Sign in

SCOTUSGate

@scotusgate.bsky.social
656 followers 2.1K following 1.4K posts

Tracking new Supreme Court petitions. Currently a work in progress. From @denniscrouch.bsky.social.

PostsRepliesMedia
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 9h
The Court confronted a lingering question after Loper Bright: does Stinson's Auer-style deference to Sentencing Guidelines commentary survive? Poore v. United States asks whether judges must still defer to the Commission's gloss on its own rules, or read the Guidelines fresh.
scotusgate.com
Poore v. United States: Does Loper Bright Reach the Sentencing Guidelines?
After nine consecutive conference distributions, the Court weighs whether Kisor and Loper Bright limit deference to Sentencing Commission commentary, a question splitting the circuits.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 15h
The Supreme Court has issued an emergency stay blocking the Eighth Circuit's order in the Missouri redistricting case, People Not Politicians v. Robert Onder. The map fight stays in limbo while the justices weigh in.
scotusgate.com
Emergency Stay Halts Eighth Circuit Order in Missouri Redistricting Fight
Justice Kavanaugh referred an emergency stay application to the full Court, which granted it, freezing an Eighth Circuit mandate in a Missouri congressional map dispute.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
The Court has granted a stay in DHS v. D.V.D., pausing lower court limits on the government's power to deport migrants to third countries. The dispute over DHS's removal authority continues as litigation proceeds.
scotusgate.com
Court Grants Stay in Third-Country Removal Fight Over DHS Deportation Powers
The Supreme Court granted a stay allowing DHS to resume third-country removals, pausing a district court order in a dispute over due process for deportees.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
Ted Hudacko kept one parental right after divorce: approval over gender surgery for his minor son. A state hospital allegedly performed it anyway, without notice. Now the Court weighs qualified immunity against a parent's retained legal authority. Hudacko v. Regents.
scotusgate.com
Hudacko v. Regents: Qualified Immunity Meets Parental Rights Over Surgery
A father stripped of parental rights except veto power over gender-surgery decisions asks the Court to revisit how "clearly established law" is defined for qualified immunity purposes.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
Genalo v. Black asked whether Section 1226(c) permits prolonged detention of certain criminal aliens without a bond hearing. Instead of resolving that question, the case ended in dismissal. The underlying tension from Jennings v. Rodriguez remains unsettled for now.
scotusgate.com
Genalo v. Black: A Prolonged-Detention Case Ends in Dismissal, Not Decision
After fourteen amicus briefs and three conferences, the government and respondents stipulated to dismiss this closely watched immigration detention case, leaving the bond-hearing question unresolved.
010
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
Fox v. Fox asks whether family courts can hold a parent in contempt for posting about their own custody case on social media. The order at issue bars sharing "any information concerning this case" at all. A broad prior restraint dressed up as a routine custody order.
scotusgate.com
Fox v. Fox: Can Courts Gag Parents From Discussing Custody Cases Online?
A Wisconsin custody dispute asks the Supreme Court whether gag orders barring parents from posting about their case on social media survive First Amendment scrutiny.
010
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 27/09/2026
The Court wants the Solicitor General's take before deciding whether to hear RNC v. Eakin, a fight over Pennsylvania's mail-ballot rules. At stake: what level of scrutiny applies to voting regulations under Anderson-Burdick when in-person voting remains an option.
scotusgate.com
Court Invites SG Views in Pennsylvania Mail-Ballot Standard Fight
The Court's request for the Solicitor General's views signals it is taking seriously the fight over what standard governs challenges to mail-voting rules under Anderson-Burdick.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 26/09/2026
The Court has agreed to decide whether Title IX lets employees at federally funded schools sue for sex discrimination on the job, not just students. Crowther v. Board of Regents could resolve a long-standing circuit split on the scope of the statute's private right of action.
