iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 16/10/2025

Why? Because “biodegradable” can mean compostable or needs special facilities. Made from biological sources: the thumbnail, the bio-based Eppendorf tube = 90% food oil waste + 10% fossil materials (for quality). Want to know what’s actually feasible for your lab? forms.gle/kJdaRCxePkLg...

forms.gle

Your Event For Greener Labs

Discover where we are at and what you can do to save plastics, energy and reagents - without affecting your workflows. Starting 15th of October at 5PM Berlin | 11AM New York | 6PM Cairo + Recording f...

000

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 16/10/2025

“Bioplastics” can mean many things: Two key distinctions: 🔹 Biodegradable vs. non-biodegradable 🔹 Made from biological vs. fossil sources Yes — some “bioplastics” are still fossil-based, and some aren’t biodegradable. Surprisingly, non-biodegradable biobased ones may be greener right now.

100

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 16/10/2025

Bioplastics for the lab are finally here! But there’s a big problem — few people actually know what bioplastics are. Here’s what you need to know 🧵👇

112

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 30/09/2025

To help, there will be a 20-min presentation + email resource: 👉 forms.gle/7zdXSKfmGyHH... Done properly, sustainability can save labs €2000+ and cut >50% of reagent/antibody use. Don’t get caught off guard—funders expect this. #GreenLab #Funding #EnvironmentalSustainability

forms.gle

Learn With Me How To Make Labs Greener

Let me share how you can align with funding body requirements and save plastic waste, energy, and reagents in just a few minutes. 20 Minute talk on the 15th of October and recording + summary sent t...

010

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 30/09/2025

This isn’t hypothetical. In the UK & Germany, it’s already a reality. Last autumn, 7 major funders pledged support for sustainability. Wellcome Trust & CRUK even require accredited certification: a 3–6 month process. But done wrong, it can endanger your workflow and samples!

100

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 30/09/2025

If you work in science, you need to adopt sustainable practices now - otherwise, you may soon lose funding. 2 of the world’s largest funders already require labs to report: 🔹 Cutting plastic waste 🔹 Reducing energy use 🔹 Traveling less If not, applications won’t be considered.

111

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 25/09/2025

I’ve optimized dozens of lab workflows to be greener 🌱 Skeptical? I’ll show you how in a free 20-min online talk at the biggest sustainability summit. 🎥 Register & get the recording here: forms.gle/zJSPZ5Gb4Ahb...

lnkd.in

This link will take you to a page that’s not on LinkedIn

000

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 25/09/2025

That wasn't Proper sustainable practices! Green action doesn’t disrupt experiments or workflows. What I have seen from them: 🔹 70% less plastic waste with smarter plating 🔹 Sterile cabinets <1 min after restart 🔹 S2 protocols optimized to save time + plastic

100

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 25/09/2025

“Sustainable practices burned down their lab!” That’s the story I once heard. Someone stored lab waste instead of disposing of it. A fire broke out, and the stored waste fueled it. What's the take away?⬇️ #STEM #GreenLab

100

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 18/09/2025

Therefore, you don’t need to read 100s of pages. One short email often tells you everything. Want more strategies to catch greenwashing in science? 🎥 Register for our short online session + get a practical handout: forms.gle/bs1DgSTiPbnK... #GreenLab #STEM #PhDLife

forms.gle

Find out how to identify greenwashing

We will share how you can: Spot greenwashing Assess the validity of marketing claims Know what to do instead = It’s an online session, sent to you so you can watch it whenever you want! This sessio...

000

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 18/09/2025

Quick tip to spot greenwashing: - Some push “infinite recycling loops” that don’t exist - Others fudge carbon accounting - Or pretend an analysis = certification 👉 Just ask the company for details. If claims are exaggerated, you’ll likely hear… nothing. ❌ Silence = red flag

110

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 02/09/2025

Something we should tell every graduate: Uni won’t teach you to follow your❤️but it will shape your career. After graduation, the structure disappears. You need to forge your own path. What I heard scientists advise: Listen to your heart it will lead you properly Other tips?

