Sign in

Saurabh Bedi

@saurabhbedi.bsky.social
49 followers 75 following 4 posts

PhD student in Neuroeconomics, University of Zurich | saurabh9729.github.io/saurabhbedi

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Saurabh Bedi
Niklas Buergi @niklasbuergi.bsky.social · 09/03/2026
How does the brain decide which mental strategy to use when inferring others' beliefs? Excited to (finally!) see my first first-author paper out @natneuro.nature.com Summary below 🧵 #CogSci #CogNeuro www.nature.com/articles/s41...
nature.com
A neural signature of adaptive mentalization | Nature Neuroscience
18830
Reposted by Saurabh Bedi
Arkady Konovalov @arkadykonovalov.bsky.social · 19/11/2025
📢 New preprint! 📢 Very excited to be a part of the project led by @saurabhbedi.bsky.social on how the brain learns from multimodal inputs (e.g. audiovisual): Separable neurocomputational mechanisms underlying multisensory learning biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
0135
Saurabh Bedi @saurabhbedi.bsky.social · 16/09/2025
When we induce new boundaries, the distortions are largely range-independent, pointing to the decoding stage as the main source. These principles are likely to generalize to other contexts with bounded quantities 🔄 This work is with @GillesdeH and Christian Ruff 🙂
030
Saurabh Bedi @saurabhbedi.bsky.social · 16/09/2025
Efficient encoding & Bayesian decoding origins of distortions and variance (via cognitive boundary repulsions) come with dissociable signatures: ➡️ Encoding → range-dependent distortions + variance patterns ➡️ Decoding → range-independent distortions + variance patterns
140
Saurabh Bedi @saurabhbedi.bsky.social · 16/09/2025
The mechanism is cognitive boundary repulsion: during inference, the posterior is pushed away from boundaries, generating distortions and variance patterns. This arises independently under both efficient encoding and Bayesian decoding of bounded quantities like probabilities.
120
Saurabh Bedi @saurabhbedi.bsky.social · 16/09/2025
📢 Preprint out! biorxiv.org/content/10.1... What gives rise to probability weighting, a cornerstone of Prospect Theory? We show it comes from the natural boundedness of probabilities + cognitive noise. Adding boundaries adds multiple distortions, across risky choice & perception.
biorxiv.org
Probability weighting arises from boundary repulsions of cognitive noise
In both risky choice and perception, people overweight small and underweight large probabilities. While prospect theory models this with a probability weighting function, and Bayesian noisy coding mod...
12212