Sign in

wicherts.bsky.social

@wicherts.bsky.social
552 followers 82 following 5 posts

Professor in methodology. Posts about meta-research, intelligence, open science, methods, and bias & error in (psychological) science. Also proud father of 4

PostsRepliesMedia
wicherts.bsky.social @wicherts.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
In @eLife.bsky.social: Responsible Research Assessment of Faculty: maximizing quality, transparency, and trustworthiness of scientific research in Research-Performing Organizations doi.org/10.7554/eLif...
doi.org
Responsible Research Assessment of Faculty: maximizing quality, transparency, and trustworthiness of scientific research in Research-Performing Organizations
000
Reposted by wicherts.bsky.social
Cas Goos @cas-goos.bsky.social · 03/09/2026
I am proud to announce that my article "Measurement reliability, construct validity, and transparent reporting in original and replication psychological research" has just been published in PLoS One. You can find the published article here: journals.plos.org/plosone/arti...
journals.plos.org
Measurement reliability, construct validity, and transparent reporting in original and replication psychological research
Published (replication) studies that use measures to assess psychological phenomena need to transparently report information on measurement procedures, validity, and reliability to allow verification ...
0113
wicherts.bsky.social @wicherts.bsky.social · 09/06/2026
A guide to reanalyzing data from psychology articles for verification, meta-analysis, and reuse dx.doi.org/10.1111/spc3...
dx.doi.org
010
Reposted by wicherts.bsky.social
Joris Frese @fresejoris.bsky.social · 01/04/2026
📄Published Today in Nature: 500 researchers reproduced 100 studies across the social & behavioral sciences to assess their analytical robustness (led by @balazsaczel.bsky.social & @szaszibarnabas.bsky.social). Article: www.nature.com/articles/s41... Preprint: osf.io/preprints/me... TLDR: 1/11
29148
Reposted by wicherts.bsky.social
Brian Nosek @briannosek.bsky.social · 01/04/2026
Can published findings be reproduced from the same data + same analysis? As part of SCORE, Miske and 127 co-authors tested this across social and behavioral science papers from 2009–2018. www.nature.com/articles/s41... OA: osf.io/preprints/me... 1/
nature.com
Investigating the reproducibility of the social and behavioural sciences - Nature
A study of reproducibility in a stratified random sample of 600 papers published from 2009 to 2018 in 62 journals spanning the social and behavioural sciences finds higher reproducibility among more&n...
13720
Reposted by wicherts.bsky.social
Brian Nosek @briannosek.bsky.social · 01/04/2026
Commentaries on SCORE papers from @asanchez-tojar.bsky.social, Jelte Wicherts, and @robbwiller.bsky.social www.nature.com/articles/d41...
nature.com
Huge meta-research project puts claims in social-science papers to the test
Three experts discuss lessons learnt from a large-scale dissection of the reproducibility, analytical robustness and replicability of published results.
13213
Reposted by wicherts.bsky.social
Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar @asanchez-tojar.bsky.social · 01/04/2026
My new piece "Reproducibility: how to strengthen a weak foundation" is out today @nature.com! 🎉 How reproducible is research in the social & behavioural sciences? A new study by Miske et al. assessed 600 papers across 62 journals: the results are sobering. 📄 doi.org/10.1038/d415... 📄 rdcu.be/fbcq5
15025
Reposted by wicherts.bsky.social
Katrin Auspurg @kauspurg.bsky.social · 16/03/2026
Do researchers share their code upon request? Does running their orginal code on the original data produce the original results? We provide evidence in a new Royal Society Open Science publication. Studying more than 1,000 articles which use data from the European Social Survey, we find that... 🧵
210848
Reposted by wicherts.bsky.social
Lena Hahn @lenahahn.bsky.social · 18/08/2025
How complete are preregistrations? Short answer: 53% include all 6 procedural specifications Medium answer: 🧵 Long answer: check out my publication with A. Glöckner @mariogollwitzer.bsky.social J. Hellmann, J. Lange, S. Schindler & @kaisassenberg.bsky.social doi.org/10.1177/2515...
doi.org
A Cross-Sectional Study of the Completeness of Preregistrations by Psychological Authors From German-Speaking Institutions - Lena Hahn, Andreas Glöckner, Mario Gollwitzer, Jens Hellmann, Jens Lange, S...
Preregistering confirmatory research aims at reducing researchers’ degrees of freedom and increasing transparency to ultimately increase replicability. Yet the ...
16434
wicherts.bsky.social @wicherts.bsky.social · 14/07/2025
What it takes to tutor—A preregistered direct replication of the scaffolding experimental study by D. Wood et al. (1978). psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/202...
psycnet.apa.org
APA PsycNet
010
wicherts.bsky.social @wicherts.bsky.social · 26/06/2025
The quality of qualitative research royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/...
royalsocietypublishing.org
Good, bad, different or something else? A scoping review of the convictions, conventions and developments around quality in qualitative research | Royal Society Open Science
We present a scoping review of methodological papers in the social science literature covered in Scopus from 2017 to 2022. In this review, we document the shared norms, ideals and practices regarding ...
184
Reposted by wicherts.bsky.social
Michèle Nuijten @michelenuijten.bsky.social · 19/06/2025
📣New Preprint Alert! Esther Maassen meticulously simulated the effect of p-hacking and publication bias on effect size & heterogeneity estimates. 💡bad: selective outcome reporting & optional dropping 💡bad: publication bias 💡not so bad: optional stopping/outlier removal osf.io/preprints/ps...
osf.io
OSF
23419
wicherts.bsky.social @wicherts.bsky.social · 27/02/2024
Vacancy: We are looking for two fully paid PhD students in methodology and statistics as part of my NWO-funded VICI project Examining Variation in Causal Effects in Psychology! www.academictransfer.com/nl/338321/ph...
152