Sign in

Tomas Knapen

@tknapen.bsky.social
410 followers 893 following 30 posts

Computational Neuroimaging Researcher based in Amsterdam

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Tomas Knapen
Martin Hebart @martinhebart.bsky.social · 16/05/2026
Finally, today is the day: Josefine Zerbe will present and release our new multi-echo 7T fMRI dataset LAION-fMRI during #VSS2026, with >30 fMRI session per subject and unprecedented stimulus diversity. Come to Talk Room 1 (Scene perception) today at 5:15. Details will follow in a separate thread!
113241
Reposted by Tomas Knapen
Alexander Huth @alexanderhuth.bsky.social · 05/01/2026
This paper had a pretty shocking headline result (40% of voxels!), so I dug into it, and I think it is wrong. Essentially: they compare two noisy measures and find that about 40% of voxels have different sign between the two. I think this is just noise!
8241100
Reposted by Tomas Knapen
Fernanda Ribeiro @felenitaribeiro.bsky.social · 01/12/2025
Investigating individual-specific topographic organization has traditionally been a resource-intensive and time-consuming process. But what if we could map visual cortex organization in thousands of brains? Here we offer the community with a toolbox that can do just that! tinyurl.com/deepretinotopy
48640
Reposted by Tomas Knapen
Spinoza Centre for Neuroimaging @spinozacentre.bsky.social · 01/12/2025
Our team's new publications cover the Nature portfolio! 🧪🧠 - Vision & touch (Nature, rdcu.be/eSsZR) - Psychedelics (Nat Commun, rdcu.be/eSsZ2) - Binocular rivalry (Nat Hum Behav, rdcu.be/eSsYW) - CSF mobility (Nat Neurosci, rdcu.be/eSs0c) - Numerical cognition (Commun Biol, rdcu.be/eSs0p)
2104
Reposted by Tomas Knapen
Nature @nature.com · 27/11/2025
Nature research paper: Vicarious body maps bridge vision and touch in the human brain go.nature.com/4839zaL
go.nature.com
Vicarious body maps bridge vision and touch in the human brain - Nature
A mode of brain organization that connects visual and bodily reference frames may translate raw sensory impressions into more abstract formats that are useful for action, social cognition and semantic processing.
55813
Tomas Knapen @tknapen.bsky.social · 26/11/2025
Massive congratulations to lead author @HedgerResearch, and co-authors Thomas Naselaris and @cvnlab . Read the open-access paper here 👇 bit.ly/VisualBodyMaps #Neuroscience #BrainMapping #VicariousTouch
180
Tomas Knapen @tknapen.bsky.social · 26/11/2025
This provides a mechanistic basis for everyday vicarious experiences — like flinching when you see someone fall — but the implications go far deeper: • Social cognition • Sensory and clinical neuroscience (e.g., ASD) • Embodied AI & AGI development
250
Tomas Knapen @tknapen.bsky.social · 26/11/2025
The core discovery: Visual cortex isn’t purely visual — it’s tiled with orderly somatotopic maps, aligned with the maps in primary somatosensory cortex. Seeing recruits the same body-based computational machinery you use to feel your own body. x.com/HedgerResear...
291
Tomas Knapen @tknapen.bsky.social · 26/11/2025
New today in @Nature: your visual cortex contains touch-based body maps. bit.ly/VisualBodyMaps Your brain transforms what you see into first-person, body-referenced codes: A previously unknown bridge between vision and touch.
68341
Tomas Knapen @tknapen.bsky.social · 24/11/2025
On the nose
000
Tomas Knapen @tknapen.bsky.social · 24/11/2025
Very proud of Marco’s work in this project!
130
Reposted by Tomas Knapen
Serge Dumoulin @sergedumoulin.net · 23/11/2025
The paper demonstrating that #psilocybin alters contextual computations is out in @natcomms.nature.com : doi.org/10.1038/s414... Thanks to the reviewers and coauthors : @marcoaqil.bsky.social , @tknapen.bsky.social , @gillesdehollander.bsky.social , and Nina Vreugdenhil
doi.org
Psilocybin alters visual contextual computations - Nature Communications
This study finds psilocybin alters visual contextual brain processes and perception, suggesting a generic mechanism through which psychedelics influence brain function and subjective experience.
