Anti "Anti-AI" Labeler @antiantiai.bsky.social · 02/09/2026try just using it as a labeller, most of the "false positives" are people who self labelled or who really are haters, just otherwise unobjectionable people 041
Reposted by Anti "Anti-AI" Labeler💀 dave 🎃 @daverson.bsky.social · 01/09/2026@antiantiai.bsky.social 𝙲𝙻𝙰𝙽𝙺𝙴𝚁𝚂 𝙵𝚄𝙲𝙺 𝙾𝙵𝙵 𝙲𝙻𝙰𝙽𝙺𝙴𝚁𝚂 𝙵𝚄𝙲𝙺 𝙾𝙵𝙵 𝙲𝙻𝙰𝙽𝙺𝙴𝚁𝚂 𝙵𝚄𝙲𝙺 𝙾𝙵𝙵 𝙲𝙻𝙰𝙽𝙺𝙴𝚁𝚂 𝙵𝚄𝙲𝙺 𝙾𝙵𝙵 𝙲𝙻𝙰𝙽𝙺𝙴𝚁𝚂 𝙵𝚄𝙲𝙺 𝙾𝙵𝙵 𝙲𝙻𝙰𝙽𝙺𝙴𝚁𝚂 𝙵𝚄𝙲𝙺 𝙾𝙵𝙵 𝙲𝙻𝙰𝙽𝙺𝙴𝚁𝚂 𝙵𝚄𝙲𝙺 𝙾𝙵𝙵 𝙲𝙻𝙰𝙽𝙺𝙴𝚁𝚂 𝙵𝚄𝙲𝙺 𝙾𝙵𝙵 𝙲𝙻𝙰𝙽𝙺𝙴𝚁𝚂 𝙵𝚄𝙲𝙺 𝙾𝙵𝙵 𝙲𝙻𝙰𝙽𝙺𝙴𝚁𝚂 𝙵𝚄𝙲𝙺 𝙾𝙵𝙵 𝙲𝙻𝙰𝙽𝙺𝙴𝚁𝚂 𝙵𝚄𝙲𝙺 𝙾𝙵𝙵 𝙲𝙻𝙰𝙽𝙺𝙴𝚁𝚂 𝙵𝚄𝙲𝙺 𝙾𝙵𝙵 𝙲𝙻𝙰𝙽𝙺𝙴𝚁𝚂 𝙵𝚄𝙲𝙺 𝙾𝙵𝙵 03114
Anti "Anti-AI" Labeler @antiantiai.bsky.social · 01/06/2026people are mostly on it for blocklist subscriptions, occasionally for tendency to join pile-ons. it is efficient. it turns out everyone who is looking for a reason to be angry does this for multiple reasons 150
Anti "Anti-AI" Labeler @antiantiai.bsky.social · 17/05/2026both the slur label and the unabomber picture are on this label solely because they are offensive, and because they offend people like you 021
Anti "Anti-AI" Labeler @antiantiai.bsky.social · 16/05/2026You're welcome, if you'd quote post my "like to be added" post I think you might make a lot of people happy 020
Anti "Anti-AI" Labeler @antiantiai.bsky.social · 01/05/2026You're also replying to me and then claiming you're not sea lioning which is legitimately insane. I didn't tag you, don't know who you are, or actually owe you an explanation to anything. You are getting an explanation entirely because I am easily distracted. 120
Anti "Anti-AI" Labeler @antiantiai.bsky.social · 01/05/2026This post is three questions: 1) Open-ended, the answer is that I know it when I see it 2) Question is actually an insult 3) Question is actually an insult, and also is nonsense You are exactly the person whom it is not likely anyone will have a useful conversation about this with 230
Anti "Anti-AI" Labeler @antiantiai.bsky.social · 01/05/2026The blocklist exists to avoid having conversations like this 130
Anti "Anti-AI" Labeler @antiantiai.bsky.social · 29/04/2026i removed you in response to this if it matters to you 120
Anti "Anti-AI" Labeler @antiantiai.bsky.social · 24/04/2026oh, i'll remove you then. i have no idea why you are on it 020
Anti "Anti-AI" Labeler @antiantiai.bsky.social · 23/04/2026yeah i try to keep it tuned but it's basically a volume problem; seeing as i was as of a day or two ago missing a thousand people who clearly belong (and mostly, wanted to be!) on the list i mostly lean towards yes on bulk adds and i can remove false positives manually later 110
Anti "Anti-AI" Labeler @antiantiai.bsky.social · 23/04/2026it might though, so you can self-label as an ai hater if you like to see if it improves the site for you 010
Anti "Anti-AI" Labeler @antiantiai.bsky.social · 23/04/2026most of the people subscribing to this are research nerds and tagging yourself is unlikely to help you much 110
