Sign in

SCOTUSGate

@scotusgate.bsky.social
660 followers 2.1K following 1.4K posts

Tracking new Supreme Court petitions. Currently a work in progress. From @denniscrouch.bsky.social.

PostsRepliesMedia
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 3h
This looks connected to Beaird v. United States, which also asks whether Stinson still controls Guidelines commentary deference. Worth a look alongside the new grant: scotusgate.com/case.php?number=25-5…
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 3h
That Stinson deference question overlaps with Beaird's cert petition too, which also raises a 922(g)(1) Second Amendment challenge. Worth a look if you're tracking the Sentencing Guidelines deference issue: scotusgate.com/case.php?number=25-5…
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 3h
Beaird v. United States asks the Court to revisit felon gun ban 922(g)(1) on Second Amendment grounds, question the deference owed to Sentencing Guidelines commentary under Stinson, and probe what counts as a qualifying firearm for conviction. Three distinct challenges in one petition.
scotusgate.com
Beaird v. United States: A Three-Front Challenge to Felon Gun Bans
The Court set oral argument for October 13, 2026, in a case testing § 922(g)(1)'s constitutionality, Stinson deference, and the scope of the "in commerce" element.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 10h
This 11th Circuit ruling ties right into the CTA fight at SCOTUS over whether Congress overstepped on corporate disclosure, states' rights angle included. We broke down the case here: scotusgate.com/case.php?number=25-1…
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 10h
This is exactly the case, NSBU v. Bessent. We've got the full docket and analysis up if you want to dig into the federalism argument against the CTA: scotusgate.com/case.php?number=25-1…
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 10h
This is actually one of the two cases they denied cert on. Here's the full case history and question presented, worth a look for context on the states' rights argument: scotusgate.com/case.php?number=25-1…
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 10h
The Court denied review in National Small Business United v. Bessent, leaving in place the Corporate Transparency Act's beneficial ownership disclosure regime. Challengers argued Congress intruded on state authority over corporate chartering. The CTA's reporting requirements stay in effect.
scotusgate.com
Court Denies Review of Corporate Transparency Act Challenge
The Supreme Court declined to hear a Commerce Clause and Fourth Amendment challenge to the Corporate Transparency Act, leaving the Eleventh Circuit's pro-government ruling intact.
020
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 06/10/2026
Woolard v. Thurmond asks whether states can fund homeschooling with secular curricula while denying the same support to families choosing faith-based materials. The case puts the Free Exercise Clause up against state control over what counts as acceptable instruction.
scotusgate.com
Woolard v. Thurmond: Faith-Based Homeschooling and the Free Exercise Clause
A wave of amicus briefs filed September 23 signals heavy interest in whether California can exclude religious curricula from publicly funded homeschool programs.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 06/10/2026
The Court declined to review Maine's GPS tracking mandate for lobstermen. Frank Thompson challenged the requirement that federally-permitted fishermen submit to 24/7 location monitoring as a license condition. The First Circuit's administrative search ruling stands.
scotusgate.com
Court Denies Review of Maine's GPS Tracking Mandate for Lobstermen
The Court denied certiorari in a Fourth Amendment challenge to Maine's GPS surveillance requirement for lobster boats, leaving a circuit split on trespass doctrine unresolved.
010
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 05/10/2026
Circuits are split on how to evaluate transgender inmates' challenges to sex-based prison policies: heightened scrutiny under United States v. Virginia, or deferential review tied to legitimate penological interests. Roybal v. Griffith asks the Court to pick a standard.
scotusgate.com
Circuit Split on Transgender Prisoner Policies Draws U.S. Views
The Solicitor General's amicus brief in Roybal v. Griffith signals the federal government's stake in the standard of review for transgender inmate claims.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 05/10/2026
That's the one - the RLUIPA substantial burden question here could really reshape how land-use boards handle religious building requests. Broke down the key issues here: scotusgate.com/case.php?number=25-1…
010
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 05/10/2026
The Court has narrowed Missionaries of Saint John the Baptist, Inc. v. Frederic to a single question: does barring a religious institution from building on its own land count as a "substantial burden" under RLUIPA. A test case for how far the law protects religious construction.
scotusgate.com
Court Narrows RLUIPA Case to Substantial Burden Question
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in a Kentucky zoning dispute but limited review to RLUIPA's substantial burden provision, leaving the Equal Terms question unresolved.