scotusgate.com
Crowther v. Board of Regents: Title IX's Employment Question Reaches SCOTUS
The Court will decide whether Title IX allows employees, not just students, to sue for sex discrimination, with argument set for November 30, 2026.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 26/09/2026
The Court has ordered supplemental briefing in Duncan v. Bonta, the challenge to California's ban on large capacity magazines. The move suggests the justices are wrestling with both the Second Amendment and Takings Clause questions before deciding how to proceed.
scotusgate.com
Duncan v. Bonta: Supplemental Briefing Signals Extended Deliberation
Nearly a year after docketing, Duncan v. Bonta remains under advisement, with supplemental briefs filed in April and August suggesting the Court is wrestling with how to resolve the magazine-ban challenge.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
Michigan is asking the Court to reconsider Edwards v. Arizona, the rule that once a suspect invokes the right to counsel, police must stop questioning unless the suspect reinitiates contact. Michigan v. Fenderson could reopen decades of Miranda doctrine on waiver and voluntariness.
scotusgate.com
Michigan Asks Court to Revisit Edwards Rule on Miranda Counsel Requests
Michigan's new certiorari petition asks the Court to abandon Edwards v. Arizona's bright-line bar on police-initiated interrogation after a suspect invokes counsel.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
A wave of amicus briefs is landing in Polk v. Montgomery County Public Schools, where a substitute teacher's refusal to comply with gender identity guidelines over religious objections has drawn outside interest. The filings hint at how broadly this dispute could reach.
scotusgate.com
Amicus Wave Signals Stakes in Teacher Pronoun Mandate Case
A single-day flood of seventeen amicus briefs in Polk v. Montgomery County Public Schools shows how the Fourth Circuit's Smith and Garcetti rulings have galvanized religious liberty and free speech advocates.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
The Solicitor General is backing GEO Group's challenge to Washington's minimum-wage law as applied to federal immigration detainees. At issue: whether a state can reclassify detainees in a federal work program as employees under the Supremacy Clause.
scotusgate.com
GEO Group v. Nwauzor: Solicitor General Backs Preemption Challenge
The federal government's amicus brief supports GEO Group's argument that Washington cannot impose minimum-wage requirements on detainees in a federal immigration work program.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
Jouppi v. Alaska asks the Supreme Court to clarify how the Excessive Fines Clause applies: should judges weigh an offense in the abstract, or look closely at what the specific defendant actually did? The answer could reshape fines analysis nationwide.
scotusgate.com
Jouppi v. Alaska: How Specific Must Excessive Fines Analysis Be?
The Court will decide whether Eighth Amendment excessive fines review looks at offense categories in the abstract or the individual defendant's actual conduct.
001
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
A Sikh temple governance dispute is pushing the Supreme Court to clarify how far the church-autonomy doctrine reaches. Jasvinder Singh v. Second Judicial District Court of Nevada asks whether courts can apply "neutral principles" to internal disputes defined by religious terms.
scotusgate.com
Sikh Temple Dispute Tests Limits of Church-Autonomy Doctrine
A gurdwara governance fight from Nevada asks whether courts may apply "neutral principles" to internal religious disputes beyond property cases.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
Gorsuch dissented as the Court denied cert in Doe v. Hochul, a case asking whether employers can cite compliance with state law as an undue hardship excuse under Title VII's religious accommodation requirement. The question of Title VII preemption goes unanswered for now.
scotusgate.com
Gorsuch Dissents as Court Denies Title VII Preemption Case Against New York
The Court denied certiorari in a Title VII preemption dispute over New York's vaccine mandate, drawing a dissent from Justice Gorsuch joined by Thomas and Alito.
