Sign in

Naomi R. Shatz

@naomishatz.bsky.social
184 followers 529 following 81 posts

Anti-discrimination, Title IX, employee rights, and free speech attorney at www.zalkindlaw.com. Bay Area native in Boston. She/her. #LawSky

PostsRepliesMedia
Naomi R. Shatz @naomishatz.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
I spoke to the @bostonglobe.com about the legal backdrop of the Robert Kraft/Macklemore situation, and whether Kraft could be sued for prohibiting Macklemore from appearing at Gillette Stadium: www.bostonglobe.com/2026/09/17/m...
bostonglobe.com
Could Kraft face legal exposure over the Macklemore controversy? A past lawsuit offers hints. - The Boston Globe
“Kraft has been explicit that he banned Macklemore from performing at Gillette because of what Macklemore said onstage, which is quintessential First Amendment protected speech,” one lawyer said.
001
Naomi R. Shatz @naomishatz.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
In Massachusetts private companies and individuals cannot violate people's free speech rights by canceling their contracts. #civilrights #freespeech www.nytimes.com/2026/09/15/a...
nytimes.com
Pro-Palestinian Remarks Roil Sheeran Tour, Leading Finneas to Drop Out
Three other acts are also leaving the tour, citing the right to free speech after the rapper Macklemore was removed over comments he had made onstage.
123
Reposted by Naomi R. Shatz
jswaneylaw @jswaneylaw.bsky.social · 19/08/2026
It is never ever ever ever going to work out better for you if you talk to police before speaking with a lawyer.
10587139
Reposted by Naomi R. Shatz
gbhnews @gbhnews.bsky.social · 30/07/2026
A new law dictates that people under the age of 18 would be unable to legally consent to sexual conduct with an adult who holds, or has held, supervisory or custodial authority over them. bit.ly/4bJNvDn
bit.ly
Under new state law, underage teens can’t consent to sex with coaches and teachers
The new law dictates that people under the age of 18 would be unable to legally consent to sexual conduct with an adult who holds, or has held, supervisory or custodial authority over them.
061
Reposted by Naomi R. Shatz
Brian Handy @brianhandy.bsky.social · 12/07/2026
Thanks for posting this article.
0101
Naomi R. Shatz @naomishatz.bsky.social · 08/07/2026
Fellow parents of teens - this one is for you. We can't bury our heads in the sand and assume our kids would never create, share, or receive nudes or deepfakes. Make sure they understand the consequences: www.bostonlawyerblog.com/distribution...
bostonlawyerblog.com
Distribution of “Revenge Porn” and Deepfakes is Now an Offense in Massachusetts
Last month distribution of “revenge porn” – nude or sexually explicit photos or videos shared online without the consent of the person pictured – became a criminal offense in Massachusetts, as ...
110
Reposted by Naomi R. Shatz
Chris Geidner @chrisgeidner.bsky.social · 07/07/2026
BREAKING: Eleventh Circuit, on a 2-1 vote, upholds injunction blocking Florida from enforcing its 2022 Stop WOKE Act in the university context. The majority opinion is from Judge Britt Grant, a Trump appointee: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
Before GRANT, LAGOA, and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
GRANT, Circuit Judge:
"Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech." U.S. Const. amend I. The First Amendment, incorporated against the States in 1868, is this country's written commitment to the idea that freedom of speech is essential to freedom of thought, and that both are essential to maintaining our liberty. The Supreme Court has long been clear that teaching and scholarship are due some measure of protection under the Amendment. But how much? And in what contexts? That Court has not had to say, but this one is now put to the test. The State of Florida legislated a broad set of speech restrictions banning certain viewpoints relating to race, color, sex, and national origin in various settings. The provision at issue here bars Florida's educators from promoting or endorsing those distavored ideas when instructing students. Its prohibition applies not only in primary and secondary education, where states traditionally exercise a great deal of control, but also in public colleges and universities, where the state government's role has been far more limited.
When several groups of professors challenged Florida's new restrictions, the State cast about for an existing case or doctrine that could support its speech ban in the university setting. Finding none, it tried to marry public-employee speech cases with government speech doctrine, resulting in a new rule: if thegovernment pays a professor's salary, it has total control over her classroom speech.
