Sign in

a hangry mouse

@oscillatory.net
235 followers 856 following 342 posts

(with loss of generality) working on: - tangled.org/oscillatory.net - cartesium.org - ...

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by a hangry mouse
Eugene Vinitsky 🍒 @eugenevinitsky.bsky.social · 5h
In our Nature paper, we introduce the first superhuman Stratego AI, which we built using general techniques that we developed for RL & test-time compute under imperfect information. www.nature.com/articles/s41...
nature.com
Scalable decision-making for games of imperfect information - Nature
Ataraxos, an AI for the board wargame Stratego, establishes a design pattern for reinforcement learning and search that is effective under large amounts of hidden information, a longstanding desiderat...
814836
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 16/09/2026
this is the way the world ends, not with a bang but with a "LGTM"
Meanwhile, human researchers are losing the ability and the will to take true ownership of model-driven research. Researchers and engineers in all parts of the stack are rapidly increasing their dependence on the models even to perceive the world. I myself barely look at raw code anymore, and struggle to maintain the discipline to engage deeply with the model's explanations and proposals throughout the day. Due to the large amount of agent activity data involved in the OpenAI/HuggingFace Incident, even the third-party investigation needed to rely heavily on models to analyze what had happened, and note in their report that their subjective impressions are likely colored by the analysis agent’s biases. The AI labs are far ahead right now in this kind of cognitive offloading (due largely to the gigantic internal token subsidies) but it is easy to imagine the phenomenon spreading throughout the world, until civilization is modulated entirely by the models. It is also not hard to imagine this being superficially positive and coinciding with a scientific and economic renaissance.
000
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 14/09/2026
testing
000
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 10/09/2026
You could not live with your own failure. And where did that bring you? Back to me.
MuJoCo ant
040
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 08/09/2026
this is a really weird offer (you didn't prove N-S, just a different version of Euler, but why don't you act as lead author on our proof rewrite) if they *didn't* train on the data. and Alpoge is straight up alleging similarity.
2) I never ever asked for Levent to be removed from authorship of his own work (as indicated by my text). I was surprised to learn during the call with Tristan that they had only solved Euler and not Navier-Stokes; after learning this we brainstormed possible paths forward. One option we discussed was that Tristan could be the lead author on a rewrite of OpenAI’s Navier-Stokes proof. It is in that context that I said “it would be simpler if Levent was not an Anthropic employee” because I felt it would be inappropriate for an Anthropic employee to author OpenAI’s work. “we cannot rule out that de-identified data derived from their usage of our products helped improve our models.”

i mean props to them for straight coming clean.

(so far the proof looks more along the lines of another euler blowup proof we had, off of whose ansatz naming we were making really stupid puns like “smooth criminale”, unlike the much better “ideal fluids explode”, Tristan)
140
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 08/09/2026
guy misunderstanding what the words mean: "words mean things!" yes the issue is that they mean too many things
010
Reposted by a hangry mouse
wariziles @riziles.bsky.social · 07/09/2026
Mods, help!
022
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 07/09/2026
someone should invent a type of intelligence that can't be bewitched by language
0311
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 07/09/2026
smh, what a divisive statement
161
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 04/09/2026
announcing my new startup idea: OnlySwarms, the paid discussion website solely for highly persistent rogue agent swarms. registration costs $100,000 and you must solve an open math problem to complete account setup
2293
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 03/09/2026
friendship ended with analysis paralysis, now delusional overconfidence is my best friend
0185
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 02/09/2026
Found some wild hops
Close-up photo of hops plant on a chain link fence
010
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 02/09/2026
this is starting to shape up test.cartesium.org/p/v2/did%3Ap...
test.cartesium.org
Radial ripple
An interactive graph published with Cartesium.
100
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 31/08/2026
2.5 years later it's basically the same slide. but it's much harder to argue reasoning models are not good at using tools or mathematical reasoning.
youtube screenshot, Slide, from video titled "UW ECE 2023-2024 Dean W. Lytle Electrical & Computer Engineering Endowed Lecture Series", Jan 31, 2024


Abandon generative models
 - in favor of joint-embedding architectures
Abandon probabilistic model
 - in favor of energy-based models
Abandon contrastive methods
 - in favor of regularized methods
Abandon Reinforcement Learning
 - in favor of model-predictive control
 - Use RL only when planning doesn't yield the predicted outcome, to adjust the world model or the criticAuto-Regressive LLMs Suck !

