Sign in

Ben Eidelson

@beidelson.bsky.social
8.1K followers 242 following 90 posts

Professor, Harvard Law School. Also developer of @CaseViewerApp.bsky.social faculty.law.harvard.edu/eidelson

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Ben Eidelson
Michael C. Dorf @dorfonlaw.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
🧵My new column for @justiaverdict.bsky.social praises the US Civil Rights Comm'n report on campus antisemitism for calling out illegal & unhelpful Trump admin actions. I also rebut a claim that the Comm'n should have endorsed a definition of antisemitism, following up on my earlier testimony. /1
verdict.justia.com
The U.S. Civil Rights Commission Tackles Campus Antisemitism with Justified Nuance
Cornell Law professor Michael C. Dorf discusses the U.S. Civil Rights Commission’s final report on the federal response to campus antisemitism, examining both its bipartisan findings and the separate....
374
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
P.S. My original testimony is here bsky.app/profile/beid... and x.com/beidelson/st...
x.com
Ben Eidelson (@beidelson) on X
What federal law actually says about campus antisemitism — and how the government has distorted it — in 7 minutes (my opening statement at @USCCRgov hearing this week)
1196
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
12/ But, finally, I want to underscore (as I did below) the distinction between a university's legal exposure and its ethical/institutional imperatives. Universities should use the breathing space the law gives them to tackle that work thoughtfully, not to ignore it. (ssrn.com/abstract=627...)
180
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
11/ As the report makes clear, current law does not support most of the threats being made based on alleged tolerance for anti-Israel protests and the like, and the First Amendment offers robust protection for schools & universities willing to invoke it.
1112
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
10/ This restatement of the law of Title VI & the First Amendment—offered unanimously by a bipartisan commission created by Congress—should offer a legal roadmap for schools and universities facing pressure to suppress student speech for fear of litigation.
1132
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
9/ All of that is before we even get to the question of when a university can be liable for failing to *curb* qualifying peer harassment. On that issue, the Commission agrees courts "must defer to colleges’ decisions to err on the side of academic freedom" in policy & discipline.
1110
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
8/ Drawing on testimony by @genevievelakier.bsky.social & @dorfonlaw.bsky.social, the report distinguishes targeted abuse from chants, signs, & other speech addressed to the campus at large. In a university setting, the latter receives much greater 1st Amendment protection, even when very offensive.
1131
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
7/ The report also stresses that an actionable “hostile environment” is not simply an alienating campus climate. The standard is much more demanding: severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive harassment, where "objective" offensiveness is informed by the First Amendment.
1120
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
6/ Namely, even if subjective intent weren't necessary, the protesters' message would at least need to be "demeaning of the protected class (i.e., people of Jewish ancestry) as such and not simply of ideas or institutions that [they] are more likely … to value."
1110
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
5/ The report then explains why—contrary to the pending Trump administration lawsuit— events like the anti-Israel "study-ins" at Harvard aren't plausibly covered as harassment: ...
1152
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
4/ At the same time, anti-Zionism can be a pretext for anti-Jewish discrimination. Excluding “Zionists” by picking out people with Jewish-sounding names, for example, is ancestry discrimination. The report rightly acknowledges that this is a point of broad agreement too.
1161
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
3/ That distinction matters for Zionism. Rejecting claims of some, the report says my "reluctance to treat Zionism as a protected facet of Jewish ancestry appears to align with current law”; beliefs about who should govern a certain territory are distinct from anyone's ancestry.
1161
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
2/ First, the report emphasizes the "broad agreement" that "Title VI protects against discrimination based on a person’s ancestry rather than their beliefs"; the law is concerned with "immutable, heritable characteristics." (PDF is at www.usccr.gov/files/2026-0...)
usccr.gov
1140
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
1/ The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights just released its report on campus antisemitism and Title VI. I testified at the hearing. The report is unanimous, bipartisan, & debunks the main legal theories behind recent attacks on universities for allegedly tolerating antisemitism. 🧵
27958
Reposted by Ben Eidelson
Marty Lederman @martylederman.bsky.social · 22/07/2026
This brief for @beidelson.bsky.social & @hellmandeborah.bsky.social is excellent--it explains, better than Harvard's own brief does, why the vast majority of incidents alleged in the DOJ suit did not violate Title VI. [1]
1154
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 22/07/2026
Thanks Marty! (I'll send you a note offline about the III-A issue, which I agree is minor in the scheme of things.)
