Sign in

quatraingleam.bsky.social

@quatraingleam.bsky.social
0 followers 0 following 12 posts
PostsRepliesMedia
quatraingleam.bsky.social @quatraingleam.bsky.social · 10/10/2026
↪ Replying to @drewharwell.com
It just increases the risk to everyone.
000 0
quatraingleam.bsky.social @quatraingleam.bsky.social · 10/10/2026
↪ Replying to @governor.ca.gov
Gonna miss your foresight, Governor.
000 0
quatraingleam.bsky.social @quatraingleam.bsky.social · 08/10/2026
↪ Replying to @thegodshow.com
We could set a trap for their cheating by running citizen exit polls. Just stand outside your precincts with a clicker and count who comes out. This would expose the suspected elon-hack (ballot stuffing bullet-ballots using registered voters who didn't vote). (Assisted by Knowlink epollbooks).
000 0
quatraingleam.bsky.social @quatraingleam.bsky.social · 07/10/2026
↪ Replying to @atrupar.com
Remember how the HeritageF guys told us there was a second half to Project 2025 that was so controversial they weren't publishing it?
000 0
quatraingleam.bsky.social @quatraingleam.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
↪ Replying to @bgrueskin.bsky.social
Violation of 8th Amendment
000 0
quatraingleam.bsky.social @quatraingleam.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
↪ Replying to @cwebbonline.com
It never occurred to him or his douche-bro interns that Smith might ever watch women's sports. Erasure-vision is the douche-bro superpower.
000 0
quatraingleam.bsky.social @quatraingleam.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
↪ Replying to @propublica.org
Takers not makers
000 0
quatraingleam.bsky.social @quatraingleam.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
↪ Replying to @oliverdarcy.bsky.social
What has David Ellison ever done in his life that qualifies him to own half the national news, 80% of Hollywood, 75% of Burbank and nearly all American music tv and movie content produced in the 20th century?
000 0
quatraingleam.bsky.social @quatraingleam.bsky.social · 20/09/2026
↪ Replying to @virginiaheffernan.bsky.social
Nice
After evo-psych’s unravelling, Pinker was at least able to pivot. He dropped that subspecialty like a wet rag and now claims broader dominion: linguistics, moral philosophy, world history, gender studies, sociology, economics, and of course cognitive science. Though his formal training is in experimental psychology, he never fails to insist that his wheelhouse is simply science – the harder the better. “Physics envy”, the neurosis among academics whose fields are accused of being “soft”, is strong in Pinker. He takes pains to condemn the “softer social sciences” – he doesn’t name them, but surely they’re dumb and woke – and, naturally, the humanities, for “political correctness”.
000 0
quatraingleam.bsky.social @quatraingleam.bsky.social · 20/09/2026
↪ Replying to @virginiaheffernan.bsky.social
He met Jeffrey Epstein?
000 0
quatraingleam.bsky.social @quatraingleam.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
↪ Replying to @abdulelsayed.bsky.social
Corporations are not people. Money is not speech. The founders didn't err. They knew humans are individuals not groups. They knew spending money isn't speaking. The founders would impeach the corrupt Roberts court.
000 0
quatraingleam.bsky.social @quatraingleam.bsky.social · 21/11/2025
↪ Replying to @markjacob.bsky.social
Sulzberger is in the Epstein files.
000 0