Orthanc @orthanc.nz · 06/10/2026I would say those things directly speak to how Jackson has accumulated his wealth and that he has taken immoral steps to hoard wealth for himself rather than more fairly compensating the other people involved in the production. 110
Simon Lyall @slyall.bsky.social · 06/10/2026Yeah but they argument that everybody should have just been paid 10% or 50% more to spread all the wealth (until Jackson was worth $5m or similar) feels wrong when you take it the other way & ask how it applies to to companies that lose money Singling out billionaires also implies poorer are moral 100
Orthanc @orthanc.nz · 06/10/2026There's obviously a spectrum, but there is something quite different IMHO about people getting more money than any one person can possibly need while people are working for them below living wage or sweat shop conditions. 210