That is not a blessed union. Florida's salary-for-speech rule is a breathtaking assertion of power to ban unpopular ideas from public discourse in the very places the State's own statutes recognize as centers of inquiry-classrooms where students are trusted to puzzle through ideas that are good and bad, easy and hard, ideally getting ever closer to the truth. This new rule also runs headlong into the Supreme Court's repeated, if imprecise, endorsements of academic freedom. If the First Amendment offers any boundary of protection at all for public university classrooms, this statute crosses it.
Nor does this Court's leading academic speech precedent,
Bishop v. Aronov, demand the outcome Florida seeks. 926 F.2d 1066 (11th Cir. 1991). In fact, it counsels the opposite. The restriction in that case was imposed by one university, against one professor, relating to speech about one thing— personal religious views that got in the way of the course's well-understood parameters.That precedent makes clear that universities and even other government entities have crucial authority to shape curricular content, discipline teachers, and take other steps to guide and govern postsecondary education. But the speech ban Florida's political leaders seek to impose here is different in both nature and degree from these ordinary concerns. The rule Florida developed for this case does not withstand scrutiny.
11 Case: 22-13992
Document: 156-1 Date Filed: 07/07/2026 Page:
22-13992
Opinion of the Court
5
The ideas Florida targets may well be noxious. Or maybe
not.
Either way, in this context the First Amendment trusts students to figure it out for themselves. We affirm the district court's preliminary injunction.
431881000
Reposted by Naomi R. Shatz
Chris Geidner @chrisgeidner.bsky.social · 08/07/2026
BREAKING: University professors (AAUP) represented by NAACP LDF and Lambda Legal, with Davis Wright Tremaine, file a federal lawsuit challenging censorship at the Texas Tech University System under the First and Fourteenth Amendments. Complaint: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO DIVISION
TEXAS AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS-AMERICAN
FEDERATION OF TEACHERS and the
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS,
Plaintiffs,
V.
BRANDON CREIGHTON in his official capacity as Chancellor of the Texas Tech University System, and ARCILIA ACOSTA, CODY CAMPBELL, CLAY CASH, TIM CULP, SHELLEY SWEATT, DOUG MCREAKEN, DON SINCLAIR, DUSTIN WOMBLE, and RACHEL MCLELLAND, in their official capacities as members of the Texas Tech University System Board of Regents, Defendants.

Case No. 26-1845
COMPLAINT
3601187
Reposted by Naomi R. Shatz
Dara Purvis @darapurvis.bsky.social · 02/07/2026
If this isn't animus, what on earth is
29937
Naomi R. Shatz @naomishatz.bsky.social · 01/07/2026
My latest on our blog:
000
Reposted by Naomi R. Shatz
Andrea Joy Campbell @ajcampbellma.bsky.social · 30/06/2026
SCOTUS is attacking trans kids’ ability to show up as their full, authentic selves rather than using government to make ALL of our kids’ lives better. This devastating ruling will do nothing to ensure fairness in school sports. MA law will continue to protect trans kids - on and off the field.
718942
Naomi R. Shatz @naomishatz.bsky.social · 30/06/2026
Regardless SCOTUS's interpretation of federal law (which I disagree with), Massachusetts law protects students' right to play on sports teams according to their gender identity: www.bostonlawyerblog.com/massachusett... #TitleIX #equalprotection #transrights
bostonlawyerblog.com
Massachusetts Law Prohibits Schools from Complying with Anti-Trans Athlete Executive Order
Youth sports are a huge part of the American education system, something many parents, schools, and communities place a high value on maintaining. Studies demonstrate the many mental, social, ...
122
Naomi R. Shatz @naomishatz.bsky.social · 30/06/2026
As always, @darapurvis.bsky.social has a clear explanation of SCOTUS’s completely inconsistent, mean spirited nonsense.
130
Naomi R. Shatz @naomishatz.bsky.social · 08/06/2026
Love opening up @wbur.org and seeing my partner Inga featured in a story on important moments in MA LGBTQ+ history.
000
Reposted by Naomi R. Shatz
Zalkind Law @zalkindlaw.bsky.social · 02/06/2026
Victory for transgender service members! We are thrilled to have partnered with @gladlaw.bsky.social, @nclrights.bsky.social, and @wardenskilaw.com on this critical case.