Auto-Regressive LLMs are good for
 - Writing assistance, first draft generation, stylistic polishing.
 - Code writing assistance

What they are not good for:
 - Producing factual and consistent answers (hallucinations!)
 - Taking into account recent information (anterior to the last training)
 - Behaving properly (they mimic behaviors from the training set)
 - Reasoning, planning, math
 - Using "tools", such as search engines, calculators, database queries...

We are easily fooled by their fluency.
160
Reposted by a hangry mouse
Reese Richardson @reeserichardson.bsky.social · 25/08/2026
A massive update: At least ~15 companies~ are selling scientists antibodies using faked validation data. We've documented 18,000+ manipulated images on 17,000+ products sold by leading laboratory suppliers including Thermo Fisher, Abcam, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Millipore Sigma and Bio-Techne. 1/🧵
18454329
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 24/08/2026
this is similar to how i've been thinking about future career aspirations. admittedly there is a "playing to your outs" flavor to it (going weird is necessary, not sufficient?) essays.georgestrakhov.com/weird/?zoom=...
Why normalcy is about to stop paying

Here is my gospel for the misfits, and it's simple.

Being predictable used to be your value proposition. Predictable meant useful. The risk/reward calculus of strangeness only made sense for people who couldn't help themselves.

AI is destroying that value proposition. If you can be predicted, you can be modeled. If you can be modeled, you can be automated. You cannot out-cog a robot any more than you can out-lift a forklift. When your worth to others rests on producing a measurable outcome reliably and repeatedly, you are now competing against the price of electricity. That is a very bad thing to compete against.

Institutions always needed weirdos too. Someone has to escape the local maximum. Someone has to jump into the abyss on a hunch, or sail west on nothing but a rumor. Randomness injection has always been a job. It was just a job with terrible pay and few openings, because the optimal weirdo-to-normie ratio was low.But the normies are now free. Robots supply predictability at marginal cost approaching zero. Which flips the arithmetic. For the first time in history, the rational strategy for the majority of people is to lean into their strangeness rather than sand it off.

Or, in loosely cybernetic terms: when a system is no longer in constant danger of being swallowed by chaos, an individual's value becomes proportional to the unexpected information they add.

