iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Crazy how everyone is lying but you! Crazier still that it lets you justify the continued death and starvation of children. Whoa! 🤯

120

NotEye @not-eye.bsky.social · 08/10/2026

Can confidently say my wife has not impeded Any of my interests, and actively encourages them. Straight couple “ball and chain” logic is so dumb.

010

NotEye @not-eye.bsky.social · 08/10/2026

It’s like they consider women a separate Type of entity from men. Only Men’s pain is worthy of attention. If a woman is hurt, the problem isn’t her pain, but the perceived slight against whatever man/men “lay claim” to her. Misogyny is a hell of a drug, is what I’m saying.

110

NotEye @not-eye.bsky.social · 08/10/2026

Wether Ace or Gay or any other form of closeted (or not), I’d say the innate issue is men being convinced that women are a different “thing” from them. That they don’t, can’t, and shouldn’t experience the world “as Men do”. Hence why some transphobes ask shit like “can a cat become a dog?”

110

NotEye @not-eye.bsky.social · 08/10/2026

Straight men spend so much time trying to prove they aren’t gay, they forget to actually Love Women.

120

Reposted by NotEye

TBSkyen Shorts @shorts.tbskyen.com · 08/10/2026

Rivals, uuuh, what's up with this? | #marvelrivals #tbshorts

222952

NotEye @not-eye.bsky.social · 07/10/2026

“Ahh. I love dying out here”

040

Reposted by NotEye

🦊 MythiccVixen 🔞 @mythiccvixen.bsky.social · 06/10/2026

Just a reminder that keeping disabled people poor is a form of quiet genocide. Allowing or ignoring discrimination in jobs, housing, and society so they can’t make money, be sheltered, or exist is quiet genocide. Eliminating safety nets so folks can’t stay warm, fed, & housed is a quiet genocide.

315995

NotEye @not-eye.bsky.social · 04/10/2026

…how much time you got?

A screenshot of an album from my photos app.

It’s titled “100% games” and contains 165 items

010

NotEye @not-eye.bsky.social · 02/10/2026

Oh, there are OPTIONS here, and I see a ton of good ones in the replies. So I think I have to give it up to the entire life and career of Yoko Ono. Even if you don’t like her work, you have to admit she received an Insane level of bad critical writing.

A black and white picture of Yoko Ono looking left. A blurred face of a man with a small beard is in the right side foreground (I assume it’s John Lennon)

062

NotEye @not-eye.bsky.social · 01/10/2026

Mind… Gutter… Get it out of there

030

NotEye @not-eye.bsky.social · 01/10/2026

No. Guys know Distressingly little about female anatomy or care. Guarantee if you take any male politician passing laws regarding women’s autonomy, and ask them how many “holes” the typical female body has, his answer will be: “Two! Wait… three if we include the mouth, right?”

120

Reposted by NotEye

The Haunting of Shane Ross @comebackshane.bsky.social · 30/09/2026

Scottish comedian Daniel Sloss talks about how men need to hold other men accountable for rape and sexual assault.

7996390

NotEye @not-eye.bsky.social · 01/10/2026

Dragon’s Dogma 2 is a good videogame

2 lady beastren characters (feline humanoids) from Dragons Dogma 2. They are both Very tall and wearing black masquerade masks.

They are dressed in very similar attire, only the one on the right is in a dark version, and the left is in a white version. The outfit has a short dress with a good waist, their midriffs are showing, and their chests are covered. The white outfit has two metal shoulder pads, and the dark outfit has only one.

The lady in white is wielding a double sided spear, and the lady in the dark outfit has a sword and shield. The sword is sheathed and the shield is on her back.

010

NotEye @not-eye.bsky.social · 30/09/2026

S (H) I (T) is fine by me. Now I won’t have to specify “not that kind” when talking about videogame ai It’s also infinitely less catchy (rolls Horrendously off the tongue) and reeks of Raw desperation

011

NotEye @not-eye.bsky.social · 27/09/2026

His entire career is “the more smugly I say something, the more true it is”. Pretty hard to share the personal depths of your soul when you’ve ensured it’s only as deep as a pothole after rain.

