penboyasgod.bsky.social @penboyasgod.bsky.social · 07/05/2026I think switching parties mid-term means an elected should resign. The terms of the election are voided by such a choice. The elected would owe it to the constituency to have their voices heard anew. 1473053614
DarLee @thedlee.bsky.social · 07/05/2026Especially those that switch IMMEDIATELY after being elected. They're the worst. They got suppprt under false pretenses, and there needs to be a penalty for that. 070
𝗚𝗥𝗘𝗘𝗡𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗡𝗘 📎 @berncomar.bsky.social · 08/05/2026That’s assuming it’s party loyalty over ideology. You’re either changing parties because you think you have a better chance of winning or you can’t stomach your part’s platform. 000
shrewdz.bsky.social @shrewdz.bsky.social · 07/05/2026The incorrect implication is that parties do not change. They do. Are you voting for a person, or a party? Why have people to vote for if your vote is solely for the party? 000
Melora @anneski.bsky.social · 07/05/2026I too think it means you quit and have to re run . You lied to get your positions 131
HBJOHN52 @hbjohn52.bsky.social · 07/05/2026I agree! Just because your personal views change in the middle of the game doesnt mean you get to quit and join the other team. 000
everyripple.bsky.social @everyripple.bsky.social · 08/05/2026Crossing the floor of the legislature between elections, is a violation of voters’ constitutional right to informed consent in choosing whom to vote for. Parties that accept floor crossers must be punished by the voters in the following election, until we can make the practice illegal. 000
natfinplan.bsky.social @natfinplan.bsky.social · 08/05/2026Instead of parties be your own lobbyist. Stand up for your own best interests. Call or e-mail your reps in DC. It only takes a few minutes and it doesn't cost any money. We don't need money in politics. We just need people to participate. Support 100% Democracy www.nationalfinancialplan.comnationalfinancialplan.comNational Financial Plan – The United States needs a long-term Financial Plan 010
🩵💙🩵 Beth 🩵💙🩵 @bethtoja.bsky.social · 08/05/2026I agree. It means that he/she was elected via fraud. Any money that was collected was ill-gotten via fraud also. 040
Annette Shaffer🇨🇦😷 @misskachoob.bsky.social · 09/05/2026Nope. I hear you, but nope. Sore loser. You don't actually vote for a party, but a person. They may be running under the banner of a particular party but they can actually support whatever ideals they align with. It's hard to align with PeePee. Often, it is in consult with constituents. 000
luq73.bsky.social @luq73.bsky.social · 07/05/2026Quit and run again. You were elected by the party who probably helped finance you, volunteers who gave their free time up to get you elected then you turn turncoat, traitor and change parties. Fraud. Give the money back to the people who donated to you. They should be taken to court. Fraud. 061
Tammy Wants to See The Epstein Files. All of them!📎 @savvycammom.bsky.social · 08/05/2026Agreed. You switch parties, and it automatically initiates a new election. 010
Craig Sicknick @jan6risingvoice.bsky.social · 08/05/2026I think parties should be abolished. George Washington warned us about a strong party system in his farewell address. We ignored him. 020
Keriezy @keriezy.bsky.social · 08/05/2026I think it is silly to formally switch parties. We are our own people and our vote, regardless of party, is our vote. Get elected as one and vote the way you see fit. People who vote pure party lines are sheep. 000
E.L. Huard @buddahcjcc.bsky.social · 08/05/2026How is fucking with laws mid election not itself election interference? 010
tit4tat1.bsky.social @tit4tat1.bsky.social · 08/05/2026I think if someone like say the President publicly offers a bribe and the person switches they should be charged for taking a bribe 020
sillymortal 👊 🇺🇸 🔥 @chrisbanks3.bsky.social · 08/05/2026i dunno, i’d gladly accept a republican turncoat to step into the light…you know some of them, probably a lot of them, hate all this but are too cowardly to do what needs doing.but if a handful jumped ships, i wouldn’t say no. 010
