Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 06/10/2026PQ wipes CAQ away, and flushes them out of AssNat. A joke 8 years in the making. 110
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 30/09/2026I admit I did not expect to see this particular Talmudic deep cut in our national press, but let me tell you, MY community can think of a few Jews this description applies to better than Avi Lewis. Extremely dangerous and incendiary nonsense… 012
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 29/09/2026At such extreme values its hard to make reasonable projections, but @338canada.bsky.social reckons 270! 331
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 10/05/2026Here's the latest GB picture - admittedly, LAB still have most councillors with ~25%, followed by CON 21%, LD 18% & REF 13%, but that's what happens when only 5k of the ~19k GB council seats are up for election. Most of these seats haven't yet been contested since REF become a factor. 221
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 10/05/2026Caution: these appear to be the proportions BEFORE Thursday's elections. 110
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 29/04/2026While I sympathise w/ the sentiment (and FPTP is a dogshit electoral system), a result like this (i.e.: basically OLP +7 & PC -7 from 2025, would be around the tipping point where FPTP starts to work fine for OLP again - they'd start narrowly winning lots of GTA seats they narrowly lost last time. 100
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 28/04/2026Something like that yeah - well done if that estimate was on gut instinct :p 110
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 02/02/2026Checked out Chessdotcom’s new monthly themed bots for February, and on behalf of the Curling community, I am OUTRAGED. Our sport is literally known as Chess On Ice. Why is the curler a 350-ELO doofus, while a hockey goalie gets to be a Magnus Carlsen level genius?? CURLING ERASURE. 030
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 02/05/2025Feast your eyes on this FPTP monstrosity. Mind-boggling that the UK used to have Supplementary Vote (kinda like Ranked Ballot) for such elections & *actively* got rid of it! Nice of the parties to arrange a neat stepped pattern. Though I see Ian Scott not holding up his end of the bargain. Prick. 030
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 29/04/2025I don't think they've called it yet (the dark blue colour means leading, right)? 000
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 20/04/2025Not at present, I believe (although still a lead in seat count, and in prior updates, Mainstreet have been showing LPC majority even when CPC had 2% lead…). The point still stands that LPC structural advantage is significant! As well as this just being one poll of course :) 020
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 16/04/2025Indeed - I believe they don't publish regionals, unfortunately, but it's true their model shows a strong Liberal majority on a 2.7% lead (in fact, as of today, the exact same majority as 338 aggregate shows on a 6% lead!). www.mainstreetresearch.ca/dashboard/ca... 200
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 14/04/2025A tragedy in 2 acts over on chess dot com. THIS is why they say "Never Resign", especially against pissy opponents so concerned about losing "a minute of their life" while playing *A 3-MIN A SIDE CHESS GAME*... And, dare I say it, especially against entitled USians who bring Canada into it 🤣 030
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 11/04/2025They were a bit further off in 2015 (e.g.: see below from Eric Grenier's ThreeHundredEight before he joined CBC!) But that's largely down to the 3pt polling miss for LPC - that is to say, arguably polls were to blame, not the models :p 010
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 11/04/2025Pretty good - here were CBC Poll Tracker's final predictions in the last two elections (other models would probably have similar results): 2021 projection: L 155, C 119, N 32, B 31 2021 result: L 160, C 119, N 24, B32 2019 projection: L 141, C 121, B 39, N34 2019 result: L 157, C121, B 32, N 24 130
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 08/04/2025The Innovative poll is on the CBC Poll Tracker, you just have to expand the list a bit. 110
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 05/04/2025There isn’t a specific breakdown by age and gender, but given this is the split for 18-34s, if you overlay the gender split on that, I would imagine it is more acute among young men, yes… 160
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 04/04/2025Can’t decide if this is better or worse! Dadaist Google Translate… 110
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 04/04/2025Not saying I love it, but worth bearing in mind that, depending on regional splits, even a 39-39 tie could be very good for the Liberals. Here's a projection based on Abacus' regionals - basically CPC only tied due to a 36% lead in AB, which masks the fact they trail by 5% in the rest of Canada! 240
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 01/04/2025Not an in-depth study or anything, but this chart from Wikipedia gives a good overview! At a high level: - Polls were fairly stable (no party's average was ever more than 4% from their final result) - Final poll average was quite close to actual result (+/-2% in most cases) 120
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 31/03/2025Lower than their recent highs of 6.78% & 6.55% in 2008/2019 respectively, but not materially different than 2021, where they managed 2.33%. 110
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 30/03/2025I've already shared the data showing pollsters (and projections models based on them) did not materially get it wrong in 2019. And if we're going down the "they got Brexit wrong" route, I don't think this is going to be a productive conversation. 100