000
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 16/07/2026
You can now listen to nearly all opinions in Case Viewer, with a text-to-speech algorithm tuned for legal content (notice how it compresses the U.S. cite). And it will keep playing from the background or lock screen with navigable sections, like a podcast. (Watch video with sound on.) caseviewer.app
0246
Reposted by Ben Eidelson
Jake Grumbach @jakemgrumbach.bsky.social · 12/07/2026
It's really that simple: the federal government want "Jewish" to be defined as holding specific policy attitudes
Title VI’s restriction to ancestry-based harassment also means that the Government’s allegations about the intensity of anti-Israel or “anti-Zionist” sentiment on campus are mostly beside
the point. E.g., AC ¶¶ 9, 19–21, 51, 54, 56, 68, 79, 97. Drawing on the same Harvard report, for
example, the Government stresses that many Jewish survey respondents “indicated they had experienced some form of discrimination, stereotyping, or negative bias on campus due to their views
on current events.” Id. ¶ 85 (emphasis added). Those experiences certainly matter for a university
that aims to foster respectful engagement amid profound disagreements. But under Stand With Us,
the Government must allege facts suggesting that the hostility felt by these students was not simply
“due to their views on current events”—even if those views were despised by many of their peers—
but rather owed to their Jewish or Israeli birth. Assuming arguendo that many Harvard students
reject the legitimacy of a specifically Jewish state in the historic Land of Israel—and that many of
those anti-Zionist students exhibited intolerance toward everyone who disagreed with them—those
hostile students still would not have engaged in discrimination covered by Title VI. See, e.g., Kestenbaum v. President & Fellows of Harvard College, 743 F. Supp. 3d 297, 311 (D. Mass. 2024)
(“[V]iewpoint discrimination . . . is not actionable under Title VI.”).
14213
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 12/07/2026
The brief explains why these lawsuits are foreclosed by both Title VI and the First Amendment. It also highlights some striking distortions in the govt's version of events at Harvard—like blatantly misquoting an email, & apparently defining opposition to speech restrictions as "anti-Israeli". (2/2)
0153
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 12/07/2026
On Friday I submitted an amicus brief in the DOJ antisemitism case against Harvard, supporting the university (w/ @hellmandeborah.bsky.social). The main arguments also apply to other cases, like the 3rd Circuit appeal in Yakoby and the DOJ suit against UCLA. PDF: tinyurl.com/mr2rezk9 (1/2)
tinyurl.com
1207
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 12/06/2026
Case Viewer (@caseviewerapp.bsky.social) has a refreshed website and a bunch of post-semester refinements & enhancements. Here's how a couple of yesterday's SCOTUS opinions render on Mac and iPhone. Check it out at www.caseviewer.app! And if you need a discount code for full version, let me know.
macOS screenshot of Case VieweriPhone screenshot of Case Viewer
121
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 20/03/2026
Yes—as reflected in Stearns's application of the MIT precedent in the Segev case a few months ago:
010
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 20/03/2026
The Trump administration's new Title VI complaint against Harvard is pervasively disingenuous in its factual allegations and exceedingly weak on the law. Fortunately the district court & court of appeals will be guided by the MIT precedent, which makes this pretty open & shut.
141
Reposted by Ben Eidelson
Joey Fishkin @fishkin.bsky.social · 16/03/2026
Recently the DOJ sued UCLA, arguing that we are such a "hotbed of campus antisemitism"—primarily because of pro-Palestinian student protests—that it's a hostile work environment for Jewish faculty and staff. Well, many actual Jewish faculty and staff vehemently disagree and we wrote this letter:
sites.google.com
Home
An Open Letter from UCLA Jewish Faculty and Staff Opposing the DOJ’s Title VII Lawsuit Against UCLA 129 signatories (below) as of March 14 Dear Attorney General Bondi, Assistant Attorney General Dhi...
4396149
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 06/03/2026
@CaseViewerApp.bsky.social is much more impressed with Justice Gorsuch’s opinion in the tariffs case than I am…
031
Reposted by Ben Eidelson
Joey Fishkin @fishkin.bsky.social · 24/02/2026
Well, the DOJ has done it: they have filed a lawsuit against the University of California over antisemitism. The complaint contains some falsehoods. But as someone who teaches and writes about Title VII, I'm equally struck by what the complaint doesn't say. A few thoughts— 🧵
nytimes.com
Justice Department Sues University of California Over Antisemitism
13465212
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 22/02/2026
thank you!
010
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 22/02/2026
Why anti-Zionism can't properly be treated as antisemitism for purposes of federal civil rights law, in ~ 2 minutes
516546
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 20/02/2026
Fixed link to written statement: securisync.intermedia.net/us2/s/folder...
urldefense.proofpoint.com
020
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 19/02/2026
Here's my opening statement at the civil rights commission hearing on campus antisemitism: www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJ_k... I thought it was a great discussion, with very important contributions from @genevievelakier.bsky.social and @dorfonlaw.bsky.social and apt questions from the commissioners.
youtube.com
Commission Business Meeting 2/19/2026
YouTube video by USCCR
0102
Reposted by Ben Eidelson
Genevieve Lakier @genevievelakier.bsky.social · 19/02/2026
I will be testifying at this panel also, along with @beidelson.bsky.social and Eugene Volokh. it should be interesting bc panelists are very far apart: Did the fed gov do too little to repress antisemitic student speech on campus after Oct 2023? or did it instead flagrantly violate 1A rights?