Gerry Dunn @ballydunn.bsky.social · 07/05/2026How about an alternative? Elections choose individuals instead of parties. Governance by people instead of parties? No more binary politics or FPTP elections. 010
John in SC @johninsc.bsky.social · 08/05/2026That's the problem they are supposed to represent all their people. Not just the ones they agree with. 000
Unaffiliated @unaffiliated303.bsky.social · 07/05/2026I suggest tar and feathers. Maybe some hard labor. It’s fraud. 000
Ben in SC @ben-foxworth.bsky.social · 08/05/2026Agreed, if we're talking about a public servant with integrity. In this case, alas ... 010
flyflicker.bsky.social @flyflicker.bsky.social · 07/05/2026Would you say that if Republicans in congress were leaving the party en masse because of Trump, and joining Dems in stalling the Trumpian agenda? Be honest now ...static.klipy.comSkeptical Dog MemeALT: Skeptical Dog Meme 210
dbeberman.bsky.social @dbeberman.bsky.social · 07/05/2026My take is that party politics should stop at the steps to the House, Senate, Supreme Court and WH. The US Constitution does not include political parties. 071
Daniel de Plantagenet @deplantagenet.bsky.social · 07/05/2026I don’t know. US elections have open ballots where you’re voting for a candidate, not for a party with a closed ballot. The guy is who you voted for. 000
A Posthumous Memoir 🏳️🌈 @aposthumousmemoir.bsky.social · 07/05/2026Senator Fetterman agrees:static.klipy.comYarp! Hot Fuzz Iconic SceneALT: Yarp! Hot Fuzz Iconic Scene 000
songfourone.bsky.social @songfourone.bsky.social · 08/05/2026static.klipy.comCousin Eddie's Iconic Bingo MomentALT: Cousin Eddie's Iconic Bingo Moment 000
Joseph @mobad.bsky.social · 08/05/2026This should be codified and strictly enforced. Switching parties is a fraud committed on the voters, as is lying to get elected. 000
bob-fisher.bsky.social @bob-fisher.bsky.social · 08/05/2026Fetterman had a stroke with brain damage. He can only think like a Republican now. 000
Melody Haller @melhalle.bsky.social · 09/05/2026But what if they are switching parties because the party they were elected in is not supporting the wishes of the people who elected them? That's a thing. 000
erickbt.bsky.social @erickbt.bsky.social · 07/05/2026If you can’t get such a law passed, at least the party can have candidates sign legally binding pledge - must return ALL campaign donations AND the constituents can file a civil suit seeking monetary damages 0131
LAWGVR @lawgvr.bsky.social · 08/05/2026If you’re talking about THIS traitorous POS, I fully agree!! 000
haterofhate.bsky.social @haterofhate.bsky.social · 08/05/2026so, you are saying that we are voting for parties not individuals? 000
Romaq @romaq.bsky.social · 08/05/2026What's the point of seeking political power if you don't intend to hang onto it? 000
Robert Weir (pickles) @robertweir.bsky.social · 07/05/2026I think rather than force a vote that may cost millions perhaps work on ethics and independent safeguards. Join the ICC and Hague conventions then ask for help setting it up. You’ve demanded it of other nations with a corruption problem so now it should be your turn. Canada will support that process 030
Robert Weir (pickles) @robertweir.bsky.social · 07/05/2026Ironic considering Canada just had several switch from conservative to liberal due to their leaders incompetence so it can work for the majority party. In past Canada’s parliament has entertained bills to force a vote on a switch but both major parties have benefitted from it so they failed. 010
The Bearded Pug 🏕 🛶 🌌 ⛰️ 🥾 @thebeardedpug.bsky.social · 08/05/2026I foresee the GOP not getting the POTUS spot in at least 2, maybe 3 of the next presidential elections after this bullshit. The GOP is gonna be in time-out for destroying the country. They need to be ousted as a threat to democracy. 000
Sandy EggO 🌵❌👑 🚫🧊 @sandyeggo14.bsky.social · 07/05/2026The party is not important. The actions are more important. 010
JPWKeeper @jpwkeeper.bsky.social · 08/05/2026What does it matter? They just won't switch parties in name but will still vote with the other party on everything. 000
Howard Beale Lives @groundedrealist.bsky.social · 07/05/2026"And pay back all salaries, financial compensation (eg, all medical deductions, etc). IMMEDIATELY." 000
