Sign in

Denverite

@berg8311.bsky.social
181 followers 35 following 2.9K posts
PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Denverite
Mark Jacob @markjacob.bsky.social · 20/08/2026
We didn't drop enough bombs on Iranian schoolgirls, Republicans say.
47811203
Reposted by Denverite
public health guy @publichealthguy1.bsky.social · 25/04/2026
this account is run by a human at NASA JPL who only posts real images with their receipts. it only has 11k followers compared to the 200k the ai slop space account has
12383643398
Reposted by Denverite
Andy Craig @andycraig.bsky.social · 20/02/2026
We should try electing some kind of deliberative body that makes decisions about levying taxes.
563530475
Reposted by Denverite
George Conway ⚖️🇺🇸 @gtconway.bsky.social · 06/02/2026
The Winter Olympics start today, and we will feel pride and honor for our country. But when we see our criminal, delusional President, we feel none of those things. I’ve faced off with him before, and now I’m ready to take him on in Congress.
513131262739
Denverite @berg8311.bsky.social · 16/06/2025
I remember when Republicans were going crazy over the bank bailout because the US temporarily gained a stake in private companies to secure the bailout loans. Seems the problem for them was the democrats, not the action
nytimes.com
‘Golden Share’ in U.S. Steel Gives Trump Extraordinary Control
1160
Reposted by Denverite
Peter Sagal @petersagal.bsky.social · 15/06/2025
I have no idea how many people get their news from Foxnews.com rather than the cable channel, but those people would have no idea — none — that there were any protests today against the President. The only even tangentially related story I found on the home page: www.foxnews.com/us/gov-newso...
foxnews.com
Gov Newsom ‘handcuffed’ police as LA riots expose ‘reactionary’ leadership failure: former sheriff’ s deputy
Former sheriff's deputy Patrick Gipson criticizes Gov. Gavin Newsom and Mayor Karen Bass for handling of LA riots, blaming delayed National Guard deployment and progressive policies.
1091225201
Reposted by Denverite
Nick Calandra @nickjcal.bsky.social · 14/06/2025
Boy, Pam Bondi is real fucking quiet about political assassinations after being real quick to make statements about burning Teslas.
312673532
Denverite @berg8311.bsky.social · 13/06/2025
Sat next two members of American horror story at a restaurant and asked how their dessert was (also had no idea who they were at the time, have never seen the show)
030
Reposted by Denverite
Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com · 13/06/2025
Newsom on Trump's military parade: "It's a vulgar display. It's the kind of thing you see with Kim Jong Un, you see it with Putin, you see it with dictators around the world that are weak ... Weakness masquerading as strength ... that's about as small as it gets ... that's Donald Trump."
288102452417
Reposted by Denverite
Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com · 13/06/2025
Newsom: "The notion that the US active duty Marines, these heroes, would be used to militarized the streets of an American city is an abomination. The Founding Fathers did not live and die to see that happen in this country for no reason whatsoever than vanity."
225134943298
Reposted by Denverite
Don Moynihan @donmoyn.bsky.social · 05/06/2025
Might be a lesson here somewhere about outsourcing capacity for key government services to a guy who lives in a lair under a volcano
392702446
Denverite @berg8311.bsky.social · 21/05/2025
For some reason I’m currently thinking of an Andrzej Sapkowski line modified for a Witcher 3 trailer: “Evil is evil. Greater, lesser, middling. Makes no difference. The degree is arbitrary, the definitions blurred. If I’m to choose between one evil and another…I’d rather not choose at all”
030
Reposted by Denverite
Kai Ryssdal @kairyssdal.bsky.social · 18/05/2025
If only there’d been a way to know this was going to happen. Oh, wait
121072180
Reposted by Denverite
Joshua J. Friedman @joshuajfriedman.com · 11/05/2025
A Mother's Day meltdown by the owners of Stone Cellar Bistro (outside Denver) after they ask a nursing mom to stop breastfeeding in their restaurant (her right under CO law!) because they're worried about getting negative online reviews—which gets them negative online reviews
Yelp review from Meghin K, Arvada, CO:

We came to Stone Cellar Bistro to celebrate Mother's Day as a family. It is my sister-in-law's first Mother's Day. During the meal, she began breastfeeding her baby at the table when the hostess (who we later learned is the owner) told her to cover up. The owner then added that her restaurant is "hyper-reviewed," as if that justified shaming a new mom. When asked if any of the other patrons complained, the owner replied no.
After we paid (and keep in mind our bill was close to $800) my sister-in-law calmly brought the issue up. The owner said she didn't know breastfeeding was legally protected in Colorado, that she didn't want other guests to feel uncomfortable, and that there were children present. For the record, the only children present were our own.
Deeply disappointing experience. The food was excellent--but the owner ruined the experience. As Arvada natives, this would have been an excellent spot to continue to celebrate big occasions. We are now telling all our family and friends to avoid it.
Despite their website saying they are grounded in family--they are not supportive of families! If you are a mother, stay clear of this place.Someone else's screenshot of what appears to be the restaurant's own reply to a negative Google Review:

Was eating there tonight when a nursing mother was rudely told to withhold nutrition from her baby because she was apparently offending staff. When the owner approached the woman, she was asked if someone had complained. No one had.
However, she was worried about her reputation.
Then the owner had the audacity to ask the mother if she could give her a hug. Will never return. Overpriced food and will never support a restaurant who is not supportive of children or mothers.

