iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Rachel Wood

@rachelwood.bsky.social

974 followers 780 following 3 posts

Social media, femininity, and consumer culture. Senior lecturer in Media, currently writing about sustainability influencers.

Posts Replies Media

Reposted by Rachel Wood

Rachel Wood @rachelwood.bsky.social · 30/06/2025

New article in Social Media + Society: A Post-Work Approach to Influencer Labor: The Paradox of Sustainability Influencers. In which I argue that the influencer industry is not environmentally sustainable and we need a more radical approach to studying influencer labour.

A Post-Work Approach to Influencer Labor: The Paradox of Sustainability Influencers
Rachel Wood

Abstract
How do Instagram sustainability influencers communicate criticisms of consumer culture, and try to promote more sustainable alternatives, in the context of a platform and industry that seeks to promote consumption by design? Drawing on an ethnography of Instagram influencers who advocate “zero waste” lifestyle politics, this paper argues that a “sustainability paradox” emerges from the impossibility of aligning environmental values with the commercial norms of the influencer industry.

1103

Rachel Wood @rachelwood.bsky.social · 30/06/2025

New article in Social Media + Society: A Post-Work Approach to Influencer Labor: The Paradox of Sustainability Influencers. In which I argue that the influencer industry is not environmentally sustainable and we need a more radical approach to studying influencer labour.

1103

Rachel Wood @rachelwood.bsky.social · 01/11/2024

Presenting at #AoIR2024 this afternoon about my sustainability influencer research. Practiced the paper this morning and it was far too long so if you like watching someone try to talk about post work theory very very quickly please come!

090

Reposted by Rachel Wood

alice @alicebennett.bsky.social · 21/09/2023

answering the question, what is an academic and why are they like that? newleftreview.org/sidecar/post...

Academics, it seems, are like the acquaintance who Dorothy Parker said ‘speaks 18 languages and can’t say “no” in any of them.’ The issue is not just servility, however, but a hubris that can superficially look like servility’s opposite, as when academics tell themselves that they are only humouring management while actually pursuing their own, subtly subversive agendas. But management, academics often forget, are generally indifferent to mockery or critique, however finely-crafted and devastating. They are happy enough to let us tire ourselves out. One of their favourite tactics, in fact, is to set academics onerous, pointless tasks to keep us busy. Could we gather some evidence to support our claims that the new policy is having a detrimental effect? Could we present the case for why we really need to have such things as offices? Could we fill in this consultation? Academics exhaust themselves writing meticulously argued treatises against the latest deleterious thing management wants

7266111