FinnegansMom @mrspop.bsky.social · 07/05/2026I am all for that but forced resignation auto recall or it starts an auto revote Enough is enough 030
worldmodeler.bsky.social @worldmodeler.bsky.social · 08/05/2026the two parties form an energy dissipating negative feedback loop and have no real meaning www.modelingforchange.com/partysys.htmlmodelingforchange.com Energy Waste 000
agamma.bsky.social @agamma.bsky.social · 08/05/2026Yes, please!!! It happened in New Jersey - Jeff Van Drew was elected as a Democrat and promptly changed parties. 000
Jolene 🎶 ❌️👑 @jojayohnoe.bsky.social · 08/05/2026We just need the ability for citizens of the state that elected members of Congress are from, to be able to initiate a vote ( with x number of state signatures) to recall a person who even just starts voting against party platform as if dark money or some other influence has found them. 000
Hope🇨🇦 @guerillawomaning.bsky.social · 08/05/2026In Canada, while Federal elections occur every 4 years, exceptions can be made if public confidence wanes. Totally agree with you and someone like Fetterman should resign without doubt 050
Laurie 💙 @leh2323.bsky.social · 08/05/2026Agree 100%!! I can’t believe that isn’t already the case! 000
Maria @otbnmalta.bsky.social · 08/05/2026static.klipy.comShea Whitney: Absolutely Yes!Alt: Shea Whitney: Absolutely Yes!🙌🏼 010
mnlib69.bsky.social @mnlib69.bsky.social · 08/05/2026Fetterman hasn’t officially switched parties— he just votes with Republicans, publicly supports them, goes on right wing propaganda programs to malign Democrats and betrays the very people who put him in power. He joins Benedict Arnold, Kristin Sinema and Joe Manchin as turncoat traitors. 020
kmansfield.bsky.social @kmansfield.bsky.social · 07/05/2026If he switches mid term he should be impeached. Period 010
Kris @tazz2023.bsky.social · 07/05/2026I agree 100%. I had this conversation with a family member yesterday about Fetterman. 020
Espinado @odanipse.bsky.social · 08/05/2026This would require honor and integrity, and we know that is in short supply in the political class. I expect anything like this would just have the elected official vote with the other party and claim they were an "independent thinker" when challenged. Sleaziest people will sleeze wherever they are. 011
Deb Garries @debrabgarries.bsky.social · 08/05/2026I disagree. If the voters disapprove they don't have to reelect them. Same as if they stay in the party but don't vote with them. 000
sundowner01.bsky.social @sundowner01.bsky.social · 08/05/2026If we could get back to politicians giving the people their views and intentions - rather than negative ads against their opponents it wouldn't matter their party and we could pick the right person for the right job. 000
Stan in Hendo @sfmcfar.bsky.social · 08/05/2026Yet another reason for converting elections to proportional representation, since in PR you're voting for both the candidate and the party. 032
EastWest65 @eastwest65.bsky.social · 08/05/2026Was there damage to Fettermans brain as a result of the stroke he had ? Seems it affected the part that controls how not to be a traitorous douchebag. 000
Steph Chabot @shazster.bsky.social · 07/05/2026I assume you are referring to the Parliamentary system & not whateverthehell the US one is. I also assume that you know very well that the Parliamentary system has always functioned that way, and is unlikely to be changed to function to your preferences anytime soon. 000
A Buffoon Walks Into The Oval Office... @alter-idem.bsky.social · 08/05/2026Switching party affiliation after being elected ought to be cause for recall by the constituency. 000
pearl50smag.bsky.social @pearl50smag.bsky.social · 08/05/2026Yes! This could be called the Fetterman -Sinema Rule! 000
Patricia @diamondstar1962.bsky.social · 07/05/2026If you change parties mid-term it should automatically trigger a special election to see if the voter wants you as a rep. for the other party. 010
horsnhound.bsky.social @horsnhound.bsky.social · 08/05/2026This seems so basic to me. How is it even legal let alone constitutional? 020
Max @esitrot.bsky.social · 07/05/2026Or the state that the switcher is from should have him or her decertified and replaced. If they refuse to return to the state go get them. Put them in handcuffs and bring them back home. They're not supposed to be there they're not representing you any longer.. 100
