Sign in

Xanaxides

@xanaxides.bsky.social
238 followers 408 following 2.4K posts

acharismatic microfauna trying to follow the Muddler’s Motto: Dominate! by stumbling onward in a slightly better than average direction a shade over half the time.

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Xanaxides
The Game Detective @gamedetective.bsky.social · 8h
Look man. You got to trust the process. Fucking around is the first step. Finding out comes later, but you HAVE to go in order.
1365
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 4h
lol. Dammit
000
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 8h
Xanaxides, when the awkward regret of failed banter becomes self-sustaining
static.klipy.com
Shaka When the Walls Fell! (Star Trek)
ALT: Shaka When the Walls Fell! (Star Trek)
010
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 8h
It’s a truth, universally practiced, that an IP that made a fortune in a single media, must be in want of an adaptation
020
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
A lot of the interesting bits in a piece of art are in the particular and specific and odd rather than the average or high probability.
000
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
The right kind of wrong
000
Reposted by Xanaxides
Pavel @spavel.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
meep meep
Trolley problem but the roadrunner is on the track. When the coyote pulls the lever, the streetcar lurches sideways off the track and flattens him instead.
6859198
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
It’s a truth, universally uncomfortable, that other people in possession of different interests and thus different political commitments than ourselves, might still want a vote
010
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
Infranecine conflicts underwhelm and supranecine are so over (sorry)
000
Reposted by Xanaxides
Brandon Bishop @brandontbishop.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
Do people think we just... publish ideas without supporting evidence and are free to ignore prior evidence arguments existing in the literature that disagree with our interpretations? That is not remotely how any of this works. Wouldn't be useful, interesting, or even *fun* if it worked that way.
0131
Reposted by Xanaxides
Jon Phillips @jowiph.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
One of the most underappreciated unforeseen consequences of the smartphone/streaming/social media era is the elimination of boredom as a key driver of creativity. Without boredom, there just isn't enough impetus for most people do go out and learn and do things.
321162
Reposted by Xanaxides
lastpositivist.bsky.social @lastpositivist.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
This is my favourite Borges story.
The Witness by Borges and translated by ANTHONY KERRIGAN