010
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
Sotomayor now faces a dispute over religious arbitration: can civil courts bar someone from participating in a beit din proceeding, or force him to seek retraction of a religious ruling he agrees with? Strulovitch v. Bain tests where courts must stay out of faith-based tribunals.
scotusgate.com
Beit Din Dispute Reaches Sotomayor: Religious Tribunals Meet Civil Courts
An emergency stay application asks whether a New York court may bar or compel participation in Jewish religious adjudication, testing the limits of Free Exercise protection.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
USPS v. California came and went fast. The stay application in this case (No. 26A297) disappeared from the docket almost as quickly as it showed up. We break down what happened and what it might mean.
scotusgate.com
USPS v. California: A Stay Application That Vanished Overnight
The Postal Service asked Justice Jackson to halt a First Circuit order in a mail-in voting dispute, then abruptly withdrew the request days later.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
The Court has denied rehearing in Gilbert P. Hyatt v. Squires, closing out one of the longest-running patent disputes in modern history. At issue: whether the PTO can invoke prosecution laches against an applicant who followed every timeliness rule in the Patent Act.
scotusgate.com
Hyatt's Long Patent Fight Ends as Court Denies Rehearing on Laches
The Supreme Court's denial of rehearing closes the latest chapter in Gilbert Hyatt's decades-long battle over the PTO's use of prosecution laches to deny his patents.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
M.W. v. Superior Court is drawing outside attention as abortion rights groups file amicus briefs in what began as an emergency stay application. Worth watching how far the Court lets this fight expand before ruling on the underlying stay request.
scotusgate.com
M.W. v. Superior Court: Emergency Stay Fight Draws Abortion Amici
An emergency application before Justice Kagan has drawn amicus briefs from the ACLJ, Americans United for Life, and Florida, signaling the case's stakes despite a sealed factual record.
010
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 20/09/2026
New analysis on Grand v. City of University Heights. At issue: whether a credible government threat that chills First Amendment rights is its own actionable injury, or whether land-use finality rules from Williamson County can override that doctrine. Cert petition now before SCOTUS.
scotusgate.com
Grand v. University Heights: Chilling Effect Meets Land-Use Finality
The Court prepares for argument in a case testing whether Williamson County's finality rule can block First Amendment chilling-effect claims in religious land-use disputes.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
Grant v. Higgins is set for December argument, with amicus briefs piling up on both sides. At issue: whether the Second and Fourteenth Amendments protect the right to own semiautomatic rifles like the AR-15, the country's best-selling rifle.
scotusgate.com
AR-15 Case Set for December Argument as Amicus Filings Pour In
The Supreme Court has consolidated and set for argument the case testing whether the Second Amendment protects AR-15 ownership, with briefing now underway.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
SCOTUS wants the Solicitor General's take before deciding whether to hear Pennsylvania v. Eakin. At issue: whether requiring mail voters to handwrite a date on their ballot envelope violates the First or Fourteenth Amendment. The CVSG signals the Court isn't rushing this one.
scotusgate.com
SCOTUS Invites Solicitor General Input on Pennsylvania Mail-Ballot Date Rule
The Court's call for the Solicitor General's views on Pennsylvania's mail-ballot dating requirement signals it is weighing whether to hear this closely watched election-law dispute.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
Justice Kagan's stay in Apple v. Epic puts a spotlight on how far courts can stretch civil contempt when an injunction never actually addressed the conduct at issue. Our new analysis digs into the "spirit of the injunction" problem and what it means for equitable authority.
scotusgate.com
Apple v. Epic: Justice Kagan's Stay and the Limits of Contempt
A denied stay application and a September 14 merits brief spotlight Apple's challenge to how far federal courts may go in enforcing injunctions through contempt.
001
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
The Supreme Court will hear Suncor v. Boulder County, testing whether federal law preempts state-law climate suits over greenhouse gas emissions. The outcome could shape how cities and states pursue oil companies for climate damages nationwide.
scotusgate.com
Suncor v. Boulder County: Climate Suits Head to Oral Argument
The Supreme Court has set October 5 argument in Suncor v. Boulder County, a test of whether federal law bars state tort claims over global greenhouse-gas emissions.
010
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
FedEx v. Watt asks whether ERISA's "actuarially equivalent" language in 29 U.S.C. 1055(d) imposes a reasonableness constraint on actuarial assumptions, despite the statute never using the word "reasonable." Could reshape how pension plans calculate benefit conversions.
scotusgate.com
FedEx v. Watt: How Strict Must Pension Actuarial Assumptions Be?