110

NotEye @not-eye.bsky.social · 27/09/2026

Now, I did Not say that You had the green/brown stimk cloud. I was simply answering a question. If you are enraged by my suggestion, then I am forced to assume that you DO have said cloud hovering around you as we speak.

130

NotEye @not-eye.bsky.social · 27/09/2026

Usually there’s like a green or brown cloud that hovers over the character.

230

NotEye @not-eye.bsky.social · 26/09/2026

I see your orange flavored child, and raise you my own

My orange cat, drooping over his bed , sound asleep

130

NotEye @not-eye.bsky.social · 25/09/2026

Can’t a girl have Hobbies anymore? Jeez

130

NotEye @not-eye.bsky.social · 25/09/2026

…why do I not believe you?

130

NotEye @not-eye.bsky.social · 25/09/2026

…so why are there these suspiciously Gir-shaped prints on it?

130

Reposted by NotEye

PSX Bunlith 🪄🏳️‍⚧️ E2 OCT 16TH!!!! 🐰🌱 BLM ACAB 🇵🇸 @b0tster.yeag.gay · 24/09/2026

"I mean its fully human made, AI was just used to assist with overlooking the codebas-" block.

362761468

NotEye @not-eye.bsky.social · 21/09/2026

Careful. Concepts like bimodal distribution might be a bit advanced for the trained scientist

130

NotEye @not-eye.bsky.social · 21/09/2026

But didn’t you know?! They got “scientist training”!! 😱

120

NotEye @not-eye.bsky.social · 21/09/2026

This marks the Thrid (at least) time that you openly lied to me. No more chances given. Enjoy the void.

010

NotEye @not-eye.bsky.social · 21/09/2026

It seems You don’t know how to focus on a topic. Maybe you think if you bounce around fast enough, we won’t notice the slight-of-thought.

110

NotEye @not-eye.bsky.social · 21/09/2026

A. The part in question doesn’t reference back to 12 and 13. I am focusing on their claims regarding WHY a distinction was present, not that a distinction was found. B. I included the graphs based on the data found in 12 and 13… the data you’re claiming I was ignoring or “didn’t know how to read”.

110

NotEye @not-eye.bsky.social · 21/09/2026

“The proof is ON MY BLUESKY PAGE!” Ignore the fact that random Bluesky bigot number 7,653 has still provided No credentials and has actively lied about a court case… They Definitely have the proof 😊👍 All you gotta do is be traffic for their account! How convenient! 😲

010

NotEye @not-eye.bsky.social · 21/09/2026

If you need to resort to these tactics, I’d say that “Scientist Training” has failed you. Go get “trained” again. 😊👍 Maybe next time you’ll actually provide worthy credentials or evidence. Any last statements before the block-void?

010

NotEye @not-eye.bsky.social · 21/09/2026

This is a perfectly normal thing to say, and was included in their original document long before this legal case. Where in the FUCK does saying “each case will be unique” equate to “they were always lying about suicide prevention! Haha! I caught them”? Another blatant dishonesty.

110

NotEye @not-eye.bsky.social · 21/09/2026

As for the claim that they admitted to lying about the suicide issue: Once again, given you failed to provide a proper citation, allow me to provide the page and quote. This is simply a statement that each case will require different intervention, ranging to potentially none in some cases…

Another screenshot of the document.

This section reads:

1. Pediatric medical transition is medically necessary to prevent suicide. Compl.
¶¶ 381-387. That supposedly “deceptive statement” does not appear in SOC-8. SOC-8 does not support “pediatric” transition at all, much less deem it “medically necessary.” It clearly states that “prepubescent gender diverse children are not eligible to access medical intervention.” SOC 8 at S67. Nor does SOC-8 deem transition “medically necessary” for gender diverse adolescents seeking treatment. It rejects a “‘one-size-fits-all’ approach” and states that transgender patients may need “none of these interventions” depending on their unique circumstances

110

NotEye @not-eye.bsky.social · 21/09/2026

Attempting to use this as proof that this one Texas org “admitted it was all a lie all along” is shockingly dishonest. You lied. You failed to provide worthy credentials, and instead told a blatant lie. Oh, and you actually did it twice.