3234
Tomas Knapen @tknapen.bsky.social · 17/05/2025
Hey everyone at @vssmtg.bsky.social! If you’re interested in pRF fitting, go visit Garikoitz Lerma-Usabiaga’s poster on pRF fitting methods! For our development of these tools, we’re very interested to hear you want in these tools. Please fill out our questionnaire: forms.gle/fx5UMs1362jv...
docs.google.com
pRF fitting toolbox wish list
With this form we are taking stock of the field's wishes when it comes to pRF fitting software implementations. We will be presenting the results from this form in our kick-off meeting, and will use t...
0105
Reposted by Tomas Knapen
Kevin Gaughen 🇺🇸 @gaughen.bsky.social · 15/03/2025
534594795
Reposted by Tomas Knapen
Gary Marcus @garymarcus.bsky.social · 16/12/2024
𝘗𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘯, 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘩 𝘥𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘺𝘰𝘨𝘢, 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘰𝘵, 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥, 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘢𝘯 𝘶𝘯𝘶𝘴𝘶𝘢𝘭 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦, 𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘢 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘈𝘐 𝘩𝘢𝘴 “𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘭𝘥 𝘮𝘰𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘴”
1311821
Reposted by Tomas Knapen
Hans Op de Beeck @hansopdebeeck.bsky.social · 13/12/2024
A thread motivated by a new paper on body representations in the human brain at a fine-grained (multi-unit) level, spearheaded by J Garcia Ramirez, T Theys, and P Janssen, where I was a small part of a bigger collaboration that also included S Bracci, R Murty and @nancykanwisher.bsky.social. 1/n
pnas.org
PNAS
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) - an authoritative source of high-impact, original research that broadly spans...
1142
Tomas Knapen @tknapen.bsky.social · 11/12/2024
And people sampling the videos with their eyes allows them to shape their own brain responses. This will likely generate an additional level of “individuality” to brain responses, lowering ISC
020
Tomas Knapen @tknapen.bsky.social · 03/12/2024
Our results indicate the brain uses aligned, 'multiplexed' topographic maps to structure connections between vision and somatosensation. The computational machinery classically attributed to the somatosensory system is embedded within/aligned with that of the "visual" system. 🧵
030
Tomas Knapen @tknapen.bsky.social · 03/12/2024
These findings complement recent work indicating that dorsolateral visual cortex is a fundamentally multi-sensory part of the brain whose role extends beyond passive visual analysis to encompass semantic and bodily information relevant to interactions with the world. 20/n
120
Tomas Knapen @tknapen.bsky.social · 03/12/2024
These encoding model fits revealed a new map of visual body-part selectivity, which overlapped with somatotopic tuning across the FBA, EBA and, strikingly, the visual word form area (VWFA). 19/n
100
Tomas Knapen @tknapen.bsky.social · 03/12/2024
To address this, we combined the Natural Scenes Dataset with a pose-detection algorithm fit a body-part tuning encoding model. This allowed us to generate a map of visual body part preference, organised along a similar toe-to-tongue axis as the somatotopic connectivity maps. 18/n
100
Tomas Knapen @tknapen.bsky.social · 03/12/2024
Much of visual cortex is body-part selective. If this tuning relates to our somatotopic connectivity, we should also be able to predict visual body part selectivity from somatotopic tuning and reveal multi-modal body-referenced alignment playing out at more semantic levels. 17/n
100
Tomas Knapen @tknapen.bsky.social · 03/12/2024
We did indeed find evidence for an alignment between visual field tuning and body part tuning beyond that expected by chance. We found this mostly dorsally and in the superior portion of EBA. 16/n
100
Tomas Knapen @tknapen.bsky.social · 03/12/2024
But do these bodily maps predict anything about visual function? For instance, could lower body part tuning (e.g. toes) predict lower visual field tuning? Such an alignment might facilitate interactions with the environment. 15/n
110
Tomas Knapen @tknapen.bsky.social · 03/12/2024
