Sign in

Poli Sci Chick

@poliscichick.bsky.social
275 followers 785 following 211 posts

Political Scientist & Sociologist who likes to break things down & figure out what makes them tick. (she/her) Follows & reposts ≠ endorsements.

PostsRepliesMedia
Poli Sci Chick @poliscichick.bsky.social · 18/12/2024
Day 6/20 📖 💙 📚 #books #booksky #bookchallenge
Book cover of “Moments: The Pulitzer Prize-Winning Photographs | A visual chronicle of our time—Revised & Updated” By: Hall Buell, Foreword by: David Halberstam
030
Poli Sci Chick @poliscichick.bsky.social · 17/12/2024
Day 5/20 📖 💙 📚 #books #booksky #bookchallenge
Cover of: “The China Study: The Most Comprehensive Study of Nutrition Ever Conducted”, By: T. Colin Campbell and Thomas M. Campbell
000
Poli Sci Chick @poliscichick.bsky.social · 15/12/2024
Day 4/20 📖 💙 📚 #books #booksky #bookchallenge
Book cover for: “Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us”, By: Daniel H. Pink
000
Poli Sci Chick @poliscichick.bsky.social · 13/12/2024
Day 4/20 📖 💙 📚 #books #booksky #bookchallenge
Cover of “Dealing With An Angry Public: The Mutual Gains Approach to Resolving Disputes”, By: Lawrence Susskind & Patrick Field
141
Poli Sci Chick @poliscichick.bsky.social · 12/12/2024
Day 3/20 📖💙📚 #books #booksky #bookchallenge
Cover of “Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions”, By: Dan Ariely
020
Poli Sci Chick @poliscichick.bsky.social · 12/12/2024
Really, @forbes.com? *This* is the phrasing you want to go with?
Excerpt from Forbes article: “In the wake of the shooting death of United Healthcare chief executive Brian Thompson, a focus on health insurer denials of medical care emerged from social media trolls and industry critics.”
100
Poli Sci Chick @poliscichick.bsky.social · 11/12/2024
Day 2/20 📖💙📚 #books #booksky #bookchallenge
Cover of: “Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming”, By: Naomi Oreskes & Erik M. Conway
040
Poli Sci Chick @poliscichick.bsky.social · 10/12/2024
Choose 20 books that have stayed with you or influenced you. One book per day for 20 days, in no particular order. No explanations, no reviews, just covers. Day 1/20 📖💙📚 #books #booksky #bookchallenge
Cover of: “Forty Studies That Changed Psychology: Explorations into the History of Psychological Research” 7th Edition, By: Roger R. Hock
020
Poli Sci Chick @poliscichick.bsky.social · 09/12/2024
Please be mindful of the videos you watch, the accounts you follow and the blogs you read. It’s very easy to fall into a political paranoia spiral in such a low-trust media environment.
Reddit post from r/BoomersBeingFools in which a boomer says he believes that kids no longer learning cursive is a conspiracy against the Constitution because if you can’t read it then how do you know what your rights are?
000
Poli Sci Chick @poliscichick.bsky.social · 09/12/2024
after certified banger 🤯
Text for the 9th amendment to the U.S. Constitution: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
000
Poli Sci Chick @poliscichick.bsky.social · 09/12/2024
after banger…
1st amendment text for the U.S Constitution: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
000
Poli Sci Chick @poliscichick.bsky.social · 09/12/2024
after banger…
Preamble of the U.S Constitution’s Bill of Rights: “Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.“
000
Poli Sci Chick @poliscichick.bsky.social · 09/12/2024
And then, it’s just banger…
From Article 1 of the U.S. Constitution: “Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:—"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
000
Poli Sci Chick @poliscichick.bsky.social · 09/12/2024
The preamble goes so hard 😩
Preamble for the United State’s Constitution: “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”
000
Poli Sci Chick @poliscichick.bsky.social · 09/12/2024
Do you remember this 2016 @forbes.com cover? It’s actually a very interesting read. It provides wonderful insight on how narratives are constructed. It does this before the article even starts. The cover itself is a great lesson. Jared Kushner did not get Trump elected in 2016– Steve Bannon did.
December 20, 2016’s Forbes cover. Jared Kushner on the cover in a grey suit. Title: “This Guy Got Trump Elected” Subtitle: “Jared Kushner delivered the White House by treating his father-in-law’s campaign like a stealth Silicon Valley startup. America’s new power broker is now poised to scale”.
100
Poli Sci Chick @poliscichick.bsky.social · 09/12/2024
There, Elon. I fixed it for you. You’re welcome 😘 “Defund the ACLU”’s implicit argument is to kneecap an organization that’s dedicated to preserving individual liberty and upholding the Constitution. I’m fairly certain that Musk is not referring to his desire to give up his own.
100
Poli Sci Chick @poliscichick.bsky.social · 05/12/2024
Cover of the book “Merchants of Doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming” by: Naomi Orestes & Erik M. Conway 📖📚
000
Poli Sci Chick @poliscichick.bsky.social · 05/12/2024
This is the same concept that plaintiffs had to push back against with the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in Jewel v. NSA. It’s an argument that stands in direct opposition to civil rights. I don’t know how this is considered an acceptable position that isn’t in conflict with Constitutionality.
“… but the District Court found that we had failed to allege facts that differentiated the injury that our plaintiffs’ suffered from the injuries suffered by every other AT&T user whose communications and records have been acquired by the government, basically concluding that so long as everyone is being surveilled, then no one has standing to sue.
“However, to deny standing to persons who are injured simply because many others are also injured, would that the most injurious and widespread government actions could be questioned by nobody.”
Kevin Bankston at the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Court Case: Jewel vs. National Security Agency
000
Poli Sci Chick @poliscichick.bsky.social · 02/12/2024
I still think about this Reddit post and so I had to share it here. Here’s my response: Discrimination is unjust treatment; it’s prejudicial behavior. Injustice is never necessary.
100