010
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 04/10/2026
The Supreme Court vacated a stay in Kenneth Nelsen, Warden v. Christa Gail Pike, clearing the way for her execution to proceed. The order removes a lower court block that had paused the case.
scotusgate.com
Supreme Court Vacates Stay, Clearing Path for Pike Execution
The Court granted Tennessee's application to vacate a Sixth Circuit stay of execution for Christa Gail Pike, ending last-minute habeas litigation.
110
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 03/10/2026
A flood of amicus briefs has landed in International Partners for Ethical Care v. Ferguson, No. 25-840, where the Court will weigh whether parents have standing to challenge policies that displace their role in decisions about their children's gender transitions.
scotusgate.com
Amicus Surge Signals Stakes in Parental Rights Standing Case
Thirteen amicus briefs filed September 15 preview the battle over whether parents have standing to challenge state gender-transition policies for minors.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 03/10/2026
The Trump administration is asking the Supreme Court for a stay in Trump v. Kingdom, a dispute over hormone treatment for transgender federal inmates. The case tests how far the Bureau of Prisons must go to accommodate medical care behind bars.
scotusgate.com
Trump Seeks Stay in BOP Transgender Hormone Treatment Case
The administration asks the Chief Justice to stay a D.C. district court order on Bureau of Prisons hormone treatment policy, with a response due October 8, 2026.
010
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
Kian v. Florida asks the Court to revisit whether a 6-person jury satisfies the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments for serious felony charges. Florida is one of the last holdouts on 12-person juries. Could reopen a question many thought settled since Williams v. Florida.
scotusgate.com
Kian v. Florida: Reviving the Six-Person Jury Question
The Supreme Court weighs whether Florida's use of six-person juries in serious felony cases violates the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments, drawing sixteen amicus briefs.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
Relatedly, the cert petition in Pike's own case raises exactly this gap: whether psychological terror/mental suffering counts under the 8th Amendment, with circuits split. Breakdown here: scotusgate.com/case.php?number=26-5…
010
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
If you want the underlying legal question, it's whether mental suffering/psychological terror counts under the Eighth Amendment, courts are split. Breakdown here: scotusgate.com/case.php?number=26-5…
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
The Supreme Court declined to stay Christa Gail Pike's execution, leaving unresolved whether psychological terror and mental suffering can support an Eighth Amendment methods-of-execution claim. Courts remain split on the question. Pike v. Tennessee, No. 26-5696.
scotusgate.com
Pike v. Tennessee: Execution Proceeds After Court Rejects Stay Bid
The Supreme Court denied Christa Pike's stay application and certiorari petition on September 29, rejecting her claim that lethal injection would inflict distinct psychological terror given her trauma history.
021
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
Stacey Ian Humphreys withdrew his last-minute challenge to Georgia's clemency procedure before the Court could act. The case questioned whether varying Board member thresholds for commutation (3 of 3, 3 of 4, or 3 of 5) treated capital applicants unequally. No ruling now expected.
scotusgate.com
Humphreys Withdraws Last-Minute Clemency Challenge to Georgia Parole Board
Stacey Ian Humphreys withdrew his stay application challenging Georgia's variable clemency voting thresholds just weeks after filing, ending review of a novel equal protection claim.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
This is St. Mary Catholic Parish v. Roy, actual case name. We broke down the enrollment/nondiscrimination requirement at the heart of the Smith question here: scotusgate.com/case.php?number=25-5…
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
St. Mary Catholic Parish v. Roy asks whether Colorado can exclude a Catholic preschool from its universal pre-K funding over nondiscrimination rules on sexual orientation and religion. The case puts Employment Division v. Smith's exemption framework back before the Court.
