Sign in

Richard Pettigrew

@wiglet1981.bsky.social
3.9K followers 1.1K following 1.4K posts

Philosopher at University of Bristol 🏳️‍🌈 he/him richardpettigrew.github.io Books: Epistemic Risk and the Demands of Rationality | Choosing for Changing Selves | Dutch Book Arguments | Accuracy and the Laws of Credence | Who Are Universities For?

PostsRepliesMedia
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 06/09/2026
La Guaita tower, San Marino
A tower built on a rocky escarpment, viewed from far off at sunset
1161
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 16/08/2026
Waiting for the bus to take the fifth and final leg of the journey to Dagstuhl for a week-long seminar on philosophy and AI. Three towers from the stops in London, Cologne, and St Wendel. Bristol 🚂 London 🚂 Brussels 🚂 Cologne 🚂 St Wendel 🚌 Dagstuhl.
090
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 08/07/2026
I always like the end of the famous passage from William James’s Will to Believe on this…
Believe truth! Shun error!—these, we see, are two materially different laws; and by choosing between them we may end by coloring differently our whole intellectual life. We may regard the chase for truth as paramount, and the avoidance of error as secondary; or we may, on the other hand, treat the avoidance of error as more imperative, and let truth take its chance. Clifford, in the instructive passage which I have quoted, exhorts us to the latter course. Believe nothing, he tells us, keep your mind in suspense forever, rather than by closing it on insufficient evidence incur the awful risk of believing lies. You, on the other hand, may think that the risk of being in error is a very small matter when compared with the blessings of real knowledge, and be ready to be duped many times in your investigation rather than postpone indefinitely the chance of guessing true.
I myself find it impossible to go with Clifford. We must remember that these feelings of our duty about either truth or error are in any case only expressions of our passional life. Biologically considered, our minds are as ready to grind out falsehood as veracity, and he who says, "Better go without belief forever than believe a lie!" merely shows his own preponderant private horror of becoming a dupe. He may be critical of many of his desires and fears, but this fear he slavishly obeys. He cannot imagine any one questioning its binding force. For my own part, I have also a horror of being duped; but I can believe that worse things than being duped may happen to a man in this world: so Clifford's exhortation has to my ears a thoroughly fantastic sound. It is like a general informing his soldiers that it is better to keep out of battle forever than to risk a single wound. Not so are victories either over enemies or over nature gained. Our errors are surely not such awfully solemn things. In a world where we are so certain to incur them in spite of all our caution, a certain lightness of heart seems healt…
184
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 02/07/2026
KLM screwed up my flight booking and stopped me from going to a conference I’d been looking forward to for months, but on the plus side I met one of my favourite neighbourhood cats for the first time since they were a kitten, so I guess it’s swings and roundabouts.
A black cat approaches the camera with a look of eager curiosity
1180
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 26/06/2026
I’m very much looking forward to this conference in Frankfurt next week with @manongarcia.bsky.social, @quillkukla.bsky.social, and others.
SEXUAL
A THREE-DAY CONFERENCE AGENCY
1 - 3 July 2026
9am - 6pm
Goethe Universität Frankfurt
Normative Orders Building
Organised by Manon Garcia and Milena Bartholain.
For participation, please register with: Bartholain@em.uni-frankfurt.de
GOETHE
UNIVERSITAT FRANKFURT AM MAIN
DFG
Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft
NORMATIVE ORDERS
Forschungsrestrum der Goethe-Universitat09:00-09:15 Welcome coffee
Thursday, ≥ July
09:00-10:15 Lizzy Holt (UCL) - The Unpredictable and the Permissible
10:30-11:45 Victor Tadros (Warwick) - Sexual Misconduct on Campus
16:00-17:15 Jonathan Ichikawa (UBC) - Consent, Agency, and the Mental
17:30-18:45 Veerle van Wijngaarden (Amsterdam) - Erotic Desire cind the Limits of Sexual Agency
Friday, 3 July
Richard Pettigrew (Bristol) - Having the Sex We Want
Manon Garcia (Frankfurt) - Sexual agency, the patriarchy, and akrasia
Quill Kukla (Georgetown) - The Architecture of Sexual Agency
Katherine Baker (lowa) - Gender, Consent and Sexual Agency
Milena Bartholain (Frankfurt) - The Future of Sexual Autonomy
1253
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 25/06/2026
My hometown actually lost its ominous megastructure recently when this power station was demolished. Now I think it’s probably these concrete blocks arrayed along the beach against a Nazi invasion.
Cockenzie coal power station pictured with two tall chimneys and a turbine hall with the firth of forth in the background Square concrete blocks arranged higgledy piggledy on a beach with the Firth of Forth in the background
140
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 24/06/2026
New arrival! @cherylmisak.bsky.social
Cheryl Misak’s Oxford Pragmatism book
1130
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 23/06/2026
risky choice of name for a construction firm
A portacabin belonging to the construction firm ‘SureFire’
080
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 21/06/2026
Second instalment of ‘Epistemology: Normal meets Formal’ happening in Oxford tomorrow!! www.philosophy.ox.ac.uk/event/episte...
Poster for workshop:

