Adverb @adverb.bsky.social · 3hso an answer to "are atoms conscious" following whatever framework would not give us full insight to any underlying process 000
Adverb @adverb.bsky.social · 3hI could see people reasonably disagreeing re "are atoms conscious?" being "hard", because it could be answered with direct access to qualia. imho you could say that makes it "*a* hard problem" but we could 100% know the necessary conditions of qualia without understanding the mapping to them 100
Adverb @adverb.bsky.social · 3hi.e. understanding the steps from some processing or mechanism leading to some specific qualia seems very very difficult -- this seems to be partially because we don't have direct access to the details of any other thing's qualia than our own 100
Adverb @adverb.bsky.social · 3hThe question "what evolutionary functions could consciousness serve" is also -- in this sense -- not a "hard problem" 031
Adverb @adverb.bsky.social · 3hPSA: "hard problems" as they're meant by the source material look like "why are specific functions mapped to specific experiences and how?" and not "are humans and atoms conscious?" or "what areas of the brain might contribute to consciousness?" 241
Reposted by Adverbvideogame history @vghistory.bsky.social · 05/10/2026vistapro, 3d scenery generator, magazine screenshot, amiga (1991) archive.org/details/cu-a... 11880210
Reposted by AdverbHannah J @hannahjdotca.bsky.social · 04/10/2026Got 30s to help me out while advancing science by answering a silly question? research.hannahj.ca As usual: quick, anonymous, and no sign-up required. 363
Adverb @adverb.bsky.social · 04/10/2026Not even a critique (everyone does it) but just imho a pretty good way to make analysis more legible & useful Esp. easy for people in industry to not do this because we'd rather not e.g. break confidentiality or w/e by being too specific but just choose a nearby domain. 020
Adverb @adverb.bsky.social · 04/10/2026Imho: every time you're having an abstracted discussion on new tech (openness vs control, acceleration vs pause, etc.), it's pretty important to ground it in at least one real case 120
Adverb @adverb.bsky.social · 04/10/2026The u.s. should take its top 20 companies & turn them into about 300 companies just as a starting point 150
Adverb @adverb.bsky.social · 04/10/2026Get ready for egocentric & computer-use data capture of every single thing every worker does everywhere 000
Reposted by AdverbAndres Guadamuz @technollama.bsky.social · 04/10/2026Wired Magazine. Fascinated by tomorrow, slightly disappointed it keeps arriving. 0111
Reposted by AdverbKuba Suder 🇵🇱🇺🇦 @mackuba.eu · 02/10/2026Man, that 7.x branch is really buggy, isn't it… 1171
Adverb @adverb.bsky.social · 02/10/2026there's a category of generative art that's conceptual and can be roughly described as: "xyz is making a system with a goal that xyz is confident is impossible but xyz has to check just in case" 140
Reposted by AdverbRyan Moulton @moultano.bsky.social · 29/09/2026Yes but you can at least get more mainstream answers to things like "is the church turing thesis probably true" "what can you learn in principle from text" "are millennial prize math problems hard" 1993
Adverb @adverb.bsky.social · 25/09/2026TESCREAL is a shame partially because it (or at least its reading by most people employing it) flattens some massive, diverse work into whatever the weirdest assholes in the field were doing at some point in time 1362
Adverb @adverb.bsky.social · 24/09/2026also: openai et al. don't monitor their CoT anyways or we wouldn't have ~the last three months' news cycles~ lmao 010
Adverb @adverb.bsky.social · 24/09/2026why are people pretending as if CoT is reliably faithful anyways; we have an entire field of interpretability to rely on here instead 130
Adverb @adverb.bsky.social · 22/09/2026so sad that i've made threads on twitter for years as if it were an literal archival site instead of just one long-form piece on the specific stances & neuroses that i'm 99% certain people are going to develop over this 010
Adverb @adverb.bsky.social · 22/09/2026flipping over my calendar page & it's become LLM-veganism season once more 100
Adverb @adverb.bsky.social · 22/09/2026the price we pay for knowing about anything or caring about anything online i guess 000
Reposted by AdverbGiovanni Campagna @gcampax.com · 19/09/2026General purpose classification of questionable quality! Like, that should be target #1 for people worried about training data induced bias 0211
Reposted by AdverbMatt Hodges @matthodges.bsky.social · 19/09/2026Somehow Jev has not yet triggered much discussion of cheap, low-latency, general-purpose classification as infrastructure for targeted oppression. 1117013
Adverb @adverb.bsky.social · 18/09/2026Iirc I tracked time / tokens but def makes sense to use path length as well 000
Adverb @adverb.bsky.social · 18/09/2026x.com/advadnoun/st... I looked at wikirace for RL for LLMs at one point. If they benchmarked with it for the demo, they probably didn't train on it, but imho a reasonable general + verifiable task to give!x.comAdverb (@advadnoun) on XOh hey Jev did this! 110
Adverb @adverb.bsky.social · 18/09/2026Lots of places in data annotation where someone would plop in a logprob from Qwen/similar otherwise; cool to see & makes good sense for parallel decoding. 130
Adverb @adverb.bsky.social · 18/09/2026physically suffering from "computer rig unplugged" syndrome 000
Adverb @adverb.bsky.social · 15/09/2026Tbf I think at a certain point rich people Just Do That e.g. Zuck is specifically not into the "AI God" in any typical sense but has had one 020
Adverb @adverb.bsky.social · 15/09/2026It's just that he thinks authoritarian governments will either be hurt by or orthogonal to gains; he isn't thanking the censors 000
Adverb @adverb.bsky.social · 15/09/2026yeah imho the open-source open-science reality of deepseek's, qwen's work moves the sentiment from what could easily be read as nationalist-v-nationalist-posting to being a real difference 130
Adverb @adverb.bsky.social · 15/09/2026i want to find the source for "wouldn't wish robotics on my worst enemy" so bad fwiw i do think it'd be great for more people to work on it though ig employment concerns are dramatically worse in some ways 010
Adverb @adverb.bsky.social · 15/09/2026fwiw I think it's still less-bad compared to bluesky and has actual roi fwict -- could be why I see more of it there. 000
Adverb @adverb.bsky.social · 15/09/2026yeah I see this for relatively-less in-the-news topics on tiktok every day -- it's visibly painful for people who like a subject to share news or fun tidbits about it 100
Reposted by Adverbaustin @aparker.io · 14/09/2026if you wonder 'why does it feel like all the expertise is draining out of the public sphere' then you kinda have to grapple with the fact that displaying expertise is often an all expenses paid trip to the omelas hole 729448
Adverb @adverb.bsky.social · 15/09/2026there are a large number of doomers at anthropic who've been doomers since long before normies had heard of LLMs. otoh there are also people who don't have beliefs full-stop but know regulatory capture + stonk are helped by doomerism 090