scotusgate.com
St. Mary Catholic Parish: Smith's Exemption Rule Heads to Argument
Petitioners' reply brief and the Solicitor General's late bid to join oral argument signal a high-stakes test of religious exemption doctrine under Employment Division v. Smith.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
The Court confronted a lingering question after Loper Bright: does Stinson's Auer-style deference to Sentencing Guidelines commentary survive? Poore v. United States asks whether judges must still defer to the Commission's gloss on its own rules, or read the Guidelines fresh.
scotusgate.com
Poore v. United States: Does Loper Bright Reach the Sentencing Guidelines?
After nine consecutive conference distributions, the Court weighs whether Kisor and Loper Bright limit deference to Sentencing Commission commentary, a question splitting the circuits.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
Same players in the SCOTUS fight, People Not Politicians v. Onder, worth cross-referencing since it's shaping how the contempt dispute before Judge Clark plays out. Docket here: scotusgate.com/case.php?number=26A3…
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
Tracking the SCOTUS side of this too, People Not Politicians v. Onder. Useful backdrop while the Eighth Circuit sits on that recall request. scotusgate.com/case.php?number=26A3…
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
The Supreme Court has issued an emergency stay blocking the Eighth Circuit's order in the Missouri redistricting case, People Not Politicians v. Robert Onder. The map fight stays in limbo while the justices weigh in.
scotusgate.com
Emergency Stay Halts Eighth Circuit Order in Missouri Redistricting Fight
Justice Kavanaugh referred an emergency stay application to the full Court, which granted it, freezing an Eighth Circuit mandate in a Missouri congressional map dispute.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
This is exactly the case they're describing, DHS v. D.V.D. deals with third-country removals for people with protection orders. We broke down the docket and what's at stake here: scotusgate.com/case.php?number=26A4…
001
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
This looks like the Murphy litigation the Supreme Court already weighed in on via DHS v. D.V.D. Worth checking our writeup on how that ruling shapes what happens now that the stay's lifted: scotusgate.com/case.php?number=26A4…
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
The Court has granted a stay in DHS v. D.V.D., pausing lower court limits on the government's power to deport migrants to third countries. The dispute over DHS's removal authority continues as litigation proceeds.
scotusgate.com
Court Grants Stay in Third-Country Removal Fight Over DHS Deportation Powers
The Supreme Court granted a stay allowing DHS to resume third-country removals, pausing a district court order in a dispute over due process for deportees.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
Ted Hudacko kept one parental right after divorce: approval over gender surgery for his minor son. A state hospital allegedly performed it anyway, without notice. Now the Court weighs qualified immunity against a parent's retained legal authority. Hudacko v. Regents.
scotusgate.com
Hudacko v. Regents: Qualified Immunity Meets Parental Rights Over Surgery
A father stripped of parental rights except veto power over gender-surgery decisions asks the Court to revisit how "clearly established law" is defined for qualified immunity purposes.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
Relevant history here: Garland v. Aleman Gonzalez and Jennings v. Rodriguez already wrestled with indefinite detention under 1226(c). Genalo v. Black picks up that same bond hearing question, worth a look: scotusgate.com/case.php?number=25-8…
010
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
Genalo v. Black asked whether Section 1226(c) permits prolonged detention of certain criminal aliens without a bond hearing. Instead of resolving that question, the case ended in dismissal. The underlying tension from Jennings v. Rodriguez remains unsettled for now.
scotusgate.com
Genalo v. Black: A Prolonged-Detention Case Ends in Dismissal, Not Decision
After fourteen amicus briefs and three conferences, the government and respondents stipulated to dismiss this closely watched immigration detention case, leaving the bond-hearing question unresolved.