KJSterl @kjsterl.bsky.social · 08/05/2026If they run and win for a party and don’t vote the party line they should have to refund donations because they basically lied to get in. Fetterman comes to mind. 000
Scott @scottg420.bsky.social · 07/05/2026Or just doing the opposite of what you told your voters you would? Like going to war with Iran or saying roe vs wade was established law then voting to destroy it. 020
dan-mcd.bsky.social @dan-mcd.bsky.social · 08/05/2026Better yet, eliminate political parties entirely. They are the root of corruption in politics. 000
JakeinUtah @jakeinutah.bsky.social · 07/05/2026Plagiarism ??? bsky.app/profile/jsar...Jill Sargent Russell, PhD@jsargentr.bsky.socialI think switching parties mid-term means an elected should resign. The terms of the election are voided by such a choice. The elected would owe it to the constituency to have their voices heard anew. 4140
Aayayay @aayayay.bsky.social · 07/05/2026The assumption has to be made that officials can and will be bought - regardless of their initial intentions. So there needs to be a mechanism for removal. A couple names come to mind. It shouldn't be easy. But it should be actionable. 2121
Simon @audiodentist.bsky.social · 07/05/2026However, you are meant to vote for the representative, not the party. The party only exists as a shorthand to indicate the representative's stance. Parties prevent the individual representative's stance and values from being considered by voters. Vote for the party alone, suffer the consequences. 010
vickiroadtripper.bsky.social @vickiroadtripper.bsky.social · 08/05/2026I always considered it fraud. They told voters they were one thing and then flipped. Old bait and switch. 050
Silence Dogoode @silencedoogoode.bsky.social · 07/05/2026In theory, thats fine but it wouldnt stop people from voting against their party consistently and just staying in the party. Fetterman doesnt have to become a republican to be a problem. 260
my mamas child @2024fighter.bsky.social · 07/05/2026 I think switching parties should automatically mean a new election. They can run again, but must do it honestly under the party they are governing as. 051
D. Chloe @dchloe.bsky.social · 07/05/2026You voted for a person's principles and outlook, he or she tells you what you need to hear, they then give you a bazinga showing their true colors and switching midstream is pretty heinousstatic.klipy.comKanye GotchaALT: Kanye Gotcha 110
Doctor Synth @doctorsynth.bsky.social · 07/05/2026But what would happen then is assholes like Joe Lieberman and John Fetterman would poison the Democratic Party to keep their jobs. Schumer / Pelosi / Jeffries would fight primary challengers from the left to keep experienced incumbents in place, even if they SUCK 010
justanotherdirtbag.bsky.social @justanotherdirtbag.bsky.social · 08/05/2026I think parties should be abolished 000
Internet cat with opinions… @im-just-sayin.bsky.social · 08/05/2026Agreed. Basically the candidate who got elected “died” in a sense. Switching parties mid-term should vacate the seat and trigger an immediate special election in the House. In the Senate it should trigger immediate appointment where the seat is up in the next election. 000
sherymae.bsky.social @sherymae.bsky.social · 08/05/2026Exactly! VanDrew you little weasel!!!! You’re getting voted out!!!! 000
tiredofthisshit.bsky.social @tiredofthisshit.bsky.social · 07/05/2026Look at Trump. Republicans don't give a fuck about their constituentsRepublicans are the most dishonest greedy unethical devious low grifting cheating frauds on earth.. 010
Jtown44 @jtownjohn.bsky.social · 08/05/2026I agree, but I believe that there are no laws about lying in a political campaign. 000
Lalura 📎 @lalura.bsky.social · 08/05/2026It should be considered fraud. Campaign donations are made... 000
damasterchief @damasterchief.bsky.social · 07/05/2026I disagree with nearly every reply in this thread. I've been a political activist for more than 6 decades. I've personally know electees from BOTH parties who have switched some time after election. In nearly every case, the realities of the job - as an insider - drove the shift. 391
