Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 10/10/2026For first-time buyers, 6% mortgages are the new 12%. observer.co.uk/news/busines... 083
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 07/10/2026Quite an enjoyable juxtaposition on the FT app, with an article from @chrisgiles.ft.com describing £ billion estimates of fiscal headroom as an "unhelpful invention" next to an article from his colleagues leading on a £ billion estimate of the Chancellor's fiscal headroom. 063
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 06/10/2026Though looking at UK spreads reveals problems of our own... 130
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 06/10/2026In this week's newsletter, I cover unappetising French spreads (like pâté, foie gras, "pig jam") and unappetising French-German bond spreads (worryingly wide, and indicative of serious investor concern about France's fiscal trajectory). Read and sign-up below. observer.co.uk/news/capital...observer.co.ukBritish gilts aren’t the problem. It’s French bonds sowin...A high tax burden and a public prone to fury over pension changes has set up une scène horrible for the French bond market 132
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 30/09/2026In case you missed it amidst the very many other things to happen yesterday, I wrote about the importance of policy salience - whether or not voters actually notice something - and what it might mean for decisions at the Budget. observer.co.uk/news/politic... 010
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 29/09/2026Another reflection. The savings from the reformed triple lock won't be enough to fund a national care service of the kind Burnham envisages. But he didn't shy away from that. He said everyone will need to contribute, i.e. broad based tax rises will be needed - but not just yet, only after 2030. 123
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 29/09/2026There is precisely zero chance of any NHS savings being enough to fund a universal social care service free at the point of use. 110
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 29/09/2026Put differently, the OBR's long-run projections say that - absent some kind of miracle - the UK needs to scrap the triple lock (and do some other spending cuts/tax rises) just to stop debt exploding. We're scrapping it, to pay for (some of) a new age-sensitive spending programme. 181
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 29/09/2026One reflection. The triple lock was bad, unsustainable policy and it's good news if it goes in 2030. Credit due for taking it on. But Burnham wants to use it to part-fund a new arm of the welfare state. It's a "tough decision", but one that won't improve the UK's public finance position. 483
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 25/09/2026I'll be at Labour party conference next week - my first ever. Do you have tips? Event suggestions? Would you like to have coffee and talk about economics? Do you know where's good to eat/drink/run in Liverpool? Get in touch! 430
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 22/09/2026One day, our political parties will face reality and stop making farcical, unserious promises to voters -- promises which entrench the delusion that we can enjoy lower taxes and better public services without ever having to pay more, even amidst the crisis-strewn 2020s. But today is not that day. 13418
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 22/09/2026... and I'm lucky enough to work in a job where, when I have a thought like this, I get paid to write it down. You can read my latest newsletter (which also includes analysis of the BoE bond sales decision and the latest ONS productivity estimates) here: observer.co.uk/news/busines...observer.co.ukDon’t lose your head: the AI revolution versus the French...Will AI do to lawyers and software engineers what the guillotine did to executioners in revolutionary France? 130
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 22/09/2026On holiday last week, I read A Place of Greater Safety, Hilary Mantel’s marvellous novel about the French Revolution. Because I’m a huge nerd who struggles to switch off, several passages about the use of the guillotine for public executions made me think about the economic impacts of AI... 143
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 22/09/20261) Pandemics are expensive 2) Monthly estimates of debt/GDP are noisy and shouldn't be over-interpreted + short term movements are far less important than longer term trends (a better chart would show them) 3) Debt (or this particular measure of it) has broadly stabilised at c. 100% of GDP 061
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 10/09/2026This is almost exactly what fictional president Buzz Windrip offers voters in It Can't Happen Here. The money never arrives, of course. www.bbc.com/news/article...bbc.comTrump says every adult American would get $5,000 if Republicans win midtermsSpeaking at a party convention, the US president gave no details on how the plan would work or where the money would come from. 150
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 09/09/2026Re-upping this because I think it's quite Bluesky-friendly (I mean this with affection) 0205
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 09/09/2026Decided that this point is sufficiently important to deserve a chart 1105
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 08/09/2026Or, the summary, for those who for some reason don’t want to read a full article about changes to the government’s social time preference rate: 031
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 08/09/2026The Treasury announced last week that for the first time in more than 20 years, it’s changing the single most economically significant, philosophically contentious number in government: the discount rate. Why? And why does it matter? My latest newsletter: observer.co.uk/news/politic...observer.co.uk‘Project tram’ v ‘Project pothole’: why the government is...The single most economically significant, philosophically contentious number in government is being changed for the first time since 2003 2175
Reposted by Ben ZarankoJohn Rentoul @rentouljohn.bsky.social · 06/09/2026Key paragraph of good summary of Budget options by @benzaranko.bsky.social observer.co.uk/news/busines... 062
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 06/09/2026One stat which jumped out to me while writing this: UK consumer prices are 16% higher than they would have been had the Bank of England’s 2% target been consistently met over the past decade. The equivalent figure for the Euro area is 9%. 0163
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 06/09/2026It's that time of year again. The OBR will be sending their first set of forecasts to the Treasury some time around now. I've written about John Healey's economic and fiscal inheritance, and the lessons he might draw from his predecessor's experience. observer.co.uk/news/busines... 160
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 03/09/2026Some story, this. Incredible journalism. All of the undercover footage in restaurants and private members clubs reminded me a bit of Sam Allardyce. Half expected someone to order a pint of wine. 1101
