A new book traces Adolf Hitler’s destruction of German democracy in only 53 days—with disturbing echoes of now.

This judge may find out what it's like to be Steve Carell

Federal judges are folding under political pressure from state AGs

Better Judgment, by Reynolds Holding, is a fascinating and detailed look at three distinguished federal district judges: Carlton Reeves (S.D.Miss.), Jed Rakoff (S.D.N.Y.), and Martha Vazquez (D.N.M…

YouTube video by Legal AF

YouTube video by Legal AF

At the State of the Union address, will Trump or John Roberts blink first?

If strident judges are auditioning for the Supreme Court, they’re going about it all wrong

The Supreme Court tells us why the defense of a fatal ICE shooting is nonsense

If Trump were right about birthright citizenship, some lawmakers would have been bounced

Grand juries are reminding us that if we won’t say it, who will?

Will a newly retired judge become Trump’s top critic or just a voice in the wilderness?

Conservative justices’ shift from restraint comes at the worst possible time

Lies about January 6 portend trouble for fair sentences

Reynolds Holding’s new book details how a trio of judges are trying to protect democracy.

From aphorisms to art heists to democracy’s necessary conditions

The courts are building an unprecedented record of presidential misdeeds

Judges can give us hope despite the deeply flawed among them

What the judge hearing the case against James Comey should say

Supreme Court justices and grand juries are telling us enough is enough

Better Judgment: How Three Judges Are Bringing Justice Back to the Courts - Kindle edition by Holding, Reynolds. Download it once and read it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Use features like bookmarks, note taking and highlighting while reading Better Judgment: How Three Judges Are Bringing Justice Back to the Courts.

A judge takes to task a bank at the heart of the financial crisis

How three judges are bringing justice back to the courts

The U.S. Supreme Court has made it way too hard for victims to win damages from the government agents who abuse them.

The chief justice needs to set us straight on the role of the courts

Judges are feeling the weight of ugly threats and emergency deadlines

Giving in to a lawless president has become far too easy

How the Supreme Court sounds to people matters

Maybe a little understatement from the Supreme Court is OK

A DOJ lawsuit aims to put immigrants seeking justice in peril

A DOJ lawsuit aims to put immigrants seeking justice in peril

With at least one obvious exception

Under this Supreme Court, executive excess seems A-OK

An essential legal presumption is all but dead

Shareholders blame UnitedHealth for its CEO’s murder

Prodded by the courts, government lawyers can still do the right thing

What Sarah Palin’s trial is really about

The Supreme Court should be better than this

Law firms can teach universities a thing or two

The president's past proves inconvenient

Fortunately, the Big Lie doesn’t work in court—yet