iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Open on Bluesky →

Replies

George Monbiot @georgemonbiot.bsky.social · 01/05/2025

It just gets worse and worse. www.theguardian.com/environment/...

theguardian.com

Planning bill could allow developers to build without replacing local nature

Green spaces created to offset removal of others may not have to be in same county, sources at Defra say

43634253

SemSema 🇵🇸 @semaleena.bsky.social · 02/05/2025

I feel sick

000

CrummyBiscuit.bsky.social @joylessbiscuit.bsky.social · 01/05/2025

The Drug Ford blight on green has spread across the pond..

050

bettertimes.bsky.social @bettertimes.bsky.social · 03/05/2025

I know I just don’t get it. I know they want to get things moving but not at the expense of nature and our well being! Also why on earth are they allowing wood burning stoves in new builds? I feel very let down as a member of The Labour Party!

040

Steve Webster @croft1a.bsky.social · 01/05/2025

There are too many buildings already. And do we really think it’s a good idea to aim for another 5 million on the UK population by 2030 ? The UK government does. And build another 1.5 million homes for them ?

110

Tracey L @bluenotgrey.bsky.social · 01/05/2025

Insanity!

100

Somnous Butler 🍃🌲🌹🐝🦋 @somnousbutler.bsky.social · 03/05/2025

They shouldn't be building any where nature grows! Absolute selfish morons!

000

MaggieP @mip36.bsky.social · 01/05/2025

It's horrendous. I hate our government with a passion.

050

ala8.bsky.social @ala8.bsky.social · 02/05/2025

Wrecking everything this Labour government, from nature to disabilities, no wonder they are losing councils to the far right Reform party

121

Hornet @hornetgx.bsky.social · 01/05/2025

Wonder if the people of the Highlands will see a massive uptick in English companies claiming to have given them lots of green spaces?

100

megatronmumma.bsky.social @megatronmumma.bsky.social · 02/05/2025

Plenty of godawful, old, inefficient houses could be pulled down and replaced with something better and more resilient. Instead, these dinlos just want to build anywhere....it is sheer idiocy.

010

Antoinette G🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🇸🇪 @karmamum1.bsky.social · 02/05/2025

Just destroy nature, pay a fine and enjoy the profits! Shame on this government.

060

La Reine des Metaphores @metaphorqu.bsky.social · 01/05/2025

It's the @theguardian.com and "could" does a lot of lifting. As in "The Guardian could create headlines so that it gets lots and lots of clicks and could create some lovely outrage." I've had enough of falling for "sources close to" because often they aren't close to all that much.

3120

gandalfpc.bsky.social @gandalfpc.bsky.social · 02/05/2025

Where are all the houses needed to be built then? Heard Island? Ascension?

000

Peter Welsh @peterwelsh68.bsky.social · 01/05/2025

Suffrage for bats and newts now! The Green Party will fight to preserve our joy and experience of nature if Labour will not.

0232

Elizabeth James @lizijames.bsky.social · 01/05/2025

Just read a couple of articles on The Onion, then straight into this... can't see the join

010

Trickcyclist 🦋🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇪🇺 @trickcyclist.bsky.social · 01/05/2025

Ridiculous. We need to live near nature, not pollute the atmosphere by driving to another county to experience it. All evidence shows mental health improves with access to green spaces. They need to be local.

070

speckle48.bsky.social @speckle48.bsky.social · 01/05/2025

What is wrong with them? We have a large number of new houses being built in our village but no upgrade to infrastructure. No more doctors or dentists or pharmacies or school places. Not many cheaper houses for younger people but quite a lot of them over £600k so who is all this building aimed at???

3120

Donnachadh McCarthy @donnachadhmc.bsky.social · 01/05/2025

Obviously they will all be created in The Shetlands.... 🙈🙈

010

TribalScribal @tribalscribal.bsky.social · 01/05/2025

061

Me & Taylor @vespalien.bsky.social · 02/05/2025

Our small, ancient village is subject to 7 huge estates planned in the green belt that will double our population. We already have rain water run-off floods, sewage overspills, traffic

110

Frankie @wakeylass.bsky.social · 01/05/2025

FGS!....Wildlife find another home, they survive!

