iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

sugag @sugag.bsky.social · 28/05/2026

Reposted by yummi

During a swimsuit photoshoot📸👙

039656

yummi @mikchan.dev · 26/05/2026

That's not even pedonacketing at this point, it's straight up libel

000

yummi @mikchan.dev · 26/05/2026

I think we need to call out these pedojacketing innuendos more often. A lot of people on this website do it and feel way too comfortable with it

01043

I literally just did that

100

Well, you attributed it to the action of... thinking?

100

I mean, you can lead by example. One post ago you were talking about morality. Do you also call bipolar and schizophrenic people immoral? Or that bipolar and schizophrenic people conditioned themselves into being that way? Why don't you do what you preach and treat it the same way?

100

I think the normal human stance is that I don't really care what thoughts you have, only whether you act on them or not

000

Hm? Explain why did you like the depiction of the lynch law in Disco Elysium? Are you into... Ah, wait, you actually are! That explains a lot

001

yummi @mikchan.dev · 21/05/2026

You low-key want to dox and harass people into suicide? Man, that's not a great look

050

"Everyone" includes you, by the way

yummi @mikchan.dev · 21/05/2026

Then why insert yourself into a conversation if you're not willing to converse? You're just wasting everyone's time

110

yummi @mikchan.dev · 20/05/2026

Not everyone is Professor Dave. I don't know where he takes the energy to be this aggressive for this long, but man, it's definitely above average. Not a lot of people are capable of that

010

yummi @mikchan.dev · 17/05/2026

I think everyone who has a dick had this idea at least once

yummi @mikchan.dev · 14/05/2026

Funny thing. The entirety of Family Guy, from the pilot to episode 460, has a total runtime of 169 hours. Which is nice

000

yummi @mikchan.dev · 13/05/2026

Literally what I said, lmao

000

Reposted by yummi

Oh Joy Sex Toy @ohjoysextoy.bsky.social · 12/05/2026

When it comes to regulating what counts as "adult" content, platforms are actually at the mercy of the all powerful credit card companies that they depend on to survive. Learn more in this classic comic from 2021 by @luxalptraum.com and @erikamoen.bsky.social www.patreon.com/posts/70032336

At the core of the porn business is one very unsexy factor: if you want to make money selling naked photos, you need a way to get money from your customer's bank accounts to you.

Even services like PayPal or Apple Pay or Google Pay are really just a fancy way of using a credit card. And that gives credit card companies a tremendous amount of power.

Even payment processors that do work with porn - like CCBill and Epoch, for instance - have strict rules about what you can and can't sell.

Ever wonder why there's not much period porn out there? Payment processors will drop you as a client if they learn that you're selling it.

People don't usually talk openly about it, but if you scratch the surface it's pretty clear that at the root of all of this is Visa, MasterCard, and their distaste for adult content.

Read the rest of The Payment Processors vs Porn by Lux Alptraum & Erika Moen on patreon.com/ErikaMoen

1602331

yummi @mikchan.dev · 12/05/2026

Hmm? Well, okay. So now they will not ignore this and will ban it. Hip hip hooray, I guess? What are you doing here? If you think it's worth not allowing it for any part of it except "nazi", you literally got what you cheer for. Why the sour face, huh?

030

yummi @mikchan.dev · 12/05/2026

This is interesting

yummi @mikchan.dev · 12/05/2026

The hit-and-block strategy is a big thing here on bsky. But as someone who went through all the replies and quotes to the original post, them mentioning it made me physically cringe. The thing is, only 3 users have done that. 3 out of idk, almost a hundred?

