What possible justification can there be for this? Especially because the same data is available without registration from tons of other sources, like Google Patents and the EPO's Espacenet? Are they experiencing some bot floods or DDoS attacks?
Michael
@sqfreak.bsky.social
82 followers 164 following 305 posts
Legal Risk Analyst for an Investment Research Company, Lawyer, Technophile, Eurovision Fan, <>
![is lopped off. The filing is directed “TO CLERK.” A blank page appears. Then a “Proposed
Default Order,” with the undersigned’s name in the signature block. Misspelled. Doc. 40 &
Doc. 40-1.
1
Counsel’s supporting declaration provides as the “Date: 9. 2025 [sic].” Doc. 40-2 at
unnumbered pg. 2. Its explanation for excluding Defendant “MOTOBUDDY” from the request
reads: “The Court’s Order No 7 allowed alternative service of the Summons and Complaint
which was accomplished as in Return of Service in Order No 7, excluding Defendant Moto
Buddy [sic].” Id. at ¶ 3. This, the Court will not attempt to decipher.
On the same day as Plaintiff’s filing, Defendants “ONDWAY,” “INPOOL US STORE”
and “POOLCLEAN US STORE” filed an Answer and Counterclaims. Doc. 42. That was on
September 9, 2025. The Court has waited, since, for Plaintiff to answer the Counterclaims.
It appears that, without prompting, that day may never come.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:j46357lsmuysdxmktshrb4g5/bafkreifug2v5g5ttmnxdfpdu2tg7grakfr4kkdsesrj6jhw4cjo67if6ky)
