoring or lawyering, but instead a cohesive group with a set of ethics that assures the public they can be trusted with health, legal protection, spiritual guidance, etc.
230
Carrie A Lee @carriealee.bsky.social · 31/10/2025
The tension lies in legitimacy. The legitimacy of the profession rests with society (because of the public trust req), even though the military serves the regime. So when the regime is illegitimate (read: non liberal) a military with public trust is a threat, and so regimes undermine the profession.
1122