110

Reposted by yummi

Gio :⁾ @im.giovanh.com · 20/02/2026

For everyone skipping Discord age verification with some easy trick: providing workarounds to competent and enfranchised people is a strategy that lets platforms normalize the new abusive standard without pushback. Then they take the workarounds away. blog.giovanh.com/blog/2025/10...

blog.giovanh.com

A Hack is Not Enough

Twisted Sister's "there ain't no way we'll lose it" political theory has not held up

4461301

yummi @mikchan.dev · 11/05/2026

Funny thing, at some point they said that if you're not willing to plow through this stream, you're not really here for a conversation, or something along those lines

130

yummi @mikchan.dev · 10/05/2026

By "didn't find" I mean there might be, but I mentally zoned out multiple times while watching it, so I might have missed a few moments. The VOD is 4 hours long

yummi @mikchan.dev · 10/05/2026

Guys, it's obviously on Twitch. Here's the VOD The addressing part starts at ~00:43 and goes up to the ~01:00 mark Then again from ~02:25 to ~02:34 Then again at ~02:35 All marks are in HH:mm format, ~ is "around" Didn't find any other marks where the topic is mentioned

twitch.tv

(Viewer Suggestion Day Friday!) UFO's DECLASSIFIED, Hormuz Heating Up Again, More - deaddomain on Twitch

deaddomain went live on Twitch. Catch up on their Just Chatting VOD now.

540

yummi @mikchan.dev · 09/05/2026

Maybe the real dead domain was the friends we made along the way

030

yummi @mikchan.dev · 09/05/2026

The video is down actually

000

yummi @mikchan.dev · 08/05/2026

It's not up for debate because words have meaning. The letter A in the acronym stands for "Abuse". If no one is abused, it's not CSAM by the very dictionary definitions of the words that make up this acronym. It's insane that you try to override it with an arbitrary re-definition

080

Demanding to outlaw something on the mere basis of *not liking* something is prudish by definition. There's a reason we try to move away from "muh god said so" and "muh gross" toward harm minimization in lawmaking, but you guys seem not to grasp the whole idea, while reaping the benefits of it

060

How would you call the "stick a needle in your eye" scene from Dead Space 2, I wonder? Not artistic expression? Yes, simple artistic expression, that's what it's called. You people need to learn to separate harm from disgust. You are not meant to write the laws with the latter

040

c - child s - sexual a - abuse < who is abused for it to count as such ??? m - material Words have meanings, Monika

010

LGBTQ grooming conspiracy theory - Wikipedia

Uh-huh. Draw your line. And now look at where the men in power think the line you've drawn lies. Not hypothetically, not in the future, but today right at this very moment While putting the people who are on your side on the chopping block, beware of where the blade. It might be above your neck too

en.wikipedia.org

040

yummi @mikchan.dev · 05/05/2026

Chibi pulled the BS about the computer out of his anus, and you're just repeating it while trashing Chibi. That's some BS ouroboros I'm witnessing here

041

yummi @mikchan.dev · 05/05/2026

> and had traced artwork of the actress from lazytown on her computer This is an unsupported lie. In the KF post you're referencing, it is stated that this art was drawn by another artist whom Mimi was following on Pixiv. And it was posted while Mimi was under arrest. There's no connection to it

150

yummi @mikchan.dev · 03/05/2026

Social media told me that if you choose your passion as a job, you'll never have to work a single day in your life. Not true at all. I love programming, but doing it for a company sucks the soul out of me. I wish I never had to work

000

yummi @mikchan.dev · 03/05/2026

Exactly how I felt as a teenager working my first full day. I still haven't overcome the feeling of horror from it, only numbed it to some extent

100

You still explained basically nothing. I don't understand why you believe you explained anything at all. The only solid claim I saw in this thread is that you believe fiction should be punishable by law. I'm still waiting for you to support it somehow. Please, I genuinely wonder why

000

> Because "No children are harmed" is how actual child predators run free Literally, what the fuck? No? What is this nonsense?

No, you didn't. When was that? When you said "Because it's sexual content"? I believe you skipped some steps in your argument, so please fill them in. Why do you personally believe creating fiction should be punishable by law?

100

Uh-huh. Cool. That wasn't what I asked tho

> Mind that I said nonfiction as well No. I will not mind that because I asked specifically about the fiction part, because it's specifically the part I have a question about. Can you please answer it without deflecting this time?

100

"while I still firmly believe that possession/production of fiction shouldn't go without consequences" Would you mind to explain why?