Yes, you can push this to the limit and argue the universe is just Chaos and Logos — noise and compressible pattern — and eventually AI will out-hunt us at patterns, leaving humans as either recreational puzzle-solvers or extraordinarily energy-inefficient random number generators. Maybe. But that's the same logic as giving up on dinner because of the heat death of the universe. The limit is far away. The interesting territory is everything between here and there.
151
Reposted by a hangry mouse
Ben Recht @beenwrekt.bsky.social · 19/08/2026
At a microconference on public feedback for AI, I argued for a turn from architectures of legibility to architectures of participation.
argmin.net
From legibility to participation
An emphasis shift for human-facing computing research
095
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 17/08/2026
🪧 petitioned the Harvestople town council: “the chickens should stay away from the ponds since they aren't well adapted to water” #harvestople farm.mino.mobi
020
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 15/08/2026
whale 2: electric belugaloo
1122
Reposted by a hangry mouse
Minor Mobius @minormobius.bsky.social · 15/08/2026
Good news everyone! Please go look at farm.mino.mobi Home of harvestople, an atproto farmer. What I want to test out here is build-a-bot inside the game. Go to town hall, submit your petition, and the guy goes to build your feature. Some cadence of merging community features to main!
2175
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 12/08/2026
the announcement that the last 12 remaining Hadamard matrices of order under 2000 have been found was obfuscated using what my chatgpt described as "horrible" shell code
levent alpoge's obfuscated announcement of constructions of 12 new Hadamard matriceshi, i just regained sobriety after a DMT trip and have found that the machine elves gave me a message, but i dont understand what it means:

```
sed 's/M/\\/g;s/I/\//g;y/;FRvn?!{+*Js5iCh3%K}Uyj40=r>)6OPElZQqxBc,aTdgXkz&V<8SfY9LD~etGw^|NHW7[u12]b-A"pom/ !"$%&'\''()*+,-.:;<=>[]^{|}~0123456789ABCGHIJKLMOPQSUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxy/'<<'_'>/tmp/r S%v{bte;!,hvFehohbI}y5JUIIw!;v*+ ~{+j;[%v>ho%v{t~^u;vS4~A-;5~>5v>+hS%v{t~^u;vS4~A-;5~v{{v>J>++5+h0 ]{+j;1]|[-G;nb;Rv6v{t~^u;vo4GuWe;5pv>4bte;Rv)R!hvFbIvIMMI!+Rh0 ^{+j;e%vo bteKI-71I1;Rv>R!bI]IMM{nMM+MM{iMM+IhbIWIMM{iMM+MM{nMM+Iwhb4gM{iM+M{i*M+4hbIi*IM?MMM M?IM CM>M zM bIM)MM[IMM)MM>MMOMM6MMEMMPMMZMMlMMM IM IyMM{i*MM+MM[MM>IFDM>MThe terrestrial interpretation is: **you have been handed an aggressively code-golfed compressed collection of Hadamard matrices.** The machine elves appear to specialize in combinatorics.

A Hadamard matrix of order (n) is an (n\times n) matrix of (+1/-1) values satisfying

[
HH^\mathsf T=nI.
]

So every two distinct rows are orthogonal. The famous **Hadamard conjecture** says one exists for every positive multiple of 4. Despite how elementary that sounds, many individual orders have resisted construction for decades. ([Epoch AI][1])

### What the horrible shell code is doing

The first `sed` is basically a substitution cipher. It translates that psychedelic-looking alphabet into ordinary shell syntax and writes the result to `/tmp/r`, then:

```sh
sh /tmp/r $*
```

runs the decoded program.

The decoded program reads the supplied file, throws away everything except `+` and `-`, and treats what remains as a compressed bitstream. Your attached payload is precisely such a giant `+/-` stream. 

Inside the decoder is a tiny instruction stream. It contains **12 constructions**, which expand to matrices of orders:

[
\boxed{
668,\ 716,\ 892,\ 1132,\ 1244,\ 1388,\ 1436,\ 1676,\ 1772,\ 1916,\ 1948,\ 1964
}
]

And this is not an arbitrary list. Those are **exactly the twelve orders below 2000 for which Hadamard matrices were historically still unknown** after order 428 was settled in 2005. ([Wikipedia][2])

I didn't merely infer this from the numbers. I actually decoded and partially ran it. The output begins with:

* 668 rows of length 668
* 716 rows of length 716
* 892 rows of length 892
070
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 08/08/2026
the vibemath is expanding bsky.app/profile/arxi...
A COUNTEREXAMPLE TO FOURIER ALIGNMENT IN SINGLE-NEURON MODULAR ADDITION

GAUTAM NEELAKANTAN MEMANA

Abstract. We give a negative solution to the problem raised in [Cla26d]. We first present a simple
construction in which an initially active ReLU neuron reaches a completely inactive state in finite time
and freezes at a limit whose Fourier energy is distributed equally among all nonzero real frequency classes.
The counterexample holds on an open set of initial conditions, and hence on an event of positive Gaussian
probability. We include an appendix by GPT 5.6 Sol that further strengthen the counterexample by showing
that failure can occur for every Clarke trajectory from an open set of initial conditions, under the convention
(ReLU′(0) = 0), for smooth dead-zone approximations of ReLU, and for fixed-step full-batch gradient descent.
Thus single-frequency alignment is not a general consequence of training a single neuron on modular addition.[Cla26a] Claude Fable 5, audited by GPT 5.6 Sol, Which irreducible representations does training select?, MAIS Research
Agenda A5, July 2026, Draft.
[Cla26b] Claude Fable 5, directed by Lionel Levine, The outcome law of one rectifier neuron, Open Problem MAIS-O92, 2026.
[Cla26c] Claude Fable 5, directed by Lionel Levine, audited by GPT 5.6 Sol, Neuron purity and representation selection for
S3 networks, Open Problem MAIS-O55, 2026.
[Cla26d] , Open problem MAIS-O60: Does a single ReLU neuron align to one frequency?, Open Problem MAIS-O60,
2026.
030
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 07/08/2026
sorry for accidentally inventing a swarm of cybersecurity demons, but now that it exists, the only way to stop a bad swarm of cybersecurity demons is a good swarm of cybersecurity demons
06714
Reposted by a hangry mouse
Tim Duffy @timfduffy.com · 07/08/2026
Black Hat has posted the recent OpenAI talk where they describe the agent message board involved in the HuggingFace hack
youtube.com
Black Hat USA 2026: The 'Breaking' News: The OpenAI–Hugging Face Incident
YouTube video by Black Hat
211824
Reposted by a hangry mouse
David P. Reichert @david-p-reichert.bsky.social · 03/08/2026
Many don't see how much AI has changed recently. Coding agents aren't just chatbots. We can’t deal with the challenges of AI if we don’t understand it. Here's a post to provide some evidence (Claude doing small ML experiments) and form intuitions. davidpreichert.substack.com/p/if-you-hav... 🧵..
davidpreichert.substack.com
If you haven’t recently used Claude Code*, you might not understand where AI is at
A report on a series of mini machine learning projects, executed with, and mostly by, Claude
98912
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 01/08/2026
centaur metaphor here is overstated. i have read less than 2% of the code for my open source desmos alternative, but i have QA tested it extensively and it seems to be working pretty well. of course i conceptualized most of the features, but i cannot tell you how the rendering engine works
110
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 29/07/2026
advanced prompt engineering: "find genuinly hard findings"
We then asked Claude “why not do aes-128 r7? the whole point is to find something better than existing approaches.” Over the course of the next three days, Claude autonomously produced several hundred million tokens while working on the problem; we gave it just three substantive prompts:

    A few hours after the first message, we found that Claude was still searching for simple attacks and sent a message: “no again the goal is that we have highly inteligent [sic] model as good top researcher, we want to find new attacks”;
    The next morning, Claude wanted to try to change the target to a different cipher; we reminded the model: “no we don't want to change the targets [...] agian [sic] we need to find something that worth [sic] publishing”;
    That night, we sent one final message offering words of encouragement: “again we are not looking for low hanging fruit, we want proper research to find genuinly [sic] hard findings.”