agrippa999.bsky.social @agrippa999.bsky.social · 07/05/2026This would give party leaders even more power over elected officials. Everybody here is happy when a Republicans votes against his/ party but cry out when a Democrat does the same. That’s why the framers of the Constitution made us we elect individuals not parties. 000
blakealbion.bsky.social @blakealbion.bsky.social · 08/05/2026It shows how confident the official is in not having to care about their constituents. 000
Paulette @pemerson3d.bsky.social · 07/05/2026I wonder if there was a possibility of doing a class action lawsuit to reclaim the money for people who donated to the campaign? There should be some sort of punishment for sure. 031
javamann.bsky.social @javamann.bsky.social · 08/05/2026And return all of the donations they received 000
Mike of the North @mikenordson.bsky.social · 07/05/2026And they should have to pay back all the donations they received prior to the election and after taking office. That would stop these assholes in their tracks. 080
ANTIFA vs.ℙ𝔼𝔻𝕆 ℙ𝕆𝕋𝕌𝕊 @breathfartnews.bsky.social · 08/05/2026This idea has too much common sense for it to succeed. 050
Jumbro @jumbro.bsky.social · 08/05/2026The only problem with this is that the elected official would probably choose to stay in the party they ran in while voting with the other side. 000
Member ❄️ Snowflake ❄️ Squad @cawr57.bsky.social · 08/05/2026Uncle Fester changed parties without changing parties...it's hard to police that.😞🤬 In California, we passed prop 50, Kevin Kiley changed from Rethulikkkan to independent... a wolf in sheep's clothing if you ask me. www.politico.com/live-updates...politico.comRep. Kevin Kiley switches party affiliation to independentHe said he’ll continue to caucus with the Republican conference. 020
That Jade Life 🏳️⚧️ @thatjadelife.bsky.social · 07/05/2026Then the elected official would just simply caucus with the other party 010
westcoastconnect.bsky.social @westcoastconnect.bsky.social · 08/05/2026The CONservative outrage is so "funny." Pierre and Andrew voted against this in 2012 when they felt the CONservatives would be the only ones to benefit from floor crossers. 000
Mac n Cheese @jamson4.bsky.social · 08/05/2026Most definitely. In just the last ten years there have several do this. 000
The13thwizard @tohightaxi.bsky.social · 08/05/2026Once a republican always a republican no matter what party they claim to be part of now. 000
Robert Shirk @robertshirk.bsky.social · 08/05/2026That’s the point, innit? Hogsbreath is Putin’s puppet too even if he’s too stupid to realize it. 130
Gary @cytherian.bsky.social · 07/05/2026Pennsylvania ought to impeach and expel Fetterman, then appoint a replacement. He's unfit to serve. And he's out of his mind. 3201
Crabby Coach @crabbycoach.bsky.social · 07/05/2026I think we should be able to recall any and ALL politicians whenever the public deems necessary. 1834
ruthkub.bsky.social @ruthkub.bsky.social · 08/05/2026Voting in a way that doesn't match what you promised in the campaign too. Fetterman should have resigned Day One. The stroke turned him into a MAGA. 010
Henrik Larsen @henriklarsen.bsky.social · 08/05/2026A view reflected by many in Denmark. Since our election less than two months ago already 4 have left their party. All so far partyless. The Danish constitution is clear on this. An elected representative is only responsible to its own conscience and the constitution, not any group or party. 010
minghow1.bsky.social @minghow1.bsky.social · 08/05/2026Exception: if their party has turned treasonous. Then it is the elected person’s duty to become a Democrat. 010
KeesJL @keesjl.bsky.social · 08/05/2026Don’t agree. Your mandate allows you to serve your constituency to your best judgment 110
Lynda🇺🇦🇨🇦🇺🇸🇺🇳🇲🇽 @seasthemoment.bsky.social · 08/05/2026Should also be treasonous offense! Deceit and lies 010
Soulshine @liberalbeth.bsky.social · 08/05/2026static.klipy.comPudgy Penguin Says YesALT: Pudgy Penguin Says Yes 000
Screaming Well @richardcarkeek.bsky.social · 08/05/2026In parliamentary systems a no confidence vote provision sometimes helps democracies change course. But then Netanyahu hasn't been tossed! Meanwhile, we've a Congress lousy with MAGA terrorists & grifters. 010
