Sign in

thewikipedian.bsky.social

@thewikipedian.bsky.social
176 followers 32 following 77 posts
PostsRepliesMedia
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 18/12/2025
10/10 Ultimately, the project values matter. Grokipedia is less an encyclopedia than a simulacrum of one. It’s a spite house, not a quest for knowledge. Wikipedia shouldn’t worry too much, but it’s no reason to be complacent. www.thewikipedian.net/p/grokipedia...
thewikipedian.net
The World According to Grok
Is Grokipedia an existential threat, passing fad, or unexpected opportunity?
000
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 18/12/2025
9/ But Wikipedia should consider stealing some ideas from Grokipedia: letting AI assist with overlooked topics, loosening some sourcing requirements, and creating a user-friendly suggestion box. www.thewikipedian.net/p/grokipedia...
100
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 18/12/2025
8/ Grokipedia seems unlikely to replace Wikipedia: licensing and competitive issues hobble it in the tech world, and there’s no popular discontent with a site most people use for mundane fact-checking. www.thewikipedian.net/p/grokipedia...
100
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 18/12/2025
7/ Finally, sourcing. Grokipedia allows primary sources and more detail with it, but sometimes also Nazis. Wikipedia opts for higher-quality sources, at the expense of completeness. www.thewikipedian.net/p/grokipedia...
100
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 18/12/2025
6/ Third, perspective. Grokipedia is clearly partisan (even if it won’t fully admit it) while Wikipedia’s pluralistic approach aims to converge on the best result, albeit imperfectly. www.thewikipedian.net/p/grokipedia...
100
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 18/12/2025
5/ Second, governance. Grokipedia is centeralized—what Musk says goes, but zero consensus means zero transparency. Wikipedia’s model is slow and sometimes exhausting, but carries more legitimacy. www.thewikipedian.net/p/grokipedia...
100
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 18/12/2025
4/ Grokipedia differs from Wikipedia in 4 key ways. First, production. AI content has advantages in speed and scale, but includes hallucinations. Human curation is slower but brings judgment and nuance. www.thewikipedian.net/p/grokipedia...
100
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 18/12/2025
3/ Wikipedia is increasingly under fire from the far-right, which now counts Elon as one of theirs. Instead of trying to beat Wikipedia at its own game, he’s trying to do it with LLM technology. www.thewikipedian.net/p/grokipedia...
100
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 18/12/2025
2/ Wikipedia has faced competition from rival encyclopedia projects before, but this one is different: not only is it sponsored by the world’s richest man, but the political and technological environment have changed. www.thewikipedian.net/p/grokipedia...
100
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 18/12/2025
1/ It’s almost two months since Elon launched Grokipedia, an AI-powered encyclopedia to compete with Wikipedia. Should Wikipedia regard it as an existential threat, nothing to be concerned about, or something else? www.thewikipedian.net/p/grokipedia...
thewikipedian.net
The World According to Grok
Is Grokipedia an existential threat, passing fad, or unexpected opportunity?
120
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 24/06/2025
7/7 Whoever gets the job takes on one of the hardest roles in the nonprofit world. Read the full post here: www.thewikipedian.net/p/wikimedia-...
thewikipedian.net
Who Should Run Wikipedia Next?
Wikipedia’s future depends on making the right hire. What should the next WMF CEO look like?
000
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 24/06/2025
6/ The real challenge: Wikipedia is publishing, tech, community, and a global nonprofit all at once. No one can be everything to everyone—but the next CEO will have to try.
100
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 24/06/2025
5/ There’s no consensus on how to respond. Some say WMF needs tech leadership; others say not so fast. Few want a political hire, but the only name offered was former US CTO Megan Smith.
100
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 24/06/2025
4/ Two dark clouds loom over Wikipedia’s future: generative AI, which depends on it but draws attention away, and rising political threats to open knowledge in the US, UK, and India.
100
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 24/06/2025
3/ Some wonder if the Foundation is doing the right job at all—raising concerns about its size, fundraising style, and spending. Has WMF gotten too big to keep up with changing media habits?
100
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 24/06/2025
2/ The good news for Iskander: her leadership got high marks for listening, facilitating, and not playing the hero. The catch? What most people want sounds a lot like... Maryana Iskander.
100
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 24/06/2025
1/ Who should run Wikipedia next? The Wikipedian asked a cross-section of insiders what they want in a successor to WMF CEO Maryana Iskander, stepping down by year’s end. www.thewikipedian.net/p/wikimedia-...
thewikipedian.net
Who Should Run Wikipedia Next?
Wikipedia’s future depends on making the right hire. What should the next WMF CEO look like?
100
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 02/05/2025
5/ Wikipedia isn’t perfect. But its flaws are debated in the open, by a community that cares deeply about facts. The WMF now faces a choice: bend to a bad-faith inquiry—or stand up to this intimidation. www.thewikipedian.net/p/maga-wikip...
thewikipedian.net
Wikipedia Got a Letter from the Government the Other Day
A Trump official's risible letter to the Wikimedia Foundation represents a real attempt to intimidate an institution it cannot control
111
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 02/05/2025
4/ The right has been laying the groundwork for this for years. Wikipedia is open, collaborative, and built on consensus—everything MAGA hates. Now it’s being folded into the broader campaign to delegitimize institutions beyond its reach. www.thewikipedian.net/p/maga-wikip...
