Sign in

Rory Van Loo

@vanloo.bsky.social
7.9K followers 378 following 22 posts

Law professor at Boston University focused on digital technologies, consumers, markets, and regulation. Previously consulted at McKinsey after law school, made sandwiches in Paris during college, and sold newspaper subscriptions door-to-door in 5th grade.

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Rory Van Loo
Boston University School of Law @bulaw.bsky.social · 08/01/2026
#BULawProf @vanloo.bsky.social discusses the use of AI shopping agents to combat manipulative advertising. “The frontier battle is going to be between these AI agents and the sellers who are going to try to undermine them,” he says. Read more ➡️ spr.ly/63321CUx9B
spr.ly
AI, E-Commerce Test Limits of the Reasonable Consumer Standard
The rise of e-commerce and data-driven digital advertising is chipping away at the reasonable consumer standard, a foundational legal concept historically used to determine whether business practices are deceptive, consumer law professionals warn.
031
Reposted by Rory Van Loo
Mark Lemley @marklemley.bsky.social · 14/11/2025
My paper with @vanloo.bsky.social and @lanemiles.bsky.social showing that more than 15% of US companies have potentially illegal interlocking board members is now published in the Columbia Law Review columbialawreview.org/content/anti...
columbialawreview.org
ANTICOMPETITIVE DIRECTORS - Columbia Law Review
“The practice of interlocking directorates is the root of many evils. It offends laws human and divine.” — Justice Louis Brandeis. Introduction Antitrust law prohibits competing corporations from shar...
35728
Rory Van Loo @vanloo.bsky.social · 09/09/2025
Glad to join @jessicasilbey.bsky.social and Woody Hartzog in discussing @rcalo.bsky.social's important new Law & Technology book. Insightful comments, great company, and lots of laughter.
2113
Reposted by Rory Van Loo
Mark Lemley @marklemley.bsky.social · 29/08/2025
Lane Miles, @vanloo.bsky.social, and I have a new blog post in the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance Overlapping Directors as a Competition Problem, corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2025/08/29/o...
corpgov.law.harvard.edu
Overlapping Directors as a Competition Problem
Antitrust law prohibits competing corporations from sharing board members—called “interlocking directorates”—and has for more than a century. ...
2145
Reposted by Rory Van Loo
Mark Lemley @marklemley.bsky.social · 17/06/2025
My newest empirical study, with Rory Van Loo and Lane Miles, finds that more than 10% of companies in the US share board members with a direct competitor, a per se violation of the antitrust laws papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
papers.ssrn.com
ANTICOMPETITIVE DIRECTORS
In search of answers for declining competition, antitrust scholars have in recent years devoted considerable attention to a few institutional owners—such as Bla
48631
Reposted by Rory Van Loo
Boston University School of Law @bulaw.bsky.social · 01/04/2025
Watch #BULawProf @vanloo.bsky.social testify before the US Senate Committee on the Judiciary today during the "Big Fixes for Big Tech" hearing. Prof. Van Loo will speak before the subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy, and Consumer Rights. ➡️ www.judiciary.senate.gov/committee-ac...
judiciary.senate.gov
Big Fixes for Big Tech | United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary
United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary
031
Reposted by Rory Van Loo
Cori Crider @coricrider.com · 01/04/2025
Big week for Big Tech antitrust. TODAY, Senate hearing - w @kint.bsky.social, @vanloo.bsky.social, + more - on break 'em up: www.judiciary.senate.gov/committee-ac... Weds @ycombinator.com.web.brid.gy's Little Tech fest w/ @teresaribera.ec.europa.eu + US enforcers: www.linkedin.com/posts/luther...
judiciary.senate.gov
Big Fixes for Big Tech | United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary
United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary
195
Rory Van Loo @vanloo.bsky.social · 31/03/2025
I’m looking forward to testifying tomorrow in the Senate! www.judiciary.senate.gov/committee-ac...
judiciary.senate.gov