EPISTEMOLOGY:
NORMAL MEETS FORMAL
WITH BOOK SYMPOSIUM ON RICHARD PETTIGREW'S
•THE VALUE OF INFORMATION AND THE EPISTEMOLOGY OF INQUIRY'
June 22-23 2026, University of Oxford
SPEAKERS
SAM CARTER (UCL)
CHRISTOPH KELP (GLASGOW)
MARIA LASONEN
(HELSINKI)
JESSIE MUNTON
(CAMBRIDGE)
RICHARD PETTIGREW
(BRISTOL)
BERNHARD SALOW
(OXFORD)
MONA SIMION
(OXFORD)
0211
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 09/06/2026
Some flowers from the garden by the philosophy dept in Bristol
Foxglove Lady of Shallott rose Red rose Pat Austin rose
0292
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 04/06/2026
Huge win for Graham Priest on the Birmingham New Street departure board
Departure board reads

12:12 Penzance - Cancelled
12:12 Penzance - On time
1366
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 01/06/2026
I’m really pleased this paper is now coming out in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Consent and the formation of preferences philarchive.org/rec/PETEOA-7 (Pictured with a cat I met just before hearing the paper has been accepted.)
Very sweet tortoiseshell cat with startling white paws and exceptional whiskers
2365
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 27/05/2026
Heading to Bochum for @lapaul.bsky.social’s Carnap lectures…providing the British, Eurostar, and German rail networks don’t succeed in preventing me through their determined conspiracy of cancellations and delays.
Poster for L. A. Paul’s Rudolf Carnap lectures for 2026.
0100
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 23/05/2026
Met a cat with a taste for Lanarkshire’s best biscuits
Black and white cat eyes a box of borders butterscotch biscuits Black and white cat scratches herself on a box of borders butterscotch biscuits Black and white cat rests her chin a box of borders butterscotch biscuits with a blissed out look on her face
0100
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 18/05/2026
I wrote up some notes about divergences and the work they might do for us in philosophy. philarchive.org/rec/PETDFP
Orange cat looking wistful
0153
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 16/05/2026
Went to help a friend with some DIY. For reasons illustrated below, I didn’t help one bit.
Orange cat closes his eyes, enjoys the head scritchies, and displays his exceptionally splendid whiskers for the camera Orange cat looks on, challengingly Orange cat and me Orange cat looking up at camera
0130
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 13/05/2026
Walking home in the gloaming last night, I felt a dull thud against my shoulder. I assumed something had fallen on me from a tree. But no, when I looked round, it turned out I was the recipient of a defensive swipe by this fellow, who’d clearly taken me to have trespassed too close to his territory.
Entirely unrepentant vigilante defender of private property rights, a white and orange cat sits on a wall looking combative
0231
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 12/05/2026
every time I want to use ‘comprise’ in a piece of writing, I think ‘oh, I should look up whether that means *to be composed of* or *to compose*’ and every time I see this and never do I learn
comprise
verb [T, L only + noun, not continuous ] • formal
UK 4) /kam'praız/ US 4) /kam'praız/
Add to word list =
C1
to have things or people as parts or members; to consist of:
• The course comprises a class book, a practice book, and a CD.
+注
to be the parts or members of something; to make up something:
• Italian students comprise 60 percent of the class.
• The class is comprised
0110
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 11/05/2026
Some nice irises from the weekend
Blue irises
071
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 07/05/2026
A new neighbourhood cat possessed of the virtues of friendliness and fluffiness
