Sign in

Jack

@pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social
63 followers 42 following 1.8K posts

Bucks in 6.

PostsRepliesMedia
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 03/10/2026
100
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
More meaningless slop that does nothing. Doctors try and scam insurance companies just as much as PE firms do.
000
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
010
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 20/09/2026
I did. Zero issues.
100
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
She has.
000
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
100
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
We’re losing the sacred texts.
000
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 11/09/2026
Most people positively assess their own financial situation and the percentage that do has not significantly changed over the last 10 years. Americans m hating the economy is a new phenomenon not explained by their actual financial conditions.
110
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
100
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
I asked it what information was necessary to answer the question and the first thing it said was the defendant’s name.
120
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
This ain’t you?
110
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
That’s just survivorship bias. How do you know there isn’t a greater number of people who otherwise would have talked to the police without reading an output that says “you can get legal advice before talking to the police”?
320
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
I wouldn’t really classify it as any “type” of question because of how vague it is. Either way, I fed it into ChatGPT and got a very different & much better answer.
010
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
The question you asked is this. Either way, I fed that into GPT and got what seems like pretty good advice. bsky.app/profile/pump...
530
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
Literally yes. Did you not read the screenshots?
000
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
Which is exactly what happened.
100
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
No, all of these are questions.
500
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
Yea here are the questions it asked. I’ll wait a few weeks for you to read them, I know how hard it is for you :)
100
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
Which one did it miss
200
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
Yea, asking what information is necessary to answer the question. Which I did, and it did.
400
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
Like this?
200
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
Can any of you explain why you couldn’t possibly think of asking the question on the right upon reading the response on the left?
420
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
Woah, you mean like exactly what I did?
100
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
Except it answered the question.
310
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
Sorry but I really have no patience for people acting like “What information is necessary?” is impossible to come up with on your own when given this response.
200
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
You’re telling me you couldn’t possibly think to ask the below without ChatGPT spoon feeding this to you?
310
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
What’s the symbol at the end of this sentence called?
200
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
Cool dunk except it literally did that.
200
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
Forgive me for expecting you all to be capable of asking basic follow-up questions instead of needing them to be spoon fed to you.
100
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
Yes it did.
200
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
Cross examination would be pretty damn difficult if it could only be done when the opposing witness literally tells the crossing attorney what the next question should be.
200
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
It did.
100
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
Sure seems like it does.
300
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
Is this incorrect?
100
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
Except it literally asked for more information instead of giving a yes/no answer, which would be inappropriate.
310
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
And if you ask “what information is necessary for a yes or a no”, you can get more details.
200
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
Except it literally did.
100
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
This is definite?
100
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
It specifies what information is necessary to give a true yes or no.
300
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
I fired the below post into it and got the following response. I’ll be fair too; it’s obviously not a perfect test if you already know the answer to this versus approaching it as an open question. bsky.app/profile/weed...
210
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
So this?
310
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
You tell me how accurate this is.
220
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
You tell me the quality of the response.
270
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
You don’t.
210
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 20/08/2026
Maybe you should’ve read it first. Private golf courses are not aided or promoted with public tax dollars.
100
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 20/08/2026
1) That’s not the problem I’m referring to. But either way, the one you’re referencing here (with Jin Shanmu) is a perfect example of what I’m talking about. The guy just told ChatGPT to not stop until it solved the problem… which it did. He did not solve it, ChatGPT did.
200
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 18/08/2026
This was the extent of my prompt lol
100
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 18/08/2026
Because I and other people have them do complex work all the time and they do a good job at it. I told 5.6 Sol to generate a legal D&D character sheet, it made this. You tell me if it’s legal or not, I have no idea.
100
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 17/08/2026
Yes. Either that or you’re an illiterate moron. 90% of cases appealed to federal judges is a FAR lower sample size than 90% of cases in general.
100
Jack @pumpndumpkicks.bsky.social · 12/08/2026
I didn’t hear no bell
010