Sign in

Purushottam Dixit

@pdixit.bsky.social
211 followers 127 following 76 posts

Assistant Professor, Biomedical Engineering, Yale University. Computational biologist. Website: dixitlab.github.io

PostsRepliesMedia
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
7/More broadly, cells may process information not only through intracellular signaling networks, but by modifying their extracellular environment. Sometimes, destroying a signal is part of the computation. Paper: journals.aps.org/prresearch/a...
000
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
6/This suggests a new function for receptor endocytosis. A receptor is not simply reading an extracellular signal. By removing ligand, receptors can actively reshape the signal outside the cell before the cell reads it.
100
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
5/…the relative difference between the front and back increases. Endocytosis makes the extracellular signal weaker but increases its directional contrast. Signal destruction can actually make direction easier to read.
100
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
4/The mechanism turns out to be particularly simple. As receptor-mediated endocytosis increases, the overall ligand concentration decreases. Even the absolute difference in concentration between the front and back of the cell decreases. And yet…
100
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
3/There is a beautiful precedent for this idea. Work from Andrew Mugler and colleagues showed that signal degradation in 3D space can improve spatial sensing by sharpening otherwise diffuse signals. That made us wonder: could surface-based degradation?
100
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
2/ The ingredients are simple: One cell secretes a chemical signal -> The signal diffuses -> A nearby cell detects it through receptors. But receptors often remove ligand from the environment through endocytosis.
100
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
1/ Cells often migrate toward one another even when there is no externally imposed chemical gradient. This raises a basic question: How does a cell know where another cell is?
100
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
🧵 Our new paper is out in Physical Review Research! Can destroying a signal make it easier to sense Surprisingly, yes! We show that ligand endocytosis can reshape extracellular chemical gradients and enhance directional information.
141
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
Led by @michaelcchung.bsky.social, with Tarran Mohan, and with Juan Guan, whose lab drove this.
000
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
Tested on 2D Brownian motion, Ornstein-Uhlenbeck, Smoluchowski self-assembly, spiking neural populations, low-rank RNNs, and one noisy experiment: aggregating RNA-liposome complexes, where it recovers a power-law exponent that maps onto known aggregation physics.
100
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
It then learns sparse symbolic models for both latents and features; ODEs for latents and interpretability for feature.
100
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
Edwin (after ET Jaynes) compresses data using the dynamic maximum entropy principle by performing dimensionality reduction using Max Ent. This splits the data into time-dependent latents Z(t) and feature-dependent latents Y.
110
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
PCA and autoencoders optimize reconstruction, and the latents they return rarely correspond to anything measurable. Equation discovery of the SINDy family assumes you already know the state variables. In high-dimensional data you usually do not.
100
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
Our paper on low dimensional max ent dynamics is out in Phys Rev E. We introduce Edwin. It compresses high-dimensional dynamics into a few latent variables and discovers symbolic equations for those variables: journals.aps.org/pre/abstract...
journals.aps.org
Discovering interpretable low-dimensional dynamics using maximum entropy
Models (i.e., governing equations) are fundamental to science and engineering. Advances in data acquisition now make it possible to extract interpretable, low-dimensional descriptions from high-dimens...
140
Reposted by Purushottam Dixit
APS journals @apsjournals.aps.org · 17/09/2026
New in PRX Life: microbial ecosystems are low-dimensional. After studying about 200 gut microbiome datasets, the authors found that niche dimensionality was below predicted value, upending previous models. Read the paper: go.aps.org/46qJqBa
Figure with three small scatter plots - a, b and c. Each of the three plots feature the niche dimensionality metric ηD on the X axis, along with a red dashed line and black dots. Plot A has “Environmental Dimensionality” on the Y axis and a positive correlation between the two variables. A label reads: R: 0.57 and P-value: 4.8e-3. Plot B has “Mean Metabolic Overlap” on the Y axis and shows a negative correlation between the two variables. The label reads R: -0.48 and P-value: 3.1e-11. Plot C has “Shannon Entropy” on the Y axis and shows a positive correlation between the two variables. The label reads R: 0.73 and P-value 1.89e-29.
152
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
7/ Encouragingly, others (e.g. @asanchezlab.bsky.social) are also finding similar signatures of non-random interactions in microbiomes!
