Sign in

Engelhardt Research Group

@thebeehive.bsky.social
383 followers 614 following 38 posts

Engelhardt Research Group at Stanford University and Gladstone Institutes. Statistical genomics, live-cell imaging, wearable data, cancer immunology, reproductive health.

PostsRepliesMedia
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 08/12/2025
Wish I were in Baltimore for this! Looks super exciting and forward thinking.
010
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 04/12/2025
Last talk of this session! #NeurIPS2025
000
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 04/12/2025
Next up! #NeurIPS2025
000
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 04/12/2025
First up! Nine minutes!!
000
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 04/12/2025
Please join us for these incredible papers and discussions with authors on important issues for the NeurIPS community 🤩
010
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 29/04/2025
We are really proud of this work. Please try out NNMF on all of your gene count spatial transcriptomics data, whether you need hard clusters or scalable, interpretable, spatially aware dimension reduction! Feedback welcome!! github.com/ragnhildlaur...
github.com
GitHub - ragnhildlaursen/NNMF: Neighborhood Non-Negative Matrix Factorization
Neighborhood Non-Negative Matrix Factorization. Contribute to ragnhildlaursen/NNMF development by creating an account on GitHub.
010
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 29/04/2025
On these CRC data, we studied the factors based on their top ten genes. We found immune-dominated factors & factors capturing intra- and peri-tumoral stroma, among others. Importantly, some factors were shared x patients and some were patient specific, characterizing tumor-specific immune responses.
genes characterizing the 30 NNMF factors in the CRC data.
100
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 29/04/2025
Then, we applied NNMF to MERFISH data publicly released by Vizgen (vizgen.com/data-release...) that includes 500 genes in ∼1.9 million cells from two human colon cancer samples. NNMF showed enormous complexity, where each factor included many cell types and identified detailed biological structure.
Top row: cell types in two patient samples; Bottom row: NNMF signatures in the same two samples, showing substantial complexity.
100
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 29/04/2025
On the same MERFISH mouse brain data, we aligned the eight parallel slices and ran NNMF on the 3D aligned data. NNMF easily labeled the important regions in 3D, and smoothed the factors across all three dimensions.
NNMF factor 1 and factor 7 across the 3D aligned brain slices.
100
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 29/04/2025
Next, we ran NNMF on MERFISH single mouse hypothalamus data with eight parallel slices on each individual slice (2D). NNMF + K-means produces hard clusters that match the manual clustering well. But the real story is how much detail and biological complexity soft clusterings add. Vasculature!
Manually annotated brain sample.hard clustering for NNMF + Kmeans, BASS, and MENDER on two parallel samples.All of the ten factors from NNMF in a single sample, colored by weights.
100
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 29/04/2025
On human brain 10X Visium data and mouse brain MERFISH data, we compared MENDER and BASS to NNMF in terms of run time, and found that MENDER is fastest and NNMF is a close second. However, MENDER uses cell type labels for the hard clustering, not gene counts, and produces poor clusterings.
run time comparison for human brain and mouse merfish across BASS, MENDER, and NNMF. Hard clusters from a manual annotation, NNMF's top signature, NNMF+K-means, BASS, and MENDER on the human brain data.
100
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 29/04/2025
We use the very cool hard clustering benchmark system pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38491270/ and compared NNMF to fourteen state-of-the-art spatially-aware hard clustering methods, showing good performance of NNMF even in the hard clustering scenario.
Benchmark comparison across five datasets and three metrics, for 15 different methods.
110
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 29/04/2025
NNMF works by using standard NMF updates, but using Gaussian smoothing of the factor weights on each spot at each iteration that encourages similar weights for spots nearby in space. No matrix inversion needed!
Graphical description of Neighborhood NMF, including its input and how we determined the number of factors.
100
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 29/04/2025
NNMF is available in R, performs nonnegative matrix factorization on the gene counts that yields soft clusterings of every spot in spatial transcriptomics, and scales to many samples, arbitrary dimensions, & millions of spots. We run K-means on the soft cluster weights to get a NNSF hard clustering.
example of factor weights on mouse brain sample, and the gene programs that define each factor. Then we use K-means to built a hard clustering.
100
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 29/04/2025
Super excited to tell you about our preprint on Neighborhood Nonnegative Matrix Factorization (NNMF) for spatially-aware dimension reduction in spatial transcriptomics, led by Ragnhild Laursen in collaboration with Karin Pelka @pelkalab.bsky.social and her lab! www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
biorxiv.org
Neighborhood nonnegative matrix factorization identifies patterns and spatially-variable genes in large-scale spatial transcriptomics data
Tissues consist of multi-cellular neighborhoods in which different cell types express correlated gene programs due to shared signaling environments. Methods for identifying these spatial neighborhoods...
3265
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 21/01/2025
Exciting update!! @bioimagearchive.bsky.social is now hosting the first publicly available Incucyte data! If you have live-cell imaging data, please consider uploading to this amazing repository!! Thanks to Julia Carnevale and Alex Marson for experimental data — www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/b...
ebi.ac.uk
BioStudies < The European Bioinformatics Institute < EMBL-EBI
BioStudies – one package for all the data supporting a study
021
