iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Reposted by @mirjamjenny.bsky.social

Institute for Planetary Health Behaviour @ipb.bsky.social · 28/07/2026

#PUBLIKATION Ein internationales Forschungsteam unter Leitung von @mirjamjenny.bsky.social hat erstmals untersucht, wie gut Kommunikationskampagnen, die vor Hitze schützen sollen, wirklich sind. Die Studie ist jetzt in Nature Health @natureportfolio.nature.com erschienen. @

021

Reposted by @mirjamjenny.bsky.social

Die Junge Akademie @jungeakademie.bsky.social · 01/09/2026

📣 Neue Mitglieder gesucht! Bis zum 11.11. können sich exzellente Wissenschaftler*innen u. Künstler*innen mit Begeisterung für den interdisziplinären Austausch an der Schnittstelle von Wissenschaft, Kunst, Gesellschaft und Politik um eine Mitgliedschaft bewerben: 🔗 diejungeakademie.de/de/mitglied-...

11315

Reposted by @mirjamjenny.bsky.social

Die Junge Akademie @jungeakademie.bsky.social · 04/03/2026

💐Herzlich willkommen @mirjamjenny.bsky.social! Die promovierte Entscheidungsforscherin ist Wissenschaftskommunikatorin und verfügt über Expertise im Aufbau von Schnittstellen zwischen Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft. Seit dem 1. März leitet sie die Geschäftsstelle. 🔗Zur Pressemitteilung: t1p.de/5qgpl

0112

Reposted by @mirjamjenny.bsky.social

Die Junge Akademie @jungeakademie.bsky.social · 26/03/2026

🎶Mit Musik durchs Leben – geht @mirjamjenny.bsky.social, Leiterin der Geschäftsstelle der Jungen Akademie. Warum #Wissenschaftskommunikation so wichtig ist und welchen Fördermodellen sie großes Potenzial beimisst, verrät sie in nur 3 1/2 Fragen im ZEIT-Newsletter Wissen3: tinyurl.com/4ft5d37s

041

Reposted by @mirjamjenny.bsky.social

Stefan Herzog @stefanherzog.bsky.social · 23/01/2025

🌟🧠💪📝 #BOOSTING: Empowering citizens with behavioral science New, freely available paper in Annual Review of Psychology. PDF: tinyurl.com/boosting2025 For more: scienceofboosting.org @arc-mpib.bsky.social @mpib-berlin.bsky.social @annualreviews.bsky.social #policy #behavioralscience 1/ 🧵👇

The image is the cover page of an article from the "Annual Review of Psychology" titled "Boosting: Empowering Citizens with Behavioral Science" by Stefan M. Herzog and Ralph Hertwig. It features a brief abstract, keywords, and publication details. The abstract outlines the concept of "boosting" as a behavioral public policy that emphasizes empowering individuals to make informed decisions, in contrast to "nudging," which subtly steers behavior. The abstract reads:

Behavioral public policy came to the fore with the introduction of nudging, which aims to steer behavior while maintaining freedom of choice. Responding to critiques of nudging (e.g., that it does not promote agency and relies on benevolent choice architects), other behavioral policy approaches focus on empowering citizens. Here we review boosting, a behavioral policy approach that aims to foster people's agency, self-control, and ability to make informed decisions. It is grounded in evidence from behavioral science showing that human decision making is not as notoriously flawed as the nudging approach assumes. We argue that addressing the challenges of our time—such as climate change, pandemics, and the threats to liberal democracies and human autonomy posed by digital technologies and choice architectures—calls for fostering capable and engaged citizens as a first line of response to complement slower, systemic approaches.

List with summary points:

1. Behavioral public policy garnered widespread attention with the introduction of nudging, which aims to steer behavior while maintaining freedom of choice.
2. Criticisms of nudging include that it does not promote agency and competences and that it relies—overly optimistically—on the presence of benevolent choice architects.
3. The proliferation of environments threatening people's autonomy, the slow pace of systemic approaches to tackling societal issues, and the intrinsic benefits of empowerment make empowering citizens an indispensable objective of behavioral public policy.
4. Boosting is a behavioral public policy approach to empowerment grounded in evidence from behavioral science that shows that humans’ boundedly rational decision making is not as flawed as the nudging approach assumes.
5. Boosts are interventions that improve people's competencies to make informed choices that conform to their goals, preferences, and desires.
6. In self-nudging boosts, people learn to use architectural changes in their proximate choice environment to regulate their own behavior—that is, they are empowered to adapt their own choice environments.
7. There are boosts to foster core competences in many domains, including finance, online environments, and health, as well as broader, overarching areas, such as motivation, risk, and judgment and decision making. Boosts should be part of a policy mix that also includes system-level approaches.
8. When implementing boosts, policy makers need to avoid the trap of individualizing responsibility and to be mindful that, due to differences in cognition and motivation, inequalities in the desirable effects across boosted individuals may emerge.

29341

mirjamjenny.bsky.social @mirjamjenny.bsky.social · 28/01/2025

Wir hatten im Vorfeld noch nie so viel Andrang! Seid am 14.2. auch beim Wahlspecial der Climate Connect dabei!👇

010

mirjamjenny.bsky.social @mirjamjenny.bsky.social · 05/12/2024

Das wird so richtig schön utopisch morgen! ☺️

131