042
Reposted by Naomi R. Shatz
Zalkind Law @zalkindlaw.bsky.social · 26/05/2026
Mass Lawyers Weekly writes about our lawsuit on behalf of bar advocates. Zalkind Law attorney Monica Shah explains that the law "should not prescribe criminal prosecution and related penalties for individuals who are engaging in their right not to work.” masslawyersweekly.com/2026/05/25/m...
masslawyersweekly.com
MAPAC sues to block law ‘criminalizing’ counsel fee protests | Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly
The Massachusetts Association of Private Appointed Counsel is seeking relief at the Supreme Judicial Court, complaining that a state law enacted last summer threatens criminal and civil antitrust pena...
011
Naomi R. Shatz @naomishatz.bsky.social · 20/05/2026
I talked to @bostonglobe.com about the SJC's decision yesterday holding that when someone is sexually harassed in an educational context, they can sue the individual harasser in addition to the school: www.bostonglobe.com/2026/05/19/m...
bostonglobe.com
Supreme Judicial Court rules that victims of sexual harassment can sue individuals in academia - The Boston Globe
021
Reposted by Naomi R. Shatz
Zalkind Law @zalkindlaw.bsky.social · 20/05/2026
The @bostonglobe.com editorial board on our ghost network lawsuit, and why the Division of Insurance must enforce the law requiring health insurance providers to maintain accurate lists of in network providers: www.bostonglobe.com/2026/05/17/o...
bostonglobe.com
‘Ghost networks’ make finding mental health care harder - The Boston Globe
State should enforce law requiring insurers to maintain accurate provider directories
022
Naomi R. Shatz @naomishatz.bsky.social · 20/05/2026
Good news for trans kids: SCOTUS is not going to take up a 1st Circuit case that held that schools do not have to out trans students to their parents. I wrote about that decision here: www.bostonlawyerblog.com/first-circui...
bostonlawyerblog.com
First Circuit Holds that School Districts, Not Parents, Decide School Policy and Rejects “Parental Rights” Argument to Out Transgender and Non-Binary Students
Since 2012, Massachusetts laws have prohibited discrimination based on gender identity, including in education. The Massachusetts Department of Education has had longstanding guidance in place ...
031
Naomi R. Shatz @naomishatz.bsky.social · 08/05/2026
My colleagues are standing up against a new law that punishes appointed defense counsel for indigent defendants who fight for fair pay for their work.
010
Naomi R. Shatz @naomishatz.bsky.social · 07/05/2026
Our firm is filing all kinds of interesting new cases today, including this challenge to health insurers who publish "ghost networks" of supposed in-network providers who do not exist or do not take the relevant insurance.
000
Naomi R. Shatz @naomishatz.bsky.social · 28/04/2026
I want to scream this from the rooftops.
030
Reposted by Naomi R. Shatz
Zalkind Law @zalkindlaw.bsky.social · 16/04/2026
Our team had a great time at the Boston Bar Association’s annual Employment Law Conference. Our lawyers @anaisamun.bsky.social and @naomishatz.bsky.social shared their wisdom on employees’ speech rights, and got to learn about new issues in the administrative agencies, noncompete law, and AI tools!
Collage of the conference program, Boston bar association flag, and panel of speakers on employee speech rights
011
Reposted by Naomi R. Shatz
Zalkind Law @zalkindlaw.bsky.social · 14/04/2026
Tomorrow: Join Ana Munoz and @naomishatz.bsky.social Shatz at the @bostonbar.bsky.social Employment Law Conference for a discussion about employee speech rights. More information here: bostonbar.org/conferences/...
011
Reposted by Naomi R. Shatz
Alicia Bannon @aliciabannon.bsky.social · 13/04/2026
Interested in a state supreme court clerkship? @statecourtreport.org has a database featuring clerkship opportunities from 25 states and more than 80 justices. We hope it's a good starting point for applicants! statecourtreport.org/state-judici...
statecourtreport.org
State Judicial Clerkship Resource
12822
Naomi R. Shatz @naomishatz.bsky.social · 09/04/2026
I spoke to @bostonglobe.com about the problem of nude deepfakes in schools. As a students' rights lawyer and parent of a tween and teen, I feel strongly that we must find a solutionthat focuses on education, respects young people's privacy, and doesn't push kids into the criminal justice system.