Big Fixes for Big Tech | United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary
United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary
0122
Reposted by Rory Van Loo
UChicago Law Review @uchilrev.bsky.social · 03/03/2025
Volume 92.2 is now live, featuring pieces by @bdgesq.bsky.social & Aziz Huq; Jonathan Gould & @vanloo.bsky.social; Kathryn Judge & Lev Menand; @stomarova.bsky.social & Brian Richardson; Christina Parajon Skinner; Yesha Yadav & Joshua Younger; and David Zaring. lawreview.uchicago.edu
132
Reposted by Rory Van Loo
UChicago Law Review @uchilrev.bsky.social · 03/03/2025
Jonathan Gould and @vanloo.bsky.social discuss Congress’s capacity to confront future threats. Noting that the playing field is tilted against Congress taking action, they propose mechanisms that Congress should utilize to regulate the risk of major crises when it has the opportunity.
121
Reposted by Rory Van Loo
Boston University School of Law @bulaw.bsky.social · 21/02/2025
#BULaw is proud to be tied at #5 for law schools with the highest number of Top 100 Legal Scholars of 2024, with #BULawProf @vanloo.bsky.social at #14, Scott Hirst at #20, and @hartzog.bsky.social at #48. Learn more ➡️ papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
021
Rory Van Loo @vanloo.bsky.social · 24/01/2025
Should be a fun conference tomorrow at Harvard on the state of consumer contract law:
340
Rory Van Loo @vanloo.bsky.social · 30/12/2024
True story. I finished well over 500 distinct books this year outside of work. Here’s how. 1. Made regular trips to the public library to fill my backpack after a quick glance, sometimes with awesome librarian help. 2. Read a few each night to my 5-year-old daughter. Happy new year!
0241
Rory Van Loo @vanloo.bsky.social · 17/12/2024
A warm Bluesky welcome to Chinmayi Sharma (@chinmayisharma.bsky.social), who is doing interesting and valuable research on trustworthy AI and other tech law topics.
141
Rory Van Loo @vanloo.bsky.social · 13/12/2024
Yes, reducing unwanted marketing emails should be bipartisan--like stopping robocalls.
030
Reposted by Rory Van Loo
Denise Howell @denisehowell.info · 13/12/2024
It would be nice on the policy front if Congress/the FTC prevented vendors from harvesting/subscribing customers to marketing emails simply because they’ve made a purchase. Yes, I aggressively use a decoy email for retail. They worm their way into the main acct anyway (through Apple Pay, etc).
031
Reposted by Rory Van Loo
Dru Stevenson @drustevenson.bsky.social · 10/12/2024
go.bsky.app/AMzLXXk
322
Rory Van Loo @vanloo.bsky.social · 03/01/2024
Delighted to see my inflation article up. It asks whether we should rely so heavily on Fed interest rate hikes, which risks great sacrifice. Another option is to first fight as much inflation as possible through policies that strengthen the economy. southerncalifornialawreview.com/2023/12/27/i...
130
Rory Van Loo @vanloo.bsky.social · 29/12/2023
In a heartbreaking year, some bore a heavier burden. I was inspired by those deeply connected to tragic world events who still somehow continued to function, be kind, and give to others. One of my hopes for the coming year is that the world gives them more back.
030
Rory Van Loo @vanloo.bsky.social · 20/12/2023
Excited to share something I co-wrote in the Chicago Tribune, reporting findings suggesting that Amazon buries the best deals low in search results. (w/ Nikita Aggarwal) www.chicagotribune.com/opinion/comm...
163
Rory Van Loo @vanloo.bsky.social · 16/11/2023
A warm welcome to my tech colleague and friend Ngozi Okidegbe, who just joined Bluesky! @ngoziokidegbe.bsky.social www.bu.edu/law/profile/...
061
Rory Van Loo @vanloo.bsky.social · 09/11/2023
The biggest accomplishment of my academic year so far: doing my daughter’s (and my) first ballet bun. When I asked the teacher who requested it if she had any feedback: “(Pause) Well, it lasted the whole practice…I really appreciate the effort.”
040
Rory Van Loo @vanloo.bsky.social · 27/09/2023
We’ve posted the updated “Amazon’s Pricing Paradox.” It examines how Amazon’s search algorithm and interface design influence prices. It’s relevant to the recent FTC antitrust case but adds another layer. Comments welcome! ssrn.com/abstract=443... @nikitaggarwal
0165