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 03/09/2026For housebuilding targets and our ability to construct enough homes and infrastructure to meet our national needs, definitely. For the official productivity statistics on the other hand... 020
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 03/09/2026Yeah I think that's probably right (though I have wondered for a while about lagged effects from, cumulatively, higher levels of investment in the recent period). If it's a TFP/allocation of capital story, I do wonder whether it's partly downstream of interest rate normalisation 110
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 03/09/2026Yeah I like the RF analysis, but I did think the dismissal of capital deepening was a little bit thin? Basically just Reeves only held investment/GDP constant, didn't increase it, so it can't be that. Within-sector capital deepening + culling of inefficient firms seem likely candidates to me 100
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 03/09/2026Thanks. Worth noting that John van Reenen has said that the employer NICs hike was *not* to reallocate workers, but was to raise £s within manifesto constraints (I'd pedantically note that the manifesto ruled out any increase in NICs, but that's by the by) www.johnvanreenen.com/_files/ugd/b... 010
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 03/09/2026Company insolvencies in England and Wales are still running at elevated levels. Presumably, higher interest rates are part of the reason why. Question: could this have something to do with the UK's apparent productivity rebound, if weaker firms are going under? 3183
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 01/09/2026The government is investing £71m in a tungsten mine in Devon. I've written about what this tells us about the economic times we find ourselves in, where security trumps efficiency, and recurring supply shocks are the new normal. observer.co.uk/news/busines... 021
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 28/08/2026There's quite the disconnect in US economic policymaking right now. Kevin Warsh says "The Fed needs clear market signals, as unfiltered as possible". Meanwhile, Scott Bessent is busy telling markets that long-term bond yields are too high, and intervening to lower them... 022
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 28/08/2026Andy Burnham and John Healey can count themselves lucky: it looks as though the NHS has managed to live within its means for the first time in a decade. If - and it's a big if - that continues, next year's spending review starts to look a bit more deliverable. 0146
Reposted by Ben ZarankoDuncan Weldon @duncanweldon.bsky.social · 26/08/2026This is very good and thought provoking. www.ft.com/content/c96c... Why today’s markets are not as contradictory as they seemft.comWhy today’s markets are not as contradictory as they seemWhat looks like a breakdown in historical correlations may simply reflect a different macroeconomic regime 5122
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 26/08/2026Bill Gates on the future of work in a world of AI: Some jobs should be "human reserved", a phrase he likes "because it makes me think of nature reserves - places where we could put buildings and roads, but we choose not to because the loss would be too great". www.gatesnotes.com/work/make-ai... 051
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 26/08/2026A bit, yeah - it's still jumped by around 7,000 applications for men, and 16,000 for women, but it is less of an outlier if I plot the absolute change rather than % change 111
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 26/08/2026ICYMI: even at A-level, students appear to be paying greater attention to which subjects might produce greater financial returns. 031
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 25/08/2026I don't think so, because the estimates are of what a woman who does (e.g.) a maths degree can expect to earn, relative to a woman with similar prior attainment and background who decides not to get a degree. So it should capture that. 000
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 25/08/2026Not intrinsically of greater value, no - I simply mean that in the face of student debt, and a tough graduate labour market, students appear to be taking greater care that the degree will be financially worthwhile. Not a comment on the societal value of arts and the humanities. 110
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 25/08/2026Very true - but the mean return (which would capture the tails) is also low for those subjects. Not necessarily a reason not to pursue them, of course. 010
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 25/08/2026I've split by recorded gender, but could in theory dig further into those who e.g. "prefer not to say", if that's what you mean? 100
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 25/08/2026The invaluable IFS analysis is here: ifs.org.uk/publications...ifs.org.ukNew estimates of the impact of undergraduate degrees on lifetime earnings | Institute for Fiscal StudiesHow does going to university affect earnings over people’s lifetimes? How much do individuals and taxpayers benefit from people going to university? 010
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 25/08/2026Longer write-up here: observer.co.uk/news/nationa... And sign up for my newsletter here: observer.co.uk/newslettersobserver.co.ukNewsletters | The ObserverSign up to hear the latest from The Observer | Investigations, analysis, features, ideas, recipes, newsletters & podcasts that make sense of the world 110
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 25/08/2026But, on the whole, it does look like students are following the money. In a world of stagnant growth, with a weak graduate labour market, and where many can expect to be making student loan repayments into their 60s, who can blame them? 111
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 25/08/2026There are also other ways to interpret the data. Maybe economics A-level is on the up because students want to make sense of what’s going on in the world. Politics A-level entries are up 12% year on year; that’s presumably less about money, and more about the UK having had 6 PMs in 7 years. 130
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 25/08/2026Relatedly, we need to consider what economists call the general equilibrium effects. If students pile onto engineering courses, and the supply of engineers massively increases, the returns to an engineering degree is likely to drop. 120
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 25/08/2026There’s a few caveats. First, the returns to different subjects aren’t fixed. Fewer students are starting a computing degree this year, presumably because of a perception that AI makes it less valuable. Things can change. 110
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 25/08/2026Turning to A-levels… I’ve limited the analysis to A-level subjects which have an obvious read across to a university degree (e.g. maths A-level to maths at university, history -> history). Not perfect, clearly, but still: subjects which unlock lucrative degrees are on the rise. 200