linkedin.com
Why SEOs need to rethink how they track LLMs | Jane Flanagan posted on the topic | LinkedIn
I’m seeing a lot of SEOs scrambling to demonstrate they’re tracking LLM visibility.
But here’s the question: *What* are they tracking?
Cause if you’re porting over the same list of keywords that you’ve been ranking for Google, you’re missing something key: Most of us don’t AI the way we Google. That’d be like treating Data from TNG like a toaster.
I don’t have a relationship with Google: I just use it as the start button of the internet. And the key to that ‘start button’ is a reductive keyword or phrase. From there, I *might* find my way to a website and form a relationship (real or imaginary, trusting or not) with a brand or content maker.
But with LLMs, I form a relationship with the tool itself. I can be long-winded, take tangents, follow up with clarifications, inject humour, and more. Some even remember things I’ve told them that I’ve long forgotten.
How I talk to AI isn’t reductive; it’s expansive.
With AI, it’s not going to be straightforward KW:Result tracking anymore. It’ll be much messier, idiosyncratic, and gloriously human, with all the complexity that entails.
#AIO #SEO #GEO #Content | 27 comments on LinkedIn