nabrug.bsky.social @nabrug.bsky.social · 13/09/2026A hitjob? They wanted to show that Gibson had not actually eliminated internal representations and inferential processes from perception—and that a theory of perception could not do without them. And they were right! 000
nabrug.bsky.social @nabrug.bsky.social · 13/09/2026Derek Arnold @visnerd.bsky.social On a personal note regarding your aphantasia, I assume that you can grasp a cup normally. However, to execute a basketball free throw or a golf putt, you must gaze. This requires suppressing the actual projection of the basket or 200
nabrug.bsky.social @nabrug.bsky.social · 13/09/2026Derek Arnold @visnerd.bsky.social "Congenital aphantasia: what we (think we) know, what we thought we knew but were mistaken about, and what we don't know" That neuroscience still does not know how an imagined representation becomes a conscious sensory experience can be fully explained ...... 200