010
Naomi R. Shatz @naomishatz.bsky.social · 08/04/2026
Standing up for free speech and academic freedom works: www.wbur.org/news/2026/04...
wbur.org
BU president pauses removal of pride flags, reversing position
The pause follows weeks of public backlash by faculty members and others over the administration’s enforcement of a policy it defended as “content neutral.”
000
Reposted by Naomi R. Shatz
Zalkind Law @zalkindlaw.bsky.social · 06/04/2026
On the blog: Attorney Noah Gillen discusses the SJC's recent decision on attorney's fees in anti-SLAPP cases, offering protection to low-wage workers: www.bostonlawyerblog.com/sjc-protects...
bostonlawyerblog.com
SJC protects low-wage earners’ ability to sue for unpaid wages
Last month, the Supreme Judicial Court issued a decision protecting the rights of low-wage workers to file lawsuits against their employer for unpaid wages. The decision concerned “anti-SLAPP” ...
022
Naomi R. Shatz @naomishatz.bsky.social · 04/04/2026
A year ago we joined 500 law firms supporting Perkins Coie in their lawsuit, today we sign on with more than 800 other firms in support of the rule of law.
010
Naomi R. Shatz @naomishatz.bsky.social · 30/03/2026
This is about to replace "it's illegal to secretly record conversations in MA" as my #1 piece of advice to clients and future clients.
000
Reposted by Naomi R. Shatz
Zalkind Law @zalkindlaw.bsky.social · 26/03/2026
Attorney @naomishatz.bsky.social has been selected by The Education Lawyers as their recommended attorney in Massachusetts. Read more here: www.bostonlawyerblog.com/recent_news/...
032
Reposted by Naomi R. Shatz
Zalkind Law @zalkindlaw.bsky.social · 26/03/2026
BU has been removing pride flags from professors' office windows. Attorney @naomishatz.bsky.social spoke to @boston.com about whether this violates professors legal rights: www.boston.com/news/local-n...
boston.com
‘It felt like a gut punch’: Pride flags removed from BU offices ignite free speech, inclusion debate
Faculty and students are challenging BU’s removal of Pride flags, arguing the enforcement of a “content-neutral” signage policy undermines free expression.
011
Naomi R. Shatz @naomishatz.bsky.social · 16/03/2026
001
Reposted by Naomi R. Shatz
Ryan Quinn @ryanequinn.bsky.social · 28/02/2026
I finally got time this weekend to read Josh Moody's great story on the war against student free speech (including student journalism). You should read it, too: www.insidehighered.com/news/student...
insidehighered.com
The War on Student Speech
Following disruptive pro-Palestinian protests in spring 2024, the federal government, state lawmakers and college officials have imposed sweeping restrictions on student speech, resulting in a wave of...
0218
Naomi R. Shatz @naomishatz.bsky.social · 19/02/2026
Another reason I love my job. This week my client returns to school after a judge found that UMass Amherst likely violated his free speech rights by suspending him for participating in a protest.
010
Naomi R. Shatz @naomishatz.bsky.social · 28/01/2026
Protecting the right to protest has never been more important. Proud to be representing a UMass Amherst student in this suit enforcing students' rights to free speech and due process.
010
Reposted by Naomi R. Shatz
Jameel Jaffer @jameeljaffer.bsky.social · 23/01/2026
The policy had nothing to do with fighting antisemitism and everything to do with suppressing legitimate and constitutionally protected criticism of Israel.
131858372
Reposted by Naomi R. Shatz
Zalkind Law @zalkindlaw.bsky.social · 12/01/2026
Attorney Emma Quinn-Judge won an appeal of criminal convictions at the SJC today. The SJC agreed with our argument that a criminal indictment may never be substantively amended. Read more here: www.bostonlawyerblog.com/recent_news/...
Emma Quinn-Judge headshot
021
Reposted by Naomi R. Shatz
Zalkind Law @zalkindlaw.bsky.social · 26/11/2025
This Thanksgiving, we’re grateful for our colleagues, partners, and community. We remain committed to our shared work toward a more just, inclusive, and democratic future—and we’re thankful to be doing that work alongside you. Wishing you a peaceful holiday from the Zalkind Law legal team.
