Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 17/08/2026Thanks! As a preview of some ongoing work, we have since replicated this result in a simple visual working memory with item-memory only (i.e., no binding needed). See attached figures. This new experiment is essentially a follow up of He et al. (Exp. 1, 2026, JEP:LMC): osf.io/preprints/os... 020
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 16/06/2026The Gumbel-min predicts that accuracy in the 2M-Min task is not affected by M. That is, having more new items to pick from does not make it easier to select a new item. This predictions is beautifully confirmed. Performance in the 2M-max task increases with M, an expected pattern from all SDT models 140
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 16/06/2026The main evidence for the Gumbel-min model does not require any model fitting. Instead, the Gumbel-min model makes a unique prediction for the 2M-task, where participants always see M studied and M non-studied items (e.g., 1 studied and 1 non-studied; 2 studied and 2 non-studied, etc). 110
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 16/06/2026Finally out in Psychological Review (psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/...), our update to Signal Detection Theory. We show that contrary to the prevailing Gaussian assumption, evidence distributions in recognition memory are likely minimum extreme Gumbel! 211842
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 10/06/2026Looks like my summer read has finally arrived. #rstats @mc-stan.org 4929
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 01/10/2025See the same pattern for our Experiments 2 and 3 here. In Experiment 3, we added additional topics (e.g., Separating church from state causes more harm than good.) and more thoroughly controlled argument quality in three levels (good, internally inconsistent, and authority-based). 100
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 01/10/2025The pattern in the average data also holds for each of the arguments (each line/colour per panel is one specific argument). People who think a claim (e.g., "abortion should be legal") is false find the corresponding argument is bad; people who think the claim is true think the argument is good. 100
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 02/09/2025Exciting #rstats news for Bayesian model comparison: bridgesampling is finally ready to support cmdstanr, see screenshot. Help us by installing the development version of bridgesampling and letting us know if it works for your model(s): pak::pkg_install("quentingronau/bridgesampling#44") 2289
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 28/04/2025Yes & we discuss some shortcomings of d_a. As shown below, d_a does not permit an ordering of participants according to performance (d' and g' do). We also compare Type I error rates for g', d', and d_a for real H/FA-pairs where only response bias differs, only g' maintains 5% Type I errors (pp. 51) 130
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 27/04/2025A particularly noteworthy example of a Gumbel-min prediction is shown here. The ROC predicted from g' (calculated from a single yes/no point) closely matches the ROC reconstruction derived independently from forced-choice judgments. The Gaussian model cannot even make a prediction in this case. 100
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 27/04/2025We compared the descriptive performance of both models across 35 datasets from four different recognition memory paradigms. The Gumbel-min model fits the data nearly as well as the Gaussian model. Once model complexity was penalized via AIC, the Gumbel-min model matched or outperformed the Gaussian. 100
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 27/04/2025The Gumbel-min model implies a behavioural principle: the probability of choosing a new item remains constant as choice sets grow. An experiment confirms this principle with constant accuracy for new item detection (2M-min). For old-item detection (2M-max), accuracy increase with choice set. 120
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 27/04/2025We consider an SDT model assuming Gumbel-min (i.e., minimum extreme-value) distributions. The Gumbel-min model avoids the problrms of the Gaussian model, predicts asymmetric ROCs assuming equal variances, and allows calculating measures of discriminability and response bias, g′ and kappa. 120
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 27/04/2025In recognition memory, ROCs are typically asymmetric, which requires Gaussian distributions with unequal variance. One problem with the unequal-variance model is that it predicts below chance performance for items with very low familiarity (i.e., studying makes some items less familiar). 110
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 27/04/2025SDT is a cornerstone of recognition memory research, primarily assuming Gaussian distributions – a choice based more on tradition than necessity. The standard model assumes two equal-variance distributions, allows calculating d′ from a pair of hits and false alarms, and predicts symmetric ROCs. 210
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 20/03/2025Results were in line with the qualitative predictions derived from sampling-based models. Predictions also held for the two types of illogical rankings we looked at. We do not know of any other (i.e. non-sampling) model that can make these qualitative predictions and predict illogical rankings. 000
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 19/03/2025Simulation results show different qualitative pattern across event sets. Pr(logical ranking) is largest for mixed sets, followed by edge-event sets, followed by mid-event sets. This pattern held independently of sample size or whether there was additional read-out noise in the sampling process. 110
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 19/03/2025We simulate the probability of obtaining logical and two types of illogical rankings for three different event sets: Edge events (P(A) & P(B) ≈ 1), mid-events (P(A) & P(B) ≈ .5), and mixed sets (P(A) ≈ 1 & P(B) ≈ .5). 100