121
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 02/05/2025
3/ Martin isn’t the IRS. His office has no role in nonprofit oversight. But that isn't the point. Instead, the letter repackages long-standing grievances from MAGA circles as official concern. www.thewikipedian.net/p/maga-wikip...
111
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 02/05/2025
2/ The letter demands documents and answers to 12 questions by May 15. Martin claims Wikipedia’s global contributors “subvert American interests,” and implies Google and AI companies are laundering biased content via Wikipedia. He cites no evidence. www.thewikipedian.net/p/maga-wikip...
111
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 02/05/2025
1/ Last week, Trump-appointed U.S. Attorney Ed Martin sent a letter to the Wikimedia Foundation accusing Wikipedia of political bias, foreign influence, and propaganda. It’s not just overreach—it’s a political threat disguised as a legal inquiry. 🧵 www.thewikipedian.net/p/maga-wikip...
thewikipedian.net
Wikipedia Got a Letter from the Government the Other Day
A Trump official's risible letter to the Wikimedia Foundation represents a real attempt to intimidate an institution it cannot control
165
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 24/02/2025
A report from WikiCredCon—and why eroding trust in media institutions is a problem for Wikipedia, by @formerlytomato.bsky.social
notthesolution.substack.com
Misinformation Is No Excuse for Failing Institutions
If institutions want to regain the trust of the public, they have to first be worth trusting.
021
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 24/02/2025
Loved the deep dive—nothing like exploring a good Wikipedia rabbit hole.
110
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 24/02/2025
"Was Wikipedia manipulated as part of the Blake Lively smear campaign?" a compelling investigation + a good read by @dflovett.bsky.social
edithistory.substack.com
Was Wikipedia manipulated as part of the Blake Lively smear campaign?
I think it was. Here's what I've learned.
131
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 20/02/2025
Fin/ So what should happen? Should the WMF step in, as it did in Croatia? Or should Wikipedia communities settle this themselves? The future of Hebrew Wikipedia—and maybe more—is at stake. www.thewikipedian.net/p/hebrew-wik...
thewikipedian.net
The Fight for Hebrew Wikipedia Puts the Wikimedia Foundation in a No-Win Situation
An existential crisis at the Hebrew Wikipedia mirrors Israel's deepening divides—and the world's. Now, the WMF must decide whether to step in.
000
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 20/02/2025
7/ Now the WMF must decide: intervene and risk inflaming critics, or do nothing and watch Hebrew Wikipedia become even more insular? It’s a test of whether institutions can still act—or if they will continue standing by as consensus collapses. www.thewikipedian.net/p/hebrew-wik...
100
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 20/02/2025
6/ This isn’t the first time a Wikipedia has been "captured" by one side. In the 2010s, Croatian Wikipedia was taken over by a far-right faction. The WMF finally intervened in 2021, stripping power from admins and resetting governance. www.thewikipedian.net/p/hebrew-wik...
100
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 20/02/2025
5/ The conflict is influencing site content, too. In 2021, Hebrew Wikipedia changed the article "Israeli occupation of the West Bank" to "Israeli rule in Judea and Samaria"—a nationalist framing. The fight over content is also a fight for control. www.thewikipedian.net/p/hebrew-wik...
100
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 20/02/2025
4/ The secular editors want the WMF to step in. The nationalists say the other side engaged in its own off-wiki coordination, and besides, most hewiki editors agree, and by the way they most every claim in the RfC is false. www.thewikipedian.net/p/hebrew-wik...
100
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 20/02/2025
3/ This fight isn’t just about Wikipedia. It’s happening against the backdrop of Israel’s biggest political crises in decades—from the October 7 Hamas attack and Gaza invasion to Netanyahu’s judicial overhaul and the dominant far-right coalition. www.thewikipedian.net/p/hebrew-wik...
100
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 20/02/2025
2/ In December, an 11,000-word Request for Comment (RfC) dropped, alleging that a religious-nationalist faction had seized power in hewiki. The claim: they mass-banned progressive and secular editors, then used the bans to cement control in the next election. www.thewikipedian.net/p/hebrew-wik...
100
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 20/02/2025
1/ A major battle is raging on Wikipedia—this time not on English Wikipedia, but on Hebrew Wikipedia (hewiki). A political faction is accused of taking control, banning opponents, and rewriting rules. Will the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) intervene? 🧵 www.thewikipedian.net/p/hebrew-wik...
thewikipedian.net
The Fight for Hebrew Wikipedia Puts the Wikimedia Foundation in a No-Win Situation
An existential crisis at the Hebrew Wikipedia mirrors Israel's deepening divides—and the world's. Now, the WMF must decide whether to step in.