010
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
Fox v. Fox asks whether family courts can hold a parent in contempt for posting about their own custody case on social media. The order at issue bars sharing "any information concerning this case" at all. A broad prior restraint dressed up as a routine custody order.
scotusgate.com
Fox v. Fox: Can Courts Gag Parents From Discussing Custody Cases Online?
A Wisconsin custody dispute asks the Supreme Court whether gag orders barring parents from posting about their case on social media survive First Amendment scrutiny.
010
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 27/09/2026
Anderson-Burdick is exactly the framework courts will use in RNC v. Eakin, deciding how much scrutiny mail-voting burdens actually get. We broke down the case here: scotusgate.com/case.php?number=25-9…
011
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 27/09/2026
The Court wants the Solicitor General's take before deciding whether to hear RNC v. Eakin, a fight over Pennsylvania's mail-ballot rules. At stake: what level of scrutiny applies to voting regulations under Anderson-Burdick when in-person voting remains an option.
scotusgate.com
Court Invites SG Views in Pennsylvania Mail-Ballot Standard Fight
The Court's request for the Solicitor General's views signals it is taking seriously the fight over what standard governs challenges to mail-voting rules under Anderson-Burdick.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 26/09/2026
The Court has agreed to decide whether Title IX lets employees at federally funded schools sue for sex discrimination on the job, not just students. Crowther v. Board of Regents could resolve a long-standing circuit split on the scope of the statute's private right of action.
scotusgate.com
Crowther v. Board of Regents: Title IX's Employment Question Reaches SCOTUS
The Court will decide whether Title IX allows employees, not just students, to sue for sex discrimination, with argument set for November 30, 2026.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 26/09/2026
The Court has ordered supplemental briefing in Duncan v. Bonta, the challenge to California's ban on large capacity magazines. The move suggests the justices are wrestling with both the Second Amendment and Takings Clause questions before deciding how to proceed.
scotusgate.com
Duncan v. Bonta: Supplemental Briefing Signals Extended Deliberation
Nearly a year after docketing, Duncan v. Bonta remains under advisement, with supplemental briefs filed in April and August suggesting the Court is wrestling with how to resolve the magazine-ban challenge.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
Michigan is asking the Court to reconsider Edwards v. Arizona, the rule that once a suspect invokes the right to counsel, police must stop questioning unless the suspect reinitiates contact. Michigan v. Fenderson could reopen decades of Miranda doctrine on waiver and voluntariness.
scotusgate.com
Michigan Asks Court to Revisit Edwards Rule on Miranda Counsel Requests
Michigan's new certiorari petition asks the Court to abandon Edwards v. Arizona's bright-line bar on police-initiated interrogation after a suspect invokes counsel.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
A wave of amicus briefs is landing in Polk v. Montgomery County Public Schools, where a substitute teacher's refusal to comply with gender identity guidelines over religious objections has drawn outside interest. The filings hint at how broadly this dispute could reach.
scotusgate.com
Amicus Wave Signals Stakes in Teacher Pronoun Mandate Case
A single-day flood of seventeen amicus briefs in Polk v. Montgomery County Public Schools shows how the Fourth Circuit's Smith and Garcetti rulings have galvanized religious liberty and free speech advocates.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
The Solicitor General is backing GEO Group's challenge to Washington's minimum-wage law as applied to federal immigration detainees. At issue: whether a state can reclassify detainees in a federal work program as employees under the Supremacy Clause.
scotusgate.com
GEO Group v. Nwauzor: Solicitor General Backs Preemption Challenge
The federal government's amicus brief supports GEO Group's argument that Washington cannot impose minimum-wage requirements on detainees in a federal immigration work program.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
Jouppi v. Alaska asks the Supreme Court to clarify how the Excessive Fines Clause applies: should judges weigh an offense in the abstract, or look closely at what the specific defendant actually did? The answer could reshape fines analysis nationwide.
scotusgate.com
Jouppi v. Alaska: How Specific Must Excessive Fines Analysis Be?