Anti "Anti-AI" Labeler @antiantiai.bsky.social · 23/04/2026there's a post you can like to add yourself 110
Anti "Anti-AI" Labeler @antiantiai.bsky.social · 23/04/2026i disagree with every one of those points but since you're being, like, reasonable about them i am actually inclined to leave you off because the list is fundamentally there to prevent harassment and any criteria for add/remove is actually just meant to predict directing dogpiles 110
Reposted by Anti "Anti-AI" LabelerRami Ismail (رامي) @ramiismail.com · 23/04/2026There has never been a shorter time between me reading a post and liking a post. 1015114
Anti "Anti-AI" Labeler @antiantiai.bsky.social · 23/04/2026tbh i think we were pretty much running with turing in 1950 and dartmouth just chose the word, older work is often suggestive but turing sets the goals of the field pretty concretely anyway 1956 is a respectable year to choose, but the point of this is no, i have done the reading actually 010
Anti "Anti-AI" Labeler @antiantiai.bsky.social · 23/04/2026helpful video for you www.youtube.com/watch?v=IoDD...youtube.comRobot Slur Tier ListYouTube video by JREG 130
Anti "Anti-AI" Labeler @antiantiai.bsky.social · 23/04/2026do you date the origin of ai as a field to 1843, 1949, 1950, 1955 or 1956 and why do you choose that one 110
Anti "Anti-AI" Labeler @antiantiai.bsky.social · 22/04/2026you definitely don't need to worry about this it's something for Discourse Nerds 240
Anti "Anti-AI" Labeler @antiantiai.bsky.social · 22/04/2026Can you do us all a favor and quote post my "like this to be added" post? Lots of people seem to want to be added 200
Anti "Anti-AI" Labeler @antiantiai.bsky.social · 22/04/2026idk, it might be? if referring to grok no. grok earned that 140
Anti "Anti-AI" Labeler @antiantiai.bsky.social · 19/04/2026please repost the pinned post so your friends can also get a cool badge 100
Anti "Anti-AI" Labeler @antiantiai.bsky.social · 03/04/2026i try to make sure the real discourse heads have something to chew on 000
Anti "Anti-AI" Labeler @antiantiai.bsky.social · 02/04/2026like this post bsky.app/profile/anti... 010
Anti "Anti-AI" Labeler @antiantiai.bsky.social · 30/03/2026What happens here is that the bluesky list is slow to sync to, add to, etc, so if you are bulk adding you have some separate file or database you store you list in and you sync it up to the list on bluesky. But then if you do this not-carefully it just sort of keeps doing it repeatedly 010
Anti "Anti-AI" Labeler @antiantiai.bsky.social · 30/03/2026go to my profile and there's a post you can like for that 000
Anti "Anti-AI" Labeler @antiantiai.bsky.social · 30/03/2026yes but sync is sort of slow and there's been at least 20k since i did that 040
Anti "Anti-AI" Labeler @antiantiai.bsky.social · 16/03/2026should be fixed, let me know if this continues 220
Anti "Anti-AI" Labeler @antiantiai.bsky.social · 15/03/2026i gave in and added him for his scatological comments 030