iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Is the Big O constant still unfathomably large?

230

Do you think context windows are infinite?

100

You absolutely can in principle.

100

Also just to poke your brain, if we implemented Claude as a lookup table, would you still argue it understands?

100

“There is no causal difference in the brain’s behavior when they replace a carbon-based neuron with a silicon-based one.” This reads as circular reasoning? The thought experiment assumes chemistry doesn’t matter, and then you reach the conclusion of substrate independence.

joe ⧉ 🍷🌊 @joetforhire.com · 09/10/2026

Reposted by BigMuffN’69

how it feels to try and think coherently about televised executions

1679

Andrea @valkyrie.hacker.gf · 08/10/2026

Bruh this shit is actually criminal

010

Reposted by BigMuffN’69

I sure do plan to bet yes on the market that only works if no one can forge elliptic curve signatures

1495

If nobody wants to clean your slop and you are unable to turn it into a proper research paper yourself/vouch for the proofs, host it as public data after making sure you aren’t committing plagiarism, but don’t claim you’ve “solved it” until it’s gone through normal peer review christ

Like a sensible thing to instead of strutting about like a god’s gift to man, if you aren’t sure about a proof’s correctness, reach out to the people whose work you site and saw we have some “raw data” you might be interested in, if you want a paper you can use it as long as you cite us.

120

Quote tweeting me without allowing comments is pretty funny ngl babe

100

(I say while the bloody carcass of no millennium prize before 2029 pred hangs from my neck)

010

Eaziest no vote of my fucking life dog

Principal Skinner Says No

“Good lord what is happening in that wave function!?” “Factoring” “Can I see it?”

static.klipy.com

ALT: Principal Skinner Says No

0101

This was be with double cycle cover ngl

000

My wife just texted me their making her change it in all the docs. It’s real.

170

that while finite may not even be provable to exist unless you operate in the correct axiomatic space. Tbc I think the resolution to p=np is that it’s simply undecidable in zfc, and in fact its undecidability is undeciable.

100

The way that these galactic algorithms start trading off these insane power towers with tiny exp improvements smells to me like somehow there is an underlying meta sequence of algorithms that get arbitrarily fast in Big O sense but to construct them requires an unfathomable to construct set of ops

Goodstein's theorem - Wikipedia

The fact that there are true (and non contrived) statements about natural numbers that are unprovable in Peano arithmetic is my gateway drug. It seems absurd, like there’s somehow a barrier that prevents us from making statements in FOL about numbers that get BIG (but finite) FAST.

en.wikipedia.org

120

So goddamn funny im smirking like an idiot now ty

020

The existence of galactic algos (esp ones dropped this week) is honestly kind of radicalizing me that there is something we fundamentally don’t understand about Big Chungus^{tm} numbers.

150

P = np but the its a polynomial of such large order that simply writing it down would create a blackhole. Ty for coming to my ted talk.

270

Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant

000

“Good on you” for coming out as pro genocide? Pathetic

000

Ok schizo remember to take your meds

100