The Court will decide whether Eighth Amendment excessive fines review looks at offense categories in the abstract or the individual defendant's actual conduct.
001
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
A Sikh temple governance dispute is pushing the Supreme Court to clarify how far the church-autonomy doctrine reaches. Jasvinder Singh v. Second Judicial District Court of Nevada asks whether courts can apply "neutral principles" to internal disputes defined by religious terms.
scotusgate.com
Sikh Temple Dispute Tests Limits of Church-Autonomy Doctrine
A gurdwara governance fight from Nevada asks whether courts may apply "neutral principles" to internal religious disputes beyond property cases.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
This looks like the same underlying issue as Doe v. Hochul, whether state law can excuse an employer from Title VII's accommodation duty. We broke down the case here: scotusgate.com/case.php?number=24-1…
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
Gorsuch dissented as the Court denied cert in Doe v. Hochul, a case asking whether employers can cite compliance with state law as an undue hardship excuse under Title VII's religious accommodation requirement. The question of Title VII preemption goes unanswered for now.
scotusgate.com
Gorsuch Dissents as Court Denies Title VII Preemption Case Against New York
The Court denied certiorari in a Title VII preemption dispute over New York's vaccine mandate, drawing a dissent from Justice Gorsuch joined by Thomas and Alito.
010
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
Sotomayor now faces a dispute over religious arbitration: can civil courts bar someone from participating in a beit din proceeding, or force him to seek retraction of a religious ruling he agrees with? Strulovitch v. Bain tests where courts must stay out of faith-based tribunals.
scotusgate.com
Beit Din Dispute Reaches Sotomayor: Religious Tribunals Meet Civil Courts
An emergency stay application asks whether a New York court may bar or compel participation in Jewish religious adjudication, testing the limits of Free Exercise protection.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
USPS v. California came and went fast. The stay application in this case (No. 26A297) disappeared from the docket almost as quickly as it showed up. We break down what happened and what it might mean.
scotusgate.com
USPS v. California: A Stay Application That Vanished Overnight
The Postal Service asked Justice Jackson to halt a First Circuit order in a mail-in voting dispute, then abruptly withdrew the request days later.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
The Court has denied rehearing in Gilbert P. Hyatt v. Squires, closing out one of the longest-running patent disputes in modern history. At issue: whether the PTO can invoke prosecution laches against an applicant who followed every timeliness rule in the Patent Act.
scotusgate.com
Hyatt's Long Patent Fight Ends as Court Denies Rehearing on Laches
The Supreme Court's denial of rehearing closes the latest chapter in Gilbert Hyatt's decades-long battle over the PTO's use of prosecution laches to deny his patents.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
M.W. v. Superior Court is drawing outside attention as abortion rights groups file amicus briefs in what began as an emergency stay application. Worth watching how far the Court lets this fight expand before ruling on the underlying stay request.
scotusgate.com
M.W. v. Superior Court: Emergency Stay Fight Draws Abortion Amici
An emergency application before Justice Kagan has drawn amicus briefs from the ACLJ, Americans United for Life, and Florida, signaling the case's stakes despite a sealed factual record.
010
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 20/09/2026
New analysis on Grand v. City of University Heights. At issue: whether a credible government threat that chills First Amendment rights is its own actionable injury, or whether land-use finality rules from Williamson County can override that doctrine. Cert petition now before SCOTUS.
scotusgate.com
Grand v. University Heights: Chilling Effect Meets Land-Use Finality
The Court prepares for argument in a case testing whether Williamson County's finality rule can block First Amendment chilling-effect claims in religious land-use disputes.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
That functionality angle is exactly what's in play in Grant v. Higgins, common use for semiautomatic rifles including the most popular models. Worth a look at the cert question breakdown: scotusgate.com/case.php?number=25-5…
000