000
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
6/ Why? Low dimensionality tracks metabolic competition and lower diversity, exactly mirroring the "niche dimensionality hypothesis". Our simulations recover it only with correlated resource supplies plus metabolic tradeoffs. Dimensionality is lower in simplified diets and in disease.
100
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
5/ Notably, across ~200 human studies (> 100000 individual ecosystems), effective dimensionality was very low, around 4. Diversity-matched disordered (spin-glass-like) models predict a much larger number (~15). Real communities are far lower-dimensional than the random-interaction picture assumes.
120
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
4/ Our model showed that the inferred niche axes are biologically interpretable. Species loadings predict metabolic capabilities from genome-scale models, embeddings predict measured metabolites.
100
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
3/ To test the dimensionality empirically, we went back to a classical ecological idea: Hutchinson's niche dimensionality. We made it measurable, inferring an effective niche dimensionality straight from abundance data with a low-rank model that can be derived from consumer-resource dynamics.
100
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
2/ The spin-glass view models microbiomes as many species with random, weak, and all-to-all interactions. It reproduces broad patterns like species abundance distributions. Yet, this high-dimensionality assumption is rarely tested directly.
100
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
1/ Our new paper is out in PRX Life. Physicists' often treat microbiomes as disordered systems with coexistence in very high-dimensional niche spaces. We asked whether empirical data supports this picture, and found the data point somewhere else: journals.aps.org/prxlife/abst...
journals.aps.org
Low-Dimensional Coexistence in Complex Microbial Ecosystems
Analysis of nearly 200 human gut microbiome datasets shows that microbial coexistence is governed by a few effective ecological dimensions, rather than the high-dimensional niches assumed by prevailing theory.
12010
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
9/ Led by Brooke Emison, with @chriswlynn.bsky.social , Andrew Mugler & Fabrisia Ambrosio. Code is here: github.com/emisbrooke/InFlow
github.com
GitHub - emisbrooke/InFlow: Information theoretic framework for quantifying trancriptional regulation
Information theoretic framework for quantifying trancriptional regulation - emisbrooke/InFlow
000
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
7/ The model suggests that switching a few TFs back on in silico (Ebf2, Ebf1, Aebp1, Elf3, Foxq1) restores much of the youthful information transfer AND pushes gene expression back toward young, echoing how just a few factors can reset cell identity.
110
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
6/ Consistent with this, the TF–TF network reorganizes with age: more centralized, hub-dominated, depleted of stabilizing feedback motifs, and more fragile when you perturb it.
100
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
5/ Aging keeps the TF→target wiring largely intact but desynchronizes the joint TF activity that wiring was tuned to read. "Input mismatch," not "channel corruption." The regulators fall out of sync rather than getting miswired.
100
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
4/ The useful part: this information depends on two factors, the channel (TF→gene wiring) and the input distribution (how TF activity is distributed). Because of the analytically tractable model, we could ask which one breaks with age. The answer surprised us: it's not the wiring.
100
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
3/ Across 10 mouse tissues, information transfer from TFs to their targets drops with age in every single tissue. And the faster a tissue turns over its cells, the bigger the drop.
100
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
2/ We treat the gene regulatory network as a communication channel between transcription factors (TFs) and their target genes (TGs) and compute the mutual information between TFs and TGs from single-cell data. A conditional maximum-entropy model makes this tractable in high dimensions.
110
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
1/ New paper out! Aging has been described as a loss of "information", but nobody could quantify it. We built a stat phys model for it. We found taht communication fidelity in gene regulation drops with age across multiple tissues, making it a hallmark of aging! 🧵: www.cell.com/cell-reports...
cell.com
An information-theoretic framework for transcriptional regulation reveals declining communication fidelity in aging
Emison et al. develop an information-theoretic framework that decomposes communication fidelity in gene regulatory networks. Applying this framework to single-cell RNA-seq data across aging tissues, they find that communication fidelity declines, driven primarily by shifting input distributions rather than increased channel noise.
151
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 24/07/2026
These were the experiments we were trying to explain: www.cell.com/cell-reports...
cell.com
Low-affinity ligands of the epidermal growth factor receptor are long-range signal transmitters in collective cell migration of epithelial cells
Deguchi et al. find that low-affinity EGFR ligands propagate faster and farther than high-affinity ligands in epithelial cells. They demonstrate that EREG, a low-affinity ligand, contributes to skin w...