A black and white cat facing the camera and posing like they’re at the met gala Black and white cat approaches with due suspicion Black and white cat with head to the side looking cheerful
1475
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 23/04/2026
met this lovely stray soul outside the philosophy dept today
Black cat licking their lips with Victorian houses behind Black cat inches closer. A little stern Black cat pauses to worship the sun Black cat looks beseechingly
1160
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 22/04/2026
I’ve updated this draft survey chapter on accuracy-first epistemology to include a technical appendix that tries to provide a way into some of the maths used in this area. philpapers.org/archive/PETT...
St Abb’s head, east coast of Scotland. Looking down from a cliff top trail into a little cove with the firth of forth behind.
0115
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 16/04/2026
bluesky is a deontologist smh
The Bluesky app showing ‘Forbidden’.
080
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 16/04/2026
The gardens by the philosophy dept looking particularly nice today
Tulips and bluebells in the foreground, a Victorian church tower and blue sky in the background
0270
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 15/04/2026
Mehrangarh, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
The intricately carved red sandstone of the fort against blue sky with some light white clouds
1100
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 14/04/2026
Tach Khaouli Palace, Khiva, Uzbekistan
Looking up from the floor to the painted wooden ceiling of a colonnade that borders an inner courtyard in the palace. The walls are tiled in geometric blue and white patterns.
0210
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 08/04/2026
New academic website! richardpettigrew.github.io A bit more minimal, but still heavy on links to cat photos.
A relaxed but alert black and white cat
1290
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 05/04/2026
the american mind cannot comprehend this
it’s a kettle. Just an ordinary kitchen kettle. For making tea. Not a ridiculous machine for using ridiculous ‘pods’. Is it too much to ask?
6240
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 03/04/2026
@mikebenchcapon.bsky.social found it!
Tweet from an account WH:

don't like horses. credulous quadrupeds lowering bridled elongate heads to drink ponds dry or annihilate a tuft of innocent grass. The horse frolics like a rock rolls down a slope: because it is obeying a law. The shrewd pig plays because it is the pleasure he has *chosen*
1131
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 02/04/2026
This isn’t actually my favourite, but I’ve never been able to find my favourite again and I can’t remember enough about it to search. It was comparing the daily lives of horses and pigs, I think, and written in high-flown Victorian English. Any help appreciated.
A tweet from an account called mtobey. 

"Anybody here named Jeff?"
Jeff: "Yes"
Geoff: "Yeos"
1586
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 01/04/2026
Princeton in the spring (and a sweetly curious fellow resident at the Nassau Inn)
Pink trees in front of a Princeton building A magnolia in front of the Princeton seminary A very sweet dog peeks out of the back window of a parked car
0100
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 30/03/2026
very specific prohibitions on what you can chuck in the water here
150
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 29/03/2026
sleepy hong kong cat
A cat sits against a grey wall, desperately trying to stay awake
1120
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 23/03/2026
Looking forward to these three events in Hong Kong this week!
Prof. Richard Pettigrew
University of Bristol, UK

What is epistemic normativity, and why?
Date: 23 March 2026 (Monday)
Time : 16:45 - 18:15

Venue: LKK303 & Zoom Seminar

Scan the QR code or
click HERE to join the zoom meeting room.