000

icknield.bsky.social @icknield.bsky.social · 01/05/2025

I see 'could,' and I'm getting very frustrated with clickbate. That seems to be all our media do these days, scare people to death. How about a few facts occasionally. It's hard enough battling the right wing media without the Gardian pilling in.

360

🔶Jenifer Gould 🦋🇳🇿 @jenifergould.bsky.social · 02/05/2025

So unnecessary when both can be achieved with forward planning, incorporating Greenspace and Nature at the development stage

030

Paul Dobraszczyk @pauldobraszczyk.bsky.social · 01/05/2025

You need to go back to Marx for the origins of this.

030

Mr Thursday @mr-thursday.bsky.social · 01/05/2025

There are many old industrial sites that could be redeveloped into quality affordable housing, rather than destroying green spaces. Plus these sites are often close to existing amenities.

030

Louise Broad @lou65broad.bsky.social · 01/05/2025

Nature is irreplaceable anyway.

030

Chronic Illness Channel @chronicchannel.bsky.social · 01/05/2025

Shouldn't be allowed wood burning stoves either, which emit more CO2 than gas. www.theguardian.com/environment/...

theguardian.com

Wood-burning stoves to be allowed in new homes in England despite concerns

Campaigners condemn decision amid growing evidence of harm to health and climate from heating appliances

1100

Ange J Williamson @angejay.bsky.social · 01/05/2025

Seriously, C'mon @teamlabouruk.bsky.social , this is your chance to step up your game! I really hope people raise a fuss about this; we can't just let them slide on environmental protections - enough is enough!

020

bradley252.bsky.social @bradley252.bsky.social · 01/05/2025

Further proof of why GDP is the wrong metric for "wellbeing". Both bad for the environment and puts short-term "gains" ahead of resultant long term pain. Similar to how growth in fast food costs the economy more long term from obesity, diabetes, etc.

040

@BatesMoira @manderson22.bsky.social · 01/05/2025

Who IS this Labour Party?

000

Flight Free UK @flightfreeuk.bsky.social · 02/05/2025

Absolutely devastating and lacking foresight as to the impacts of deleting our green and natural spaces 😤

050

Steve B @stevebasnett.bsky.social · 01/05/2025

Sometimes you have to be cruel to be cruel.

010

Melinda @melesmeles1.bsky.social · 01/05/2025

Glad I voted Green in the last election. Labour are vying with tories to see who can decimate and ruin the most flora and fauna. They are short sighted and ill informed. The future is just getting bleaker as the very things we need to preserve the future of this planet are being foolishly destroyed.

130

Stef M @martin-stefan24.bsky.social · 01/05/2025

What is the point of net zero if you're going to destroy every bit of nature elsewhere?

060

nigeladcock.bsky.social @nigeladcock.bsky.social · 01/05/2025

BNG in conjunction with the enhanced NPPF is dreadful. Eff all to do with nature,

150

Melissa Eco-Zealot 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 🇺🇦 🇪🇺 @melissapudding.bsky.social · 01/05/2025

So very wrong!

000

Dennis Patton @dennispatton.bsky.social · 02/05/2025

Labour are Anti Nature.

020

Winter02 @winter02.bsky.social · 01/05/2025

Decent housing is desperately needed: www.gov.uk/government/s....

gov.uk

English Housing Survey 2022 to 2023: housing quality and condition

100

zidangus.bsky.social @zidangus.bsky.social · 01/05/2025

There going to find out exactly what the public and in particular environment conscious voters think of them in the local elections today.Hopefully they will listen and change course, but i wont hold my breath for that, its far more likely they go even more anti environment towards reforms positions

020

Carla Martin/Carlabela1 @carlabela1.bsky.social · 02/05/2025

😢

000