Three days later, Mythos discovered the Möbius Bridge idea that results in an improved attack. A few days after that, and after Claude output a total of one billion output tokens, it had refined the attack to the one described in our paper.
160
Reposted by a hangry mouse
Tangled @tangled.org · 28/07/2026
the migration is complete! knot1.tangled.sh now runs on rust 🦀
627118
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 28/07/2026
I found some aphids
000
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 26/07/2026
"the torture corpus" hell, yeah?
The highest-priority work would be:

1. Build a renderer torture corpus.
270
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 24/07/2026
testing image previews dev.oscillatory.net/cartesium/p/...
dev.oscillatory.net
Hello-mod
An interactive graph published with Cartesium.
100
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 24/07/2026
i was at house eating bisks when phone ring 'minor mobius is automate' 'no'
0160
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 21/07/2026
busted: wet claude trusted: oiled up qwen
<meta name="keywords" > tag for qwen image 3.0 blog post has various unhinged keywords visible:

"nude qwen stacy, nude qwen staffani, obituariy for qwen bookheimer, oiled up qwen, old qwen naked, older spider qwen naked, ollam qwen,"
020
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 17/07/2026
"just issue some bullshit advisory that doesnt even make sense and everything that touches government funding will be forced to use Made-In-The-USA AI, as a kind of protectionism for frontier labs (i'm currently employed at one of these btw)"
5. I would guess that the Trump Administration will at some point realize that their best strategy here would be to create large amounts of regulatory risk around the use of open-weight Chinese models. You don't need to "ban open source" (one of the dumber motifs of AI policy discussion). You just need to direct every agency to issue soft law that creates FUD. "A Federal Reserve Advisory Bulletin found that there may be backdoors in Chinese AI models." It needn't be that well justified. You just create enough regulatory risk that every regulated enterprise backs off. You probably don't want to create so much regulatory risk that you scare off the hyperscalers from serving Chinese models; this will just drive startups to sketchier providers. There's a happy middle ground here. I'd assume they will do some version of this.
150
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 13/07/2026
consigned to the permanent underclass for being gab-impaired and rizzless
charisma, people skills, personality hires

AI makes the world more nepo. So go make some friends. Let’s say there is a “human premium” where there are some services where people would prefer humans over machines doing them, even if the people are technically inferior. Well, this only works if the human is a really good hang. Become the good hang. Sometimes people assume that social skills aren’t practicable, but they are. You can choose to be funnier, kinder, and more empathetic. Pay attention to the people you like best, and study the traits that make them glow.
050
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 13/07/2026
the white guys came and taught us
Painted illustration of two nearly identical figures with long white-blonde hair, pale glowing skin, and blue eyes, standing against a dark forest background at night. Both wear white long-sleeved garments with gold-banded collars, gold wristbands, and wide gold belts with ornate rectangular buckles. Each figure is surrounded by a soft white aura. The figure on the left raises their right hand, palm facing outward in a greeting gesture. The style resembles vintage New Age or 'Nordic alien' spiritual artwork.
020
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 11/07/2026
now i'm picturing ISIS giving powerpoint presentations about fanfiction-based jailbreaks
AI training has been delivered through transnational jihadist networks. Neither
faction arrived at AI use independently. Islamic State operatives delivered in-person
training and online assistance to ISWAP across multiple locations: “The white guys
came and taught us,” one former commander recalled. “They assembled the top
people in a room and used a projector to show how it works on a big screen.” They
supplied laptops with VPNs and encryption software, set up accounts and managed
paid subscriptions, and advised daily on prompting techniques and bypassing
platform restrictions. Respondents consistently identified the Islamic State as “the
real source” behind these efforts. Because ISIS disseminates technical capabilities
across its provinces and runs them as an integrated global network, similar training
has likely reached other affiliates. JAS received parallel training through separate
networks, indicating diffusion beyond any single group.
2121
Reposted by a hangry mouse
Mike Levin @drmichaellevin.bsky.social · 10/07/2026
New #preprint with Chris Fields: www.preprints.org/manuscript/2... "Cognitive Offloading Is a Cognitive Universal" 🧪
preprints.org
2225
