ACM! What are these publishers thinking? Abstracts go through peer review. The AI summary isn’t even approved by the author.
Why would they make a design decision hiding the author’s work behind AI?
Some of these publishers are losing trust as distributors of scholarly communication.
@cfiesler.bsky.socialThe ACM Digital Library, where a LOT of computing-related research is published (I'd say at least 75% of my own publications), is now not only providing (without consent of the authors and without opt-in by readers) AI-generated summaries of papers, but they appear as the *default* over abstracts.