FedEx asks the Supreme Court whether ERISA's actuarial equivalence requirement imposes a reasonableness constraint the statute never states.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
The Court keeps relisting National Association for Gun Rights v. Lamont without action. At issue: Connecticut's ban on AR-15-style rifles and magazines over 10 rounds. The repeated delay suggests something is happening behind the scenes before the justices decide whether to grant cert.
scotusgate.com
Connecticut Gun Ban Case Lingers Through Repeated Conference Relists
The Court has distributed National Association for Gun Rights v. Lamont for eleven straight conferences without action, a pattern worth watching as the justices weigh whether to take up assault weapons bans.
010
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
Sam Bankman-Fried is asking the Supreme Court to weigh in on two questions from his fraud conviction: what loss evidence is admissible under a fraudulent inducement theory, and whether his forfeiture order violates the Eighth Amendment's excessive fines clause.
scotusgate.com
Bankman-Fried Asks Supreme Court to Revisit Fraud Evidence and Forfeiture Limits
SBF's cert petition raises two questions: when loss evidence is admissible in fraudulent inducement cases, and whether ruinous forfeitures violate the Eighth Amendment.
010
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
DHS is asking the Supreme Court for a stay in Department of Homeland Security v. League of Women Voters, a dispute over citizenship verification requirements for voter registration. SCOTUSGate has the analysis.
scotusgate.com
DHS Seeks Stay in Voter Registration Citizenship Verification Dispute
The Supreme Court weighs a DHS application to stay a lower court ruling blocking citizenship verification through the SAVE system for voter registration.
010
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
The Court will consider whether to hear Moylan v. Guam Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, a case asking if courts can dismiss as moot a challenge to a permanent injunction based on constitutional precedent the Court has since overruled.
scotusgate.com
Guam Abortion Injunction Case Heads to Conference After Dobbs
The Supreme Court will consider whether courts may dismiss as moot a Rule 60(b)(5) challenge to a permanent injunction based on overruled constitutional precedent.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
The Court has denied rehearing in Donald J. Trump v. E. Jean Carroll, leaving in place the ruling on whether FRE 415 overrides Rule 403's balancing test for older propensity evidence in sexual misconduct cases.
scotusgate.com
Court Denies Rehearing in Trump v. Carroll Evidence Rules Dispute
The Supreme Court denied rehearing in Trump v. Carroll, leaving intact Second Circuit rulings on propensity evidence under Federal Rules 413 and 415.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 13/09/2026
The Supreme Court is set to consider whether state anti-SLAPP laws apply in federal court. Wealthy, Inc. v. Spencer Cornelia asks the justices to resolve a three-way circuit split on how these statutes interact with federal procedure under Shady Grove.
scotusgate.com
Anti-SLAPP in Federal Court: Circuit Split Heads to Conference
Wealthy, Inc. v. Spencer Cornelia presents a three-way circuit split on whether state anti-SLAPP statutes apply in federal court, with cert. petition distributed for the Sept. 28 conference.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 12/09/2026
The Court has relisted Gator's Custom Guns, Inc. v. Washington, which asks whether magazines holding more than ten rounds are "Arms" protected by the Second Amendment's plain text. A decision on whether to grant cert is expected soon.
scotusgate.com
Magazine Capacity Bans Return to the Court's Conference List
Gator's Custom Guns v. Washington has been distributed for conference over 20 times, raising questions about whether the Court will finally take up Second Amendment protection for standard-capacity magazines.
