iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 8h

You might find this really interesting then, regarding Asherah. Do you remember the passage when Moses is purported to have asked God what his name was, and he responds with the cryptic answer “I am that I am” (ie. ’ehye ’ăšer ’ehye)?

100

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 20h

There is still disagreement about whether Atenism was monotheistic or henotheistic. I used to think it was the former, but I’ve more and more started to think about the latter. Your final sentence makes a good point, and supports that too. The chronology is very telling as well.

120

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 21h

It’s Atenism. The Egyptian verb jtn/itn, or aten, means to object, oppose, or contradict. As a noun, it means disc or flat circular object. As an -ism, it’s contrarianism. Inherently dualistic, built on circular reasoning. Absolute and timeless. No arc, meaning non-relativistic. Devil’s Advocate.

010

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 09/10/2026

This app isn’t always good for nuance because the threads get split up. So I wrote the response in Pages and screenshot it. What’s important is that we’re not actually in disagreement about the problem of Zionism, but the way to approach it. My goal is to strengthen all of our arguments.

010

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 09/10/2026

Ah, I don’t agree with that. The etymological fallacy isn’t really a thing. Actually, it’s an appeal to novelty because it removes the baseline definition from which other definitions necessarily derive. The etymology is the entire catalogue of a word’s meaning, including past and present.

130

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 09/10/2026

Sounds like “A is A”, which, of course, is circular reasoning. An autological statement. What do you think of ideologies and religions that build around circular reasoning and autological statements? Cultish thinking?

000

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 09/10/2026

Fascism = fasces,(“symbol of judicial authority, the state”) + -ism,(“ideology, principle, or condition born of”) = ideology or principle born of the state.

000

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 08/10/2026

Isn’t that what a false accuser would say when they’re backed into a corner and need to deflect away from what they wrote? What does the circled part say?

110

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 08/10/2026

Why don’t we focus on what you actually said? What does the circled part say?

140

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 08/10/2026

Where is the spin? This is your post. You said that you believe in a free Palestine, did you not?

020

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 08/10/2026

Well, we’re trying to find out what you’re talking about. You said that you support a free Palestine, which you have attempted to define as genocide. Is that not the case?

110

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 08/10/2026

a) Ok, so then you don’t support a free Palestine? Then why did you say that you do? b) Can you provide a source that defines the word “iridication”? Preferably with a screenshot.

160

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 07/10/2026

I’m not sure. I think that’s why I chose spherics. Travelling through spacetime can be viewed chronologically as multi-linear.

110

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 07/10/2026

You asked how it was bullshit, and I succinctly explained.

120

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 07/10/2026

I can’t even see your full handle. You did ask what lesser evilism is. That said, I’ve had discussions with her about multiple non-politics topics. She’s not a bot.

000

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 06/10/2026

The subject was whether Zionism is racist was something that the Greens came up with. I asked you whether there was any scientific evidence that disconfirmed that statement, and you avoided the question. Then I asked what your definition of Zionism was. You punted that question too.

000

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 05/10/2026

No, social democracy most definitely is not egalitarian. Scandinavian countries have strong social safety nets, but there are dozens of billionaires in Sweden alone. The presence of formally recognized class hierarchies (ie. the state and private capital) disconfirms your claim of egalitarianism.

021

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 05/10/2026

The semiotic definition narrows it. The word carries two morphemes: Zionism = Zion,(“a mountain in Jerusalem, used as a synecdoche for Biblical Israel”) + -ism,(“ideology, principle, or condition born of”) = Ideology or Principle born of Zion. Important in a messianic religious tradition.

010

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 05/10/2026

Ah, there it is. That explains why you’re confused. The left is defined by egalitarianism, yes. Social democratic parties and liberal parties both rely on state capitalism, which means they can’t be egalitarian. The further away you get from the far left, the less egalitarian it becomes.