Reply from Stone Cellar Bistro (Owner):

This has some truth, we HATE kids and poor parenting, look like a lot of that going on at that table tonight.Someone else's screenshot of what appears to be the restaurant's own reply to a negative Google Review:

Stone Cellar Bistro (Owner):
I figure, you might be the only one with some common sense. I have just filed a police report against your wife.For bullying and harassment, and anyone associated with this will also have charges pressed against them.
451073247
Denverite @berg8311.bsky.social · 07/05/2025
Only the Trump administration would declare an energy emergency then also eliminate programs that reduce energy use.
nytimes.com
E.P.A. Plans to Shut Down the Energy Star Program
071
Reposted by Denverite
George Conway ⚖️🇺🇸 @gtconway.bsky.social · 06/05/2025
The Trump Administration lies about the law, and it lies about the facts. The administration lies about EVERYTHING.
1443829963
Reposted by Denverite
The Daily Show @thedailyshow.com · 02/05/2025
At the rate Trump is saving lives from fentanyl, death will cease to exist by August!
2604144708
Reposted by Denverite
Brad Heath @bradheath.bsky.social · 23/04/2025
It is true that the government, which is bound by the Constitution's requirement that it provide due process, is expected to behave better than criminals.
711938324
Reposted by Denverite
Aaron Reichlin-Melnick @reichlinmelnick.bsky.social · 23/04/2025
First off, what the heck is that even supposed to mean? It's just smashing together two unrelated things. Second, this stuff is insulting to Ms. Riley's memory. Mr. Abrego's case has nothing to do with her, why invoke her name except to use it as a weapon; an emotional cudgel.
1021676257
Reposted by Denverite
Boley Law Library @lawlib.lclark.edu · 22/04/2025
Willy Wonka's in-house counsel and the terrible, horrible, no good, very bad day (via @joepatrice.bsky.social) abovethelaw.com/2025/04/will...
abovethelaw.com
Willy Wonka's In-House Counsel Is The Best Lawyer Parody You'll Watch Today - Above the Law
This is fantastic.
530750
Reposted by Denverite
George Conway ⚖️🇺🇸 @gtconway.bsky.social · 21/04/2025
This is a very, very complex and exceedingly thorough process that involves extensive use of the president’s TiVo remote, so please, please, everyone, give it time www.npr.org/2025/04/21/n...
1951247614012
Reposted by Denverite
Eric Columbus @ericcolumbus.bsky.social · 21/04/2025
🚨HARVARD SUES TRUMP 🚨 Please read the introduction — first six pages! www.harvard.edu/research-fun...
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF
HARVARD COLLEGE,
Plaintiff,
V.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES;
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH;
ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR., in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services;
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; PAMELA J. BONDI, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the United States; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION; LINDA
M. MCMAHON, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Education: UNITED STATES GENERAL
SERVICES ADMINISTRATION;
STEPHEN HIKIAN, in his official capacity as Acting Administrator of the United States General Services Administration; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY;
CHRISTOPHER A. WRIGHT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Energy; UNITED STATES NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION;
SETHURAMAN PANCHANATHAN, in his official capacity as Director of the United States National Science Foundation; UNITED FEAR B. HEOSETH, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Defense; NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION; and JANET E. PETRO, in her official capacity as Acting Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration,
Defendants.
Case No.
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEFINTRODUCTION
Scientific advancement and the pursuit of knowledge fuel America's innovation,
economic success, and global leadership. The commitment to expanding human understanding is
foundational at American universities, including Harvard, the Nation's oldest institution of higher
learning. Since its founding nearly four centuries ago, Harvard's students, faculty, and researchers
have helped identify and solve some of society's most pressing problems. Those pathbreaking and
life-saving advancements are due in part to the longstanding collaboration between universities
such as Harvard and the federal Government dating back to the Second World War. Millions of
Americans are healthier and safer as a result. Federal funding has enabled researchers at Harvard
to develop novel drugs to fight Parkinson's and Alzheimer's diseases, engineer nanofibers to protect servicemembers and first responders, support American astronauts in space, and design an
artificial intelligence system that can be used to diagnose and treat cancer.
2. In recent weeks, the federal Government has launched a broad attack on the critical