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 19/03/2025In each trial of the event ranking task, participants have to rank an event set consisting of four events, A, not-A, B, and not-B, in terms of their perceived likelihoods. The task contains an embedded logical that allows to classify the obtained ranking as logical or illogical. 100
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 14/01/2025If you want to see a bit more up to date explanation, Macmillman & Creelman (2005, ch. 3) also describe the process. 010
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 12/12/2024This term in my stats teaching, I regularly included images of Moo Deng into my slides. One of my students was clearly inspired by this combination and made this super cool drawing of Moo Deng doing stats herself. I love it so much. Stats is Moo Deng Approved! 0121
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 08/12/2024Getting ready for my last week of teaching with a new stats meme 0112
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 12/11/2024Be careful how many emails you send to the CRAN maintainers (and in which format), otherwise your package might get removed from CRAN. Found on the r-package-devel mailing list. #rstats 000
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 27/10/2024Getting ready for my stats teaching tomorrow and looks like my meme game is on point. I really hope stats meme never go out of fashion (and if so, please no one tell me). 120
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 17/10/2024In addition to finding strong evidence for the use of compensatory decision strategies. We found evidence for considerable individual differences. The figure shows both mean and individual-level thresholds between the numerical and categorical impacts. 100
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 17/10/2024For both numerical and categorical judgements we found that weather scientists used compensatory decision strategies. An increase on any impact variable led to an increase in perceived severity, even when adjusting for the effect of the other impacts. 100
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 17/10/2024We asked 278 weather scientists from four countries (Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, & Vietnam) to provide both categorical and numerical severity judgements for hypothetical weather events that were similar to real weather events. We used Judgement Analysis to analyse their decision strategies. 100
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 17/10/2024Our research question was how weather scientists turn numerical impact information of extreme rainfall events, such as number of affected people, into categorical severity judgments. Nowadays, Impact-Based Warnings (IBWs) are commonly used which use categorical severity judgements. 100
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 17/10/2024New applied JDM paper on decision-strategies of weather scientists in South-East Asia led by Xiaoxiao Niu, with meteorology colleagues from the UK and South-East Asia. Free download link for 50 days: authors.elsevier.com/c/1jxx-7t2zZ... 141
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 14/10/2024This is a very cool way to visualise pre-post Likert data. 030
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 13/09/2024Had a great time at SMLP2024 (vasishth.github.io/smlp2024/) where I not only met my stats hero Doug Bates (developer of lme4) but also learned to use the incredibly fast MixedModels.jl Julia package: github.com/JuliaStats/M... If lme4 in R is too slow for you, give Julia and MixedModels.jl a chance! 060
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 05/09/2024One of the highlights of the academic calendar is graduation day. Yesterday we awarded the UCL BSc psychology class of 2024 their diplomas. 030
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 23/07/2024Summer is @mathpsych.org MathPsych time, this year in Tilburg. Our group from London learned a lot, had intense discussions, and of course also fun. This year EP UCL was supported by colleagues from econ and @birkbeckpsychology.bsky.social See you all next year! 040
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 08/12/2023My last attempt of turning this ship around. Who wants digital currency when they can have nutrition? 000
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 08/12/2023I am not giving up on adding some vegetables to her purchase order. 100
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 08/12/2023Hmm, it does not seem as if Fiona is interested in cabbages but only apples. 100
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 08/12/2023Luckily, this is exactly where I am heading on my way to get some Brussels sprouts. And because there is a deal, I am sure "Fiona" also wants some. 100
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 08/12/2023As expected, she wants me to go to the supermarket... 110
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 08/12/2023Exciting: My former deputy head of department in Warwick (where I still have a honorary appointment) suddenly reaches out to me and needs my help. I haven't talked to her in ages but we always got a long great so I am more than willing to help! Luckily I am about to head to the supermarket already. 100
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 22/11/2023Expressed the same thought in a recent presentation: Maybe methods for uncovering structures in covariance matrices (e.g., FA, SEM) are not appropriate tools for "carving nature at its joints". 031
Henrik Singmann @singmann.bsky.social · 22/10/2023I have started using AI created illustrations to make my teaching slides more visually appealing. However, the persistent biases are disturbing and not helpful. The attached image shows Bing create's idea of an "illustration of statistical testing". Seems to be a pretty manly business. 012