110

NotEye @not-eye.bsky.social · 21/09/2026

It’s making the LEGAL case that the FTC has no…LEGAL grounds for a suit on this front. Note the caveat: “Even if such verification were possible, it would be established by the fact that more than 110 doctors, affiliated with institutions such as… insert list here)… all signed on as SOC-8 authors”

110

NotEye @not-eye.bsky.social · 21/09/2026

Of course the poster doesn’t want to acknowledge this is a Legal Defense! Meaning the Texas based organization will use previous case law to make its legal defense. Saying that their use of “consensus” is protected speech as an opinion is not an admittance of falsehood.

110

NotEye @not-eye.bsky.social · 21/09/2026

Fucking LOVE when people assume I’m not crazy enough to actually read. Since you didn’t provide the page number, quote, or any other way to get to the Damn Point (obviously hoping I wouldn’t check) allow me. Bottom of page 18, into page 19 is the section questioning the use of the term “consensus”

(too long for alt-text. I will have to cut it short.)

6. SOC-8 is the result of unbiased, evidence-based expert consensus. Compl. ¶¶ 396–
402. The FTC faults SOC-8 because its methodology section states that its guidance is “not only based on the published literature,” but also “consensus-based expert opinion.”... But SOC-8 discloses the identity of all authors and their affiliations, id. at S1, allowing readers to assess whether they are “experts.” SOC-8’s methodology section devotes five pages to describing how the authors developed their “consensus” opinions... Even if the FTC disagrees that SOC-8’s authors are experts or that its methodology culminated in consensus-based
opinions, such statements are “expressions of opinion” and “not actionable.”… Whether a doctor is an expert or a statement reflects a group’s consensus cannot be shown “true or false” by “empirical verification.” Presidio, 784 F.2d at 679. Even if such verification were possible, it would be established by the fact that more than 110 doctors, affiliated with institutions such as Columbia University, the Mayo Clinic, the University of Houston, Children’s National Hospital, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, and Harvard Medical School all signed on as SOC-8 authors. SOC-8 at S1-S3.

The FTC alleges that WPATH departed from one part of its methodology, the “Delphi
process,” when removing age-based minimums from a draft of SOC-8 in response to a request from the American Academy of Pediatrics. But that is consistent with SOC-8’s own description of its methodology, under which the “Delphi process” occurred before the “public comment period” and before “Revision of Final Draft based on comments.” SOC-8 at S247. SOC-8 thus explicitly acknowledges that it included changes due to public comments after the Delphi process. Id. Regardless, acceptance of recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics——does not render it deceptive to describe SOC-8 as “consensus-based expert opinion.”

110

NotEye @not-eye.bsky.social · 21/09/2026

Points at Superman The author has a stroke while trying to invent 4 new powers for him.

010

NotEye @not-eye.bsky.social · 21/09/2026

Oh, they also assert (without provided evidence or even a link to a reference) that “at least some of the gap is intrinsic”. [highlighted in the screenshot] Weird that they wouldn’t include data for that part… maybe they forgor!

130

NotEye @not-eye.bsky.social · 21/09/2026

I got you on the provided example btw. They identify an approximately 5% difference in prepubescent kids. Their “several” (actually 2) reasonings are… 1. Some boys get early “minipuberty”… 2. Boys tend to be socialized into more physical activities than girls…

A screenshot from the letter to the editor that was provided by the weirdo we’re talking to.

It reads as follows:

“There are several bioplausible explanations for the male-female performance gaps seen before puberty in these sports. First, transient increases in sex hormones during early life (so-called "minipuberty") are associated with increased growth velocity (14) and reduced adipose accumulation (15) among male infants compared with female infants, and greater muscle mass (16) and muscle strength (17) among boys compared with girls. Second, boys tend to run and jump more than girls during unstructured play and spend more time engaged in higher-intensity physical activity (18, 19). Such activities could produce an informal training effect in boys. The extent to which these sex differences in children reflect the impact of biology, socialization, or both is a matter of discussion (20), but differences in early childhood body composition indicate that at least some of the male-female performance gap among prepubertal children is due to intrinsic biological factors.”

I edited a black box toward the bottom pointing to the part that starts with “but differences in early childhood” near the bottom. Inside the box are red words that read “source? Reference? Hello?”

Bellow that are two graphs. One labeled “track and field” and the other labeled “freestyle swimming”

230