iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Busing doesn't help this. These kids are way behind even when they're in the exact same classrooms as kids who are doing well.

010

It's your argument. 🤷 Is producing unreliable output an argument for or against AI behaving like humans?

100

And I think if we could roll back time a few minutes, your brain would do the exact same things it did the first time. I'm not even sure what argument you're making.

000

>They work exactly according to their algorithm. So what? Why do you believe an algorithm is incapable of thought? Yes, autocomplete can think if it's backed by a sufficient process. You're just restating the Chinese room argument.

000

You say that like it matters at all. How does knowing what each node is doing exclude their collective state being able to infer facts about the world?

100

Evidence of what, exactly? These models are unquestionably intelligent, are capable of reasoning about problems that humans can't solve, create art and music. This is reality today, and anyone who uses them knows it. And I got my CS degree in 1996.

Will Stancil @whstancil.bsky.social · 21/09/2026

Reposted by Lovah Spaghets!

One thing I'll say: a whoooole lot of people are staking out strong philosophical views on AI with a false sense of security, serenely unaware that the capabilities that would severely undermine their confident claims already exist.

2422510

The fact that you're admitting that humans have the exact same failing as the ai - hallucinations - as an argument against the AI is very interesting.

100

Except it the exact same argument, just used in a way you don't like.

150

But not via reasoning and induction/deduction.

So what? It still solved the problem when no human was able to and not just by trying every possible combination or something equally boring.

When the prompt is "solve this unsolved math problem" and it does it, that's amazing and not just repeating the question back.

070

This is not brute forcing like they do when trying to crack large primes. This is more like hiring 1000 mathematicians to work on the problem at the same time.

Lovah Spaghets! @spaghets.bsky.social · 25/02/2026

You're using an opinion piece to argue the science?

000

Lovah Spaghets! @spaghets.bsky.social · 27/05/2025

Ai art, and AI in general, doesn't need any defense. Almost everyone is using it every day for work, and that's not going to stop. Chatgpt is the 5th most used site on the Internet and rising.

030

Lovah Spaghets! @spaghets.bsky.social · 27/05/2025

The AI industry won't be killed by this, it will simply become the Chinese AI that everyone uses.

000

Lovah Spaghets! @spaghets.bsky.social · 27/05/2025

This is how you lose your user base to a competitor who uses AI.

000

Lovah Spaghets! @spaghets.bsky.social · 17/03/2025

Buying a Tesla has never been more completely out of the question.

000

Lovah Spaghets! @spaghets.bsky.social · 07/03/2025

If it's a fake issue, then why are the democrats in the Senate so out of touch with the members of the Democratic party on the issue?

000

Lovah Spaghets! @spaghets.bsky.social · 21/02/2025

Screaming "LITERALLY" doesn't make it so.

100

Lovah Spaghets! @spaghets.bsky.social · 06/02/2025

Indigenous knowledge is a perfect example of a stopped clock being right twice a day. It's mostly useless.

000

Lovah Spaghets! @spaghets.bsky.social · 19/01/2025

Which part of this was violated? There are still dozens of social media apps, including the one you're currently on, where you can speak freely. Part of the supreme court's decision was that this was a content neutral ban - it had nothing to do with what people were posting.

000

Reposted by Lovah Spaghets!

Jerry Coyne @evolutionistrue.bsky.social · 19/01/2025

A consortium of secular organizations refuses to recognize that in a few cases (e.g., sports, hormones for kids), trans rights conflict with ethicality or the rights of other groups. The Center for Inquiry begs to differ. I suggest supporting the CFI. whyevolutionistrue.com/2025/01/19/c...

1124

Lovah Spaghets! @spaghets.bsky.social · 31/12/2024

That is the case nearly all the time. Nobody cares that someone wants to play out whatever gender stereotype they like. The only time it's a problem is when they feel the need to invade female only spaces.

100

Lovah Spaghets! @spaghets.bsky.social · 30/12/2024

Follow the science...but not there!!

010

Reposted by Lovah Spaghets!

Michael Shermer @michaelshermer.bsky.social · 22/12/2024

Wokeness Poisons Science Part II of my series on why I am no longer woke open.substack.com/pub/michaels...

open.substack.com

Wokeness Poisons Science

Part II of my series on why I am no longer woke

5156

Exactly! It's a tool, the same as any other. It can be used for copyright infringement just as easily as a photocopy machine, but that doesn't make the machine the problem.

010

So why did you commit copyright infringement by querying for it?

No, there aren't at all. You don't have an even basic understanding of how LLMs work.

000