121

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 04/10/2026

Strictly speaking, colonization doesn’t require a metropole. And if you want to get strict about definitions, then we’re getting into semantics and semiotics. That means that Zionism is the ideology of Zion, which is a synecdoche for biblical Israel, and is related to messianic beliefs.

000

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 04/10/2026

How do you define colonial? Has there ever been a point where it has not been a colonial ideology?

100

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 04/10/2026

That’s kind of my point. The Greens didn’t create a new definition, but applied an older and more established one. The “Zionism is racism” part isn’t really new, either. It used to be a full-on UN resolution. Do you disagree with that definition, or do you just think it’s not the popularized one?

200

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 02/10/2026

Ah, there it is. You’re DARVO’ing and deflecting from the question because you gravitated towards an inherently violent ideology and don’t want to self-reflect out of an avoidance of accountability. The reason you won’t answer is because your ego can’t handle that it’s true.

020

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 01/10/2026

Lakoff is pretty great, and that book in particular is amazing. When he talks about neoliberalism being a conservative frame that is overlayed over progressivism, he’s partially talking about set theory and venn diagrams. P = Progressivism Q = Conservatism (Regressivism) PQ = Neoliberalism

001

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 01/10/2026

UK is talking about electoral reform. I’ve been thinking about how we should be looking at systems that are more cooperative than competitive. That includes modes of production. Anyone who is advocating policies and systems that increase competition is inherently advocating more conflict/division.

010

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 01/10/2026

The alternative is neither, which is always in play. If you don’t support the system, then voting for a duopoly (PQ/Q) means abandoning your own stance. Put another way, if you want egalitarianism (P), and want nothing to do with despotism (Q), then rejecting PQ and Q become valid options.

110

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 30/09/2026

I’m having a great time dunking on you after you got upset because you made assumptions that were objectively false and dug your own aegument’s grave. You keep telling me that you’re departing, yet you keep coming back for more. And I keep letting you dig yourself in deeper.

121

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 30/09/2026

Yes, actually it is. A vote is an act of consent by those being governed. I’m not surprised that you reject the notion of consent, considering you actively voted for a party that gave material and political support to the on-going genocide.

100

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 30/09/2026

It is about consent. That said, it’s not my responsibility to vote for the Democrats or Republicans. Hence why I vetoed your argument that says it is. If you can veto reality, I can then veto your veto of reality.

100

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 30/09/2026

I don’t want to hijack the thread too much, but this made me think of the domain “.tv”. It comes from the Pacific island of Tuvulu, and generates almost 10% of their government revenue, lmao.

030

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 30/09/2026

Empirically speaking, yes. The term predates legal conceptions.

100

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 30/09/2026

Fascism = Fasces,(“judicial authority, the state”) + -ism,(“ideology, principle, or condition born of”) = “ideology or principle born of the state” Unless you see more morphemes, those are the only two there, are they not? Do you see any others?

122

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 29/09/2026

Related, but ever hear of liquid democracy? It’s a hybrid of direct and representative democracy. You can pick and choose which issues that come up that you personally want to vote on, or you can delegate your vote to your representative if, for example, you’re unsure and trust them to decide.

120

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 29/09/2026

The land was called Retjenu, and later Khor, under Egypt. If you look at the Merneptah stele, the line that explicitly identifies Israel lacks the hill country hieroglyph that identifies a foreign land. That is what you would expect from a semi-nomadic people without a land of their own.

020

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 28/09/2026

You know, the Egyptian verb jtn/itn, or aten, means to object, oppose, or contradict. As a noun, it means disc or flat circular object. As an -ism, it’s contrarianism. Inherently dualistic, built on circular reasoning. Absolute and timeless. No arc, meaning non-relativistic. Devil’s Advocate.

100

Crown Prince Thutmose @thutmose.bsky.social · 27/09/2026

Yep. Remember the Unity Coach goof? And remember when he admitted to using methodological individualism? Same psychopathic delusion and contrarianism. Recall Ayn Rand’s view of altruism. Same dualistic opposition. A negative image or dual of Comte, the one who coined altruism.

100