122
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 13/02/2025
8/ The bottom line: Wikipedia isn’t "leftist". It just values accuracy over ideology. And that’s why right-wing activists are trying to turn it into another culture war battleground. www.thewikipedian.net/p/right-wing...
thewikipedian.net
The Right’s War on Wikipedia is Just a Repackaging of its War on Journalism
In its exaggerated critique of Wikipedia's standards for reliable sources, the Media Research Center attempts a striking feat of false equivalence
0243
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 13/02/2025
7/ Wikipedia has become too institutionally important for the right to ignore. Like their broader war on journalism, conservatives are attacking it not because it’s unfair, but because it won’t bend to their narrative. www.thewikipedian.net/p/right-wing...
1234
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 13/02/2025
6/ MRC also ignores that _some_ right-leaning outlets pass Wikipedia’s reliability tests. The Wall Street Journal, The Telegraph, Reason, and The Economist? Reliable. Newsmax, OANN, and Daily Caller? Not so much. The difference? Journalism vs. propaganda. www.thewikipedian.net/p/right-wing...
1231
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 13/02/2025
5/ Right-wing media wants to be treated like NPR or The Atlantic, but refuses to do the work of real journalism. Wikipedia’s sourcing guidelines reward fact-checking & accountability—not political alignment. That’s why MRC is crying foul. www.thewikipedian.net/p/right-wing...
1182
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 13/02/2025
4/ Let’s talk about those results. Wikipedia prioritizes fact-checking, editorial oversight, and accuracy. That’s why mainstream outlets—yes, even left-leaning ones—get better marks than sites like Breitbart, which has a history of misinformation. www.thewikipedian.net/p/right-wing...
1193
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 13/02/2025
3/ Last week, MRC’s NewsBusters blasted Wikipedia for "blacklisting ALL right-leaning media". It’s an alarming claim—but also misleading. Wikipedia applies the same reliability standards to all sources. MRC just doesn’t like the results. www.thewikipedian.net/p/right-wing...
2151
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 13/02/2025
2/ In 2024, conservative agitation against Wikipedia reached new heights. From Elon Musk’s trolling to the Manhattan Institute’s claims of bias to the Heritage Foundation’s plans to “target” editors, the right ramped up its attacks. Now, they’re doubling down. www.thewikipedian.net/p/right-wing...
1171
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 13/02/2025
1/ The Media Research Center (MRC) is pushing a new attack on Wikipedia, claiming it "blacklists" conservative media. In reality, right-wing groups have been escalating their war on Wikipedia for over a year—because they can’t control it. 🧵👇 www.thewikipedian.net/p/right-wing...
thewikipedian.net
The Right’s War on Wikipedia is Just a Repackaging of its War on Journalism
In its exaggerated critique of Wikipedia's standards for reliable sources, the Media Research Center attempts a striking feat of false equivalence
16118
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 11/02/2025
When you search Google for "Gulf of Mexico" you get this knowledge panel:
000
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 08/02/2025
This is amazing
youtube.com
Chamber CEO charges Wichita Falls with updating its Wiki page
YouTube video by Texomashomepage.com - KFDX, KJTL
000
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 06/02/2025
Fin/ Without real institutional support, the WiR role may disappear. This is about more than just jobs—it’s about whether the world’s most important cultural institutions can keep contributing to Wikipedia. www.thewikipedian.net/p/wikipedia-...
thewikipedian.net
Hard Out Here For a WiR: Can the Wikimedian-in-Residence Position Survive?
Wikipedians working at cultural institutions are struggling with brittle tools and a lack of resources to support their work. Now they're facing a new threat
000
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 06/02/2025
7/ The Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) claims to support free knowledge, but when it comes to funding and sustaining WiRs, its priorities are… unclear. The question is: Does WMF actually care about this work? www.thewikipedian.net/p/wikipedia-...
100
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 06/02/2025
6/ Now, an even bigger problem looms: Trump and Musk. Many GLAM institutions rely on government grants. With U.S. funding for cultural initiatives under attack, and DEI-focused programs a target, WiRs may be collateral damage. www.thewikipedian.net/p/wikipedia-...
100
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 06/02/2025
5/ And it’s not just about broken tools. Wikimedia’s own infrastructure is failing WiRs. Newer tools like the Wiki Commons Query Service launched behind a login wall, making them nearly useless to the cultural institutions they were meant to serve. www.thewikipedian.net/p/wikipedia-...
100
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 06/02/2025
4/ The tools WiRs rely on—like impact tracking software and bulk upload utilities—are breaking down. Built by volunteers, many are now unmaintained. Without these, proving their work’s value to funders is much harder. www.thewikipedian.net/p/wikipedia-...
100
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 06/02/2025
3/ But the job has always been precarious. Most WiRs work on short-term contracts, with little job security and minimal institutional support. Many even have to fundraise to keep their own positions. Now, things are getting worse. www.thewikipedian.net/p/wikipedia-...
100
thewikipedian.bsky.social @thewikipedian.bsky.social · 06/02/2025
2/ The WiR role started in 2010 at the British Museum as an experiment to bridge the gap between Wikipedia and cultural institutions. Since then, over 200 WiRs have helped share millions of images, documents, and research with the public. www.thewikipedian.net/p/wikipedia-...
110