In a stable lying almost in the shadow of the new stone church, a man with
gray eyes and a gray beard, stretched on the ground amidst the animal
odors, meekly seeks death like someone seeking sleep. The day, faithful to
vast secret laws, continuously displaces and confounds the shadows in the
wretched stable. Outside stretch the tilled fields, a deep ditch filled up with
dead leaves, and the tracks of a wolf in the black mud where the woods
begin. The man sleeps and dreams, forgotten. The bells calling to prayer
awake him. In the kingdoms of England, the sound of the bells is already
one of the customs of the afternoon, but the man, while still a boy, had
seen the face of Woden, had seen holy dread and exultation, had seen the
rude wooden idol weighed down with Roman coins and heavy vestments,
seen the sacrifice of horses, dogs, and prisoners. Before dawn he would be
dead and with him would die, never to return, the last firsthand images of
the pagan rites. The world would be poorer when this Saxon was no more.
We may well be astonished by space-filling acts which come to an end
when someone dies, and yet something, or an infinite number of things,
die in each death—unless there is a universal memory, as the theosophists
have conjectured. There was a day in time when the last eyes to see Christ
were closed forever. The battle of Junín and the love of Helen died with
the death of some one man. What will die with me when I die? What
pathetic or frail form will the world lose? Perhaps the voice of Macedonio
Fernandez, the image of a horse in the vacant space at Serrano and
Charcas, a bar of sulfur in the drawer of a mahogany desk?
722049
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
Simple Simon met an AI man, Going to the fair; Says Simple Simon to the AI man, Is there consciousness in software? Said the AI man to Simple Simon, Show me first *your* wee ken-y; Says Simple Simon to the AI man, Indeed I haven't any.
000
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
Get enough moral fiber and the binding becomes less discomfortable
000
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
One euphemism to rule them all, One pen to sign them, One delay to bring them all and in the morality bind them
000
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
Meanwhile, on the other side of the Sickos house…
020
Reposted by Xanaxides
Champie @champierth.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
A tree, a shell, and a bubble walk into a bar, the barman says "We don't like your sort in here."
2131
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 27/09/2026
At a party, I had a retro- playground conversation that started like: Hi Hi, I can jump like this! Nice! I can jump like this! Cool! Do you like dump trucks? Heck yeah! Graders? etc it was actually about books (because I saw him reading), but it was the best party conversation since forever
000
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 27/09/2026
Why necessarily illusory, when it could be contingently or functionally illusory?
000
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 27/09/2026
Epistemopic
000
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 26/09/2026
“(Bureaucratic/political) legibility is not the same thing as vitality” “This arrangement is exploitative and inefficient.” An interesting and fairly thorough read.
061
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 26/09/2026
In the slow dance of quotes and replies, being able to write a Romance in 300 characters wouldn’t even be a plot point, just a light whisper of fingers on glass.
010
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 26/09/2026
Anthropomorphism tells you something about the beholder and nothing of the beheld. I don’t think that’s bad. Distracting, maybe, but in a really human way.
000
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
Neat!
010
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
¡Ándale! …on delay ~ today’s motto, apparently
000
Reposted by Xanaxides
Scott Barolo @sbarolo.bsky.social · 19/10/2023
MR DARCY: Please disregard my last email. At the time I believed myself perfectly calm and cool, but I am since convinced that it was written in a dreadful bitterness of spirit, during faculty meeting
Mr Darcy (Colin Firth) from Pride and Prejudice 1995 BBC, writing a letter
341583
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
“Forbidden” is dissolving it in reheated weak coffee to fortify it (I’m told) otherwise it’s just sparkling disapproval
010
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
I think anthropomorphizing ourselves seems like an assumption of both illusionism and theory of mind. It’s like just a way we deal with the world in some sense… it should be the expectation that we have to work around (rather than attempt to purge) Computer crashes make me sad, like it’s hurt
000
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
Double issue voter, but it’s actually a third secret issue
100
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
I enjoyed the bit about famous ax murderer, Henry VIII
010
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
Are the polls half empty or half full? Twice as weighted as they need to be?
000
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
It’s a lot of thankless work to be a sexy murder poet all the time (so I’ve heard from my basically pleasant desk)
010
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
If someone mostly replies by vague post, that tells you they are more interested in lukewarming for themselves than having a conversation
100
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
(Mouth pipetting grant writing) “is its own form of danger, just slower and less honest than the phenol.” Satirical truths
000
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
The New Sisyphus
010
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
It’s only nepotism if it is from the familial region of intergenerational advantage, otherwise it’s just sparkling “excellence”.
000
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
Intelligence is as intelligence does
000
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
Is there a definition of definition that doesn’t rely on metaphysics? (actual question as well as play)
010
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
Single cell multiome analysis of transporter accidents reveals a role for forked beard genes in fate acquisition
000
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
Asymmetric Midichlorian deposition by Hensen’s Node is dependent on frnkoz1
000
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
OK, what if instead of us having pnuema that LLMs lack, what if LLMs have phusao that we lack? (not camp B, but the sort of joke that flies at summer camp)
000
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
One. Two. My Two Brains! Ah ha ha
Cookie Monster and Count Von Count.  One. Two. Two brains! Ah ha ha
010
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
The roads to perdition or salvation are paved with inference from subversion
000
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
A we that is wee loses in stability what it gains in clarity
000
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
This is true for wizards, too
010
Reposted by Xanaxides
Kenny Pearce @kennypearce.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
Word of the day: ‘opiniatrety’. “The floating of other Mens Opinions in our brains makes us not one jot more knowing…What in them was Science, is in us but Opiniatrety, whilst we…do not..employ our own Reason to understand those Truths.” (Locke, Essay, §1.4.23)
072
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
I was noodling about today’s rhetorically-ignored third way(s) and thought about concepts that are under-defined enough to interfere with some forms of strict analyses but having been subjected to a lot of previous rigorous analysis interfered by being over-defined *at the same time* Ambi-defined?
100
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 20/09/2026
Surely 40 whacks with a hair brush isn’t gong to impress anyone, Lizzie
391
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
Wager: I don’t have to say which character this is about
000
Xanaxides @xanaxides.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
Ah, it was a story about madness.
000