011
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 12/09/2026
SCOTUS has agreed to take up Viramontes v. Cook County, a case asking whether the Second and Fourteenth Amendments protect the right to own AR-15s and similar semiautomatic rifles. The ruling could affect assault weapons bans across the country.
scotusgate.com
Viramontes v. Cook County: Court to Decide AR-15 Rights
The Supreme Court granted cert in Viramontes v. Cook County to decide whether the Second Amendment protects possession of AR-15 platform semiautomatic rifles.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
Amicus briefs are piling up in United States Postal Service v. California, the case over whether USPS must comply with state voter registration laws. SCOTUSGate breaks down who is weighing in and what they are arguing.
scotusgate.com
USPS Voter Registration Case Draws Flood of Amicus Briefs
The Supreme Court's emergency docket sees a wave of amicus filings in a dispute over USPS voter registration obligations under the NVRA, with midterms approaching.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
Can courts override a believer's own judgment about what their faith requires? That's the core question in Gary Perez et al. v. City of San Antonio, Texas, now before the Supreme Court. SCOTUSGate breaks down what's at stake for First Amendment religious exercise claims.
scotusgate.com
Perez v. San Antonio: Who Defines the Burden on Religious Exercise?
The Supreme Court is considering whether courts may override a claimant's own theological judgment when assessing burdens on religious exercise under the First Amendment.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 09/09/2026
The Supreme Court will take up Republican National Committee v. Mi Familia Vota, examining whether federal law blocks Arizona from requiring proof of citizenship on state voter registration forms.
scotusgate.com
Arizona Citizenship Proof Rules Head to the Supreme Court
The Court will decide whether the NVRA bars Arizona from requiring citizenship proof at registration and canceling non-citizen registrations within 90 days of an election.
010
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 05/09/2026
Foster parents are asking the Supreme Court to take up an equal protection challenge to the Indian Child Welfare Act. The case, N. R. et al. v. Keith M. Ellison et al., argues ICWA and Minnesota's counterpart law treat Indian children differently based on race.
scotusgate.com
Foster Parents Press ICWA Equal-Protection Challenge at High Court
Minnesota foster parents ask the Supreme Court to rule that ICWA and MIFPA impose unconstitutional race-based classifications in child placement decisions.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 05/09/2026
New case at SCOTUS: ODonnell v. Garcia asks whether a state official's waiver of Younger abstention binds their successors in office, and whether an elected official can demand a speedy judgment before an upcoming election.
scotusgate.com
ODonnell v. Garcia: Can a Waiver of Younger Abstention Bind Successors?
A stay application before Justice Alito raises whether official-capacity waivers of Younger abstention bind successor officials, and whether election timing justifies mandamus.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 04/09/2026
Cup Foods is asking the Supreme Court to rule that Minneapolis took its property without compensation by barricading George Floyd Square and withdrawing police protection for over a year. The case is Cup Foods, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis.
scotusgate.com
Cup Foods Asks Court to Recognize Takings Claim Over George Floyd Square
Cup Foods petitions SCOTUS to rule that Minneapolis's barricades and police withdrawal at 38th & Chicago constituted a compensable taking of nearby property.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 03/09/2026
Missionaries of Saint John the Baptist v. Joel Frederic is headed to conference after full briefing. The case asks whether a zoning rule blocking a religious group from building on its own land counts as a substantial burden under RLUIPA.
scotusgate.com
RLUIPA Zoning Case Heads to Conference After Full Briefing
The Court will consider whether blocking a religious institution from building on its own land constitutes a substantial burden under RLUIPA.
010
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 03/09/2026
The Court has agreed to take up International Partners for Ethical Care v. Ferguson, asking whether parents have standing to challenge Washington's law that limits their role in decisions about their children's gender transitions.
scotusgate.com
Standing for Parents: Court Takes Up Washington Gender Transition Case
The Supreme Court granted cert in No. 25-840 to decide whether parents have Article III standing to challenge Washington's gender transition policies affecting their children.
