ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 25/09/2026Me: "Oh nothing for me, thanks, I stopped for some coffee on my way in." Them: Me: Them: Me: "Shoot, was I supposed to bring enough to share?" 010
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 30/08/2026That's a reasonable thing to think but utterly separate from "excess" 100
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 28/08/2026I was like, Naw! But let's see what others say. Me trying to see what others say: 000
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 27/08/2026Users who can read can see where my focus is 100
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 10/07/2026Talk to me again when you're willing to just acknowledge normal word meanings. Until then, consider that if your point depends on making up your own private meanings, perhaps your point is weak. 100
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 10/07/2026Go do some reading friend. You need to know things 100
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 09/07/2026Good thing I said "profile" and not "post" 100
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 09/07/2026Lol maybe the problem is you haven't even read the article you shared. It says more people switched D to R and that Ds suffered more from people declining to vote. 300
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 09/07/2026I mean they're obv shitposting so whether you want to believe them is 🤷♂️ but it is a person literally saying they do what I say people do 300
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 25/06/2026perhaps because those "in charge" have ascended by participating in censorial behavior, on a smaller scale, for a generation now. We let it grow, and now it's here. 010
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 24/05/2026Again I think there's a lot of truth to what you say. The dilemma is that in terms of "a lot of people harmed by ICE", there are a lot more because Trump took over 100
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 24/05/2026Factually there were six names on the ballot you could mark. Factually the child had 6 dozen pictures they could mark. Stein or Oliver or Happy Acres or Sunny Tails are not, in any factual sense, options. 100
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 24/05/2026We were talking about so-called terrorists. The fact that trans folks could, until 47, serve in uniform while out, served at the time as a direct repudiation of the idea that trans folks are a threat to Americans. Then you wanted to talk about vet healthcare. Which is important! ...but a new topic. 000
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 24/05/2026I don't really care about the math, but you used your bad math to justify a general claim about the role Ds play in the loss of rights trans people are experiencing. That claim is as false as the math used to support it. [sorry for the double post] 100
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 24/05/2026This moral equivocation is so tiresome. www.piie.com/blogs/realti... 100
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 23/05/2026Do you not remember when you tried to claim I said this thing, then could not show anywhere I said it? 100
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 23/05/2026Again that's an interesting comparison. But while you may have had it in your mind, you certainly didn't write it. The parallelism of crediting X for endorsing Y, where (X,Y) is (voter,Harris) in my post and (X,Y) is (Hindenburg,Hitler) is clearly there in your post. 000
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 23/05/2026Wait one more time, who tried to do dictionary checkmate? 100
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 23/05/2026The article does exactly the sort of handwaving needed to maintain a stance of moral equivocation. As you and I seem to agree, the D party has deep flaws. But perhaps we can also agree how to read this graph? tracreports.org/immigration/... 100
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 23/05/2026You can be all upsetty spaghetti about it, but you drew a parallel between crediting voters for endorsing Harris and Hindenburg for endorsing Hitler. 100
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 23/05/2026You are right. But it is how analogies work 300
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 23/05/2026I could elaborate on how analogies work, if you really want, yes. 200
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 19/03/2026One million rials is how many actual pieces of paper? Oh, turns out it's... just one. 010
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 24/12/2025Amazing how that "t" at the end obviates any debate over the correct pronunciation of "gift" 020
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 27/11/2025it feels like you're intentionally misreading, when the intent is clear. I am referring to the distinction you yourself originated. how is that not obvious 100
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 16/11/2025NYT Sunday edition: Our big takeaway from the Epstein emails? How much this town's nightlife has changed over the years. Something something journal of record. 4788
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 08/11/2025As a kid riding with my dad, when we passed a logging truck he would call them murderers. Only later did I realize our house was made of wood. 141
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 07/11/2025But that kind of thing is only possible for a country with a big unoccupied desert in its interior, surely! 👀 010
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 30/10/2025I too had a teenage Rand phase, but interestingly the spell was broken when I read an old review. Whittaker Chambers, 1957: 010
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 26/10/2025It's an interesting survey, but these results did give me pause. Aren't these the same scenarios? Do nothing, 5 die; or do something, 1 dies who otherwise wouldn't've but the original 5 imperiled people survive. 010
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 24/10/2025Gonna tell my kids these got their name from a famous jewel heist, having been invented so that would-be thieves couldn't get in through the windows again. 000
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 04/10/2025@debbartlette.bsky.social I am afraid you are mistaken, nothing in the article addresses my question. Feel free to let me know what passage I am overlooking. (Hope it isn't this one) 020
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 02/10/2025Unfortunately, the DSM sort of requires suffering or dysfunction (or however you want to think of it). 200
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 28/09/2025Man I'm not sure this is the hill you wanna lie on 100
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 28/09/2025Just to be quite clear, the margin of error for this specific crosstab isn't even 2.7. Read the results before you write an "article" about it in which you misinterpret your own graph. 100
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 28/09/2025Friend, why did you write a whole ass article about it and not read it 100
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 21/09/2025Your question was not initially about specific political stances. I answered it using a very standard definition of a term you demanded a definition for. Now you insist it's about specific political stances. So maybe you can see why I might wonder, umm, what you're really trying to get at. 000
ventifact.bsky.social @ventifact.bsky.social · 21/09/2025Do you consider your initial question answered? (see pic) 100