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 28/11/2024
Me three!
110
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 26/11/2024
Feedback welcome! And please play with these data! There is a lot more signal there. Thank you to @bioimagearchive.bsky.social for hosting these Incucyte image data -- this is a new thing for them, and they have been so kind in working through the details of submission (link coming soon!)! 🎉
010
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 26/11/2024
Try out Caliban and Occident on your own Incucyte data! More phenotypes and analyses added regularly. github.com/vanvalenlab/... github.com/bee-hive/occ...
github.com
GitHub - vanvalenlab/Caliban-2024_Schwartz_et_al
Contribute to vanvalenlab/Caliban-2024_Schwartz_et_al development by creating an account on GitHub.
100
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 26/11/2024
With five new collaborations in the works, and a paper characterizing the differences using explainable AI already accepted as an oral presentation at #PSB2025 (lead by high school senior Marcus Blennemann), look for future work in this space! www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
github.com
GitHub - bee-hive/occident: Github repo for Occident Website hosting Live Cell Image Data
Github repo for Occident Website hosting Live Cell Image Data - bee-hive/occident
110
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 26/11/2024
In summary, we found that, compared to the SH KO control condition, TCR T cells with the RASA2 KO have a longer dwell time and cripple cancer cells more effectively this way, whereas TCR T cells with the CUL5 KO proliferated more frequently upon activation, adding more T cells to the fight.
100
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 26/11/2024
With a Markov model, we deconvolved when, in frame t-1, there is one cancer cell and one T cell in a window, and in frame t there is one cancer cell and two T cells. We were able to quantify how often this doubling of T cells attacking a cancer cell was due to proliferation or due to recruitment.
100
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 26/11/2024
Most thrilling is that we can identify active T cells based on relative cell size and morphology, and watch T cells activate (differentially based on condition) after interacting with cancer cells.
100
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 26/11/2024
Even more exciting, the speed of cancer cells decreased after interactions with T cells, as did their overall size (indicating stress).
100
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 26/11/2024
While the # of T cell--cancer cell interactions increased similarly, these interactions & their effects were modulated by the CRISPR KOs. E.g., the time a T cell remained attached to a cancer cell (as estimated by a negative binomial and Markov model separately) was highest in RASA2 KO T cells.
100
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 26/11/2024
Cancer cell and T cell morphology changes dramatically depending on state. These changes are visible in the brightfield imaging – active interacting T cells are larger and change to less circular shapes. Cancer cell begin to aggregate together when interacting with T cells.
100
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 26/11/2024
We found that the number of T cells attached to cancer cells reduces the likelihood that the cancer cell will proliferate, with the beneficial KO T cells having greater effects on proliferation reduction.
100
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 26/11/2024
We can study differences in cancer cell division events (lower in beneficial KO T cells) and average T cell speed (faster in beneficial KO T cells).
100
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 26/11/2024
We found that T cell proliferation increased in the two beneficial KO T cells, in the CUL5 KO T cells in particular.
100
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 26/11/2024
With the masked, tracked cells, we went to work to develop Occident. We were curious how well the RFP markers captured cancer cell number; we found that RFP lags as a proxy for cancer cell numbers.
100
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 26/11/2024
Then, the Van Valen Lab developed Caliban to segment and track each cell (green are T cells, red are cancer cells, white are detritus).
100
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 26/11/2024
Each well was imaged every 4 minutes at 10X magnification on Sartorius Incucyte for 72 hrs. Images include brightfield, RFP (cancer cell nuclei) channels.
100
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 26/11/2024
We teamed up with Alex Marson and Julia Carnevale’s Labs, who imaged TCR T cells co-cultured with RFP+ A375 tumor cells 3 ways: Safe harbor knockout (SH KO; control), RASA2 KO (Carnevale et al., 2022), CUL5 KO (Liao et al., 2024).
100
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 26/11/2024
…and amazing pack hunting behaviors of the modified T cells:
100
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 26/11/2024
…cancer cell death, which is quite rare in much of these data...
100
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 26/11/2024
A lot of interesting signal is left on the cutting room floor. For example, proliferation (rates) in cancer cells...
100
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 26/11/2024
Incucyte live cell imaging is ubiquitous, but from this complex data cancer immunologists typically plot one thing: the number of red pixels in the well, which is a proxy for the cancer cell coverage (RFP marks cancer cell nuclei). From [Carnevale et al. 2022]:
110
Engelhardt Research Group @thebeehive.bsky.social · 26/11/2024
First post in the Good Place! Our preprint on cellular behavior analysis in TCR T cells & cancer cell live-cell imaging data is out! This 3-year collaboration led by pd Archit Verma w/ Alex Marson & Julia Carnevale, with segmentation & tracking by @davidvv & team! www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
biorxiv.org
Cellular behavior analysis from live-cell imaging of TCR T cell–cancer cell interactions
T cell therapies, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells and T cell receptor (TCR) T cells, are a growing class of anti-cancer treatments. However, expansion to novel indications and beyond l...
1197