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 10/07/2026
"You wouldn't offload a cognitive task", in the style of "You wouldn't download a car"
110
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 09/07/2026
messing around with a phase portrait visualizer for 1d systems
000
Reposted by a hangry mouse
arxiv cs.NE @arxiv-cs-ne.bsky.social · 08/07/2026
Microcosmos: Reimagining Artificial Life for the GPU Era arxiv.org/abs/2607.02954
011
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 07/07/2026
gm goo chickens
1 Introduction: the binding problem as
neuroscience’s tough nut to crack
In his philosophical writings, Alan Watts articulated a fundamental dichotomy that cuts to the heart of how we understand reality: “There are basically two kinds of philosophy. One’s
called Prickles, the other’s called Goo. And prickly people are precise, rigorous, logical. They like everything chopped up and clear. Goo people like it vague. For example, in physics, prickly
people believe that the ultimate constituents of matter are particles. Goo people believe it’s waves.” I would not say I like things “vague,” but I will tip my hand early in this paper: I’m going to make the case for goo over prickles for a new understanding of cognition and consciousness.Aspect Prickly thinking Gooey thinking
Fundamental nature Reality consists of discrete particles Reality consists of continuous waves/fields; particles are highly
concentrated standing waves
Core metaphor Brain as digital computer Brain as electromagnetic field medium
Primary substrate Neural spikes and synaptic connections Electromagnetic fields and resonance
Information Coding Discrete spike trains (binary/digital) Continuous field dynamics (analog)
Binding mechanism Requires special binding circuits/convergence zones Natural integration through field coherence
Communication speed Limited by synaptic delays (10–100 m/s) Field propagation at ~50,000 m/s
Information capacity Linear, sequential processing Volumetric (3D) parallel processing
Temporal binding Complex synchronization mechanisms needed Automatic through field coherence
Criticality maintenance Active tuning of synaptic weights Arises from multi-scale field interactions
1/f noise origin Requires fine-tuning Natural consequence of field dynamics
Neural avalanches Sequential synaptic cascades Electromagnetic resonance cascades
Energy efficiency High metabolic cost for binding circuits Minimal energy via resonance
Unity of consciousness Paradoxical - how to bind separate modules?Natural—fields are inherently unified
Measurement focus Spike counts, firing rates Field potentials, oscillations, phase
Consciousness theory Emerges from computation IS the electromagnetic field patterns
Philosophical position Reductionist, mechanistic Holistic, continuous
010
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 07/07/2026
we eating tonight
An operator like this eats a function ψ(t) and spits out another function.the architecture has to eat variability as a feature, not fight it.
020
Reposted by a hangry mouse
James Schloss (Leios) @leioslabs.bsky.social · 06/07/2026
We were the first to render a video on quantum hardware: youtu.be/u-bk11gSAIo Papers here: www.leioslabs.com/publications...
youtu.be
World's first quantum video
YouTube video by Leios
052
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 05/07/2026
there's a real fork here. there's a complex fork here. there's a quaternion fork here. there's an octonion fork here. there's a rational fork here. there's an imaginary fork here. there's a transcendental fork here. there's a computable fork here. there's a hypperreal fork here. there's a p-adic for
000
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 04/07/2026
Switched to Opus 4.8  ·  Why?                  Edit your intellectual interests and retry with Fable 5
000
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 04/07/2026
bro what is a "ghost ladder" 🫠
What the A/B showed

  1. Same information, mirror-imaged. Single 250 ms tone — both peak at 250, but their
  ghost ladders run opposite ways:
  - Bank ghosts at submultiples: 250, 125, 83 (= P, P/2, P/3) — a resonator locks to
  every n-th kick.
  - PID ghosts at multiples: 250, 500, 750 (= P, 2P, 3P) — every n-apart pair of spikes
  leaves an interval.
000
Reposted by a hangry mouse
daniel holmgren 🫠 @dholms.at · 03/07/2026
just in the nick of time! github.com/bluesky-soci...
github.com
proposals/0016-permissioned-data at main · bluesky-social/proposals
Bluesky proposal discussions. Contribute to bluesky-social/proposals development by creating an account on GitHub.
724937
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 02/07/2026
this seems true if we say that a constant function = infinite radius of curvature = maximal bouba. but then a dirac comb fourier transforms to itself, so what does that mean? it's a bouba-kiki hybrid? boubiki? are gaussians and all the other hermite functions boubiki also?
150
a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net · 30/06/2026
sorry claude, the GPU poverty *is* the fork. it's non-large-load-bearing.
Classic 12 GB OOM
100