25320
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 19/02/2026
I’ll be testifying later this morning at a hearing of the U.S. Civil Rights Commission on campus antisemitism and the government’s response, on a panel with @genevievelakier.bsky.social, @dorfonlaw.bsky.social and others. My statement: tinyurl.com/2t4z3yr2 And the livestream: tinyurl.com/jwnj8yb5
tinyurl.com
1100
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 23/01/2026
Update: I pointed out this tension with Trump DOJ guidance, and the EEOC Chair responded that it's "[e]mbarrassing that a Harvard Law professor has this degree of reading and listening comprehension issues." Ok then!
0123
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 23/01/2026
Isn't this message from the EEOC blatantly unconstitutional under Trump DOJ guidance? A nice exhibit for any university challenged over targeted recruitment or the like! "Are you a white male who has experienced discrimination at work based on your race or sex? You may have a claim..."
2239584
Reposted by Ben Eidelson
Jamal Greene @jamalgreene.bsky.social · 22/01/2026
It seems to me Congress should hold off on funding elaborate conspiracies to violate the Constitution.
242400623
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 17/01/2026
P.S. The Bluesky embed above is the whole event, which is interesting & worthwhile, but the part I meant to link to is here and should now embed below ... : youtu.be/uNaTmCdzx94?...
youtu.be
Protecting Free Speech in K 12 & Beyond - January 15, 2026
YouTube video by Minuteman Media Network
021
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 16/01/2026
And here are some of the slides, meant to capture what the hard question is, what I think the bottom line is, and why the IHRA definition, as it's been construed, is problematic:
052
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 16/01/2026
I spoke yesterday at a local event here in MA about efforts to restrict criticism of Israel in K-12 schools and how schools should think about defining antisemitism in light of the 1st Amendment. Here's the video (~20 minutes): www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNaT... CC @concernedjfaculty.bsky.social
youtube.com
Protecting Free Speech in K 12 & Beyond - January 15, 2026
YouTube video by Minuteman Media Network
271
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 09/01/2026
The latest version of Case Viewer (www.caseviewer.app) includes a beta of an integrated chatbot that's pretty distinctive and genuinely useful (IMHO). It reads the case, answers directly based on the text, and scrolls you to the relevant passages. @caseviewerapp.bsky.social
011
Reposted by Ben Eidelson
Case Viewer @caseviewerapp.bsky.social · 19/12/2025
New experiments with an integrated chat/assistant for Case Viewer. Still pretty amazing what LLMs can do, especially when they have full access to the relevant text
021
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 10/12/2025
I am trying to keep most of the Case Viewer content on @CaseViewerApp.bsky.social, but I'm especially proud of this innovation and can't resist sharing it here too. The best way to read a judicial opinion, IMHO. (The magic is that none of the section titles below are actually in the opinion.)
142
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 11/11/2025
A nice write up about Case Viewer, my legal browser app: hls.harvard.edu/today/harvar... If you have an iPhone, iPad, or Mac and haven't tried it, you should! Learn more at www.caseviewer.app, follow @caseviewerapp.bsky.social, or download for free from app store: apps.apple.com/app/apple-st...
hls.harvard.edu
Harvard Law professor launches Case Viewer app for easier access to court decisions - Harvard Law School
Harvard Law Professor Ben Eidelson tapped into a childhood passion to build a tool for lawyers and law students.
082
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 27/10/2025
Based on the @theharvardcrimson.bsky.social's new reporting, Harvard's commitment to scrubbing discussion of race from the admissions process (left) appears to go far beyond what the conservative Supreme Court majority actually required in SFFA (right).
021
Reposted by Ben Eidelson
Case Viewer @caseviewerapp.bsky.social · 09/10/2025
Check out the latest version of Case Viewer on the App Store — now with detailed AI annotations, on iPhone, iPad, and macOS apps.apple.com/app/apple-st...
001
Reposted by Ben Eidelson
Jamal Greene @jamalgreene.bsky.social · 22/09/2025
Kagan’s short dissent is unanswerable.
1025466
Reposted by Ben Eidelson
Free Law Project ⚖ @free.law · 05/09/2025
Case Viewer is one of those tools you didn't know you needed. Apple-only for now, but it brings a simple, clean interface to reading case law, and it's finally out of beta! We're proud to have our APIs and data integrated into the tool and we encourage folks to give it a try!
163
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 04/09/2025
Case Viewer, my quirky side project of building my ideal legal search & reading app, has come a long way. With lots of help, it's grown into the best way to find & read cases on a Mac, iPhone, or iPad. Check it out or download on the App Store below. And follow @CaseViewerApp for updates!
caseviewer.app
Case Viewer
0124
Ben Eidelson @beidelson.bsky.social · 26/08/2025
Even with its professed limits, Trump’s flag-burning order appears blatantly unconstitutional. “Prosecute disfavored acts of expression insofar as they also constitute criminal acts under some content-neutral law” is not content-neutral. @charliesavage.bsky.social www.nytimes.com/live/2025/08...
nytimes.com
Trump Administration Live Updates: President’s Order on Burning Flag Reveals Its Own Limits
261