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 30/03/2025That article is from two weeks before the election though - LAB declined 2-3% in final weeks of campaign and CON recovered slightly by 1-2%! Point still stands that the FINAL projections, the only ones anyone's hanging their hat on, got quite close - one or two outliers, mostly CONs 100ish. 200
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 30/03/2025This is directly from what I originally shared. Nine major models were active during the election, and those numbers I gave are the median of these projections. Same thing for 2019 election. Although I miscalculated slightly, the median projection is: CON 343, LAB 223, LD 16, SNP 43 100
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 30/03/2025Sorry, but that's simply not true, at least recently in Canada: 2021 final projection: L 155, C 119, N 32, B 31 2021 final result: L 160, C 119, N 24, B32 2019 final projection: L 141, C 121, B 39, N34 2019 final result: L 157, C121, B 32, N 24 100
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 30/03/2025Sure they’re flawed, and by necessity have to make assumptions about turnout & demographics. But the proof is in the pudding - the point I’m making is that, *despite* being imperfect, in Canada at least, recent polls managed to do very well! 110
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 30/03/2025Indeed - FPTP is wack, and there’s no better example of its wackness than the UK 2024 General Election! Which makes it tricky to accurately model results as a side effect, and can make small polling errors translate to large seat projection errors. 100
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 30/03/2025But it might also be due to shifts in how LPC vote is distributed, and who they've gained from? For example, in ON, latest projection has L 47%, C 38%, N 9%, giving 81/39/1 seats. But in last election, it was 39/35/18%, giving 78/37/5 seats. 110
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 30/03/2025Needless to say, a polling miss involving overestimating LPC by 4.3% and underestimaating CPC by 2.4% could have a FAR larger impact on the makeup of Parliament in this election, where things are much closer to start with! 100
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 30/03/2025Having said that, the actual national poll numbers were off by a fair amount: LAB averaged 39ish, they ended up on 34.7% (GB only); CONs averaged 22ish, they ended up on 24.4%. But LAB were so far ahead and vote so efficient that the modellers were able to do quite well anyway! 130
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 30/03/2025Wait what, which polls predicted Tories would be reduced to 20 seats? These were the final calls from the various reputable groups making projections - they ranged from 64-130 seats, with an average of 102, so the Tories were on the high end, but well within the range... 240
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 27/03/2025I dunno, it doesn't seem that bad! Here's the latest from each pollster per @338canada.bsky.social: Mainstreet: L +4 Research Co.: L+4 Liaison: L+4 Abacus: L+1 EKOS: L+15 Angus Reid: L+8 Leger: L+6 Pallas: L+4 OK, EKOS is doing EKOS things, but the rest all have Ls between 38-46% and Cs 36-41%. 210
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 27/03/2025SK is a bit harder, as most polls lump it in with MB, but you can ballpark non-AB numbers using regional breakdowns, if you really want. AB is (roughly) 1/8th of Canada, so take the 42% lead there & divide by 8 - it impacts national margin by approx. 5%. Excluding AB, it's roughly LIB 41%, CON 34%. 100
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 12/03/2025PHEW. You had me going for a few questions there! #YiddishPride 010
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 12/02/20254. There’s also the other extreme, where they try to make a SV recommendation in ridings such as Lambton / Kent / Middlesex. I’m sorry, but saying anything other than "It doesn’t really matter; soz, OLP/NDP voters, pick who you want 🤷” is laughable. 110
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 12/02/20253. For example: trying to pick the right SV in Humber River / Black Creek, based solely on this projection, is essentially impossible, and could backfire! There may very well be a theoretical “right” SV in this riding – but a more honest take here would be “insufficient data for meaningful answer”. 110
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 17/12/2024My French may be a bit rusty, but I’m *pretty* sure that’s not how you say “smooth”… 240
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 15/12/2024Ha good Q! I don't "automatically" do it, but my brain does work a bit like that - was looking at "List of French PMs", to read up on recent officeholders, noticed 99/240 = 5/12ths ratio, then thought "huh, isn't 1 year 238 days about 600 days?" before doing more precise calcs for joke purposes :) 110
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 13/12/2024Élisabeth Borne: 16-May-22 to 9-Jan-24 = 603 days Gabriel Attal: 9-Jan-24 to 5-Sep-24 = 240 days Michel Barnier: 5-Sep-24 to 13-Dec-24 = 99 days 99/240=0.41; 240/603=0.4. Hmmm... Is Macron making a geometric progression of PMs with a ratio of 0.4? 🤔 Ready for the PM Singularity on 16-Feb-25? 210
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 05/11/2024Impressive, and well done that guy indeed, as it could quite plausibly actually matter! 😟 000
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 02/11/2024Done! I may have gone a bit overboard, but I guess it can't hurt - it probably can't help either, but I'm trying to be less defeatist about that sort of thing these days :) 010
Joe Moed @mojo87.bsky.social · 26/10/2024Thanks for the clarification - I knew your friend had led an interesting life, but this seemed a bit far-fetched! 020