What is the distinction between what we ought to believe simpliciter and what we ought to believe epistemically speaking, and why do we draw that distinction? I motivate this question through a series of examples, consider various existing answers, and find them wanting.
Then I propose and explore an alternative based on a version of rule consequentialism transposed to the epistemic realm: the norms that determine what we ought to do epistemically speaking are those such that broad adherence to them across your epistemic community would give the best results from an epistemic point of view. I argue that norms that exhort us to believe only what we ought to believe epistemically speaking follow from this epistemic version of rule consequentialism. In a coda, I offer an alternative account of the function of knowledge ascriptions that improves on Edward Craig's.Me pictured on a bad hair day on Blackpool beach with the text: 

THE VALUE OF INFORMATION AND THE EPISTEMOLOGY OF INQUIRY
Date;
March 27 (Fri) 2026
Time:
3:30pm-5:00pm
Room 10.13, 10/E,Run Run Shaw Tower,
Centennia Campus, HKU
Register HERE
Professor Richard Pettigrew
University of Bristol
Abstract: In the analytic tradition, epistemology has typically begun at the point at which we have our evidence; it has then asked which beliefs or credences are justified or warranted by that evidence, which are rational and which count as knowledge for someone with that evidence. And yet we are not mere passive recipients of our evidence; we often actively collect it, and collect it in one way rather than another, or act in ways we know will bring us certain pieces of evidence and not others, even when acquiring that evidence is not the primary aim of that act. In this paper, I present a Bayesian theory of how and when we should inquire, extend it to cover reasoning and other components of our cognitive lives, and apply it to central questions in the recent literature on inquiry concerning the way in which the inquiries that lead to our beliefs and credences affect the epistemic standing of those cognitive states.Same bad hair, but mercifully smaller picture, and surrounded by others. Naked people are pictured looking more professional. 

Co-Organized by:
HKU Master of Arts-Al, Philosophy, Politics and Economics (MAPPE) and HKU Ethics Lab

HKUPPE WORKSHOP 2026
This two day workshop brings together researchers to discuss work-in-progress on the philosophy of work and labor markets, and political economy.

MAR 26CTHU), 2026
1:00PM - 6:15PM
James Stacey Taylor
The College of New Jersey
Richard Pettigrew
University of Bristol
Shang Long Yeo
National Univerity of Singapore
MAR 27CFRD), 2026
10:00AM - 4:30PM
Daniel J. Singer
Untversity of Pennsylvanta
Pascal Brixel
Northwestern University
Winnie Jiang
INSEAD
Room 4.36, 4/F, Run Run Shaw Tower, Centennial Campus, HKU
Register
080
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 22/03/2026
some personal news
An Oregon-based archaeologist is the latest scientist attempting to find Amelia Earhart's long-lost plane and solve the baffling 88-year mystery surrounding her and flight navigator
Fred Noonan's disappearances.
Dr. Richard Pettigrew, executive director of the Archaeological Legacy Institute in Eugene, has assembled a team of about 10 scientists will launch an expedition this summer to the remote island of Nikumaroro in the western Pacific Ocean to find Earhart's Lockheed 10-E Electra.
After years of acquiring and analyzing satellite, video and drone imagery, Pettigrew believes a metallic and reflective visual anomaly, called the Taraia Object, on the north shore of the Nikumaroro lagoon alongside the Taraia Peninsula is the main body and tail of the missing aircraft.
0242
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 13/03/2026
King Lear, Act I Scene I



GONERIL
 
Sir, I love you more than word can wield the matter,
Dearer than eyesight, space, and liberty,
Beyond what can be valued, rich or rare,
No less than life, with grace, health, beauty, honor;
As much as child e’er loved, or father found;
A love that makes breath poor, and speech unable.
Beyond all manner of so much I love you.

