iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

I'm well aware lots of Jewish people support the motion, but no single person speaks for their entire demographic, I was speaking about the specific ones who do want reassurance. An amendment was voted on specifically saying Jewish people are safe to worship at synagogue, it was voted down.

000

You people think it's like supporting sports teams or something. We're fine.

100

Obviously electing our representative is the most important thing.

100

We wanted Zack to be in Holborn & SP to campaign for the by-election which is more important than the conference.

100

Kieran🏳️‍🌈 @diptripping.eurosky.social · 04/10/2026

Weird purity testing, he supported the amendment. Just because that doesn't fit into your little character you've created doesn't mean it isn't true.

000

Reposted by AssadaTGP

I noticed that the emergency motion on opposing the trans surgery ban had around 100 fewer voters online even though that was in the middle of all the ZiR stuff, so they still would have been there.

1452

Zack also backed the amendment.

200

The Green Party of England & Wales @greenparty.org.uk · 02/10/2026

They have not said anything, it would be very easy to calm tensions. The vote had 45% against and it was very emotional for people on both sides. Don't you think it's just an easy thing to do to come out and support party unity and reassure our fellow Jewish members who are worried?...

100

Reposted by AssadaTGP

“We are calling on this government to put in place a three-year emergency brake on private rents, let wages begin to catch up with the rents that have outstripped them for far too long.” Zack Polanski on the fight for fairer, more affordable rents.

319665

The Green Party of England & Wales @greenparty.org.uk · 04/10/2026

I hope the proposers can now follow up to announce unequivocally that they support Jewish members who attend synagogue and other Jewish institutions in the United Kingdom As much as, as an E motion, it cannot enforce that. It's still important to say that they don't want that for our Jewish members

150

Reposted by AssadaTGP

Following the vote on the anti-Zionist policy at Green Party Conference, the 5 Green MPs, the Leader and Co-Deputy Leaders have issued a joint statement

A green background with white text that reads: Joint Statement As Greens, we will always uphold universal human rights. We will never tolerate any form of discrimination or harassment. We will continue to stand in opposition to genocide, ethnic cleansing, apartheid and the illegal occupation. We will continue to call out the heinous crimes of the Netanyahu government. And we will continue to work to ensure that the Green Party is an anti-racist party in every way. We know there is no conflict between supporting the rights of Palestinians and the rights of Jewish people. Signed by: Zack Polanski, Rachel Milward, Mothin Ali, Sian Berry MP, Ellie Chowns MP, Carla Denyer MP, Adrian Ramsay MP, Hannah Spencer MP

3728178

Yeah it was nice to be followed by them as I back their motion, both sides are bad in Iran that's unequivocally true. That's of course in contrast to Palestine where one side is being genocided by an invasive settler colonialist regime. Anyway, I don't believe in hell and you're wrong.

000

One of the lines the authors of ZiR say is 'Palestinians will liberate themselves'. I think the idea they will liberate themselves is also ridiculous, we need to help them and give them to the platform to self determine by sanctions Israel. ZiR will hurt our ability to do this, it needs amending.

030

The motion is more than just the title, it's the text of the motion that needs editing it's very poorly written and will cause a lot of issues. I think the difficulty is when people have been saying they want to edit the text they get attacked for it by the proposers...

010

The motion is more than just the title, obviously Zionism is racist in practice but there are various issues that need to be addressed. The proposers refuse any discussion around the motion and refuse any amendments. It's essentially poorly written and yet heavily backed.

130

They should have been open about it from the start I agree but it was known all MPs, Zack and Rachel were against the motion for a while and Carla was scheduled to speak against the motion at spring conference on behalf of the MPs. Unfortunately it's difficult to go against G4P, but it's right.

010

As someone who is against ZiR and in favour of E03 this idiot does not represent the green members who are against ZiR. Genocide denier can attack his anti-Semite opposite number in David Miller, they are both scum.

1120

Caroline Russell @carolinerussell.bsky.social · 03/10/2026

Zionism is definitely racist in practice, there are just a bunch of issues with the motion. 'Zionism is Racism' is just the title don't forget. It's just been very hard to argue to change a motion that has such emotion hanging on it, especially with the author's insistence that it remains unamended

150

Reposted by AssadaTGP

Every word chosen with care. Thank you Sian.

0351

Which of course was suggested by the authors of E03 haha

110

No, E03 actively removes the party policy that supports a 2SS. It then advocates for the self determination of the all people in the region. E02 both keeps a 2SS and advocates for a 1SS. It is just a poorly written motion unfortunately.

100

I think this is really disappointing. E02 keeps a 2SS whilst E03 removes it. Palestinians helped with the creation of E03. It's clearly an antizionist motion that is strategically better at supporting Palestinians. I'm not sure why you're lying, but I'm assuming you've been informed incorrectly.

110

I'm really not worried about us being officially anti Zionist or not when we are clearly de facto anti Zionist. If we wasn't then we wouldn't pass incredibly strong BDS motions near unanimously whilst some of those same voters will speak out on the floor against ZiR for being strategically empty.

000

E03 also calls for the end to the proscription of PA too. I'm fine with declaring us an antizionist party but I'm not sure what that does? Or why it's historic. Ultimately feels more like patting ourselves on the back for materially changing nothing, whilst hurting us electorally for many reasons.

100

I agree that it's a problem that we look like we're holding back support for Palestine, unfortunately the motion has been advertised in that way. Realistically E02 actually does nothing it's just rhetoric. Rhetoric is absolutely important, but we're passing BDS D motions that are actually effective

2101

Hi Sian, Zionism in practice is racist, however this motion is obviously not the way to achieve Palestinian liberation and the motions proposers refuse to engage in good faith. Can we ask you to alternatively support E03, which seeks to support Palestinians in a more effective way?

0122