000
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 24/07/2026
EGFR signaling breaks this tradeoff: low affinity ligands diffuse farther from the source (expected) but also lead to higher activity (unexpected).We show that kinetic proofreading combined with receptor/ligand degradation explains this phenomena. Work done in collaboration with an undergraduate!
000
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 24/07/2026
Traditional models of paracrine gradients are constrained by a tradeoff driven by ligand-receptor affinity. High activity implies shorter spatial range and vice versa. Strong binders lead to higher signaling activity but also trigger receptor and ligand degradation and therefore shorter range.
120
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 21/04/2026
Congratulations!
110
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 31/03/2026
I will be talking about some recent work on using niche theory to model host associated microbiomes in a couple of hours!
011
Reposted by Purushottam Dixit
International Initiative for Theoretical Ecology @iite-ecotheory.bsky.social · 30/03/2026
📣Tomorrow! 📣Purushottam Dixit (Yale Engineering) will present: 'Niche dimensionality drives microbial community structure'
021
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 06/01/2026
Big picture: Directional sensing can be a receptor-level computation driven by diffusion + degradation + feedback. This explains puzzling experiments (e.g., why blocking endocytosis impairs chemotaxis) and suggests a general biophysical strategy across receptors families.
000
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 06/01/2026
The stochastic analysis is especially striking: Noise reveals an optimal basal activity set point that maximizes signal-to-noise. Too little activity → noisy. Too much → less directional contrast. Biology tunes itself in between.
100
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 06/01/2026
Predictions: ✔ There is an optimal diffusion rate for maximal polarization ✔ Receptors encode relative, not absolute, ligand gradients ✔ Cooperative receptor interactions can amplify weak gradients All without requiring separate “local” and “global” signaling species.
110
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 06/01/2026
Add diffusion, and something remarkable happens: Receptors move from low-ligand regions to high-ligand regions, but degradation depletes them where ligand is high. This mismatch creates polarized receptor activity-directional sensing emerges naturally.
100
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 06/01/2026
Without diffusion, degradation implements integral feedback: receptor activity adapts perfectly to a ligand-independent set point-essential for sensing relative changes rather than absolute ligand levels.
100
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 06/01/2026
The key ingredients: • Receptor diffusion along the membrane • Basal (ligand-independent) activity • Selective degradation of active receptors Together, these create an integral feedback loop (as opposed to an IFFL in LEGI) at the cell surface.
110
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 06/01/2026
Classic models of eukaryotic directional sensing (e.g., LEGI) assume receptors are passive: they report ligand levels, while intracellular networks compare “local vs global” signals using incoherent feedforward loops. We asked: can receptors do the computation directly?
100
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 06/01/2026
How do cells know which way to move in a chemical gradient? 🧭 New work by graduate student Andrew Goetz proposes that receptors can compute direction. This new mechanism for directional sensing was published in PNAS late last year: www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
pnas.org
PNAS
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) - an authoritative source of high-impact, original research that broadly spans...
111
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 04/11/2025
Given the centralization of information flow, our analysis suggests that re-tuning just a few TFs could in principle rejuvenate information flow and restore gene expression. Aging may not be just cellular damage, but a gradual communication breakdown.
010
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 04/11/2025
While signs of cellular aging may be varied, across all tissues, mutual information between TFs and TGs declines with age. Aged networks show input mismatch, higher centralization, and reduced stability, patterns reminiscent of aging brains and failing ecosystems.
110
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 04/11/2025
We borrowed statistical physics/neuroscience models to study information transmission in noisy systems. We treated transcription factors (TFs) → target genes (TGs) as a multi-input, multi-output communication channel, and measured its fidelity using mutual information.
120
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 04/11/2025
We analyzed single-cell RNA-seq data from multiple mouse tissues across the lifespan. This dataset captures how thousands of genes are expressed in individual cells, letting us see how regulatory communication changes with age.
100
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 04/11/2025
In our new paper led by Brooke Emison, in collaboration with Fabrisia Ambrosio, Andrew Mugler, and @chriswlynn.bsky.social, we show that as cells age, the flow of transcriptional information in gene regulatory networks breaks down.
120
Purushottam Dixit @pdixit.bsky.social · 04/11/2025
What if aging isn’t just cellular damage, but a lossy transmission of information? We used single-cell data and physics-based models to show that as cells age, the flow of transcriptional information collapses. Here’s what that means. 👇
100