LEAR

As a friendly reminder, please ensure interactions adhere to the guidelines provided. Let me know how you would like to proceed.
48524
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 12/03/2026
Do you know smooth infinitesimal analysis, Rafe? Feel it might appeal to you… en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smooth_...
110
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 12/03/2026
I’m sorry, but I find it deeply depressing if you don’t find this perfectly round specimen a national hero
A long-tailed tit stares at the camera, challenging the viewer to question its elevated status in the hierarchy of great Britons
3281
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 09/03/2026
Call for Applications
8th Urbino Summer School in Epistemology
University of Urbino Carlo Bo - Department of Pure and Applied Sciences.
Urbino, August 31 - September 3, 2026.
Under the auspices of:
The Italian Society for Analytic Philosophy (SIFA)
The Italian Society for Logic and the Philosophy of Science (SILFS)
Lecturers
Jennifer Lackey (Northwestern University)
Anne Meylan (University of Zürich)
Marco Nathan (University of Denver)
Richard Pettigrew (University of Bristol)
Overview
The goal of the four days in-person Summer School is to provide an opportunity for highly motivated graduate students (or even advanced undergraduate students), and early-career researchers to learn, discuss and exchange ideas about current epistemological issues in close contact with internationally renowned experts.
There will be two kinds of sessions on each of the four days: lectures in the morning, and parallel group sessions in the afternoon.
The lectures will be delivered by our Lecturers, and will focus on both general and specific aspects of their current work. Each lecture will comprise approximately 45-50 minutes of presentation, and 20 minutes for Q&A.
Each group session will be led by a different Lecturer, and will take a laboratory format. In order to allow the participants to engage in open discussion, these sessions are based on specific texts read in advance. A reading list will be provided in due course by the Lecturers.
Each student will hence have the opportunity to attend 16 lectures and 4 group sessions during the 4 days. Of course, there will be ample room for intellectual and philosophical exchanges outside of these academic activities, in the beautiful setting of late summer evenings offered by Urbino.Participation fee
The enrolment fee is € 220,00. It includes didactic materials and four coffee breaks.
Depending on the availability of funds, we hope to be able offer a few bursaries to cover the cost of the enrolment fee.
Application
Applications to the Summer School must be sent via email to
adriano.angelucci@uniurb.it by April 15th, and must include a CV (with a list of publications, if applicable).
Notifications of acceptance will be sent out by May 1st.
The opening date for online enrolment is May 15th.
The closing date for online enrolment is June 30th.
All the info needed to complete the online enrolment procedure will be provided to selected participants in due time.
The Summer School will be activated only if the minimum number of participants is reached.
For all inquiries about the school, please contact: Adriano Angelucci (adriano.angelucci@uniurb.it), DanieleSgaravatti (daniele.sgaravatti@unibo.it).
000
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 09/03/2026
I’ll be teaching at the Urbino summer school with Jennifer Lackey, Anne Meylan, and Marco Nathan this year. Do please circulate the call (in comments), if you know anyone who might be interested.
Poster for the summer school. The image is of the Italian town of Urbino. The text reads:

