instagram.com
tirso_cons on Instagram: "I’m getting back into training; now it’s time for a period of consistency. I was really eager to start, as I was feeling good about…"
I’m getting back into training; now it’s time for a period of consistency. I was really eager to start, as I was feeling good about my recovery before the summer. I need to get my energy back. There are months of intense work, travel, and renovations ahead... so being prepared will do me good.But above all—above all else—lately, whenever I turn on the news, I get this terrible urge to smash some faces in.And who better than Ippo to illustrate this post? I’ve added color to the most viral piece from my Inktober series last year (I won’t be doing it this year, sorry).It’s also a chance to test out an anti-AI tool (Foxglove) to avoid Meta’s crazy tagging—and, while I’m at it, to poison the generative AIs trying to train on my work.They could learn a thing or two from this manga:Work, fail, learn, create.Because it’s not the end goal; it’s the process of transformation that holds the real value.....Just as much as reading this far does. That’s one of the new values worth championing. Thanks for that!
![Case 1:25-md-03143-SHS-OTW Document 1977-1 Filed 09/17/26 Page 1 of 92
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
IN RE:
OpenAI, INC.,
COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
1:23-cv-11195-SHS-OTW
1:24-cv-01515-SHS-OTW
1:24-cv-03285-SHS-OTW
1:24-cv-04872-SHS-OTW
1:25-cv-04315-SHS-OTW
25-md-3143 (SHS) (OTW)
NEWS PLAINTIFFS’ COMBINED SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEF
5('$&7('
I. Introduction
This case is about, as Microsoft’s Director of Applied Science put it, “an astonishing theft
of unprecedented proportions”; SF1437, perhaps the “largest theft of labor in human history.”
SF1652. Defendants repeatedly copied millions of Plaintiffs’ copyrighted articles in their entirety
without permission to produce substitutive commercial AI products. OpenAI’s Head of ChatGPT
wrote that “[p]ublishers” face an “existential threat” from those products, SF1466, which, he said,
“are largely substitutive, period” and “will get more and more substitutive as they get better.”
SF1473-74. Such admissions eviscerate Defendants’ “fair use” defense because substitution is
“copyright’s bête noire.” Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith, 598 U.S.
508, 528 (2023). For Defendants to prevail on this defense “would,” the same Microsoft executive
recognized, arguably “make a complete mockery of the idea of ‘fair use.’” SF1450
https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/News-orgs-v-OpenAI-Microsoft-Memo-9-17-26.pdf](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:cdfyjyki67a5fangqrjurna7/bafkreifyjmyvu7qalxdcdgajvy4a4m7dbmqkdmeb4phyxtzxcpmicwr6oa)
