iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

savannah! 🪱 @savannahstains.neocities.org · 16/10/2026

shout out to the nikon f4 user manual for this bit of helpful advice

140 4

savannah! 🪱 @savannahstains.neocities.org · 16/10/2026

fucking lol. of COURSE this was her response.

130 3

savannah! 🪱 @savannahstains.neocities.org · 15/10/2026

oopsie i just spent a bunch of money on this camera. woopsie. uh oh

250 5

savannah! 🪱 @savannahstains.neocities.org · 09/10/2026

lastly, here's another quip by ho about "societal elites" pushing a transgender agenda - because apparently "federal appellate judge with obvious SCOTUS ambitions" is less elite than "random trans person taking a piss"

100 1

savannah! 🪱 @savannahstains.neocities.org · 09/10/2026

ah yes, "the history and tradition" of pronouns. give me a fucking break dude.

100 1

savannah! 🪱 @savannahstains.neocities.org · 09/10/2026

we all know that ho is not arguing in good faith, but it's worth explaining why this is wrong: this was not about the victim's right to enter the restroom, but about whether the defendant had a right to photograph her there. and NOTHING in this case prevented her from "objecting" in general.

110 1

savannah! 🪱 @savannahstains.neocities.org · 09/10/2026

of course this is pure transphobic drivel, the ravings of an actual psychopath. but it's also a legally illiterate point. the identity of a person is irrelevant to their expectations of privacy in sensitive places like restrooms. and it's irrelevant under the plain language of the statute.

100 1

savannah! 🪱 @savannahstains.neocities.org · 09/10/2026

this logic is so braindead, i hardly know where to start. 1, the photo was already part of the public record in the case. it's not "ironic" to include it in the concurrence. this is toddler "i know you are but what am i" type shit from ho. just unbecoming of a judge.

100 1

savannah! 🪱 @savannahstains.neocities.org · 09/10/2026

yes judge ho, that's exactly why taking a photo of someone in a bathroom is illegal under texas law, and why that law is constitutional, despite the right-wing political intentions of the person taking the photo

100 1

savannah! 🪱 @savannahstains.neocities.org · 09/10/2026

"the right to express [transphobic] views disfavored by those in power" says the appellate judge on a majority republican court in a majority republican state controlled by republicans in a country whose federal government is currently run entirely by republicans. fucking victim complex bullshit.

120 2

savannah! 🪱 @savannahstains.neocities.org · 08/10/2026

i sent a message to the gerald ford presidential library lol. fingers crossed

1140 14

savannah! 🪱 @savannahstains.neocities.org · 08/10/2026

the only photo i can find ostensibly of ms hzyan is this picture of her wing-walking in 1977. sadly her face is not visible here, but it's still badass

390 9

savannah! 🪱 @savannahstains.neocities.org · 08/10/2026

and she was definitely present for this prom!

130 3

savannah! 🪱 @savannahstains.neocities.org · 08/10/2026

ok found this NYT article that mentions a nour hzyan who i think *might* be our photographer... this wapo article from 1980 also mentions her. i can't seem to find an image of her, however www.nytimes.com/1975/11/22/a... www.washingtonpost.com/archive/life...

130 3

savannah! 🪱 @savannahstains.neocities.org · 08/10/2026

who is this absolute diva?? the two camera bodies, the dress, the sparkly makeup. i must know her name

1100 10