funding partnerships that make this invaluable research possible. To date, the Government has-
with little warning and even less explanation-slashed billions of dollars in federal funding to
universities across America, including Brown, Columbia, Cornell, Princeton, the University of
Pennsylvania, and Northwestern. This case involves the Government's efforts to use the
withholding of federal funding as leverage to gain control of academic decisionmaking at Harvard.
3. On April 11, 2025, citing concerns of antisemitism and ideological capture, the
Government identified ten conditions Harvard must satisfy to receive federal research funding
already committed to by the Government and relied on by Harvard, its researchers, and its affiliates
(the "April 11 Letter," attached as Exhibit A). Ex. A at 2, 4. The Government dictated that Harvard
"reform and restructur[e]" its…viewpoints of Harvard's student body, faculty, and staff. Id. at 3-4. Then, based on the results of this university-wide viewpoint audit, Harvard must "hir[e] a critical mass of new faculty" and
"admit[] a critical mass of students" to achieve "viewpoint diversity" in "each department, field, or teaching unit"-to the Government's satisfaction as determined in the Government's sole discretion. Id. And the Government has demanded that Harvard terminate or reform its academic
"programs" to the Government's liking. Id. at 4. All told, the tradeoff put to Harvard and other
universities is clear: Allow the Government to micromanage your academic institution or
jeopardize the institution's ability to pursue medical breakthroughs, scientific discoveries, and
innovative solutions.
4. Harvard is committed to "combatting antisemitism, one of the most insidious forms
of bigotry"' and to "broaden[ing] the intellectual and viewpoint diversity within [its] community."?
Harvard is actively undertaking structural reforms to do both. And while important steps have been
taken, Harvard acknowledges that there is still "much work to do." Harvard also fully recognizes
the requirement that it comply with all federal laws, including Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of
1964.
5. But, as Harvard made clear last week in a letter to the Government (attached as
Exhibit B), "[njeither Harvard nor any other private university can allow itself to be taken over by
the federal government." Ex. B at 2. In the words of Harvard's President, Alan M. Garber, "[the
' Alan M. Garber, Our Resolve, Harvard Univ.: Off. of the President (Mar. 31, 2025), https://perma.cc/4UC7-E65V.
2 Alan M. Garber, The Promise of American Higher Education, Harvard Univ.: Off. of the President (Apr. 14, 2025), https://perma.cc/L4G7-J8UB.
3 Garber, Our Resolve, supra n. 1.
2University will not surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights."* "No
government—regardless of which party is in power-should dictate what private universities can
teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue."s
6. In response to Harvard's defense of its own constitutional freedoms, the federal
Government announced that it was freezing "$2.2 billion in multiyear grants and $60M in
multiyear contract value to Harvard University" (the "Freeze Order," attached as Exhibit C). Ex.
C at 2. Within hours of the Freeze Order, Harvard began receiving stop work orders. The freezing
of federal funds amounts to final agency action and has put vital medical, scientific, technological,
and other research at risk. And that risk is growing. Just yesterday, it was reported that the
Government is "planning to pull an additional $1 billion of [Harvard]'s funding for health research."6
7. Defendants'
actions are unlawful. The First Amendment does not permit the
Government to "interfere with private actors' speech to advance its own vision of ideological
balance," Moody v. NetChoice, 603 U.S. 707, 741 (2024), nor may the Government "rely] on the
'threat of invoking legal sanctions and other means of coercion….. to achieve the suppression' of disfavored speech," Nat'l Rifle Ass'n v. Vullo, 602 U.S. 175, 189 (2024) (citation omitted). The Government's attempt to coerce and control Harvard disregards these fundamental First
Amendment principles, which safeguard Harvard's "academic freedom." Asociacion de
Educacion Privada de P.R., Inc. v. Garcia-Padilla, 490 F.3d 1, 8 (1st Cir. 2007). A threat such as
4 Garber, The Promise of American Higher Education, supra n.2; see also Research Funding, Harvard Univ., https://www.harvard.edu/research-funding.
§ Garber, The Promise of American Higher Education, supra n.2.
6 Douglas Belkin & Liz Essley Whyte, Trump Administration Irate at Harvard, Plans to Pull Additional $1 Billion in Fu…
10563110
Denverite @berg8311.bsky.social · 10/04/2025
www.nytimes.com/2025/04/09/u...
nytimes.com
Inside Trump’s Reversal on Tariffs: From ‘Be Cool!’ to ‘Getting Yippy’ (Gift Article)
Economic turmoil, particularly a rapid rise in government bond yields, caused President Trump to reverse course on the steep levies.
030