000

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 28/08/2025

Still, S2O could: Limit excessive publisher profits 💰 Finally let us read science without paywalls 🚀

000

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 28/08/2025

Still, S2O could: Limit excessive publisher profits 💰 Finally let us read science without paywalls 🚀

100

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 28/08/2025

The first journal to try S2O? 👉 Annual Reviews, back in 2017. Now, other big names like the Royal Society (UK) are adopting it too. For scientists, if S2O works: Free access to articles 📖 Free publishing (no APCs) ✍️ But uncertainty if it’ll stay that way each year 🤷

100

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 28/08/2025

There’s a new publishing model you should know about. 🔹 Subscribe to Open (S2O) If enough libraries keep subscribing, the journal flips to 100% open access for that year. If not, it falls back to subscriptions + APCs. Read more in the thread #ScientificPublishing

110

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 21/08/2025

For scientists, S2O could mean: ✅ Free to read ✅ Free to publish (no APCs) ⚠️ But also some uncertainty year to year

000

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 21/08/2025

🔒 Traditional model: Libraries pay subscriptions → scientists read behind paywalls. 🌍 Open Access: Free to read → but authors pay hefty publishing fees S2O works differently: If enough libraries keep subscribing → the journal flips to 100% open access for that year.

100

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 19/08/2025

The result? ✅ 45+ concrete opportunities for greener practices What made this work? Enthusiasm + positivity. Here is my full list of sustainable actions: re-advance.com/a-list-of-su...

re-advance.com

A List of Sustainable Practices – https://re-advance.com/science-and-sustianability/

001

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 19/08/2025

The Leibniz-HKI (renowned for microbiology & natural products) asked me to to consult and explore: 🔹 How to cut lab plastic waste 🔹 How instruments (HPLC, MS, PCR) can run more sustainably 🔹 How to get 400+ scientists onboard—without disrupting their work

100

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 19/08/2025

Research labs generate tons of plastic waste every year. But what if making science greener didn’t require extra effort from scientists? 🧪 Here’s how one of the world’s leading institutes tackled it—Leibniz-HKI 👇 @leibniz-hki.de @iubmb.bsky.social @iubmbtrainee.bsky.social

110

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 07/08/2025

P.S. The thumbnail? One of the memes I add at the end— So people leave with a smile :)

000

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 07/08/2025

It took almost a year... we hit 900+ subscribers. No ads. Just consistency. We are told these days success is instant Reminder: Not everything works right away. Experiments don’t. Ideas don’t. But if you stick with it, they will.

100

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 07/08/2025

A year ago, I started a weekly newsletter on sustainable science. At first: – Few readers – Zero feedback – Hours spent on each post

100

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 07/08/2025

Writing about sustainability changed my life. The biggest lesson? Good things take time. A thread for anyone who's building something from scratch 👇

100

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 01/08/2025

I’ve worked nearly 5 years as a sustainability consultant. One thing I’ve noticed? Almost no one talks about how much energy lab equipment consumes. > A single institute can use enough electricity to power a small village. Let’s raise awareness. Let’s do better.

000

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 01/08/2025

Of course, these vary depending on model + usage. But even as rough averages, they’re eye-opening. Big thanks to @MyGreenLab and @Eppendorf for pushing transparency on this! #ACTLabel #LabEnergy

100

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 01/08/2025

And the heavy hitters: 🌫️ Fume Hood: 20–35 kWh ⚛️ MS: 15–20 💧 HPLC: 5–15 🔥 GC-MS: 20–50 🥶 Freezer: 5–20 (old ones: >35!)

100

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 01/08/2025

If you care about sustainability, these numbers you need to know - let's make it super quick: These numbers are hard to come by but: Centrifuge: 4.2 kWh Incubator: 0.04–0.9 PCR Cycler: 0.2–2 Thermomixer: 0.11 E-pipette: 0.01–0.05 #GreenLab #STEM #Sustainability

132

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 29/07/2025

The wild part? In cases where the AI and authors disagreed, human judges sided more often with the AI. We may be witnessing the next evolution of science. Soon, we won’t know if a review was written by humans or AI. Are we ready for that? #AI #ScientificPublishing #STEM

000

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 29/07/2025

A Cochrane review usually takes 2–3 researchers up to 365 days. The AI did it in under 48 hours — with similar conclusions. 🔹 GPT-4.1 screens titles & abstracts 🔹 Gemini turns PDFs into structured Markdown 🔹 o3-mini-high extracts outcome data → Meta-analysis is then run

100

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 29/07/2025

It finally happened. AI can now write systematic reviews better than humans. And it only takes 2 days... A group of researchers (Cao et al.) built a workflow using freely available AI tools to: 🔹 Screen papers 🔹 Extract data 🔹 Run meta-analyses All without any hefty coding.