8TH URBINO
SUMMER SCHOOL
IN EPISTEMOLOGY URBINO, AUG 31 - SEP 03 2026
University of Urbino Carlo Bo
Department of Pure and Applied Sciences
Lecturers:
Jennifer Lackey Northwestern University
Anne Meylan University of Zürich Marco Nathan University of Denver Richard Pettigrew University of Bristol
For info, please contact:
adriano.angelucci@uniurb.it
daniele.sgaravatti@unibo.it
m.antonelli17@campus.uniurb.it
1235
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 25/02/2026
I will never not post this picture of my mum as a child holding the family cat when I come across it in my camera roll
Black and white photo of a young girl standing in a garden holding the world’s fluffiest cat and looking extremely pleased with the situation
1260
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 23/02/2026
outstanding two-and-a-half page footnote halfway through Rawls’ Two Concepts of Rules that begins ‘this footnote is not even in the right place’
This footnote should be read after sec. 3 and presupposes what I have said there. It provides a few references to statements by leading utilitarians of the summary conception. In general it appears that when they discussed the logical features of rules the summary conception prevailed and that it was typical of the way they talked about moral rules. I cite a rather lengthy group of passages from Austin as a full illustration.
John Austin in his Lectures on Jurisprudence meets the objection that decidingin accordance with the utilitarian principle case by case is impractical by saying that this is a misinterpretation of utilitarianism. According to the utilitarian view " ... our conduct would conform to rules inferred from the tendencies of actions, but would not be determined by a direct resort to the principle of general utility. Utility would be the test of our conduct, ultimately, but not immediately: the immediate test of the rules to which our conduct would con-form, but not the immediate test of specific or individual actions. Our rules would be fashioned on utility; our conduct, on our rules" (vol. I, p. 116). As to how one decides on the tendency of an action he says: "If we would try the tendency of a specific or individual act, we must not contemplate the act as if it were single and insulated, but most look at the class of acts to which it be-longs. We must suppose that acts of the class were generally done or omitted, and consider the probable effect upon the general happiness or good. We must guess the consequences which would follow, if the class of acts were general; and also the consequences which would follow, if they were generally omitted.
We must then compare the consequences on the positive and negative sides, and determine on which of the two the balance of advantage lies. ... If we truly try the tendency of a specific or individual act, we try the tendency of the class to which that act belongs. The particular conclusion which we draw, with regard to the single act, implies a general conclusion embracing all similar acts.... To the rules thus inferred, and lodged in the memory, our conduct would conform immediately if it were truly adjusted to utility" (ibid., p. 117).
One might think that Austin meets the objection by stating the practice conception of rules; and perhaps he did intend to. But it is not clear that he has stated this conception. Is the generality he refers to of the statistical sort? This is suggested by the notion of tendenc…cases "of comparatively rare occurrence" he holds that specific considerations may outweigh the general. "Looking at the reasons from which we had inferred the rule, it were absurd to think it inflexible. We should therefore dismiss the rule; resort directly to the principle upon which our rules were fashioned; and calculate specific consequences to the best of our knowledge and ability" (ibid., pp. 120-121). Austin's view is interesting because it shows how one may come close to the practice conception and then slide away from it.
In 4 System of Logic, bk. VI, ch. xii, par. 2, Mill distinguishes clearly between the position of judge and legislator and in doing so suggests the distinction between the two concepts of rules. However, he distinguishes the two positions to illustrate the difference between cases where one is to apply a rule already established and cases where one must formulate a rule to govern subsequent conduct. It's the latter case that interests him and he takes the "maxim of policy" of a legislator as typical of rules. In par. 3 the summary conception is very clearly stated. For example, he says of rules of conduct that they should be taken provisionally, as they are made for the most numerous cases. He says that they "point out" the manner in which it is least perilous to act; they serve as an "admonition" that a certain mode of conduct has been found suited to the most common occurrences. In Utilitarianism, ch. ii, par. 24, the summary conception appears in Mill's answer to the same objection Austin considered.
Here he speaks of rules as "corollaries" from the principle of utility; these
"secondary" rules are compared to "landmarks" and " direction-posts." They are based on long experience and so make it unnecessary to apply the utilitarian principle to each case. In par. 25 Mill refers to the task of the utilitarian principle in adjudicating between competing moral rules. He talks here as if one then applies the utilitarian principle directly to…
2202
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 20/02/2026
Final one: a baboon who seems to have clocked off for the weekend early
A baboon sleeps slumped on the branch of a tree, one arm hanging down
1111
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 19/02/2026
The permanently furious white-browed coucal
An angry coucal sitting on a thorny bush
150
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 18/02/2026
A cheerful mid-week Nile crocodile
An enormous crocodile lies on the river bank with mouth open
030
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 17/02/2026
A tawny eagle
A tawny eagle on a tree, looking over its shoulder towards the camera
070
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 16/02/2026
061
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 16/02/2026
I sometimes worry our advertising material isn’t as welcoming as it might be
An information poster about studying philosophy at university of Bristol with an image of a skeleton skewering a peasant as illustration
1020625
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 15/02/2026
A black-backed jackal
A jackal, standing in long grass with sunlight just behind, stares at the camera
0120
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 14/02/2026
Giraffe in front of a friendly herd of elephants
1140