A photo of the lawyers of Zalkind Duncan and Bernstein
021
Naomi R. Shatz @naomishatz.bsky.social · 18/11/2025
Thrilled to get to work on this important brief on behalf of women's and girls' advocacy groups.
120
Reposted by Naomi R. Shatz
Max Kennerly @maxkennerly.bsky.social · 16/11/2025
Going back to Summers' talk about how women don't want to work hard and don't have high end aptitude, we could ask: What fraction of young men must deal with a creep with substantial power over their career hitting on them using tips from an infamous pedophile? 🤔 www.thecrimson.com/article/2005...
There are three broad hypotheses about the sources of the very substantial disparities that this conference’s papers document and have been documented before with respect to the presence of women in high-end scientific professions. One is what I would call the—I’ll explain each of these in a few moments and comment on how important I think they are—the first is what I call the high-powered job hypothesis. The second is what I would call different availability of aptitude at the high end, and the third is what I would call different socialization and patterns of discrimination in a search. And in my own view, their importance probably ranks in exactly the order that I just described.Another way to put the point is to say, what fraction of young women in their mid-twenties make a decision that they don’t want to have a job that they think about eighty hours a week. What fraction of young men make a decision that they’re unwilling to have a job that they think about eighty hours a week, and to observe what the difference is. And that has got to be a large part of what is observed.
341235284
Naomi R. Shatz @naomishatz.bsky.social · 11/11/2025
As someone who represents students in both free speech and harassment/discrimination cases, I care about universities protecting both sets of rights. I spoke at length with Mass Lawyers Weekly about the First Circuit's recent decision in StandWithUs v. MIT: masslawyersweekly.com/2025/11/11/m...
Screenshot of article with photo of Naomi Shatz and the following quote: "The entire point of the university is the marketplace of ideas, and people on university campuses may have to feel uncomfortable sometimes. That is part of being in a community with different views, and that is not discrimination."
030
Reposted by Naomi R. Shatz
Zalkind Law @zalkindlaw.bsky.social · 17/10/2025
In Shah v. The System, Super Lawyers profiles our own Monica Shah. She shares how her career has been driven by challenging powerful institutions in Massachusetts that claim to support equality and diversity. Read more about Monica here: www.superlawyers.com/articles/mas...
021
Reposted by Naomi R. Shatz
Zalkind Law @zalkindlaw.bsky.social · 20/10/2025
Massachusetts is considering a law to address book banning in public schools. Attorney Jacob Bezner discusses the strength of the law on our blog: www.bostonlawyerblog.com/massachusett...
bostonlawyerblog.com
Massachusetts state legislature considers enhanced protections for librarians and safeguards against book bans
As book bans continue to cause controversy nationwide, Massachusetts lawmakers are considering a bill that would prohibit ideologically driven book bans and protect public school employees from ...
011
Naomi R. Shatz @naomishatz.bsky.social · 18/10/2025
A photo collage of signs from the No Kings rally in Boston, including “ew, Donald,” “time for another tea party … hold the ice,” “Boston: anti-kings since 1773,” “the harbor thirsts for tea,” and “stop acting like a disgruntled pelican.”
020
Naomi R. Shatz @naomishatz.bsky.social · 17/10/2025
Kudos to my partner Monica for this great profile about what drives her practice and our firm.
010
Reposted by Naomi R. Shatz
Marisa Kabas @marisakabas.bsky.social · 15/10/2025
NEW — I dug into the story of ICE abducting a 13-year-old boy in Massachusetts and moving him 500 miles across state lines without notifying his mother, local cop's complicity, and how the federal government's justification for such cruelty is already falling apart:
thehandbasket.co
ICE took a 13-year-old they said had a gun. Local cops say he didn’t.
Now he's detained 500 miles away from his Massachusetts home.
12475543216
Reposted by Naomi R. Shatz
Anonymous @youranoncentral.bsky.social · 06/10/2025
Jane Goodall offers sage advice for the rest of us. #3E
6034971226
Naomi R. Shatz @naomishatz.bsky.social · 30/09/2025
Moving opinion from Judge Young addressing the attacks on free speech from this administration.
020
Reposted by Naomi R. Shatz
Zalkind Law @zalkindlaw.bsky.social · 16/09/2025
Register here: bostonbar.my.site.com/LightningMem...
011