010
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 03/09/2026
The Court declined to hear Jose Joya Parada v. United States, leaving intact the rule allowing six-person juries in federal cases. The 1970 ruling in Williams v. Florida, which approved smaller juries, remains good law for now.
scotusgate.com
Court Denies Cert in Challenge to Six-Person Federal Jury Rule
The Supreme Court declined to revisit Williams v. Florida, leaving intact the precedent permitting six-person juries in federal criminal trials.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
The Court will hear St. Mary Catholic Parish v. Roy, a case asking whether Colorado can bar a Catholic preschool from a state funding program because the school follows Catholic teaching on religion and sexuality.
scotusgate.com
Catholic Preschool Funding Case Heads to Oral Argument
The Supreme Court will decide whether Colorado can exclude Catholic preschools from a universal preschool program while granting exemptions to secular providers.
100
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
Stacey Ian Humphreys is asking the Supreme Court to stay his execution, arguing Georgia's clemency process is unequal. Some applicants need 3 of 5 board votes to win commutation while he needed 3 of 3 or 3 of 4, raising an equal protection question.
scotusgate.com
Humphreys Seeks Stay of Execution Over Unequal Clemency Procedure
A Georgia death row inmate asks Justice Thomas to halt his execution, arguing that a conflict-of-interest recusal left him facing a higher vote threshold for clemency than other applicants.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 29/08/2026
The Supreme Court will consider whether Alaska can force a nonprofit that does not engage in electoral advocacy to disclose its donors. Alaska Policy Forum v. Alaska Public Offices Commission raises First Amendment questions about campaign finance disclosure laws.
scotusgate.com
Alaska Nonprofit's Donor Disclosure Fight Heads to Conference
The Supreme Court will consider whether Alaska can compel a 501(c)(3) to disclose donors and register with campaign finance authorities for engaging in issue speech near a ballot measure.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 29/08/2026
SCOTUS will take up a Second Amendment challenge to Maine's firearm cooling-off period. The case asks whether making buyers who already passed a background check wait days before taking possession of a gun violates the Second Amendment.
scotusgate.com
Maine Cooling-Off Period Heads to SCOTUS in Second Amendment Challenge
Petitioners challenge Maine's firearm waiting period under Bruen's historical scrutiny test, asking whether delays after a passed background check violate the Second Amendment.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 28/08/2026
16 amici have weighed in on Richard Hershey v. City of Bossier City, Louisiana, et al. The Court is being asked whether Hope v. Pelzer's qualified immunity principles apply beyond the Eighth Amendment to First Amendment free speech and free exercise claims.
scotusgate.com
Qualified Immunity and the First Amendment: Hershey Petition Draws 16 Amici
A pending Fifth Circuit petition asks whether Hope v. Pelzer's qualified immunity principles extend beyond the Eighth Amendment to Free Speech and Free Exercise claims.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 27/08/2026
MIT is urging the Court to deny cert in StandWithUs Center for Legal Justice v. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, a Title VI case asking whether discriminatory intent and First Amendment limits apply to antisemitism hostile environment claims.
scotusgate.com
MIT Opposes Cert in Title VI Antisemitism Hostile Environment Case
MIT filed its opposition brief in a case asking whether discriminatory intent and First Amendment limits apply to Title VI hostile environment claims.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 25/08/2026
New cert petition: Hoffmann v. WBI Energy Transmission asks whether state law or the Fifth Amendment governs just compensation when private companies condemn land under the Natural Gas Act. A circuit split on the question has been building for years.
scotusgate.com
Natural Gas Act Condemnations: State Law or Fifth Amendment Floor?
The Supreme Court will decide whether landowners in Natural Gas Act condemnations are entitled to state-law compensation or only the Fifth Amendment minimum.
000
SCOTUSGate @scotusgate.bsky.social · 24/08/2026
The Court has invited the Solicitor General to weigh in on Roybal v. Griffith, which asks whether transgender inmates challenging sex-based prison policies get heightened scrutiny or the more deferential penological interest standard. A circuit split exists on the question.
scotusgate.com
Court Invites SG Views on Transgender Inmate Strip Search Scrutiny Split
The Supreme Court has invited the Solicitor General to weigh in on a circuit split over what level of scrutiny applies to sex-based prison policies affecting transgender inmates.
020