100

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 24/07/2025

This project concludes in August. I’ve spent 10 out of 14 days so far. Results to come! Sustainability is possible, even with limited time and small investments. 🌍 Wish me luck! 🍀

010

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 24/07/2025

So far, we’ve identified 30+ ways to be more sustainable without changing workflows. The best part? I’ve made incredible connections. The team is creative and constantly surprises me with new ideas to make experiments greener. 💡

100

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 24/07/2025

The plan: Get to know the institute, people, and culture Work one-on-one with scientists on their workflows Share solutions and drive culture change = All in two weeks

100

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 24/07/2025

A few weeks ago, a former professor reached out from a research institute with 350+ scientists. Asking for help making their research more sustainable. 🌱

100

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 24/07/2025

Making a research institute more sustainable in just 2 weeks? The Leibniz-HKI and I took on the challenge... 🧵👇 The goal wasn’t just clean energy, but also less plastic in experiments, reducing chemical waste, and improving health & safety. #STEM #Greenlab @leibniz-hki.de

152

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 22/07/2025

And yes—even in papers, you start with the abstract. Why? Because readers want to know if it's worth reading—before they commit. Your audience is no different. #SciComm #PhDLife #STEM #Storytelling #ScienceCommunication

000

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 22/07/2025

Instead of asking: “How do I introduce my topic?” Ask: “What grabs my viewer right now?” “What’s the most shocking part of this story?” Then start there.

110

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 22/07/2025

If you want to hook people, don’t introduce. Grab them. Surprise them. Make them feel something they can’t scroll past.

100

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 22/07/2025

Most scientists start their SciComm like they start a paper: "Today I'm going to talk about..." Big mistake. Nobody has time to be well informed—until they know it's relevant.

100

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 22/07/2025

🎬 Do science communication like making a great movie. Start mid-action. No foreplay. Here’s how I got millions of views (and 600+ newsletter readers in 3 weeks) by doing what most scientists don’t:

100

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 03/07/2025

PCR doesn't have to be slow, expensive, or wasteful. Small changes = big impact. #PCR #LabTips #PhDLife #GreenLab #ScienceTwitter

000

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 03/07/2025

🧪 Pipetting tip: Always prep a master mix. It saves time AND plastic. Also, use the same tip to prep and distribute the mix. 📉 Working with replicates? Mix water + DNA once, then aliquot. Don’t pipette into each tube separately. → Saves tips → more consistent DNA concentrations

110

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 03/07/2025

💡 Sustainability tip: Raise your holding temp from 4 °C → 12–16 °C Eppendorf found this saves 30–45% energy depending on the thermocycler.

110

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 03/07/2025

Pedlar et al. shortened cycle times significantly: • 5s denaturation (vs. 30s) • 25s annealing (vs. 60s) • 25s extension (vs. 60s) 🔬 Result: – 46% faster (1h 57min → 59min) – 50% less energy – Fewer cycles (28 vs. 32) with similar results & less variation

100

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 03/07/2025

This post might change how you do your PCRs Potentially saving you 46% time, 50% money, and 38% plastic waste In short: DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2024.01.013 In more detail in the thread below:

111

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 30/06/2025

= Something we throw away every day could soon become a medicine Plastic is organic. It contains carbon. And carbon can be reused. -> The same chemistry that created the plastic crisis might just help clean it up—and ease some pain along the way. Now that’s transformation isn't it?

100

Patrick Penndorf @patricks-science.bsky.social · 30/06/2025

In a recent breakthrough, Johnson et al. developed a new route to produce paracetamol: No fossil fuels required. The chemistry: PET → terephthalic acid → para-aminobenzoic acid (a natural E. coli metabolite) → 4-aminophenol → paracetamol Improved yield from 29% to 92%.

100