Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 09/10/2026Yes, that could be true. We just can't rule out other possibilities with much confidence (yet). 010
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 09/10/2026Sorry I meant to include the link: wbthorne.com/evidence.html This is the direction of effect of studies of rent control when it comes of measures of mobility/stabilitywbthorne.comEvidence · William B. ThorneInteractive explorer: the direction of rent control's reported effects on eight outcomes across 150 studies, filtered by the design features of each regime. 010
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 09/10/2026Economists do measure mobility/stability effects of rent control (although admittedly not necessarily as a monetary cost.) But we have to remember the market is not allocating on need either, so there is no guarantee that more moving between apartments indicates a better allocation 110
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 09/10/2026here is the evidence we have on all CPI+X rent control regimes, to say the least, there is not a consensus: wbthorne.com/evidence.htm... 000
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 09/10/2026here's a fun example of 1920s rent control with a new housing exemption: bsky.app/profile/wbth... 010
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 09/10/2026I think that is an available interpretation, but not the only one: bsky.app/profile/wbth... 100
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 09/10/2026FWIW the vast proportion of rent controls, even going back in time, already exempt new construction. Vacancy decontrol and the pricing mechanism are the two design features with lots of variation 130
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 08/10/2026Economists don't dislike American sports enough: strict price controls and cartels with no entry and exit, break 'em up! 020
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 08/10/2026do you know of a paper that measures its effectiveness? 100
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 08/10/2026oh wow, people are fascinating. So, for Japan, the options are: deal with it (disruptive/expensive), hugely expensive subsidies, or increased immigration? (maybe some weird stuff but experimental) 000
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 08/10/2026not an area I have spent much time focusing on, but a student is pursuing this topic for an in-class paper: is there anything that works that isn't very expensive? 310
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 07/10/2026That seems like a plausible consensus that could emerge, but I think we do not yet understand how each of these design features interacts with one another (plus questions of enforcement & penalties) to rule out a version that could be more powerful and have minimal downsides. 000
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 07/10/2026it is effect direction so positive means increasing and negative decreasing for all variables. So positive means increasing rents 010
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 07/10/2026I thought it was the space side that had decent fundamentals and the AI bit was a gimmick for the sake of the initial stock prices? 110
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 07/10/2026Very sad, I remember interviewing with him when applying to graduate programs 010
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 07/10/2026@socio-steve.bsky.social @buddyyakov.bsky.social @idothethinking.bsky.social 010
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 07/10/2026And some of the benefits and negatives are just the same thing framed differently: bsky.app/profile/wbth... 120
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 07/10/2026Same for misallocation, what is "misallocation?" Well largely "the distribution of housing is different from what the free market would have allocated" that's the point of rent control, to allocate housing differently. 010
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 07/10/2026Another thing to note on, for instance, the "mobility" (I dislike the name) outcome family, you could easily talk about its inverse as "stability." These are not benefits or drawbacks: do you value moving freely and easily or not being forced to move when you don't want to? 110
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 07/10/2026One thing that is interesting that speaks to this a bit: almost without fail, full vacancy decontrol is paired with just cause eviction protections (without which landlords could evict at any time to raise the rent.) 110
Reposted by Will ThorneEA Strom @profmisterlizzie.bsky.social · 07/10/2026An economist doing nuanced work on rent regulation? Using painstaking mixed methods? Someone needs to hire @wbthorne.bsky.social 021
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 07/10/2026In general, I would be more worried about searching and latching on to effects that aren't really there than the inverse, just because of the incentives economists face. 020
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 07/10/2026my JMP is on Oregon RC with rich data, and it falls into this category. In some ways, it is deeply frustrating to do a lot of work and say, "I can't detect much" but realistically, most papers should look like this. 120
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 07/10/2026It is seen as unfair not to contribute (further investment) and still get the reward of high rents, but the escape route could hypothetically be anything "build a park and all your buildings are no longer rent controlled." There are just so many knobs and dials to turn! 110
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 07/10/2026My *feeling* is that high "bite" is okay, so long as the escape routes available are socially valuable. Rent Control is, in some sense, addressing an urban free-rider problem (LVT would solve this, etc.) where old building owners get to take advantage of neighborhood improvements. 120
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 07/10/2026To avoid confusion I refer to this 10% or 20% number as "bite" and the other as "coverage," but then the question on coverage is "Can you do something to escape rent control?" if you choose not to do that thing, are you still "bound?" 110
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 07/10/2026Would we call a RC with controlled rents 10% less than the market rate for every apartment, more or less binding than an RC with 20% less than the market rate but only on 50% of the housing stock? 110
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 07/10/2026This brings to mind this paper on 1920s rent control. I think we cannot say across the board "more or less binding" because we quickly run into problems: 110
Reposted by Will Thorneryan cooper @ryanlcooper.com · 07/10/2026yes! rent control has many policy dials with many divergent effects!! 3443
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 07/10/2026You can select for new construction exemption here in the first section, the new construction exemption is what first got me started on this paper 010
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 07/10/2026Alas, that is the way things are headed a lot of places. Thank you for the kind words on my work, and I wish you a very enjoyable retirement! 010
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 07/10/2026Try out the included tool, I think that goes some way to addressing your concern - let me know! 030
Reposted by Will ThorneJohn Burn-Murdoch @jburnmurdoch.ft.com · 07/10/2026This is great work from Will, breaking down the evidence on the impacts of rent control according to the finer details of the policy 👇 5448
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 07/10/2026Thanks! The Kholodilin 2024 paper was a huge influence on my work, and I thought your piece was very well done! 120
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 07/10/2026New paper to bring some context to this older discussion, I coded every single rent control regime covered in the paper you linked according to its design features (and updated with new papers): bsky.app/profile/wbth... 010
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 07/10/2026(If @nerd4cities.bsky.social sees this, I will die happy) 030
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 07/10/2026yes, good idea! I will add those tomorrow. (I thought this might only be seen by a few people who already had read the full paper; so not quite as accessible/user friendly as it could be) 020
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 07/10/2026The whole paper came from arguments on Twitter, so I genuinely thank everyone from the good old days 🫡 2311
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 07/10/2026I am going to implement a feature for the website that pulls the quote from each paper where the claim was made, so you can click on a "bar" and it will give you the quotes from each paper, but that's still in beta. 000
Reposted by Will ThorneWilliam B. Fuckley @opinionhaver.bsky.social · 07/10/2026this is actually sick as hell and a great idea for a showcase. 1363
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 07/10/2026I was almost tempted to have this paper replace my JMP (diff-in-diff millions of parcels either size of Oregon Washington border for statewide Oregon rent control; no clear effect on new construction.) Third paper is on the proliferation of rent control and other housing preemption laws. 100
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 07/10/2026I have a new paper about the statewide stabilization in Oregon (no significant effects on total new housing construction), and this follows my meta analysis of the literature which finds the effects of modern rent control policies to not have clear negative effects on supply. 060
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 07/10/2026I categorized every rent control regime by design feature, and re-ran the meta analysis and it largely aligns with your summary here. If you want to see it in full: bsky.app/profile/wbth... 000
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 07/10/2026I do so in my review of the literature, here. The paper referenced in the article above does not distinguish between regime features, so that information was not available for the FT article: bsky.app/profile/wbth... 020
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 07/10/2026I think you'll enjoy exploring the options I have put together ( wbthorne.com/evidence.html ): 040
Will Thorne @wbthorne.bsky.social · 07/10/2026it took a year or so of manually coding the design features of many many rent control regimes, but you can find such an effort and breakdown here: bsky.app/profile/wbth... 140