Yes! Throughout dorsolateral visual cortex, we see several body-part gradients separated by reversals. These maps were consistent across hemispheres and subject splits. 14/n
100
Tomas Knapen @tknapen.bsky.social · 03/12/2024
But what about the body part tuning of these somatotopic activations? Do these dorsolateral regions exhibit orderly gradients, as found in 'core' somatosensory regions around the central sulcus? The answer is... 13/n
100
Tomas Knapen @tknapen.bsky.social · 03/12/2024
We then repeated our somatosensory connectivity analyses separately on a movie section involving human agents and another without any humans. This demonstrated that somatotopic responses are not generic, but driven by movie content, specifically that featuring human action. 12/n
120
Tomas Knapen @tknapen.bsky.social · 03/12/2024
Our analysis allows us to contrast somatotopic and retinotopic explained variance. All dorsolateral (but not ventral!) visual regions were characterised by multimodal topographic connectivity. These regions care as much or more about the body as they do the visual scene! 11/n
111
Tomas Knapen @tknapen.bsky.social · 03/12/2024
We find that movie watching led to increased somatotopic connectivity in the somatosensory network outlined above. But strikingly, we now also find that dorsolateral visual cortex has structured connectivity with S1. Look at that red band across visual cortex! 10/n
221
Tomas Knapen @tknapen.bsky.social · 03/12/2024
So, we turned to the HCP movie watching experiment. This dataset allows us to investigate the relation of somatosensory connectivity to naturalistic visual experiences, where mental content is yoked to a visual stimulus. 9/n
100
Tomas Knapen @tknapen.bsky.social · 03/12/2024
So, during resting state, endogenous activations throughout frontal, parietal, and insular cortex resonate along scaffolding provided by the somatotopic structure of bodily sensations. But how this resonance relates to mental content in resting state is unclear... 8/n
100
Tomas Knapen @tknapen.bsky.social · 03/12/2024
Body part tuning revealed multiple somatotopic gradients and body-part tuning biases that are typically only revealed by exogenous stimulation (e.g. brushing people). Critically, we show that these same detailed principles can be revealed in the absence of sensory input! 7/n
100
Tomas Knapen @tknapen.bsky.social · 03/12/2024
Since this method uses one part of the brain to explain another, we can fit these models to any data - even with no stimulus! Analysing 7T resting state data from the HCP, we found signals in a large cortical network were predicted by somatotopic connectivity with S1. 6/n
100
Tomas Knapen @tknapen.bsky.social · 03/12/2024
This allows us to 'project' the visual field or body part tuning of V1 and S1 onto the rest of the brain. We’re performing connectivity-derived retinotopic and somatotopic mapping, which allows us to find higher-level sensory maps throughout the brain. 5/n
100
Tomas Knapen @tknapen.bsky.social · 03/12/2024
Our computational model of functional connectivity explains target voxels’ timecourses as 'connective fields' located on the surfaces of both V1 and S1. Due to their specific locations on our primary sensory cortices, connective fields inherit visual and somatotopic tuning. 4/n
100
Tomas Knapen @tknapen.bsky.social · 03/12/2024
These findings raise the question how the brain connects the computational machinery of vision and touch. Here, we developed a model for measuring joint visual and somatosensory tuning throughout the brain and applied it to resting state and movie watching data. 3/n
100
Tomas Knapen @tknapen.bsky.social · 03/12/2024
When seeing bodily experiences, our brain responds 'as if' it simulates the observed tactile experience as our own. We know that e.g. viewing fingers being touched can activate finger-selective regions of primary somatosensory cortex (S1) (tinyurl.com/vissom3b) 2/n
100
Tomas Knapen @tknapen.bsky.social · 03/12/2024
Since I need a first bsky post, here's a rehash of @nickhedger.bsky.social's thread announcing our preprint with Kendrick Kay & Thomas Naselaris. TLDR; High-level visual cortex is tiled with maps 'multiplexing' vision and touch. tinyurl.com/seesoma 🧵 1/n
2106
Tomas Knapen @tknapen.bsky.social · 02/12/2024
I can confirm your #10: lowering the sampling rate from 1 or 2 kHz to 500 or even 250 can drastically reduce pixel noise!
020